http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-7073
![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
An important property of wildfire behaviour is rate of spread (ROS). The objectives of this study are to evaluate the uncertainty of landscape-scale ROS estimates derived from repetitive airborne thermal infrared (ATIR) georeferenced imagery and the utility of such estimates for understanding fire behaviour and controls on spread rates. Time-sequential ATIR image data were collected for the Cedar, Detwiler, and Rey Fires, which burned in California during summers of 2016 and 2017. We analyse error, uncertainty, and precision of ROS estimates associated with co-location accuracy, delineation of active fire front positions, and generation of fire spread vectors. The major sources of uncertainty influencing accuracy of ROS estimates are co-registration accuracy of sequential image pairs and procedures for delineating active fire front locations and spread vectors between them; none of these were found to be substantial. Median ROS estimates are 11 m min−1 for the Cedar Fire and 8 m min−1 for the Detwiler Fire, both of which burned through mixed shrub and tree areas of the Sierra Nevada foothills and were estimated for downslope spread events. Of the three study fires, the fastest spread rates (average spread of 25 m min−1 with maximum of 39 m min−1) are estimated for the Rey Fire, which burned on variable directional slopes through chaparral shrubland vegetation.
Acknowledgements
ATIR image acquisition and pre-processing was conducted by Michaela Truman and David Maxwell of Kolob Canyon Air Services, Cedar City, UT. Lloyd (Pete) Coulter assisted with evaluation of image co-registration accuracy. Referees provided valuable recommendations for improving this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.