tandf: Journal of Media Law: Table of ContentsTable of Contents for Journal of Media Law. List of articles from both the latest and ahead of print issues.
https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjml20?af=R
tandf: Journal of Media Law: Table of Contentstandfen-USJournal of Media LawJournal of Media Lawhttps://www.tandfonline.com/cms/asset/3599e198-b083-41a2-80d4-bc237792cab0/default_cover.jpg
https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjml20?af=R
Interpretation is opinion: realigning the fact/opinion distinction in English defamation law
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2216523?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 62-89<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 62-89<br/>. <br/>Interpretation is opinion: realigning the fact/opinion distinction in English defamation lawdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2216523Journal of Media Law2023-06-01T03:02:44ZThomas DC BennettCity Law School, City, University of London, London, UKThomas DC Bennett is a senior lecturer in law at City, University of London. He has written extensively on the law relating to privacy, defamation, and judicial methodology in elaborating the common law. He is the cofounder and co-host of The Media Law Podcast.Journal of Media Law15162892023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2216523https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2216523?af=RRethinking journalism protection: looking beyond copyright
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2234691?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 90-120<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 90-120<br/>. <br/>Rethinking journalism protection: looking beyond copyrightdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2234691Journal of Media Law2023-07-19T02:56:40ZClaudio LombardiSchool of Law, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKClaudio Lombardi, Lecturer, University of Aberdeen, School of Law, director Eurasian Centre for Law, Innovation, and Development, KIMEP.Journal of Media Law151901202023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2234691https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2234691?af=RDefining the ‘media’ in Europe: pitfalls of the proposed European Media Freedom Act
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2240998?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 39-51<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 39-51<br/>. <br/>Defining the ‘media’ in Europe: pitfalls of the proposed European Media Freedom Actdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2240998Journal of Media Law2023-07-31T09:51:59ZTheresa SeippRonan Ó FathaighMax van DrunenInstitute for Information Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsTheresa Seipp is a PhD Candidate at the Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam; Dr. Ronan Ó Fathaigh is a Senior Researcher at the Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam; and Dr. Max van Drunen is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam.Journal of Media Law15139512023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2240998https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2240998?af=RLiberal democracy, law and the citizen speaker: regulating online speech
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2218064?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 121-123<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 121-123<br/>. <br/>Liberal democracy, law and the citizen speaker: regulating online speechdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2218064Journal of Media Law2023-06-06T02:12:05ZHelen FenwickDurham Law SchoolJournal of Media Law1511211232023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2218064https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2218064?af=RRaab’s bill of rights and the challenges inherent in attempting a statutory re-balancing of articles 8 and 10 ECHR
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 1-22<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 1-22<br/>. <br/>Raab’s bill of rights and the challenges inherent in attempting a statutory re-balancing of articles 8 and 10 ECHRdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914Journal of Media Law2023-05-23T08:37:18ZHelen FenwickProfessor of Law, University of Durham, Durham, UKHelen Fenwick, LLB, BA, is Professor of Law at Durham University Law School, and a Human Rights Academic Consultant to Doughty Street Chambers. She specialises in human rights, especially in relation to freedom of expression and the ECHR. She is author of Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act (OUP 2006, with G Phillipson); Volume 88A Fifth Edition, Halsbury's Laws of England new section ‘Rights and Freedoms' (2013); Civil Liberties and Human Rights (Routledge, 5th edn 2017). Recent journal articles include ‘Protecting free speech and academic freedom in universities' (with I Cram) (2018) 81(5) Modern Law Review 825-873; ‘Prevent, free speech, ‘extremism' and counter-terror interventions: exploring narratives about chilling expression in schools' [2020] Public Law 661-679, with D Fenwick; ‘Exploring narratives about ‘Cancel Culture' in UK educational/employment settings under the ECHR' 2022 in European Yearbook on Human Rights, P Czech, editor (2022); Vol 73 NILQ No AD1 26-73 (with F Brimblecombe) ‘Protecting private information in the digital era: making the most effective use of the availability of the actions under the GDPR/DPA and the tort of misuse of private information'; ‘Keeping Control of personal information in the digital age: efficacy and equivalence of tortious and GDPR/DPA relief’ 138 Law Quarterly Review Issue 3, July 2022, 455-479 (with F Brimblecombe).Journal of Media Law1511222023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914?af=RThe right to de-referencing ‘manifestly inaccurate’ information: TU, RE v Google
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 52-61<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 52-61<br/>. <br/>The right to de-referencing ‘manifestly inaccurate’ information: TU, RE v Googledoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412Journal of Media Law2023-05-25T02:22:32ZLaroussi ChemlaliLeila Benseddika College of Law, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emiratesb Faculty of Communication, Arts and Sciences, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesDr. Laroussi Chemlali is an Assistant Professor in Law. He earned his PhD in Law from the Université Paris-Est Créteil. His research focuses on Privacy Law, E-commerce Law, and IP/IT Law.Dr. Leila Benseddik is an Assistant Professor in Applied Linguistics, with particular interest in Legal English and Legal Studies. Leila earned her PhD from the University of Northampton.Journal of Media Law15152612023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412?af=RInference of serious harm in the context of online publications past their peak and after the public interest defence falls away: Banks v Cadwalladr
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2230005?af=R
<a href="/toc/rjml20/15/1">Volume 15, Issue 1</a>, July 2023, Page 23-38<br/>. <br/>Volume 15, Issue 1, July 2023, Page 23-38<br/>. <br/>Inference of serious harm in the context of online publications past their peak and after the public interest defence falls away: Banks v Cadwalladrdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2230005Journal of Media Law2023-07-16T08:17:02ZMark Patrick HannaDurham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UKMark Patrick Hanna is an Assistant Professor in Media Law at Durham University.Journal of Media Law15123382023-01-02T08:00:00Z2023-01-02T08:00:00Z10.1080/17577632.2023.2230005https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2230005?af=RMedia freedom and journalist safety in the UK Online Safety Act
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2307678?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>Media freedom and journalist safety in the UK Online Safety Actdoi:10.1080/17577632.2024.2307678Journal of Media Law2024-01-25T10:07:25ZRicki-Lee GerbrandtFaculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKRicki-Lee Gerbrandt, BA (Hon), J.D., LL.M. (Harvard) is currently completing her PhD at the University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law. She previously worked in private practice as a barrister in Canada litigating media, technology, and constitutional issues, including SLAPP suits, online defamation, publication bans, and cases concerning freedom of expression, privacy, harassment, and intellectual property. She has acted for national broadcasters, social media and telecommunications companies, governments, public officials, and journalists. Her research interests include international and comparative freedom of expression, media law, and constitutional law.Journal of Media Law13410.1080/17577632.2024.2307678https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2307678?af=RTackling online false information in the United Kingdom: The Online Safety Act 2023 and its disconnection from free speech law and theory*
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2316360?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>Tackling online false information in the United Kingdom: The Online Safety Act 2023 and its disconnection from free speech law and theory*doi:10.1080/17577632.2024.2316360Journal of Media Law2024-02-20T07:36:27ZPeter CoeBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKPeter Coe is an Associate Professor in Law at Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham. He is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University, a Senior Visiting Research Fellow at the School of Law, University of Reading, and an Associate Research Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies and Information Law and Policy Centre, University of London.Journal of Media Law13010.1080/17577632.2024.2316360https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2316360?af=RThe concept of media pluralism under the European Convention on Human Rights – substantive principles and procedural safeguards
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2305419?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>The concept of media pluralism under the European Convention on Human Rights – substantive principles and procedural safeguardsdoi:10.1080/17577632.2024.2305419Journal of Media Law2024-03-22T09:10:20ZRobert SpanoFormer President of the European Court of Human RightsJournal of Media Law11110.1080/17577632.2024.2305419https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2305419?af=RStates' positive obligation to create a favourable environment for participation in public debate: a principle in search of a practical effect?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2326278?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>States' positive obligation to create a favourable environment for participation in public debate: a principle in search of a practical effect?doi:10.1080/17577632.2024.2326278Journal of Media Law2024-03-25T06:06:58ZKatie Pentneya Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKb Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, CanadaKatie Pentney is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxford and a Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism at McGill University's Faculty of Law. She writes on human rights and constitutional law issues, in particular the capacity of traditional rights frameworks to respond to modern challenges. Her work has appeared in the Human Rights Law Review, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, and ECHR Law Review (forthcoming).Journal of Media Law13210.1080/17577632.2024.2326278https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2024.2326278?af=RHansman v Neufeld: The Supreme Court of Canada protects counterspeech under anti-SLAPP law, but is it even defamatory?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2288395?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>Hansman v Neufeld: The Supreme Court of Canada protects counterspeech under anti-SLAPP law, but is it even defamatory?doi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2288395Journal of Media Law2023-12-08T05:27:40ZHilary YoungFaculty of Law, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaHilary Young is a professor in the University of New Brunswick's Faculty of Law. She is one of Canada's leading defamation scholars. Her other research and teaching interests include torts, remedies and health law. She is one of the authors of Linden and Feldthusen's Canadian Tort Law. Her work has been cited by courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada.Journal of Media Law11510.1080/17577632.2023.2288395https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2288395?af=RSanchez v France: ECtHR judgment raises questions about politician’s liability to moderate his own Facebook ‘wall’
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2287954?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>Sanchez v France: ECtHR judgment raises questions about politician’s liability to moderate his own Facebook ‘wall’doi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2287954Journal of Media Law2023-12-08T05:29:38ZPäivi KorpisaariCommunication Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandPäivi Korpisaari is Professor of Communication Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki. Her main fields of research are media and communication law, personal data protection, tort law, constitutional law, human rights law, and criminal law concerning“freedom of expression offences”.Journal of Media Law11210.1080/17577632.2023.2287954https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2287954?af=RWhat can a media privilege look like? Unpacking three versions in the EMFA
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2299097?af=R
. <br/>. <br/>What can a media privilege look like? Unpacking three versions in the EMFAdoi:10.1080/17577632.2023.2299097Journal of Media Law2024-02-01T01:50:12ZM. Z. van DrunenC. PapaevangelouD. BuijsR. Ó. FathaighInstitute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsM. Z. van Drunen is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Information Law. His research focuses on the regulation of technologies used to automatically gather, produce, and disseminate news and other political information.C. Papaevangelou is a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Information Law. His research explores the implications of the novel EU platform regulatory framework for the relationship between news media organisations and platforms.D. Buijs is a junior researcher at the Institute for Information Law. Her research explores interrelated topics such as platform governance, safety of journalists and online freedom of expression regulation.R. Ó. Fathaigh is a senior researcher at the Institute for Information Law, and specialises in fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression and privacy.Journal of Media Law11610.1080/17577632.2023.2299097https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2023.2299097?af=R