Dioxygen, an unexpected carbonic anhydrase ligand

References

• a) Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nature Rev Drug Disc 2008;7:168–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Supuran CT. Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases. Biochem J 2016;4:2023–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Alterio V, Di Fiore A, D’Ambrosio K, et al. Multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases: how to design specific drugs targeting 15 different isoforms? Chem Rev 2012;112:4421–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  d) Supuran CT, Carbonic Anhydrases and Metabolism. Metabolites 2018;8:E25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Moya A, Tambutté S, Bertucci A, et al. Carbonic anhydrase in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata: characterization, localization, and role in biomineralization. J Biol Chem 2008;283:25475–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Nocentini A, Vullo D, Del Prete S, et al. Inhibition of the β-carbonic anhydrase from the dandruff-producing fungus Malassezia globosa with monothiocarbamates. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2017;3:1064–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Del Prete S, Vullo D, Fisher GM, et al. Discovery of a new family of carbonic anhydrases in the malaria pathogen Plasmodium falciparum–the η-carbonic anhydrases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2014;2:4389–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Maresca A, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT. 7,8-disubstituted- but not 6,7-disubstituted coumarins selectively inhibit the transmembrane, tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase isoforms IX and XII over the cytosolic ones I and II in the low nanomolar/subnanomolar range. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010;20:7255–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Xu Y, Feng L, Jeffrey PD, et al. Structure and metal exchange in the cadmium carbonic anhydrase of marine diatoms. Nature 2008;452:56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Capasso C, Supuran CT. An overview of the alpha-, beta-and gamma-carbonic anhydrases from Bacteria: can bacterial carbonic anhydrases shed new light on evolution of bacteria? J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2015;3:325–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Neri D, Supuran CT. Interfering with pH regulation in tumours as a therapeutic strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011;1:767–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  d) Supuran CT, Vullo D, Manole G, et al. Designing of novel carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and activators. Curr Med Chem Cardiovasc Hematol Agents 2004;2:49–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
  e) Supuran CT, Capasso C. New light on bacterial carbonic anhydrases phylogeny based on the analysis of signal peptide sequences. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:1254–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Tripp BC, Bell 3rd CB, Cruz F, et al. A role for iron in an ancient carbonic anhydrase. J Biol Chem 2004;279:6683–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Supuran CT. Advances in structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2017;1:61–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Akocak S, Lolak N, Vullo D, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of histamine Schiff bases as carbonic anhydrase I, II, IV, VII, and IX activators. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2017;3:1305–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  d) Angeli A, Vaiano F, Mari F, et al. Psychoactive substances belonging to the amphetamine class potently activate brain carbonic anhydrase isoforms VA, VB, VII, and XII. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2017;3:1253–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  e) Licsandru E, Tanc M, Kocsis I, et al. A class of carbonic anhydrase I - selective activators. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2017;32:37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Schlicker C, Hall RA, Vullo D, et al. Structure and inhibition of the CO2-sensing carbonic anhydrase Can2 from the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. J Mol Biol 2009;385:1207–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Bozdag M, Carta F, Vullo D, et al. Dithiocarbamates with potent inhibitory activity against the Saccharomyces cerevisiae β-carbonic anhydrase. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:132–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domsic JF, Avvaru BS, Kim CU, et al. Entrapment of carbon dioxide in the active site of Carbonic anhydrase II. J Biol Chem 2008;283:30766–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu C, Tripp BC, Ferry JG, Silverman DN. Bicarbonate as a proton donor in catalysis by Zn(II)- and Co(II)-containing carbonic anhydrases. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:5861–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Supuran CT. How many carbonic anhydrase inhibition mechanisms exist? J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;3:345–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Garaj V, Puccetti L, Fasolis, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: novel sulfonamides incorporating 1,3,5-triazine moieties as inhibitors of the cytosolic and tumour-associated carbonic anhydrase isozymes I, II and IX. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005;15:3102–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Fabrizi F, Mincione F, Somma T, et al. A new approach to antiglaucoma drugs: carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with or without NO donating moieties. Mechanism of Action and Preliminary Pharmacology. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2012;27:138–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• a) Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase activators. Future Med Chem 2018;10:561–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  b) Winum, JY, Temperini C, El Cheikh K, et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: clash with Ala65 as a means for designing inhibitors with low affinity for the ubiquitous isozyme II, exemplified by the crystal structure of the topiramate sulfamide analogue. J Med Chem 2006;49:7024–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  c) Pacchiano F, Aggarwal M, Avvaru BS, et al. Selective hydrophobic pocket binding observed within the carbonic anhydrase II active site accommodate different 4-substituted-ureido-benzenesulfonamides and correlate to inhibitor potency. Chem Commun (Camb) 2010;46:8371–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone G, Supuran CT. (In)organic anions as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J Inorg Biochem 2012;111:117–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangani S, Håkansson K. Crystallographic studies of the binding of protonated and unprotonated inhibitors to carbonic anhydrase using hydrogen sulphide and nitrate anions. Eur J Biochem 1992;210:867–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Håkansson K, Carlsson M, Svensson LA, Liljas A. Structure of native and apo carbonic anhydrase II and structure of some of its anion-ligand complexes. J Mol Biol 1992;227:1192–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson K, Briand C, Zaitsev V, et al. Wild-type and E106Q mutant Carbonic anhydrase complexed with acetate. Acta Cryst D 1994;50:101–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Temperini C, Scozzafava S, Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. X-ray crystal studies of the Carbonic anhydrase II-trithiocarbonate adduct-an inhibitor mimicking the sulfonamide and urea binding to the enzyme. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010;20:474–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson K, Wehnert A, Liljas A. X-ray analysis of metal-substituted human carbonic anhydrase II derivatives. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr 1994;50:93–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabsch W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr 2010;66:133–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Cryst. D 1997;53:240–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott W, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Cryst. D 2010;66:486–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamzin VS, Perrakis A, Wilson KS, International tables for crystallography. Vol. F: Crystallography of biological macromolecules. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall IIIWB, et al. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003;50:437–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 2010;78:1950–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1157–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Madura JD. Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. Solvation and conformation of methanol in water. J Am Chem Soc 1983;105:1407–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1781–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter J, Iannuzzi M, Schiffmann F, VandeVondele J. cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2014;4:15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedecker S, Teter M, Hutter J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 1996;54:1703–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeVondele J, Hutter J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. J Chem Phys 2007;127:114105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello J. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 2007;126:014101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becke AD. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev 1988;A38:3098–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys 2010;132:154104–154104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becke AD. Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 1993;98:5648–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader RFW. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem Rev 1991;91:893–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu MD, Trinkle R. Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J Chem Phys 2011;134:064111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angyan JG, Loos M, Mayer I. Covalent bond orders and atomic valence indices in the topological theory of atoms in molecules. J Phys Chem 1994;98:5244–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettles WL, Song H, Farquhar ER, et al. Characterization of the Copper(II) Binding sites in human carbonic anhydrase II. Inorg Chem 2015;54:5671–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Weitz AC, Hendrich MP, et al. Building reactive copper center(s) in human carbonic anhydrase II. J Biol Inorg Chem 2013;18:595–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland PL. Metal-dioxygen and metal-dinitrogen complexes: where are the electrons? Dalton Trans 2010;39:5415–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderstråle Y, Fierke CA, Roush ED, Wistrand PJ. Localization of a protein inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase in pig tissues. Acta Physiol Scand 2002;176:27–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar