A standardized nomenclature and atlas of the female terminalia of Drosophila melanogaster

ABSTRACT The model organism Drosophila melanogaster has become a focal system for investigations of rapidly evolving genital morphology as well as the development and functions of insect reproductive structures. To follow up on a previous paper outlining unifying terminology for the structures of the male terminalia in this species, we offer here a detailed description of the female terminalia of D. melanogaster. Informative diagrams and micrographs are presented to provide a comprehensive overview of the external and internal reproductive structures of females. We propose a collection of terms and definitions to standardize the terminology associated with the female terminalia in D. melanogaster and we provide a correspondence table with the terms previously used. Unifying terminology for both males and females in this species will help to facilitate communication between various disciplines, as well as aid in synthesizing research across publications within a discipline that has historically focused principally on male features. Our efforts to refine and standardize the terminology should expand the utility of this important model system for addressing questions related to the development and evolution of animal genitalia, and morphology in general.


Introduction
Animal terminalia (which includes both the genitalia and analia) have a long history of being used for taxonomic and phylogenetic purposes, as well as being studied in the context of functional morphology and morphological evolution. This is because these structures possess a remarkable level of anatomical diversity, making them excellent morphological features for distinguishing species as well as understanding mechanisms of rapid morphological change [1][2][3]. Past investigations mostly focused on male terminalia, and female terminalia were generally considered to be relatively invariable [1,4]. In the last several decades however, there has been a burgeoning interest in improving our understanding of female genital diversity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This interest has been motivated by the realization that some evolutionary hypotheses, for instance with respect to coevolution of genitalia, are best addressed by studying both male and female genital morphology simultaneously [3,[11][12][13][14][15]. In addition, the female terminalia can evolve in response to ecological factors, such as the properties of egg-laying substrates [6]. Furthermore, as morphological adaptations in female genitalia are central to the ability of many pest species to damage crops when laying their eggs into plants [16][17][18][19][20], studying female genitalia can potentially lead to practical applications.
In recent years, the genitalia of species in the Drosophila genus have become an important study system to address research questions in ecology, behaviour, evolution, development and taxonomy. A survey of the egg-laying apparatus of Hawaiian drosophilids for example revealed that ovipositor form, and especially length and patterns of sensory structures, differ between species and strongly correlate with adaptations to different oviposition substrates [6]. Similar observations were made for Drosophila suzukii, which has evolved an elongated ovipositor with derived sensory structures, enabling piercing through the skin of still-ripening fruits, which allows this species to access a new ecological niche and simultaneously makes it a pest causing massive agricultural damage [8,16].
Cross-disciplinary communication among researchers investigating different aspects of Drosophila female terminalia has often been impeded by two important challenges. First, many important features are internal, mostly composed of folded soft tissues, which can make it more difficult to identify, delimit and rigorously quantify variation in shape between individuals or species. For example, commonly used terms such as vulva, vagina and uterus have no clear delineations and have been applied to variable portions of the genitalia in different publications (see Table 1). Imaging and dissecting technology developed in recent years has greatly mitigated this technical limitation [5]. For instance, micro-computed tomography (micro CT) scanning can now provide detailed images of internal structures [21]. The second challenge has been that individual structures have often been referred to by several different names. This is most obvious in the long list of synonyms that have been applied to the egg-laying sclerites laterally surrounding the gonopore (e.g. ovipositor, vaginal plates, oviscapt, gonopod, etc. See Table 1).
In a previous paper, we delineated the structures of the male terminalia of D. melanogaster and proposed a standard set of terms for these parts [22]. Following a discussion with the members of the consortium, we opted to designate terms that can be homologized across the Diptera, but we recommended that authors also indicate common terms, whenever possible, in their manuscripts in order to guarantee maximum understanding among disciplines. In this paper, we follow the same approach and collectively propose a collection of terms and definitions to unify the terminology associated with the female terminalia in D. melanogaster (Table 1). In contrast to our previous paper, which was limited to the external male terminalia, we also include here a comprehensive overview of the internal reproductive structures of females. Many of these structures make contact with intromittent parts of the male genitalia during mating and may therefore be of interest in studies of genital evolution and coevolution [e.g. 15,21,23].
Distinguishing between the various parts of the female genitalia can be challenging, especially where clear boundaries (e.g. sutures, joints) do not exist. To achieve maximum clarity in our visual depictions, we have used a combination of bright field images of dissected cuticle (Canton S wild type strain), scanning electron microscopy, and line drawings.

A visual atlas of adult D. melanogaster female terminalia
We provide below a unified nomenclature of the anatomical parts of the female terminalia of D. melanogaster, together with images to Table 1. Definition of the terms in the standardized nomenclature.

Parts Female terminalia
Flybase ID: FBbt:00004830 Definition: The entire set of internal and external structures in the distal half of the female abdomen that are derived from segments 8-10, making up the female genitalia and female analia. It develops from the female genital disc [24,25]. Female genitalia Flybase ID: FBbt:00004827 Definition: Set of internal and external structures originating from segments 8-9, that makes up the genital apparatus. It develops from the female genital-primordium part of the genital disc ,25].

Hypogynial mid-dorsal incision
FlyBase ID: FBbt:00052065 FlyBase synonyms: New term Definition: A mid-dorsal incision on the dorsal margin of each hypogynial valve. Synonyms: submedian incision of the egg-guide lobe [80]. Hypogynial posterior lobe FlyBase ID: FBbt:00052063 FlyBase synonyms: New term Definition: The posterior portion of each hypogynial valve, posterior to an imaginary line connecting the hypogynial long sensillum and the hypogynial mid-dorsal incision. It is double-walled and carries on the outer wall a series of sensilla that are larger and less interspaced than those carried by the anterior lobe. On the inner wall, there are three terminal, minute sensilla trichoidea and one subterminal, long sensillum. The outer wall is sclerotized, lobate, and harbors the posterodorsal pouch. Synonyms: upper margin of the egg-guide lobe [80], mesal surface of the oviscapt [72], distal part of the oviscapt valve [46], dorsal vaginal plate [69,70,74,88]. Hypogynial posterodorsal pouch FlyBase ID: FBbt:00052066 FlyBase synonyms: New term Definition: A posterodorsal depression on the outer wall of the hypogynial posterior lobe of each hypogynial valve. Synonyms: dorsodistal depression [80], oviscapt pouch [15]. Hypoproct FlyBase ID: FBbt:00004834 Definition: The plate ventrally surrounding the anus in females [30,45,46,72,48,49]. It has an average of 19 sensilla of which four are large. It arises from segment 10 primordium in the female genital disc. Synonyms: abdominal sternite 9 [42], subanal plate [76], ventral anal plate [24, 68, 70, 73, 74; 75], lower anal plate [40]. Oviduct FlyBase ID: FBbt:00004911 Definition: Duct of the female reproductive tract that connects the ovaries to the uterus [24,39,73]. Oviducts are divided into two lateral oviducts (each connected to an ovary) and one common oviduct, to which the lateral oviducts connect, and which itself connects to the uterus. Oviduct, calyx of FlyBase ID: FBbt:00004918 (calyx of oviduct) FlyBase synonyms: New term Definition: The anterior-most, cup-shaped region of the lateral oviduct [64,89]. Formed by the joining together of the individual pedicels (small tubes coming from the base of each ovariole). Oviduct, common FlyBase ID: FBbt:00004913 (common oviduct) (Continued )  [90], marked by an asterisk).

Oviducts, lateral
FlyBase ID: FBbt:00004912 (lateral oviduct) Definition: Epithelial tubes that connect the ovary to the common oviduct. They are lined with a chitinous intima, and surrounded by muscle.

Hypoproctal sensillum
The female terminalia of D. melanogaster are composed of anatomical structures arising from a fusion of abdominal primordia 8-10 [24,25]. In females, the abdominal segment 8 primordium of the genital disc develops into the majority of the internal and external female genital structures [26,27]. The abdominal segment 9 primordium is reduced in females, giving rise to the internal structure of the female accessory gland and the dorsal surface of the uterus [26,28]. In females, as in males, the abdominal segment 10 primordium of the genital disc develops to become the analia [29]. We divide our descriptions of the terminalia into two FlyBase synonyms: New term Definition: Scale-like projections on the surface of the ventral oviprovector membrane. These structures may act as ratchets to prevent bidirectional movement of an egg [32]. Definition: Muscle of the adult female abdominal segment 7 that extends to the uterine posteroventral intima [76].  [76]. Common oviduct circular muscle FlyBase ID: FBbt:00003553 Definition: A striated array of circular muscle fibres forming an almost continuous sheet around the common oviduct [76]. Lateral oviduct circular muscle FlyBase ID: FBbt:00007338 Definition: A striated array of circular muscle fibres forming an almost continuous sheet around the lateral oviduct [76]. Uterine circular muscle FlyBase ID: FBbt:00003554 Definition: Circular muscle that surrounds the adult female uterus [76].

Musculature
Parenthetical names next to FlyBase ID numbers indicate the name as it appears in FlyBase, as some names were modified slightly in FlyBase for consistency with existing terms (e.g. "hypogynial bristle" is used as opposed to "hypogynial sensilla", to reflect how other structures of this type have been referred to in FlyBase).
regions, internal and external. The external terminalia have prominent roles in oviposition and copulation, while the internal terminalia have roles in ovulation and sperm storage. We use the junction of the oviprovector (external) and vulva (internal) as the division between these two regions. Table 1 details our proposed unified nomenclature. Each proposed term is listed along with a description of the structure, previously used alternate names, and references. For ease of conversion, Table 2 provides the reverse search functionality; previously used terms are listed in the first column, with the corresponding unified nomenclature term we propose here given in the second column. Instances where the same term has been used elsewhere for more than one distinct structure are indicated with an asterisk.

External structures of the female terminalia
The external structures of the female terminalia (Figures 1-3) consist of the female analia and external genitalia, both of which harbour sensilla (bristles). In females, the analia (Figure 2, panel A") are subdivided into a dorsal plate (the epiproct), and a ventral plate (the hypoproct). The analia are surrounded by the genital tissue of the epigynium (formerly female abdominal tergite 8). The epigynial ventral lobe connects to the paired valves (left and right) of the hypogynium via the perineal membrane. We further subdivide the hypogynium into several parts (Figure 2, panel A'). The hypogynial posterior lobe and hypogynial anterior lobe are the posterior and anterior parts of each valve of the hypogynium. The ventral side of both valves is connected by the hypogynial anteroventral bridge (Figure 2, panel B'). The hypogynial mid-dorsal incision is an indentation on the outside of each hypogynial valve. The posterior and anterior hypogynial lobes are delimited by an imaginary line connecting the hypogynial mid-dorsal incision with the hypogynial long sensillum. During copulation, the male surstylus contacts the hypogynium near this incision [30]. The hypogynial posterodorsal pouch is a depression positioned at the apical end of each hypogynial valve (Figure 2, panel A'), which contacts the male epandrial posterior lobe early in copulation [15,31]. The two hypogynial valves are connected medially by the oviprovector, an eversible membrane whose ventral surface bears the oviprovector scales (Figure 2, panel C; Figure 3d), which likely act to prevent bidirectional movement of eggs [32].
The setation of the external female terminalia has several readily identifiable components ( Figure 3). Sensilla on the epiproct and the hypoproct are referred to as epiproctal sensilla and hypoproctal sensilla, respectively (Figure 2,  panel A). On the genitalia, both the epigynium  (epigynial sensilla) and hypogynium (hypogynial sensilla) have characteristic setation. The hypogynial sensilla are subdivided into three types ( Figure 3). Hypogynial short sensilla (previously gonopod sensillum trichodeum; Figure 3c, blue) are small apical bristles at the dorsal tip of the hypogynial posterior lobe. The hypogynial posterior lobe of each valve also possesses a single hypogynial long sensillum (previously gonopod long bristle; Figure 3b,c, green) at the apical end. Finally, each valve of the hypogynium possesses a row of stout hypogynial teeth (previously gonopod thorn bristles or vaginal teeth; Figure 3b,c, red).

Internal female genital and reproductive structures
The upper reproductive tract consists of the ovaries and oviducts, which transfer mature eggs to the lower reproductive tract (Figures 4,  5). The lower reproductive tract is composed of the genital chamber, female accessory glands, seminal receptacle and spermathecae. The seminal receptacle and spermathecae store sperm after mating, while the female accessory glands and the spermathecal secretory glandular cells that surround the spermatheca capsule serve as secretory organs. The genital chamber is subdivided into the uterus (or bursa; anterior) and vagina (posterior) (Figure 4). It is in the uterus  that fertilization of eggs takes place [33]. The posterior opening of the lower reproductive tract consists of the vagina through which sperm is transferred to the female and the vulva, a name which has also previously been used for the oviprovector, and where copulation occurs and where the egg exits the reproductive tract [e.g. 34,35].

Delineation of structures
Some parts of the female genitalia that we outline in this work do not have clear boundaries, such as ridges or clefts. We justify the demarcation of these structures in several ways. In some cases, we note the structure separately because the feature appears to have functional significance. For instance, the hypogynial mid-dorsal incision ( Figure 2) does not have clear boundaries with surrounding tissue, but there is evidence to suggest that this depression is a site that makes contact with the male surstylus during copulation [30]. Delimitation of anatomical features can also be aided by considering the distribution of important developmental molecules (e.g. transcription factors), the patterning of which may indicate regions that harbour developmental or evolutionary independence [27,28,36]. Lastly, some identified features are quite subtle in D. melanogaster but are more exaggerated in closely related species, providing reasoning for their designation as notable structures of the female genitalia in this group. For example, the hypogynial posterodorsal pouch is relatively shallow in D. melanogaster but is unambiguous in D. simulans [15], a closely related species which diverged about 2 million years ago [37]. Future work investigating the development and function of these structures will further aid in structural demarcation.

Choice of terms
The term hypogynium was first proposed by Crampton [38] to refer to the abdominal sternite below the genital apparatus of the female, which in the case of Diptera corresponds to sternite 8. In the same paper, Crampton [38] defined the term hypandrium as the abdominal sternite below the genital apparatus of the male, i.e. sternite 9 in Diptera. Whereas the term hypandrium has been used in Drosophila systematics and developmental biology as early as the 1940s [e.g. 39,40], 'hypogynium' has never been applied to Drosophila. Instead, a variety of nonanatomical terms such as 'egg-guide' and 'ovipositor' have been applied to the female egg-laying external structures. In entomology, the ovipositor is usually  formed from the appendices of the genital segment [41], and indeed Ferris [42] called the external egglaying structure (in D. melanogaster) the 'female gonopod'. However, it has been suggested that Diptera females lack an ovipositor, in the proper entomological sense [41]. Indeed, in D. melanogaster the homoeotic gene Abdominal-B represses all leg-development genes in female A8, confirming the sternal nature of the hypogynium [43]. Crampton [44] suggested that specific terms, such as oviscapt, would be more appropriate. Grimaldi [45] has introduced this term in Drosophila systematics, and since then it has been used in multiple systematic and functional morphology studies [15,30,46,47,72]. However, given our conservation of the terms hypandrium and epandrium for the sternite and tergite of abdominal segment 9 in our paper on male terminalia anatomy [22], we prefer here for consistency the usage of the terms hypogynium and epigynium for the sternite and tergite of female abdominal segment 8. As the anatomical term hypogynium is not commonly used in the literature, it would be preferable to cite it alongside the more common functional term 'ovipositor' in publications, e.g. hypogynium (ovipositor) or ovipositor (hypogynium).
The analia have formerly been called the proctiger and consequently the sternite and tergite surrounding the anus were called the hypoproct and the epiproct, respectively [30,45,46,72,48,49]. However, in some Dipteran species, two additional lateral plates, called the cerci, also surround the anus. Remarkably, there are no hypo-and epiprocts in males and no cerci in females of D. melanogaster. Nonetheless, it has been observed that in doublesex, transformer-2, hermaphrodite, or intersex mutant females, the hypoproct is reduced and the epiproct shifts laterally, resembling the male cerci, but still usually fused on the dorsal side [50][51][52][53]. This suggests that the female epiproct may have the same developmental origin as both male cerci. Females of the subfamily Steganinae have a pair of lateral plates identified as cerci posterior to the epiproct [45]. In the subfamily Drosophilinae, however, these cerci have been lost or possibly fused to the epiproct. In addition, we note that in some insect groups (such as odonates) the terms hypoproct, epiproct, and paraproct describe terminal structures that are not functionally homologous to the structures named here for D. melanogaster and could very well derive from different segment primordia during terminalia development [54,55].
Considering the internal structures, we propose here a term in Drosophila, the furca ( Figure 6). In non-Cyclorrhaphan Diptera, the furca is an internalized sclerite on the dorsal surface of the genital chamber derived from sternite 9 [56], and it was believed to be absent or unrecognizable in most Cyclorrhapha. Interestingly, developmental studies showed that the dorsal wall of the genital chamber in D. melanogaster derives from the A9 primordium [26], suggesting the furca is present in this species though far less sclerotized. The furca has several folds that we choose to define more precisely here, motivated by evidence that some of these may interact with male intromittent organs. For example, the vaginal furcal dorsolateral fold (Figure 6b) is the location of one type of copulatory wound described by Kamimura and Mitsumoto [30].

Incorporation of our standardized terminology across areas of research and species
A primary goal of this article is to facilitate the flow of information across disciplines and research areas. To this aim, we worked with the FlyBase team to incorporate our unified terminology into their database, updating and adding terms as needed. We understand that there may be good reasons for individual authors to continue using the terminology that they are accustomed to in their own work. In such cases, our suggestion would be to parenthetically reference the unified terminology that we outline here, e.g. parovaria (female accessory glands). In this manner, there will be greater ease in translating across works that employ different terminology for the same feature.
Our work here focused on the terminalia of Drosophila melanogaster females. However, despite the great morphological diversity of the female genitalia in the Drosophilidae, the general ground plan of these structures is fairly well conserved. Therefore, most of the terms we define are easily extensible to other species, facilitating comparison across studies outside D. melanogaster. In cases where structures have been lost in D. melanogaster (and thus are not named here), we hope that this set of unified terms will mitigate potential confusion by giving common references for surrounding structures. We briefly illustrate below two exciting research areas for which our unified terminology may prove useful in facilitating fruitful comparisons across species or in different species groups.

Evolution of genitalia in response to ecological factors
Evolution of the female genitalia has frequently taken place in response to changing oviposition substrates. Adaptations usually involve changes in size and shape of the hypogynium as well as in the number, disposition and shape of the hypogynial sensilla [6,16]. For example, species laying eggs on solid substrates, such as D. suzukii or leaf-and barkbreeding Hawaiian drosophilids [57], often have large and elongate hypogynium with numerous, large teeth-like sensilla. On the other hand, species laying eggs in decaying or soft tissues, such as D. melanogaster, often have a short and roundish hypogynium with fewer and less sharp sensilla. In some cases, female genital evolution in Drosophila has important consequences for agriculture. For example, the evolution of a serrated ovipositor in D. suzukii and closely related species (e.g. D. subpulchrella) has allowed these flies to oviposit in ripening fruit, making them crop-damaging pests, while closely related species such as D. biarmipes, where the ovipositor retains the basal shape and setation, are benign [16]. A common language with respect to anatomical structures will ensure that studies conducted in disparate systems come together to inform our collective understanding of the forces and mechanisms driving such changes in response to ecological factors.

Coevolution of the sexes
The rapid evolution of animal genitalia is a longstanding area of research interest [1][2][3].
While early work focused specifically on male structures, added emphasis has recently been placed on understanding the evolution of female structures [5,10], and how coevolution of male and female genitalia might contribute to the rapid evolution of these structures in both sexes [11,12]. Adaptations of male genitalia to rapidly evolving female genitalia [58], or vice versa, usually involve changes concerning specific genital features, such as the shape and size of the hypogynial posterodorsal pouch in the melanogaster species complex and the sclerification of some internal walls of the oviprovector (e.g. in D. teissieri), the vulva (e.g. in D. orena) and the vagina (e.g. in D. erecta) [15,59,60]. Some internal sperm-storage organs, such as the seminal receptacle, have co-evolved with the size of the male sperm [61,62]. We hope that the common set of terms we outline here to reference the various parts of the female genitalia, in combination with the previous work outlining terms for the male genital structure [22], will aid in the synthesis of empirical studies of genital evolution and coevolution across Drosophilid species.

Scanning electron microscopy
The scanning electron micrographs from Figures 1b  and 3d were collected about 40 years ago, and the exact strain of D. melanogaster, and exact methods used to collect these images are no longer known. The scanning electron micrograph in Figure 3c was collected as follows: Adult female D. melanogaster were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, stained with osmium tetroxide, dried through an ethanol series (35-100%) and the ethanol dried with a Tousimis AutoSamdri 815 critical point dryer. The terminalia were then dissected from the abdomen, mounted on stubs, and coated with gold-palladium using a Tousimis sputter coater. Specimens were visualized with a Hitachi SM-5000 scanning electron microscope.
The scanning electron micrograph in Figure 6a was collected by fixing a female sample from the Oregon-R strain in ice-cold ethanol, followed by a t-butanol wash, and drying by sublimation. The samples were then gold-coated and observed under a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-510).
The scanning electron micrographs in Figure 6b, c, are from L. Tsacas' collection at the National Museum of Natural History, Paris (Courtesy of the Museum).

