119
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Parent Education in Bangladeshi Families with Young Children of Diverse Abilities: Implementation of the Learning Through Play Calendar

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 310-326 | Published online: 13 Mar 2024

ABSTRACT

Despite increasing demands, the uptake of parenting education programs in developing countries is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Learning Through Play (LTP) informed, illustration-based parent educational training program designed for low-literacy populations in Bangladesh to promote early childhood development. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving parents of typically developing children and children with special needs aged 0–6 years. Results showed significant enhancements in parenting knowledge, skills, and attitudes in both groups, with larger effects on knowledge and attitudes among parents of special needs children. The findings underscore the potential of LTP Calendar-based educational training programs as cost-effective, culturally sensitive, and accessible strategies for enhancing positive parenting practices and child development outcomes in economically disadvantaged settings. Future research should focus on cultural sensitivity evaluation, sample size expansion, and long-term impact assessment to further validate and extend these findings.

Early childhood is one of the most formative periods in human development (Maree, Citation2022; Piaget, Citation2013). Existing research indicates that parenting education interventions during this time can not only support parents (Jeong et al., Citation2021; Morawska et al., Citation2014) but also predict positive outcomes for the child (Morris et al., Citation2020). Supporting parents with information and tools is highly beneficial to the continued growth and strength of children in their communities (Grantham McGregor et al., Citation2007).

Providing parents with quality information and care can be difficult to manage in low-income countries due to low literacy rates, limited access to resources, technology, and training, as well as inadequate healthcare infrastructure (Children with Disabilities | UNICEF, Citationn.d.). Without a substantial increase in culturally relevant and accessible child development programs, over 200 million children in developing countries are at risk of experiencing deficient cognitive, social, and academic outcomes (Grantham McGregor et al., Citation2007), not to mention poor physical health (The State of the World’s Children, Citation2013). The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs reports that 10 percent of the world’s population has special needs, with a disproportionate 80 percent of disabled individuals located in developing countries (Factsheet on Persons with Disabilities, Citationn.d.). UNICEF (Citationn.d.) reports that around 240 million children globally, or 1 in 10, have disabilities that impede their ability to flourish within their communities. The healthcare systems in these countries cannot provide the support these children require to live a more functional life, which, in the long run, can place additional strain on parents to provide adequately for their children (Han et al., Citation2018; UNICEF, Citationn.d.).

Disabilities, also referred to exceptionalities, are the conditions of having at least one of the following: intellectual or learning disability; impairment of hearing (including deafness), speech, language, vision (including blindness), or physical or motor functioning, emotional disturbance, autism, or traumatic brain injury (Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, § 300.8, Citation2006). While exceptionalities require various levels of specialized treatment, positive parenting practices have been shown to help improve child and family well-being (Del Rosario et al., Citation2023; Tang et al., Citation2023). Parenting interventions for families with exceptional children typically provide psychoeducation on exceptionality and behaviorism-based suggestions for managing symptoms (Dekkers et al., Citation2022; Schaefer & Andzik, Citation2021). These interventions also support increased parental self-efficacy (MacKenzie & Eack, Citation2022), decreased negative parenting (Rimestad et al., Citation2019), among other outcomes.

Attachment theory

Attachment theory suggests that the nature of parent-child relationships in early childhood can inform interactions across the lifespan (Bowlby, Citation1988; Cassidy & Shaver, Citation2016). Attachment styles are either considered secure (confident in a parent’s availability, protection and comfort as a result of positive past experiences) or anxious (insecure, avoidant, or disorganized, and lacking trust in the parent’s likelihood based on varied past experiences; Cassidy & Shaver, Citation2016). The ideal secure attachment style is characterized by high levels of parental warmth and accessibility to the child. Parents can promote secure attachment through identifying and promptly responding to the child’s needs (Ainsworth et al., Citation1978; van der Voort, Juffer, et al., Citation2014; Wright & Edginton, Citation2016) and engaging affectionately in developmentally appropriate ways (Gerhardt, Citation2014). Attachment theory, criticized for its Western-centric perspective, often overlooks the rich diversity of emotional bonding across cultures. Chaudhary and Keller (Citation2017) highlight the theory’s bias toward maternal-centric caregiving, ignoring the varied childcare practices that are normative in other cultures, including Bangladesh. Allen (Citation2016) extends this critique by pointing out the theory’s narrow focus on maternal attachment, suggesting it fails to capture the broad spectrum of relationships and support systems essential for a child’s development. Despite these critiques, attachment theory’s capacity to explore and understand the complex dynamics of emotional connections across different cultures remains valuable, illustrating its adaptability and relevance in global contexts (Allen, Citation2016; Chaudhary & Keller, Citation2017).

Learning Through Play

The Learning Through Play (LTP) parent training intervention promotes positive parenting practices that help support the formation of a secure attachment relationship in the early years (Bevc, Citation2004). By educating parents on their child’s developmental needs and providing ideas for age-appropriate activities, the intervention enables parents to anticipate and promptly respond to their child’s needs, engage affectionately, and foster positive attitudes in their own parenting. Based in cognitive development (Piaget, Citation2013) and attachment (Bowlby, Citation1988) theories, LTP provides foundational knowledge on normative early childhood development and how parents can facilitate positive relationships from the start. First, parents participate in a four-hour group psychoeducational workshop. Facilitators, who are trained in the LTP intervention and corresponding theoretical framework, engage the parents in presentations, discussions, and activities to teach the material. Specific topics include child physical and cognitive development, effective communication strategies, understanding children’s emotions and behaviors, setting boundaries and discipline, promoting emotional intelligence, and building strong parent-child relationships. The workshop was designed to support parents in developmentally appropriate interactions with their children that would help facilitate a positive, secure relationship.

The second part of the intervention provides an opportunity for parents to practice at home what they learned in the workshop. Parents are given a pictorial calendar which depicts the stages of early childhood development using simple illustrations and few written words (Bevc, Citation2004). The calendar shows five domains of child development: (a) sense of self, (b) physical development, (c) relationships, (d) understanding and (e) communication (Evans & Ilfeld, Citation1982). For each domain, at sequential developmental stages from birth to age six, the calendar provides suggestions for play, learning, and attachment-promoting activities. Parents hang the calendar somewhere visible in their home and use it to help inform their interactions with their children at each developmental stage.

Systemic perspective

The Learning Through Play (LTP) intervention aims to support the interplay between parent-child relationships and broader contextual factors. Using attachment (Bowlby, Citation1988; Cassidy & Shaver, Citation2016) and ecological systems (Bronfenbrenner, Citation1979) frameworks, LTP addresses individual, familial, and societal influences on parenting practices. At the individual and family levels, LTP equips parents with tools to foster secure attachment and positive interactions (Ainsworth et al., Citation1978; van der Voort et al., Citation2014; Wright & Edginton, Citation2016). At the sociocultural level, LTP considers availability of resources, cultural norms around parenting to optimize implementation. This holistic perspective emphasizes the interconnectedness of systems in shaping parenting and child well-being.

LTP is uniquely able to support families in low-income settings due to its low funding and training requirements, and high accessibility to families regardless of literacy level (Knerr et al., Citation2013). This makes it an ideal candidate for low-resource countries such as Bangladesh. Bangladesh’s status as a low-resource country is underscored by several critical factors affecting early childhood development. Despite progress, a literacy rate of 74.7% among those aged 15 and above (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Citation2019) highlights educational gaps that may hinder parental support for child learning. Limited digital access, with only 15% internet penetration (World Bank, Citation2020), and an under-resourced healthcare system, with a low density of healthcare professionals (WHO, Citation2020), reflect significant barriers to quality education and healthcare. Furthermore, 20.5% of the population living below the poverty line (UNDP, Citation2019) and restricted access to early childhood education (UNICEF, Citation2019) exacerbate these challenges. These factors collectively demand targeted interventions to improve outcomes in early childhood development within this context.

The current study

The early childhood phase is formative for parents as they foster secure attachment and anchor themselves in the context of their child’s development. Few studies have looked at the usefulness of attachment-based interventions for families with exceptional children. Additionally, though research on parenting interventions has historically been concentrated in developed countries (Knerr et al., Citation2013; Mejia et al., Citation2012), the past decade has seen increased exploration of parent education interventions in low- and middle-income countries (Jeong et al., Citation2018; Tinajero et al., Citation2016). While many established parenting interventions foster positive parenting skills (e.g. Triple P (Sanders, Citation2014) and Incredible Years (Webster-Stratton, Citation2014)), there remains a need for culturally adaptable, resource-sensitive tools for wider dissemination. Thus far, LTP has demonstrated a wide range of effectiveness through implementation in over 25 diverse countries, including Pakistan (Husain et al., Citation2017), Nigeria (Jidong et al., Citation2021), the Caribbean (Jidong et al., Citation2022), Kenya (Notiar et al., Citation2021), and refugee communities in the United States (Kaptan et al., Citation2023).

Given the potential utility of the LTP calendar for the development of parenting training programs in Bangladesh, the current study was conducted with three specific objectives: (1) to adapt an LTP calendar-based parenting training program aimed at enhancing Bangladeshi parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills in parenting; (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of this training program; and (3) to determine the relative effectiveness of the training in supporting parents of exceptional children as compared to parents of typically developing children. Although the LTP calendar focuses on typical development and does not include education on exceptionalities, we hypothesized that the LTP calendar-based parenting training program would still contribute positively to parents’ knowledge, attitudes, and skill sets in supporting their typically developing children as well as children with special needs.

Methods

Design

The study utilized a mixed quasi-experimental design. The within-group variable was the phase (pretest vs. posttest), and the between-group variable was the parent category (parents of typically developing children vs. parents of children with exceptional needs). The quasi-experimental nature of the study implied that the parent categories were preexisting (i.e., participants were not randomly assigned to groups). The same scales were employed in both the pretest and posttest phases. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Department of Education and Counseling Psychology Ethics Committee at the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh (reference number DECP/05/2018). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before collecting data. The study adhered to the ethical guidelines outlined in the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki throughout its duration.

Setting

The research was conducted in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, comprising two distinct administrative entities: Dhaka South City Corporation and Dhaka North City Corporation. Socio-economic disparities between Dhaka North and Dhaka South are evident, characterized by variations in land use, housing conditions, and access to healthcare (Razzaque et al., Citation2020; Sharmeen & Houston, Citation2019; Sowgat & Roy, Citation2022). Therefore, gathering data from both areas was crucial to assess the diversity within the middle class and identify socioeconomic differences between the two regions. The data collection process was facilitated by workshops held in schools that granted permission to utilize their facilities.

Participants

The study’s sample consisted of purposive and conveniently selected 28 participants: 16 parents (comprising nine mothers and seven fathers) of typically developing children and 12 parents (comprising eight mothers and four fathers) of children with exceptional needs, including learning challenges, developmental delays, and autism spectrum conditions. Parents were eligible for inclusion if they had at least one child aged 0 to 6 years. Due to scheduling constraints, only one parent per child could participate in the study. The majority of the participants identified themselves as belonging to middle-class socioeconomic backgrounds.

LTP calendar-based parenting training program

The LTP Calendar-Based Parenting Training Program, adapted for Bangladeshi parents, began with a four-hour psychoeducational workshop on early childhood development. The workshop was facilitated by professionals trained in the LTP intervention and theory. They held bachelor’s and master’s degrees in educational psychology and received training in Learning Through Play from a specialized educator. Facilitators received a three-month training program covering instruction in both the intervention methodology and attachment theory, aligning closely with the program’s theoretical framework. In addition to receiving psychoeducation, parents were oriented to the LTP calendar, a visual intended to be displayed in their homes. The calendar illustrated developmental milestones and various activities parents could undertake to support their child and strengthen the parent-child relationship.

The LTP Parent Training Program for Bangladeshi parents was customized to align with local customs and language. It included activities tailored to each domain, including (a) self-recognition practices with local toys for a sense of self, (b) traditional fabric play for physical development, (c) family games for relationship development, (d) local environment exploration for cognitive development, and (e) stories and simple conversations in Bengali language for development of both verbal and non-verbal skills. These activities were designed to suit Bangladeshi family structures and norms from birth to age six. All adaptations were made in pursuit of enhanced program effectiveness and stronger parent-child connections within the Bangladeshi cultural context.

Measures

Demographic information form

A demographic information form was used to collect information, including the name, age, gender, occupation, educational attainment, and socioeconomic status of the participants.

Parenting knowledge and attitude scale

A 10-item Parenting Knowledge and Attitude self-report Scale was developed to assess the impact of the intervention on participants’ parenting knowledge and attitudes. Four items evaluated participants’ understanding of key parenting concepts, while the remaining six items appraised their attitudes toward parenting practices. Each item utilized a five-point Likert-type scale.

Parenting skill rating scale

An 18-item Parenting Skill Self Rating Scale was developed to assess changes in parenting abilities following participation in the LTP Calendar-guided parenting workshop. Responses to each item were scored on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all applicable) to 10 (fully applicable). There were four negative items representing negative aspects of parenting; scores to these items were reversed in the computation of the total score.

Scale development process

Developing the Parenting Knowledge and Attitude Scale and Parenting Skill Rating Scale involved ensuring cultural relevance and validity within the Bangladeshi context. Initially, the content of these scales was tailored to align with the curriculum of the LTP workshop, ensuring that the questions resonated with the cultural and daily experiences of the participants. Following this, a panel of experts specializing in psychology and early childhood development reviewed the content to evaluate its cultural sensitivity and appropriateness. Despite time constraints limiting extensive quantitative validation, qualitative methods were employed to refine and validate the scales. These methods included gathering expert feedback and conducting pilot testing. Insights gained from these processes led to iterative improvements in the scale items, enhancing their ability to measure the intended parenting constructs accurately. Subsequent pilot testing facilitated the collection of preliminary data on the effectiveness of the scales, guiding further refinements. The decision to develop the Parenting Knowledge and Attitude Scale and Parenting Skill Rating Scale, rather than utilizing existing ones, was made to ensure cultural relevance and validity within the Bangladeshi context. Existing scales may not adequately capture the cultural nuances and daily experiences of Bangladeshi participants, necessitating the development of new scales tailored to their specific context and needs.

Procedure

The procedural framework began with formal approval from school authorities and pretest evaluations of knowledge, attitudes, and skills. To initiate the intervention, participants engaged in a four-hour psychoeducational workshop to lay the foundation for the LTP calendar. Then, participants implemented the LTP calendar in their homes for two weeks. Post-test measurements captured knowledge, attitude, and ability changes, with participants marking relevant options.

Statistical analysis

Given the ordinal nature of the data, non-parametric tests were utilized for analysis (Field, Citation2018). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed to determine whether the workshop significantly increased participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills in parenting (Haynes, Citation2013). The Mann – Whitney U test was used to evaluate the efficacy of the workshop by comparing the change scores (posttest minus pretest) in parenting knowledge, attitudes, and skills between parents of typically developing children and parents of children with exceptional needs. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 28.

Results

Parents of typically developing children

Changes in knowledge about parenting

Before attending the workshop, participants’ median parenting knowledge score was 9 (Mean = 8.19, SD = 2.23), which increased to 12 (Mean = 11.44, SD = 1.71) post-workshop. This change was statistically significant, z = −3.57, p = .001, r = .63, indicating a considerable enhancement in their understanding of parenting concepts and practices.

Changes in attitude about parenting

The pre-workshop median parenting attitude score was 25 (Mean = 25.06, SD = 2.95), which significantly increased to 29 (Mean = 29.13, SD = 2.47) post-workshop, z = −3.45, p = .001, r = .61. This suggests a positive shift in attitudes toward parenting, aligning more closely with best practices.

Changes in parenting skills

The pre-workshop median score for parenting skills was 97 (Mean = 100.19, SD = 22.57), increasing significantly to 112 (Mean = 114, SD = 8.51) post-workshop, z = −2.56, p = .02, r = .45. This indicates immediate enhancements in parenting skills and the application of new strategies in real-world settings.

Parents of children with exceptionalities

Changes in knowledge about parenting

The pre-workshop median parenting knowledge score was 9 (Mean = 8.92, SD = 1.51), which increased significantly to 13 (Mean = 13.17, SD = 1.19) post-workshop, z = −3.09, p = .002, r = .63. This indicates the workshop’s effectiveness in enhancing parenting knowledge within contexts that include specialized care requirements.

Changes in attitude about parenting

The median attitude score pre-workshop was 22 (Mean = 21.75, SD = 2.92), which increased significantly to 29 (Mean = 28.92, SD = 1.73) post-workshop, z = −3.07, p = .002, r = .63. This reflects a positive shift in attitudes toward parenting children with exceptionalities.

