Self-efficacy and optimism as predictors of coping with stress as assessed during the coronavirus outbreak

Abstract This study provides novel insight into the relationships between coping with stress as reported during the first three months of the Coronavirus outbreak, self-efficacy, and optimism among Israeli-Palestinian college students living in Israel. Participants (n = 702) were selected using convenience sampling techniques from ten colleges in Israel, and self-report questionnaires were utilized to assess coping, self-efficacy, and optimism. Stepwise multiple regression models were used to examine the unique association of each independent variable on coping with stress, while accounting for the effects of the other independent variables to reduce multicollinearity concerns. The regression models demonstrates that higher levels of self-efficacy (β = −.12, p < 0.01) and optimism (β = −.18, p < 0.01) were negatively associated with maladaptive emotion-focused coping, whereas pessimism was positively associated (β = .12, p < 0.01). Further, higher levels of self-efficacy (β = .12, p < 0.01) and optimism (β = .18, 67 p < 0.01) were positively associated with adaptive problem-focused coping, whereas pessimism was negatively associated (β = −.10, p < 0.01). These findings are consistent with previous studies conducted globally which entail the contribution of self-efficacy and optimism to the improvement of coping behaviors. Thus, the current research shows the importance of these variables as coping resources for the Arab Israeli-Palestinian minority as well.


PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT
The main area of his interest is understanding the role of self-control skills, self-efficacy, positive emotions, social support, personal components, parenting styles and religious affiliation in predicting effective coping with various stressful conditions among Arab adolescents and adults living in Israel. The stressful conditions that he examine in relation to these variables include academic and social maladaptation, violence, anxiety, depression, internet addiction and other behavioural issues. The significance of this research lies in the fact that the relationship between these variables has not been studied in relation to the Arab minority living in Israel.

Introduction
The Coronavirus outbreak since the end of 2019 has alerted many countries across the globe to make better preparations to cope with the consequences of the pandemic. Some of the major consequences these countries have had to deal with are people's physical and mental health, finances, employment and social relations. For these reasons, a number of studies conducted around the world have shown the negative psychological outcomes of the Coronavirus pandemic (Dubey et al., 2020;Gao et al., 2020). These studies demonstrate how Coronavirus Disease  has ultimately affected people's mental health and wellbeing by causing mass hysteria, economic burdens and personal losses, to name a few.
The mass fear of COVID-19, termed as "Corona phobia", has generated a plethora of negative psychiatric manifestations across all different social groups (Dubey et al., 2020). These include symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder that have been found in a large number of recent studies (Gao et al., 2020). While the negative psychological consequences of COVID-19 have been reported cross-culturally, few studies have been conducted since the start of the pandemic within the Arab population living within Israel.
Studies conducted in many countries across the globe, and in the Palestinian population in particular, have indicated the positive contributions that self-efficacy and optimism have for individuals' mental welfare, especially when tackling risk behaviours and stressful situations (2021;Agbaria & Bdier, 2019;Agbaria & Natur, 2018;Mansdorf et al., 2020). However, no prior research has examined whether self-efficacy and optimism are associated with more adaptive coping strategies among the minority population of Arab individuals living in Israel. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to be the first to examine whether self-efficacy and optimism are associated with use of adaptive coping strategies among Arab Israeli-Palestinian students, as assessed during the first three months of the Coronavirus pandemic when stress levels may be heightened. Lazarus (1999) defines coping as ever-changing cognitive and behavioral efforts developed in order to meet specific demands (external and/or internal) that are considered to exceed or go beyond the subject's resources. Perceived stress means experiencing difficulties in meeting demands within important life domains (Willemen et al., 2008). Difficulties in meeting life's demands might lead to behaviors that deplete one's immune system, especially if individuals continue to allow stress to affect their health negatively. Thus, those with high levels of perceived stress may be more prone to chronic depression and anxiety than others.

Strategies for coping with stress
Depressive feelings and anxiety episodes usually result from adversities and unfavorable circumstances. One, however, can reduce the effects of these negative psychological states by adopting active and adaptive coping strategies such as approach oriented coping and/or problem focused coping (Dhillon & Arora, 2017). Strategies for coping with psychological stress are defined as the methods adopted and practiced by the individual to deal with stressful situations in life. Therefore, there are multiple strategies for coping with stressful situations that differ between different people due to individual differences. These differences are usually linked to each individuals' personal characteristics and/or personality traits (Chai & Low, 2015).
The various formulations for coping, nevertheless, also include defensive and ego processes (Haan, 1969;Vaillant, 1977), conceptualization of traits (Lazarus et al., 1974;Moos & Tsu, 1977), as well as contextual and cognitive approaches (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980;Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). For the purposes of this study, a distinction between emotion-focused coping and problem-focused coping is adopted. Emotion-focused coping strategies are usually employed when an individual is making active efforts to change one's emotional response to the situation. Problem-focused coping strategies, on the other hand, are employed when an individual is making active efforts to change the situation itself. Hence, these strategies are employed when an individual views that his/her perception of the situation or the situation itself can be changed (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980).
Research tends to show that problem-focused coping is especially associated with adaptive outcomes and that it is positively related to overall health (Huijs et al., 1999;Pisarski et al., 1998). Such adaptive outcomes include better academic performance (MacCann et al., 2011) and higher marital satisfaction (Stoneman et al., 2006). This is since problem-focused coping is the process of employing problem-solving strategies to address a stressor (Carver & Connor-Smith, 1989;Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). These problem-solving strategies involve task-oriented actions such as planning or seeking instrumental support (Nes & Segerstrom, 2006). Hence, problem-focused coping is especially important for students dealing with achievement stressors.
Emotion-focused coping, on the other hand, is the process of employing emotion-based strategies in an attempt to reduce or manage the emotional distress evoked by a situation or threat (Carver & Connor-Smith, 1989;Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). This can involve adaptive strategies such as reappraising or reinterpreting a stressor as being nonthreatening (Lazarus, 1993) or trying to relax using breathing techniques (Nes & Segerstrom, 2006). Nevertheless, emotion-focused coping can also involve maladaptive strategies such as yelling, crying, rumination and/or wishful thinking (Carver & Connor-Smith, 1989). This is why previous research tends to show that adaptive forms of emotion-focused coping are associated with positive outcomes, whereas maladaptive forms of emotion-focused coping are associated with a range of negative emotions and cognitions including denial, avoidance, self-blame and interpersonal withdrawal (Carver et al., 1989;Compas et al., 2001;O'Brien & DeLongis, 1996). These maladaptive strategies can hinder students' coping abilities by increasing students' perceived stress instead of limiting it.

Self-efficacy and coping strategies
Self-efficacy refers to the belief that individuals have in their personal ability to deal with daily life's challenges (Bandura, 1997). In contrast to individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy, individuals with a weak sense of efficacy usually avoid difficult tasks, have low aspirations and weak commitment to their goals, and concentrate on obstacles, failures and personal deficiencies (Bandura, 1997). Conversely, according to Bandura (2010), "a strong sense of self-efficacy will produce "cognitive, motivational, affective and selection process" that affect human functioning. Henceforth, individuals with a weak sense of self-efficacy are more likely to experience depression, anxiety and even social isolation. Individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy, on the other hand, are more likely to cope with life's hardships and thus experience negative emotions more mildly.
Following from this, self-efficacy as a coping strategy refers to the extent to which individuals believe that they can draw upon their personal resources in order to handle stressful situations in an effective and competent way (Godoy et al., 2008). When coping with stress, it has been widely accepted that a strong sense of self-efficacy correlates positively with adaptive coping strategies (e.g., problem solving and cognitive restructuring) and correlates negatively with maladaptive strategies (e.g., self-criticism, wishful thinking and social withdrawal; Hastings & Brown, 2002;Kuhn & Carter, 2006;Lightsey & Sweeney, 2008;Salas et al., 2017;Woodman & Hauser-Cram, 2012). Too, individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy exhibit less symptoms of distress with less frequency whereas individuals with a weak sense of self-efficacy exhibit severe symptoms of distress more frequently (White et al., 2019). That is, a stronger sense of self-efficacy contributes to the individual's overall health.
Many studies have been conducted to test the relationship between self-efficacy and coping with stress (Gam et al., 2016;Lee, 2010;Stanley & Murphy, 1997). The results of these studies demonstrate that individuals with a stronger sense of self-efficacy are better active copers than others. Just as perceived by others, self-efficacy has a significant negative correlation with stress (Kreitler et al., 2007;White et al., 2019). This is since individuals with a stronger sense of selfefficacy are more likely to use problem-focused coping whereas individuals with a weaker sense of self-efficacy have a higher tendency to use avoidance (i.e. maladaptive emotion-focused coping strategy) (Ślebarska, 2014). Having said that, the level of general self-efficacy (GSE) varies according to each individual's experiences and skills (Sherer et al., 1982). Thus, the moderating effects of coping almost always depends on the person in situ (Lazarus, 1993).

Optimism and coping strategies
Optimism is a personality dimension that plays a significant role in how individuals cope with stress (e.g., Carver & Connor-Smith, 1989;Connor-Smith & Flachsbart, 2007). Scheier and Carver (1985) define optimism as a general individual belief that good things rather than bad things will happen to the person. More specifically, optimism refers to "an individual difference variable that reflects the extent to which people hold generalised favorable expectancies for their future" (Carver et al., 2010, p. 879). It includes the capacity to manage life's difficulties in such a way to maintain a sense of equilibrium in spite of these difficulties. That is, optimism as a personality trait reflects one's positive expectations for the future (Kapikiran & Acun-Kapikiran, 2016).
Optimism affects both how people look at the world (appraisal) and their behavior in it (effort). Optimism is thus a likely candidate to influence coping behaviors and thereby affect adjustment. Indeed, optimism and coping with stress were found to be strongly correlated (Karimzade & Besharat, 2011;Malkoç, 2011;Nes & Segerstrom, 2006). Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the interaction between the two variables predicts a large proportion of the variance in both perceived stress and satisfaction in life (Reed, 2016). This is because optimism challenges appraisals that produce negative effects. This can be the reason why optimism has psychological benefits for acute stressors as well as chronic stressors (see: Baumgartner et al., 2018).
It has been shown in many studies that there is a positive relationship between "perceived stress" as a dependent variable and self-efficacy, optimism, self-esteem, positive affect and negative affect as cognitive predictors variables (Higgins, 2017). Furthermore, optimism is associated with heightened SBP and DBP stress reactivity and lower daily cortisol secretion (Puig-Perez et al., 2017). One reason for this is that optimistic people have a higher tendency to employ problem-focused strategies (Nes & Segerstrom, 2006), and the use of problem-focused coping leads to higher levels of satisfaction in life (MacCann et al., 2012). Meta-analytic findings indicate that optimistic individuals can also adjust their coping strategies to meet the demands of the stressors at hand (Nes & Segerstrom, 2006). This flexibility makes optimistic individuals overall better copers.
Optimism has a strong influence on coping strategies and perceived satisfaction in life among students (Cabras & Mondo, 2018;Skinner & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007). Cabras and Mondo (2018) suggest that optimistic students have a more complex series of goals to achieve and they behave in a way that is more likely to result in goal achievement when compared with their pessimistic peers. That is, students who are confident and optimistic about their future achievements tend to persist with achieving their goals even when they are facing great difficulties (Carver & Connor-Smith, 1989;Nes & Segerstrom, 2006). Moreover, optimism plays an important role in increasing the student's ability to adapt to new educational environments. Optimism thus helps students experience lower levels of psychological distress and higher levels of social support (Brissette et al., 2002;Scheier & Carver, 1992;Taylor et al., 1990). This makes sense when considering how optimism is positively associated with active coping, planning and acceptance but negatively associated with denial, behavioural disengagement and mental disengagement (Aspinwall & Taylor, 1992;Brissette et al., 2002;Nes & Segerstrom, 2006).

The present study
The current study is the first to investigate the relationship between coping with stress as reported during the first three months of the Coronavirus outbreak, self-efficacy, and optimism among Israeli-Palestinian college students (n = 702). Previous literature has shown that self-efficacy and optimism are positively correlated with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies and negatively correlated with maladaptive emotion-focused coping strategies. However, no prior studies have assessed whether little is known about whether these associations translate to coping with stress among this understudied sample of Arab students living in Israel. The present data was collected during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may be a time of particularly heightened stress and thus an opportune time to assess how individual differences in self-efficacy and optimism relate to adaptive versus maladaptive coping strategies. Based on previous research findings on coping with stress in general, and the literature on the Arab Israeli-Palestinian minority in particular, the current study hypothesizes that among Israeli-Palestinian college students in Israel, 1) self-efficacy and optimism will negatively correlate with maladaptive emotion-focused coping strategies reported during the first three months of COVID-19, and 2) self-efficacy and optimism will positively correlate with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies reported during the start of COVID-19.
The Arab Israeli-Palestinian minority living in Israel is of particular uniqueness. This community lives as a collective society that is experiencing rapid modernization along with "Israelization" on one hand (Al Hajj, 1996), while also experiencing movements in the opposite direction by Islamization and "Palestinianization" on the other (Samoha, 2004). In addition to the formal and informal discrimination faced by many minorities across the globe and in Israel, the Arab Israeli-Palestinian community in Israel have to lead a double life as an undesirable ethnic, religious and political minority living in a Jewish-majority state. Hence, this community has captured itself as a community on the fringes of Israeli society, being disadvantaged in terms of social and health services, along with a lower economic status and lower mental health welfare when compared to the Jewish community living in Israel. Additionally, this population faces a unique dichotomy within their own culture that may cause challenges to their identity formation (Erikson, 1961;Sue & Sue, 2003).
During the Coronavirus crisis, the Arab Israeli-Palestinian community was further marginalised in the public discourse as the Israeli government's health services classified this minority as" not meeting the priority criteria". Therefore, this community has been excluded from the general mass COVID-19 tests carried out by the government as well as the public guidelines around the disease. In part, this means that the rates of COVID-19 within this student population have not been examined nor recognized as warranting healthcare resources or other forms of support. This context therefore presents a timely opportunity to examine the relationships between individual characteristics and the strategies employed when coping with the stress, given that stress may be especially heightened due to the treatment of Arab individuals living in Israel during the Coronavirus outbreak. Thus, the present work is the first to examine the relationship between coping with stress (as reported during the first three months of COVID-19), self-efficacy, and optimism.

Sample
The sample consisted of 702 Israeli-Palestinian college students, 75% of which were females and 25% were males. Participants' ages ranged from 19 to 30 years old (M = 26.14, SD = 5.91). The participants were recruited using non-random convenience sampling from ten colleges in Israel. 61% of the participants grew up in villages (rural) and 39% of them grew up in cities (urban). In terms of religious affiliation, 81% of the participants identify as Muslims, 13% identify as Christians, and 6% identify as Druze.

Measures
Each measure was translated from English into Arabic by five interdisciplinary Israeli-Palestinian scholars who are experts in conducting cross-cultural research in psychology. The measures were assessed by the researchers in collaboration with the five experts and they were checked for the clarity and cultural appropriateness of the content and translation. The questionnaires were then translated back into English by an independent expert in translation. Finally, 40 Israeli-Palestinian students completed the questionnaires and provided feedback to confirm that the measures appropriately captured the constructs as intended.

Demographic variables questionnaire
The variables included in this instrument are gender, age, residence and religion.

Coping style questionnaire
This questionnaire is based on Carver et al.'s (1989) questionnaire that was first translated into Hebrew (Ben-Zur, 2005), and then translated into Arabic. The Arabic and Hebrew versions include 30 items assessed according to a scale of 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. These items exhibited good internal consistency in the present study for both subscales of problem-focused coping (α = .71) and emotion-focused coping (α = .76). In the validation study for the Hebrew version, good internal consistency was also observed (problem-focused coping, α = .82; emotionfocused coping, α = .72). Examples of coping strategies assessed by the measure included taking additional action to try to solve a problem (problem-focused coping) and avoidance (emotionfocused coping). All the items had a factor load level greater than 0.4.

Self-efficacy questionnaire
The present work used the Arabic version of Schwarzer and Jerusalem's (1995) Generalized Self-Efficacy scale that Radhwan (1997) developed to fit Arab culture. The scale consists of ten items answered in a 4-point (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = strongly agree) format. Sample questions included: "I know how to deal with unexpected situations" and "I always find solutions to problems facing me." In the present study, Cronbach Alpha was (α = .83), which is comparable to prior research using this measure (e.g., α = .80; Alrekebat, 2016). All the items had a factor load level greater than 0.4.

Optimism & pessimism scale (OPS)
This scale was designed by William Dember and colleagues in 1989 to measure optimism and pessimism as two poles of a single trait. This scale is the first to separate optimism and pessimism as related sub-traits rather than a unidimensional trait. The OPS includes 56 items answered in a 4-point (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = strongly agree) format. 18 items measure optimism (e.g., "All in all the world is a good place"), 18 items measure pessimism (e.g., "I believe there's not much hope for the human race."), and 20 items are filler items that are included to mask the purpose of the scale (e.g., "It is wise to flatter important people."). The scale provides subscale scores for each optimism and pessimism sub-traits, with higher scores indicating more of the construct. In the present study Cronbach Alpha was α = .83 for optimism and α = .79 for pessimism, which is comparable to the findings in the validation study for the measure (optimism: α = .83-.84; pessimism: α = .86-.88) . All the items had a factor load level greater than 0.4.

Research procedure
The study sample was recruited by non-random convenience sampling from ten colleges in Israel. The research was conducted in 2020 over the course of three months, i.e. during the first months of the Coronavirus outbreak in Israel, in order to examine how coping with stress is related to personal factors as reported at the beginning of COVID-19. After obtaining the needed clearances from each of the colleges as well as the ethical committee at Al-Qasemi College, the questionnaires were distributed using Google forms. All participants have been informed that the questionnaires will remain anonymous. Eighty percent of all eligible students agreed to participate, for a sample size of 702 individuals.

Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics for the study variables (problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, self-efficacy and optimism) were examined. Assumptions of normality, homogeneity of variances, linearity and independence were confirmed, demonstrating the appropriateness of conducting the parametric testing. In order to examine the study hypotheses, two approaches were used. First, bivariate correlations were examined for all study variables. Correlations were considered to have a small effect size if r = |.10-.29|, medium if r = |.30-.49|, and large if r = |.50-.1.00|. Second, hierarchical linear multiple regression models were employed to test the associations of the independent variables of self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism on the dependent variables of problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping (in separate regression models for each dependent variable). The independent variables (self-efficacy, optimism pessimism) were entered in step 2 in a hierarchical fashion for each dependent variable. Order of entry was explored for the three variables and all orders of entry yielded the same variables emerging as significant predictors. Thus, the reported order of entry for step 2 of each regression model was: 1) religiosity; 2) optimism; 3) pessimism; and 4) self-efficacy. In step 1, control demographic variables of gender, age, residence, and religiosity were entered into the model to increase the likelihood that the associations of interest were not due to confounding individual characteristics. The hierarchical multiple regression model was used in order to understand how each of the independent variables (self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism) uniquely relates to the outcomes of coping with stress using problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, while controlling for other independent variables in the model. Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the study variables. Overall, the students exhibited medium scores in the coping styles questionnaire and medium scores in each of the self-efficacy and optimism questionnaires. Table 2 reveals the correlations between the study variables. Significant correlations were observed between problem-focused coping scores and self-efficacy, pessimism, and optimism. Significant correlations were observed between emotion-focused coping scores and self-efficacy, pessimism and optimism.

Results
The regression model (Table 3) demonstrates that higher levels of self-efficacy and optimism were negatively associated with maladaptive emotion-focused coping, whereas pessimism was positively associated.
The regression model (Table 4) demonstrates that higher levels of self-efficacy and optimism were positively associated with adaptive problem-focused coping, whereas pessimism was negatively associated.

Discussion
This study examined the relationships between coping with stress (as reported during the first three months of the Coronavirus outbreak), self-efficacy, and optimism among Israeli-Palestinian college students. The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of personal and social resources on how well Arab Israeli-Palestinian students cope with the stress, and assessing these relationships during the ongoing situational stressor of COVID-19 was opportune for elucidating individual differences in coping.

Self-efficacy and coping strategies as assessed during COVID-19
The study results indicate that self-efficacy positively correlates with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies (e.g., problem solving and cognitive restructuring) and negatively correlates with maladaptive emotion focused-coping strategies (e.g, self-criticism, wishful thinking and social withdrawal), as reported by Israel-Palestinian students during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings align with previous studies that demonstrate that self-efficacy correlates positively with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies and correlates negatively with maladaptive emotionfocused coping strategies (Hastings & Brown, 2002;Kuhn & Carter, 2006;Lightsey & Sweeney, 2008;Salas et al., 2017;Woodman & Hauser-Cram, 2012). One possible explanation for these results lies in the fact that individuals with a stronger sense of general self-efficacy (GSE) are more active copers, meaning that they are more likely to use problem-focused coping. Individuals with a weaker sense of GSE, on the other hand, experience emotional turbulences more frequently and have a higher tendency to use avoidance as a coping strategy (Ślebarska, 2014).
These results can also be explained through Bandura's (1997) assessment which entails that individuals with a weak sense of self-efficacy have a high tendency to avoid difficult tasks, have low aspirations and weak commitment to their goals. This is since individuals with a weaker sense of self-efficacy tend to concentrate on obstacles, the consequences of failures and their personal deficiencies when they are faced with difficult tasks. That is in contrast to individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy. That is, individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy are able to motivate themselves and become more affectionate when facing obstacles (Bandura, 2010). Furthermore, individuals with a strong sense of self-efficacy are able to divert their attention and think creatively to find alternative solutions as well as change their automatic ways of thinking and replace them with planned and more appropriate ones. Hence, a stronger sense of self-efficacy can enable individuals cope more effectively with new stressful situations. While the associations between higher self-efficacy with greater likelihood to use adaptive problem-focused coping strategies and a reduced likelihood to use maladaptive emotionfocused coping strategies are consistent with prior findings, this provides novel insight for the individual differences in how Israeli-Palestinian college students have handled coping, particularly during the situational stress of COVID-19. Notably, the present findings aligning with prior research may suggest that individuals with higher self-efficacy may have exhibited more adaptive coping strategies generally. In other words, the individuals who felt a greater capacity to overcome challenges generally may also have been most likely to feel equipped to overcome potential stressors of COVID-19 using similar, adaptive coping strategies. These findings highlight the importance of establishing self-efficacy within marginalized populations like Israeli-Palestinian youths to cope with discrimination as religious minorities and in times of international crisis like COVID-19.

Optimism and coping strategies assessed during COVID-19
The study results indicate that optimism positively correlates with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies (e.g., careful planning and acceptance) and negatively correlates with maladaptive emotion focused-coping strategies (e.g., denial, behavioural disengagement and mental disengagement). These findings align with previous studies conducted during similar situations which demonstrate that optimism positively correlates with adaptive problem-focused coping strategies and negatively correlated with maladaptive emotion-focused coping strategies (Aspinwall & Taylor, 1992;Brissette et al., 2002;Nes & Segerstrom, 2006).
A possible explanation for these results lies in the notion that happiness helps enable flexible thinking which ultimately helps individuals in problem-solving, self-control, thinking ahead and taking caution (Aspinwall, 1998;Isen & Reeve, 2005). In other words, positive feelings contribute to less impulsive and more controlled and planned behavior. Another explanation for these results lies in the fact that optimism refers to the ability to manage life's difficulties in order to maintain a sense of balance despite these difficulties. This is consistent with the conceptual basis of dispositional optimism which assumes that positive expectancies for the future lead to engagement and striving rather than disengagement and giving up (e.g., Billingsley et al., 1993;Carver et al., 1989;Fontaine et al., 1993).
Thus, higher optimism has related to a greater likelihood to use adaptive problem-focused coping strategies consistently throughout the literature and also was associated with more adaptive coping as reported during COVID-19 among Israeli-Palestinian college students. It may be that students with a greater sense of optimism were more likely to perceive their stress both generally or specific to COVID-19 as temporary negative circumstances that could be managed with active, problem-focused coping techniques. The active coping strategies may reflect that Israeli-Palestinian students were optimistic that certain facets of the difficulties they were experiencing related or unrelated to COVID-19 were malleable and able to be improved to a certain extent. These findings highlight the relevance of offering support to this marginalized group to help create a greater sense of optimism and thus encourage the use of more active, adaptive problemfocused coping strategies.

Limitations
The results of this study should be interpreted in light of the following limitations. First, while the circumstances of COVID-19 presented an opportune time to assess and elucidate individual differences in adaptive versus maladaptive coping strategies, the purpose of this study was not to assess participants' perceived levels of stress due to COVID-19 nor the strategies they used to cope with stress attributed specifically to COVID-19. Thus, future studies may consider highlighting the personal experiences of Arab individuals living in Israel during COVID-19 and individual characteristics associated with more or less stress. Additionally, the sample was not recruited using a randomized subset of the larger population, and all participants identify as one racial and ethnic group. Future research may consider recruiting a more diverse sample to permit direct comparisons across racial, ethnic and religious groups as means to increase the validity of the current findings. In addition, the data was comprised only of self-report questionnaires which may be subject to reporting bias. Thus, further studies may consider additional tools of measurement (e.g., behavioral observations). Finally, there is a need for future research to examine the relationship between coping with stress, self-efficacy and optimism by testing a wider variety of moderating and mediating effects.

Conclusion
This study is the first to investigate the relationship between coping with stress as reported during the first three months of the Coronavirus outbreak, self-efficacy and optimism among Israeli-Palestinian college students. The aim of the study is to examine, for the first time, how self-efficacy and optimism may increase adaptive coping skills among this unique sample of Arab college students living in Israel. The results demonstrate that a stronger sense of selfefficacy increases one's ability to cope actively, adaptively and efficiently. The results also demonstrate that optimistic students tend to employ active problem-focused coping much more often than maladaptive emotion-focused coping. These results align with results from other studies conducted across the globe. Lastly, we hope that the present research can provide insight into coping with stress during times of international crisis in a manner that may increase early identification and intervention efforts within this marginalized population of Israeli-Palestinian individuals.