Bright field cuticle imaging
For cuticle images in Figure 2 (except Figure 2, panel C), a Canton S line of Drosophila melanogaster (Bloomington # 64349) was used. Adult females were dissected in 100% EtOH with microforceps and mounted in PVA Mounting Medium (BioQuip). Samples were imaged at 10× and 20× magnification on a Leica DM 2000 with a Leica DFC540 C camera. Images were Z stackcompiled with the Leica Application Suite to allow for optimal focus.
For cuticle image in Figure 2c and the image of the spermatheca in Figure 4 (inset), female specimens from a lab-culture strain of Canton S were used. The distal portion of abdomen after the segment 7 including the spermatheca therein was detached from the main body in 70% EtOH, treated with 10% KOH solution at 80-90°C for about 5 min, and mounted in a droplet of glycerine on a cavity slide. After removing the tergite and sternite 7 within glycerine, the dissected and cleaned terminalia and spermatheca were microphotographed at different depths of focus using a DinoLite® Digital Eyepiece Camera attached to an Olympus BX50 microscope. The photos were stacked into an all-in-focus composite using the software CombineZP [63]. The confocal images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and Adobe Illustrator CS6.
For the cuticle image in Figure 3a, a female from the Canton S strain was used. The sample was mounted in 50:50 Hoyer's medium and lactic acid. The sample was imaged at 20× magnification using a Zeiss Axioplan with a Manta G609C camera (Allied Vision Technologies). Focus stacking was performed with the software Picolay (www.picolay.de, version 2020-08-13).

Visualization of the upper and lower RT
Reproductive tracts were dissected in Schneider's Drosophila medium (Sigma) on ice and processed for electron microscopy as described in 64. Briefly, tracts were flat-embedded between two sheets of Aclar (Electron Microscopy Sciences), which allowed us to image the entire tract at the light microscopic level prior to sectioning. Sections were cut on a Reichert Ultracut microtome. Oneµm thick sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue and viewed with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope.

Immunocytochemistry
Reproductive tracts were dissected in Yamamoto's Ringer, fixed in 4% paraphormaldehyde in PBS and incubated in blocking solution and stain with Alexa Fluor 594-phalloidin (1:200) and DAPI (Molecular Probes) as described in 64.
Reproductive tracts of the different treatments were mounted with Antifade media [65] on a multi-well glass slide.

Reporter constructs
The image in Figure 5L shows the pattern of DsRed expression (magenta) for an enhancer-reporter construct containing 301 bp of sequence between the transcription start site of CG32833 and a distal transcription start site of twist (coordinates 2,2985,299-2,2985,599 in D. melanogaster genome v6.42). Note that this intergenic sequence is also upstream of the transcription start site of miR-4939 (transcribed in the same direction as CG32833) and of the transcription start site of long non-coding RNA gene CR42742 (transcribed in the same direction as twist). It is not known to which gene's expression pattern the reporter corresponds. The 301-bp fragment was amplified by PCR with primers respectively containing a KpnI site and an XhoI site, for cloning into the KpnI and XhoI sites in the polylinker of pRed H-Stinger [66]. The construct was inserted into strain w 1118 by P-element-mediated transformation, and the reproductive tract of a female from the resulting strain was dissected and imaged as done previously [67].

Confocal microscopy
Reproductive tracts were imaged in a Leica TCS SP8 multiphoton (MP) laser scanning confocal microscope operated by the LAS X software. Fluorescence was detected by using argon excitation lasers of 488 nm captured by a conventional photomultiplier (PMT). Image processing was done using Fiji and Imaris 8.4 (Bitplane).

Micro computed tomography (micro-CT)
Reproductive tracts were stained with a mixed contrasting dye [1% crystalline I2 (Merck 376,558) and 1% Tannic acid (Merck 1401-55-4) in 200 proof ethanol] for 24-48 hours at 40°C. Before imaging, the samples were washed two times for ten minutes each in fresh 200 proof ethanol. Micro-CT was done with a Zeiss Xradia micro XCT-400 at X20 magnification and data processing was done using AVIzO and Fiji (Zelinger E, Brumfeld V, Rechav K, Heifetz Y, in prep). support from the CNRS as part of the MITI interdisciplinary action 'Défi Adaptation du vivant à son environnement' 2020. M. L.S. acknowledges support from R35GM118170. Project Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación BFU2017-86244-P funded by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/50110001033/ and ERDF A way of making Europe to E.S. Y.H. acknowledges support from Israel Science Foundation (ISF-2041/17 and ISF-2470/21). The authors have no potential competing interests to report.

Data availability statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.