Changes in parenting skills

The median score for parenting skills was 110.5 (Mean = 112, SD = 6.15) before the workshop, and this increased significantly to 116.5 (Mean = 115.58, SD = 6.32) after the workshop, z = −2.36, p = .02, r = .48. This suggests the workshop’s effectiveness in enhancing skills pertinent to the unique needs of children with exceptionalities.

Comparing the parents

Changes in knowledge about parenting

The median gain in parenting-related knowledge post-workshop was 4 (Mean = 4.25, SD = 1.06) for parents of children with exceptionalities and 3 (Mean = 3.25, SD = 1.18) for parents of typically developing children. This difference was statistically significant, U = 48.5, z = −2.31, p = .02, r = .44, suggesting greater efficacy of the workshop in enhancing understanding of parenting principles among parents of children with exceptionalities.

Changes in attitude about parenting

The median change toward a positive attitude about parenting was greater for parents of children with exceptionalities, at 7.5 (Mean = 7.17, SD = 2.69), compared to 4 (Mean = 4.06, SD = 2.57) for parents of typically developing children. This significant difference, U = 39, z = −2.67, p = .01, r = .50, indicates a more pronounced positive shift in attitude among parents of children with exceptionalities.

Changes in parenting skills

There was no significant difference in the change in parenting skills between the two groups. Parents of special needs children had a median change score of 4.5 (Mean = 3.58, SD = 4.14), while parents of typically developing children had a median change of 15 (Mean = 13.81,SD = 17.54), U = 56.5, z = −1.84, p = .07, r = .35.

Discussion

The findings from the study offer a compelling insight into the differential impacts of a parenting workshop on two distinct parent groups – those of children with exceptionalities and those of typically developing children. For both the parent groups, the workshop significantly increased their knowledge about positive parenting, skills to strengthen parent-child relationships and support children’s developmental needs, and positive parenting attitudes. When the groups were compared, the workshop was particularly effective for parents of exceptional children in terms of knowledge acquisition and attitude change. One reason for the observed group difference may relate to the unique challenges parents of exceptional children face. Unlike parents of typically developing children, these parents often confront extraordinary situations, such as stigma associated with their child’s disabilities, resulting in negative perceptions about their parenting, social isolation, heightened stress levels, reduced parental satisfaction, demanding caregiving requirements, and the need for acquiring specialized skills and knowledge to support their children’s unique developmental needs (Cheng & Lai, Citation2023; Ragni et al., Citation2022; Serchuk et al., Citation2021). This context could mean that they see the relevance of the training more clearly and might be more motivated to apply what they learn. This might have resulted in the parents of exceptional children gaining more in terms of knowledge and attitude from the workshop.

In addition, since parental morale can be challenged over time by the demands of exceptionalities (Baker et al., Citation2003; Han et al., Citation2018), it is meaningful that, overall, parents of exceptional children reported improvements in their attitudes. Our study’s findings regarding the shifts in parental attitudes toward children with special needs in Bangladesh shed light on a critical issue: the exhaustion experienced by parents, especially mothers, due to the prevalent stigma and discrimination (Begum, Citation2007). These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate stigma and bolster support services within Bangladesh’s unique cultural landscape.

Although there was no statistically significant difference in the change in parenting skills between the two groups, the notable variability in responses, especially the higher standard deviation among parents of typically developing children, suggests a contrast in practical experiences. This indicates that while the workshop’s content was beneficial for both groups, it had varied practical impacts on parenting experiences, skills, and improvements. Such variability in training outcomes aligns with the findings of previous studies, which found that factors like marital satisfaction, parents’ motivation, mental health, child’s comorbid mental illnesses, and socioeconomic status significantly influence the efficacy of parenting interventions (Beauchaine et al., Citation2005; Fosco et al., Citation2014; Lundahl et al., Citation2006). The differential effects of parenting training, as observed in our study, highlight the importance of context-specific strategies. While tailored interventions that consider individual parent characteristics could enhance the effectiveness of parenting programs, our study demonstrates the broad applicability and potential benefits of the LTP calendar intervention across diverse family settings.

Limitations

The intervention is rooted in attachment theory, but it is crucial to recognize that its origins lie in Western, Anglo-centric ideas, which may not comprehensively encompass the wide range of cultural norms and values prevalent in global cultures (Morelli et al., Citation2018). This constraint compels us to acknowledge the possibility of a lack of harmony between the intervention and the cultural milieu in which it is implemented. Despite the diligent incorporation of cultural sensitivity in its execution (Maciel et al., Citation2023), the intervention’s compatibility with diverse cultural frameworks may vary, thereby impacting its efficacy in some contexts.

Furthermore, it is imperative to recognize attachment theory’s applicability or lack thereof within the cultural context of Bangladesh. The theory provides insights into parent-child relationships, but its relevance in cultural contexts that differ from its Western roots warrants additional investigation. In this setting, the intervention was presented as a means to lay the foundation for mutually satisfying parent-child relationships during the early years; attachment-specific terminology was not used.

Implications for practice

The low cost and personnel requirements for the LTP calendar, combined with the positive effects in both normative and exceptional families, make this intervention promising for widespread use. Understanding and improving parenting through this targeted training contributes to academic research and practical applications in parental education and child development. The study’s findings emphasize the critical role of tailored parenting interventions for therapists working with parents, especially those of exceptional children. By acknowledging the unique challenges faced by these parents, such as stigma and heightened stress, therapists can advocate for targeted support and resources. Understanding the variability in parenting experiences underscores the need for personalized approaches, enabling therapists to adapt strategies to individual family contexts. Ultimately, by incorporating these insights into clinical practice, therapists can empower parents, promote positive parenting practices, and support the healthy development of children in diverse family settings.

Implications for research

To build upon the findings and limitations of this study, future research could stratify by age groups rather than the wide span of birth to six years old. By conducting separate analyses for age groups (e.g. infancy, toddlerhood, and preschool), researchers could pinpoint aspects of interventions such as LTP that support the changing dynamics of parent-child relationships during early childhood. These analyses could be strengthened through the use of externally validated measurement tools.

Increasing the sample size within each age group would increase power and improve external validity. The current study’s sample size of 28 participants, encompassing parents of typically developing children and parents of children with exceptional needs, presents limitations in terms of generalizability. However, as Anderson and Glebova (Citation2022) discussed, small-sample research offers unique advantages in clinical research, including the ability to provide in-depth insights into specific phenomena and the feasibility of conducting studies with limited resources. While Roessner (Citation2014) highlights the benefits of larger samples for generalizability in child and adolescent psychiatric research, it’s also important to recognize small studies’ value in exploring nuanced, case-specific questions and piloting innovative interventions. Future studies could benefit from balancing the depth of small-sample studies with the breadth of larger sample sizes to enhance the specificity and generalizability of research findings.

The intervention timeframe, which includes a four-hour workshop and a subsequent two-week home practice period, was deliberately chosen to test its initial feasibility and effectiveness given the limited resources and to suit the scheduling needs of families in Bangladesh. Shorter interventions present practical benefits, such as reduced costs and potentially higher retention rates. However, shorter intervention timeframes can also inhibit long-term efficacy (Berger et al., Citation2009).

Evidence on the efficacy of brief interventions in parenting and early childhood development is varied. Some research indicates that short-term interventions can lead to notable improvements in parenting knowledge and attitudes (Anderson & Glebova, Citation2022; Furlong et al., Citation2012), whereas other studies advocate for extended durations to ensure deeper learning and sustainable behavioral changes (Sanders et al., Citation2014). This inconsistency underscores the importance of additional research to determine the ideal length of parenting programs, especially in settings like Bangladesh, where limited resources and accessibility issues challenge program implementation. Future research should consider varying the lengths of programs systematically to pinpoint the most effective duration that maximizes benefits for both parents and children over short and long terms.

Future studies may also explore the specific content and delivery methods that contributed to positive changes for Bangladeshi. For example, adjusting the guidance in each developmental stage, specific to various needs, while keeping the simple, intuitive calendar framework could provide more targeted support to families with exceptional children. Finally, longitudinal assessments could evaluate the long-term sustainability of these positive changes, informing ongoing support and development initiatives. These efforts would help inform ongoing research and attachment-based parenting intervention that is culturally and developmentally appropriate for the populations it serves.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.