About this journal
Aims and scope
Accountability in Research is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of practices and systems for promoting integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards, policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results.
The journal welcomes original work on advancing research integrity in the form of empirical research, conceptual assessment, and critical analysis in all fields of science, including biology, chemistry, physics, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. The journal seeks to publish research that makes a significant contribution to the literature and advances knowledge of accountability and integrity in research. With some exceptions, the journal is not interested in publishing studies that merely duplicate previous work or are limited in generalizability (e.g., due to problems with statistical design or research focus) or that do not meaningfully contribute to the scholarly literature.
While the journal seeks to advance accountability and integrity in research, it is not a forum for attempting to adjudicate complaints about specific cases involving individual researchers, academic institutions, journals, or research sponsors.
All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double-anonymized (some reviewers opt to have their identity known, however) and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
Accountability in Research accepts the following types of articles:
- Original Articles
- Letter to the Editor
- Commentary
Preparing Your Paper
- Read making your article more discoverable, including information on choosing a title and search engine optimization.
Articles
- Should be no more than 6,000 words.
- Should contain an unstructured abstract of 200 words.
- Should contain between 2 and 5 keywords.
Letter to the Editor
- Should be confined to responses to important issues addressed in an article published recently in Accountability in Research .
- Should have no or very few references
- Should be no more than 500 words.
Commentary
- Should address a compelling public issue of concern in research or an article published in the journal. A Commentary will be subject to the regular peer review process.
- Should be no more than 1500 words.
- Should contain an unstructured abstract of 200 words.
- Should contain between 2 and 5 keywords.
. Read the Instructions for Authors
Note: If you are interested in submitting a book review, please send a presubmission inquiry to the Editor.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 183K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 2.8 (2023) Impact Factor
- Q1 Impact Factor Best Quartile
- 3.5 (2023) 5 year IF
- 4.9 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.295 (2023) SNIP
- 0.623 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 1 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 50 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 12 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 20% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Speed data is only available where a journal has made more than 10 decisions of that type in the time period. Speed metrics are averages; some manuscripts will take longer than this. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed/downloaded by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months. This includes manuscripts which are not sent for peer review (desk rejections). Manuscripts which are sent out for review can therefore have a significantly longer wait than this metric indicates.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
EDITOR IN CHIEF
Lisa M. Rasmussen, Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Philosophy
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA
lrasmuss@uncc.edu
ASSOCIATE EDITORS
David B. Resnik, Ph.D.
Associate Editor for “Normative Ethics” and Letters to the Editor
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
E-mail: resnikd@niehs.nih.gov
Zubin Master, Ph.D.
Associate Editor for Commentaries
Biomedical Ethics Research Program
Mayo Clinic
200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
E-mail: master.zubin@mayo.edu
Alison Antes, Ph.D.
Bioethics Research Center
School of Medicine
Washington University in St. Louis.
St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
E-mail: aantes@wustl.edu
Sam Bruton, Ph.D.
Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Office of Research Integrity
University of Southern Mississippi,
Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
E-mail: samuel.bruton@usm.edu
Mohammad Hosseini, Ph.D.
Department of Preventive Medicine (Health and Biomedical Informatics)
Feinberg School of Medicine
Northwestern University
320 E. Superior Street
Chicago, IL 60010, USA
Email: mohammad.hosseini@northwestern.edu
Kelly Laas, MLIS
Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions
Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago, IL 60616, USA
E-mail: laas@iit.edu
Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Ph.D.
Baker Institute for Public Policy
Rice University
Houston, TX, 77015-1892, USA
E-mail: krwm@rice.edu
Toby Schonfeld, Ph.D.
National Center for Ethics in Health Care
Washington, DC 20420, USA
E-mail: schonfeldair@gmail.com
EDITORIAL BOARD
Emily Anderson - Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Jason Borenstein - Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Michael Davis - Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities, IIT Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Kenneth DeVille - Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
Chunyan Ding - City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Tu Van Duong - Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Kevin C. Elliott - Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Jake Earl - US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA
Ruiping Fan - City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Daniele Fanelli - Institute for the Study of Science, Technology & Innovation, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Elizabeth Heitman - University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Guangwei Hu - Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR
Kohji Ishihara - The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Francis Kombe - Africa Research Integrity Network, Nairobu, Kenya; EthiXPERT, Pretoria, South Africa
Dorcas Kamaya - KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kenya; and Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Yonghui Ma - Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Tristan McIntosh - Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
David Moher - Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
Sophia J. Pan - National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Tainan City, Taiwan
Trisha Phillips - West Virginia University, Morganton, USA
Dena Plemmons - University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
Hans Radder - VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands
Jeffrey I. Seeman - University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki - University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Kristin Shrader-Frechette - Notre Dame, IN, USA
Elise Smith - University of Texas Medical Branch, TX, USA
Kory Trott - University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Jennifer Wright - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Qin Zhu - Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Abstracting and indexing
Open access
Accountability in Research is a hybrid open access journal that is part of the Taylor & Francis Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
If you choose not to publish open access in this journal, there is no APC.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
8 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Accountability in Research?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Accountability in Research.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors