Reconstruction of the structural setting of the north-eastern side of the high Agri Valley (Southern Apennines, Italy) based on detailed field mapping

ABSTRACT The Southern Apennines consist of a Cenozoic to Quaternary fold and thrust belt characterized by a complex structural architecture. In the axial portion of the chain, corresponding to the Agri Valley, folds and faults with multiple styles formed during the progressive emplacement of various tectonic units, derived from different paleodomains. In the available geological maps, the geometry of these tectonic structures is often hindered by scarce cartographic detail due to the use of basic stratigraphic subdivisions. Therefore, at the aim to better define these structures and contextually update the outcropping stratigraphic units, we realized a detailed geological map, which take into consideration not only the formation as basic stratigraphic units, but also finer subdivisions such as members or beds. Using this approach, we improved the stratigraphy of the area, we recognized new geological units and, eventually, we reconstructed the structural setting, and the tectonic evolution of the Agri Valley in detail.


Introduction
The axial zone of the Southern Apennines shows a complex structural arrangement, resulting from the superposition of contractional, strike-slip and extensional tectonic structures, which are often difficult to unravel (Cello et al., 2000;Mazzoli et al., 2001;Olita et al., 2023).Recently, Prosser et al. (2021), have stressed on the importance of using updated geological maps, showing detailed stratigraphic subdivisions, for unravelling the geometry of the tectonic structures in such structurally complex terrains.The authors successfully applied this method to a sector of the Agri Valley in the Southern Apennines.Encouraged by the good-quality preliminary results and aware that other authors came to the same conclusions using the same approach in different areas (i.e.Zuccari et al., 2021), the authors decided to extend the study to the entire left side of the Agri Valley (Figure 1a,b).This choice was essentially driven by the occurrence in this area of a great amount of hydrocarbon and freshwater reserves capable to provide tens of thousands of barrels of oil per day and millions of m 3 of water (Colella, 2003).Due to the large exploitation of these natural resources, we believe that the Agri Valley represent a critical area, where benefiting from an accurate mapping and a precise reconstruction of the outcropping geology is essential, for example, to prevent or deal with possible environmental issues.
Geological maps encompassing the Agri Valley were released since the beginning of the last century (Baldacci et al., 1908;Baldacci & Sabatini, 1908), with significant improvements during the '70s, when the Geological Map of Italy at the 1:100.000scale was published by the Italian Geological Survey.In particular, the Agri Valley was included within the Sheet 199 'Potenza', Sheet 210 'Lauria' and Sheet 211 'S.Arcangelo' (Ogniben, 1969a(Ogniben, , 1969b;;Scandone, 1971), where the main tectonic units forming this sector of the Apennine chain were defined and mapped for the first time.A particular focus on the Agri Valley was successively provided by Carbone et al. (1991) at the 1:50000 scale, who introduced new details in the tectono-stratigraphic organization and in the mapping of the geological structures.The last update was provided by the realization of the new Geological Map of Italy at the 1:50000 scale by the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA).The Agri Valley was included in the sheets 489 'Marsico Nuovo' (Servizio Geologico d'Italia, 2012), 505 'Moliterno' (Servizio Geologico d'Italia, 2014a), 506 'S.Arcangelo' (Servizio Geologico d'Italia, 2005), and 521 'Lauria ' (Servizio Geologico d'Italia, 2014b).Further geological maps for the NW sector of the study area have been published at the 1:25.000scale by Bucci et al. (2012Bucci et al. ( , 2020)).
Despite the progressive updates, all the cited geological maps are based on stratigraphic schemes that mostly provide a formational rank level of detail.However, a series of studies focussing on detailed stratigraphic analyses of the successions exposed in the Agri Valley showed that a higher level of stratigraphic resolution, including members and marker intervals, is possible (Amodeo, 1999;Giordano et al., 2011;Rigo et al., 2012) and these lower rank units are still suitable for mapping at a 1:30000 scale.
The advantages of producing such a detailed map are manifold.It shows a more refined distribution of the outcropping stratigraphic units, which have been defined mostly at member level.Consequently, the displacement produced by faults, especially when cutting through a single formation, and fold geometry is outlined with a markedly better resolution with respect to previous maps.More in general, the map represents a reliable tool for the sustainable exploitation of natural resources, environmental studies, and research.

Geological setting
The high Agri Valley is located in a crucial area of the Southern Apennine fold and thrust belt, corresponding to its axial portion (Menardi-Noguera & Rea, 2000) (Figure 1a, b).It consists of a tectonically controlled depression filled by a thick pile of quaternary deposits (Giano, 2011;Giano et al., 2000).The pre-Quaternary bedrock, well exposed along both sides of the valley, includes some of the older formations in Southern Italy.These make up the deeper structural levels of the fold and thrust belt, which has been drilled by a series of boreholes for hydrocarbon exploration (Shiner et al., 2004).Emplacement of the tectonic units is the result of different tectonic phases that involved the Tethyan realm and the northern margin of the African plate from the Cenozoic to the Pleistocene times (Patacca & Scandone, 2007).Exhumation mainly took place during the Upper Pliocene -Pleistocene and was initially driven by the development of low-angle normal faults (Bucci et al., 2014;Mazzoli et al., 2008).Integrated geological and geophysical studies carried out during the last decades, particularly prompted by hydrocarbon exploration, strongly contributed to the knowledge and the understanding of the geological setting of the area (Mazzoli et al., 2001;Shiner et al., 2004).These studies allowed dividing the stacked allochthonous nappes and the quaternary valley infill into different stratigraphic units (Bucci et al., 2012(Bucci et al., , 2020;;Giano, 2011Giano, , 2016;;Zembo, 2010).
The tectono-stratigraphic organization of the Agri Valley pre-Quaternary bedrock, which is representative of the axial portion of the entire Southern Apennine fold and thrust belt, from the geometrically upper to the lower tectonic unit, is summarized as it follows (Figure 2).
The Liguride Unit, represents the highest tectonic unit.It consists of a strongly deformed Meso-Cenozoic succession pertaining to the Alpine Tethys realm, originally deposited above an oceanic crust (Bonardi et al., 1988).The succession consists of strongly deformed metamorphic and nonmetamorphic rocks, followed upward by deepwater turbidites (Cavalcante et al., 2012;Prosser et al., 2021).
The Sicilide Unit derives from a Meso-Cenozoic succession deposited in a basin located between the Tethyan domain and the northern African paleomargin (Lentini, 1979;Ogniben, 1969b;Patacca & Scandone, 2007).This unit mainly consists of basinal clays and turbidites.
The Apennine Platform Unit consists of a Meso-Cenozoic shallow water carbonate succession originally deposited at the northern margin of the African plate (D'Argenio et al., 1973;Patacca & Scandone, 2007;Scandone & Bonardi, 1968).Shallow water carbonates are followed upwards by Miocene slope to basin siliciclastic deposits, testifying the dismissing and drowning of the carbonate platform.
The Lagonegro II Unit (Scandone, 1967(Scandone, , 1972) ) consists of a Meso-Cenozoic succession deposited in the proximal sector of the Lagonegro Basin, E of the Apennine Platform.The succession records the progressive opening and deepening of the basin and its transition from shallow to deep-water conditions, below the CCD (Miconnet, 1988).
The Lagonegro I Unit (Scandone, 1967(Scandone, , 1972) ) consists of a Meso-Cenozoic succession deposited in the axial sector of the Lagonegro Basin.The succession shares similar characteristics with the Lagonegro II Unit; however, it lacks the shallow water interval at the base.
The youngest formation of the substratum is represented by base of slope to basinal siliciclastic turbidites of the Miocene Gorgoglione Formation, consisting of syn-orogenic thrust-top deposits lying unconformably on the aforementioned tectonic units (Boiano, 1997;Selli, 1962).
Finally, the quaternary infill of the Agri Valley consists of a thick package of fluvial plain and alluvial fan deposits, fed both longitudinally and transversally to the valley, deposited on the Meso-Cenozoic bedrock.
All these units and the related formations will be described in detail in the next sections.

Methods
The geological map covers an area of about 350 Km 2 (Figure 1) between Pergola and Montemurro (Main Map).It has been constructed by using the topographic map of the Basilicata Region, at a 1:25:000 scale (https://rsdi.regione.basilicata.it).Fieldwork has been carried out at a 1:10.000scale; more detailed mapping at 1:5.000 scale has been done in sectors characterized by higher tectonic and/or stratigraphic complexity.During fieldwork, 3.118 outcrop data have been collected and georeferenced, and 3.014 attitudes of bedding planes have been measured.Attitude data have been selected using a GIS environment in structurally consistent sub-areas and processed with the Stereonet software by RWA Allmendinger.The original data are openly available in a public repository.The geological map has been finally rendered at 1:30.000 scale, using as base map the topographic map of the Basilicata Region, at a 1:25.000scale.

Stratigraphy of the north-eastern side of the high Agri Valley
The stratigraphic organization proposed in Main Map is summarized in the tectono-stratigraphic scheme of Figure 2. The tectonic units are indicated by a short acronym made by two letters or a letter and a number.The stratigraphic units are indicated by acronyms made by a combination of two, three or four letters and numbers.The occurrence of a subscript letter denotes a member, which has been mapped due to significant differences with respect to the general characteristics of the considered formation.A short description of the stratigraphy of the different tectonic units, from the geometrically higher to the lower, is here provided based on new field data and the previous literature.Additional details can be found in the legend accompanying the Main Map.New findings are emphasized.
4.1.Pre-quaternary substratum 4.1.1.Liguride unit (LI) Represents the remnant of the Ligurian accretionary prism which consists of strongly deformed Meso-Cenozoic rocks, originally deposited above the Alpine Tethys Ocean (Bonardi et al., 1988;Cavalcante et al., 2012;Prosser et al., 2021) (Figure 2).In the Agri Valley only the youngest stratigraphic units, represented by the Saraceno and Albidona formations, are present.The Saraceno Formation (FSC) consists of alternating clays, calcilutites and calcarenites.Based on Torricelli and Amore (2003) the age ranges from Middle to Upper Cretaceous.According to Baruffini et al. (2000) and Prosser et al. (2021), the Albidona Formation has been subdivided into two members, FAB and FABa, the former containing marly horizons (MRN).This new stratigraphic scheme allowed to extend FAB to larger areas with respect to the existing geological maps (a great portion of the Albidona Formation deposits occurring in the study area have erroneously been ascribed to the Gorgoglione Formation, see Prosser et al., 2021), by mapping specific stratigraphic horizons.FAB mainly consists of alternating clays, marls and sandstones, whereas coarsegrained sandstones and conglomerates dominate in FABa (Figure 3a).The age of the formation is still matter of debate (Baruffini et al., 2000;Bonardi et al., 1985); however, the stratigraphy of the Albidona succession exposed at Monte dell'Agresto, which is representative of the entire formation in the study area, has been recently revised, providing an Eocene Age (Prosser et al., 2021).

Sicilide unit (SI)
The Sicilide Unit consists of deep-water sediments originally deposited in a basin located between the Tethyan domain and the northern African paleomargin (Lentini, 1979;Ogniben, 1969b;Patacca & Scandone, 2007) and includes two main formations (Figure 2).The first formation, the Torrente Cerreto Unit (TCU) (Lentini, 1979), is a chaotically-organized unit consisting of a varicoloured shaly matrix, containing isolated blocks of white marls and quartzarenites derived respectively from the Monte Sant'Arcangelo Unit (MSA) and the Numidian Flysch (FYN).We interpret this unit as a mass transport deposit (MTDs) (Festa et al., 2022 and references therein).The second formation is represented by the Varicoloured Clay (AVA) (Oligocene; Bucci et al., 2012), consisting of varicoloured shales alternating with cm to m-thick calcarenites and sandstones, microconglomerates and 10 m thick layers of whitish marls (AVA1) (Figure 3b).Microconglomerates are made up of clasts of phyllites and platform limestones.
Eocene deposits are represented by the Eocene Breccias and Calcarenites (BCE) which, similarly to the previous unit, are related to a carbonate slope environment.

Lagonegro 2 unit (L2)
Includes all the Meso-Cenozoic units deposited in the proximal sectors of the Lagonegro Basin (Scandone, 1967(Scandone, , 1972) ) (Figure 2).The succession records the progressive opening and deepening of the basin and its transition from shallow to deep-water conditions (Miconnet, 1988).
The Calcari con Selce Formation has been divided into two members (Bertinelli et al., 2005;Giordano et al., 2011), which have been mapped for the first time in the study area.The lower member, Calcari con Selce 2 (CCS2) (Carnian -Norian), consists of thinlybedded pelagic cherty limestones, with local secondary dolomitization.A green clay-radiolaritic interval, related to the Carnian Pluvial Event (Rigo et al., 2007), occurs near the base in the northwestern sector of the study area.The upper member, called as Transitional Interval 2 (CCS2a) (Upper Norian -Lower Rhaetian), is bounded at the base by a typical horizon of red shale, and consists of alternating shales, marls, calcarenites and cherty limestones (Bertinelli et al., 2005;Giordano et al., 2011).
The Scisti Silicei Formation consists of two members, identified for the first time in the study area.The lower Scisti Silicei 2 (SCS2a) (Upper Triassic -Lower Jurassic) consists of shales alternating with marly limestone and isolated radiolarites.The Scisti Silicei 2 (SCS2) (Jurassic) is the younger member, corresponding to the Chiatamone member defined by Amodeo (1999).

Lagonegro 1 unit (L1)
The L1 Unit (Scandone, 1967(Scandone, , 1972) ) encompasses the Meso-Cenozoic formations deposited in the axial sectors of the Lagonegro Basin (Figure 2).The succession shares similar characteristics with the L2 Unit (Figure 3e,f); however, it lacks the shallow water interval at the base, represented by the Middle Triassic AMF and CRL.
The succession starts with alternating brownish shales, limestones and marlylimestones of the Sorgente Acero Member (USA) of the Calcari con Selce 1 Formation (Bucci et al., 2020;Patacca & Scandone, 2007).It continues upward with the Calcari con Selce 1 and the Transitional Interval 1 (CCS1, CCS1a), as well as the Scisti Silicei 1 (SCS1, SCS1a) and the Galestri 1 (GAL1) formations.All these units show distal characteristics with respect to the corresponding units described for the L2 Unit.The succession ends with a new stratigraphic unit informally introduced for the first time in this area, named as Piana del Lago Marls (UMI).The formation consists of alternating shales, marls and sandstones.The age is Upper Oligocene -Lower Miocene, as documented by the occurrence of Miogyspina sp. and Miogypsinoides.sp.

Quaternary basin infill (QU)
Quaternary deposits, representing the infill of the Agri Valley, consist of unconsolidated and coarseto finegrained continental deposits, fed both longitudinally and transversally to the Agri Valley, ranging in time from Lower Pleistocene to present-day, whose stratigraphy has been reconstructed in the 489 'Marsico Nuovo ' and505 'Moliterno' sheets (Servizio Geologico d'Italia, 2012, 2014a).

The structural organization of the northeastern side of the high Agri Valley
The structural setting of the north-eastern side of the high Agri Valley derives from different tectonic phases occurred since the Oligocene (Bucci et al., 2014(Bucci et al., , 2020;;Mazzoli et al., 2001).As a result of our detailed mapping (Main Map), the whole area has been divided, from NW to SE, into four sectors delimited by three NE-trending oriented fault zones (Figure 4).Each sector shows peculiar differences in structural styles and stratigraphic organization.We describe the main features of each sector and the bounding tectonic structures in the next sections.

Sector 1
Consists of three superimposed tectonic units represented respectively, from the top to the bottom by the AP, L2 and L1 units bounded to the SE by the Agri Fault Zone (Figure 4).It consists of a high angle, NNE-SSW oriented fault dipping toward WNW.The fault zone follows approximately the higher Agri River course and shows the Monte Facito Formation at the hangingwall and the Galestri 1 Formation at the footwall.Slip indicators collected along the Marsico Nuovo Hill suggested a probably right-lateral strike slip kinematics.
In Sector 1, the thrust which superimposes the AP carbonates onto the L2 deposits (Monti della Maddalena Thrust; Bucci et al., 2014) can regularly be followed between Castel di Lepre and Santino and in the Torrente Melaggio tectonic window (Figure 5a), where the L2 Unit is affected by a NW-trending fold (Figure 5b).The thrust plane consists of a SW gentlydipping surface with a dip angle ranging from 5°to 30°and top-to-the-NE sense of transport (Figure 5c).Variable orientations and higher dip angles are generally related to tilting connected to later faulting.A 1-10 m thick shear zone, showing different types of deformation based on the lithologies involved, is developed mainly at the footwall of the main thrust surface.Fault breccia and slickensided surfaces, generally characterize brittle lithologies whereas plastic deformation such as S-C tectonites and folding typically involve thinbedded, clayey and shaly successions (Figure 5d,e).The younger unit involved at the thrust footwall is represented by the FYR, whereas the FMS represents the younger units recognized at the hangingwall.This provides a time constrain for the thrust activity.As concerning this latter formation, the apparent unconformity contacts with the older units, widely observable in the Pergola area, is considered the result of post-emplacement gravitational collapse, linked to later fault-related block tilting.In the Sector 1 minor thrust surfaces, affecting the Lagonegro 2 Unit and cutting at the base the GAL2 and the SCS2 formations, have also been recognized.
The thrust superimposing the L2 Unit on the L1 Unit (Marsico Nuovo Thrust; Bucci et al., 2014) is largely exposed between Pietra Maura and Piana del Lago (Main Map).It generally involves the Monte Facito Formation at the hangingwall and the GAL1 at the footwall.The portion of the Monte Facito Formation serving as decollement surface is generally represented by AMF, although MSD is locally involved.In the Piana del Lago area, the Marsico Nuovo Thrust displays the Piana del Lago Marls (UMI) at the footwall.This allows us to infer that the emplacement of the L2 Unit onto the L1 Unit is younger than the Lower Miocene.
The structural analysis performed in this sector shows that the orientation of the contractional structures is consistent with an overall SW-NE oriented shortening direction.The best evidence is represented by the Cognone Anticline (Figure 5f), an asymmetrical anticlinal fold of about 1 km in wavelength, exposed at the footwall of the Marsico Nuovo Thrust, involving the L1 Unit, which shows an axis oriented N325°/7°( Figure 5g).

Sector 2
This sector is included between the Agri and Marsicovetere fault zones (Figure 4).This latter consists of two main segments, oriented NE-SW and N-S, respectively.The NE-trending segment mostly dips towards the SE, separating the L2 and L1 units at the footwall from the LI, SI and AP units at the hangingwall.The N-trending segment is nearly vertical, displaying pure dextral strike-slip kinematics.Tectonic slices made up of carbonates and sandstones, of the AP and the SY respectively, have been recognized along the N-trending segment, immediately SE of Monte Torrette (Main Map).
In Sector 2 the L1 Unit is widely exposed, with limited outcrops of L2 and AP units.The most striking characteristic of this area is represented by the occurrence of km-scale, symmetrical and asymmetrical folds affecting the L1 deposits (Figure 6).Magnificent exposures are represented by the Monte Lama, Serra di Calvello, Monte San Nicola and the Monte Volturino folds (Figure 6a,b).
According to Mazzoli et al. (2001) folding is accomplished by buckling mechanisms which is favoured by the thin-bedded, multi-layered nature of the involved successions which show strong competence differences.These folds show a predominant box geometry (Figure 6c,d), with double anticlinal hinge zones (Figure 6b) and locally overturned or faulted limbs.Along the Monte Lama-Serra di Calvello-Monte San Nicola Structure (Figure 6a) the fold axes orientation significantly changes from NW-SE to N-S and NNE-SSW (Figure 6e), from the northern to the southern portions of the area, according to an arcuate shape.Accordingly, N-S to NNE-SSW axial trends have been obtained at Monte Volturino (Figure 6f,g).
In the remaining part of the area, although poorly exposed, the tectonic contact between the L2 and L1 units occurs immediately SW of Marsico Nuovo, at the Sant'Elia locality (Main Map) and along the valley separating Monte Calvelluzzo from Monte Volturino (Romanelli area; Main Map).In this latter locality, a klippen formed by the MSD and the overlying CCS2 overthrust onto the GAL1.The AP carbonates occur in a series of klippen, which overthrust the L2 Unit along the eastern and southern sides of Monte Volturino at Scarrone di Mezzo and Serritello (Main Map).

Sector 3
This sector is bounded by the Marsicovetere Fault to the NW and the Torrente Casale Fault to the SE (Figure 4).This latter consists of a roughly NEtrending and SE-dipping normal fault, bounding the eastern side of the Monte Caldarosa-Monte S. Enoc structure and extending to the eastern slope of the Viggiano town hill.The fault shows the L2 Unit deposits at the footwall and the LI Unit with the overlying SY deposits, at the hangingwall.
Sector 3 differs from the previous sectors for the absence of the L1 Unit and the occurrence of the LI and SI terrains, resting tectonically above the L2 Unit.The main structural feature is represented by the tectonic superposition of the LI thrust sheet onto the SI, AP and L2 units.In particular, the contact with the SI Unit consists of a very poorly exposed thrust surface indicated in the map as an undefined tectonic contact.More obvious is the superposition of the LI onto the L2 deposits which can be traced S of Monte Pilato and W of the Monte Caldarosa area (Main Map) (Figure 7a).The occurrence of ATS at the footwall of the thrust allows to provide an age not older than the Upper Oligocene for the thrusting phase.The tectonic superposition of the LI and SI onto the AP carbonates is not exposed in the study area.However, thrusting of the LI and SI onto the AP is consistent with data about the tectonic load obtained from marly intervals in the AP carbonates exposed at the Monte di Viggiano (Main Map), which indicate that carbonates have been subjected to 4-5 km of tectonic burial (Manniello et al., 2022).
At Viggiano, and in the proximity of the Monte di Viggiano area, the L2 Unit deposits are also overlain by the AP carbonates along the Monti della Maddalena thrust (Section B-B' in the Main Map).This tectonic contact is never clearly exposed in the study area.However, at La Raia, SE of the Monte di Viggiano (Main Map), it is possible to observe at least three m-scale tectonic slices of the GAL2 that are included within a duplex formed by the platform carbonates.The L2 Unit is also affected by complex contractional deformation as showed by the Monte S. Enoc-Monte Caldarosa fold (Figure 7a-c).It consists of a km-scale, asymmetric anticline showing a moderate arcuate shape in map view, with fold axis trends varying from NW-SE to N-S and NNE-SSW (Figure 7d).The axial plane shows an average dip direction toward WNW.The structure, showing a NW gently dipping limb and a steeply-dipping or locally overturned southeastern limb, is associated to a series of deep-seated thrusts represented in the Section A-A' (Main Map) and can be interpreted as a fault propagation fold.
Other contractional structures are represented by a km-scale N-trending anticline affecting the L2 Unit at the Torrente Alli, N of Viggiano (Figure 7a, d) and the Rupe Rossa Thrust (Figure 7e-g).This NW-dipping thrust crosscuts the Eastern limb of the anticline, involving both the CCS2 and the CCS2a members.Intense and disharmonic folds develop at the footwall of the thrust within CCS2a, while the thrust surface consists of a sharp and slickensided surface, with scarce fault gouge (Figure 7h).

Sector 4
This sector includes the portion on the map located to the SE of the Torrente Casale Fault Zone (Figure 4).In this area, the FAB and FGO formations are mainly exposed.However, some outcrops, pertaining to the L2 Unit, also occur at Serra Carlea (Main Map), at the footwall of a NW-trending normal fault.Kmscale folds in the FAB and FGO formations have been recently described in Prosser et al. (2021).The contact between the SY and the underlying units is represented by a regional unconformity.5.5.Other structures 5.5.1.Low angle normal faults (LANFs) These structures, formed during the Pliocene to Lower Pleistocene, are associated to the early extensional deformation affecting the Southern Apennine allochtonous sheets (Bucci et al., 2014;Ferranti et al., 1996;Mazzoli et al., 2008).They commonly reactivate pre-existing tectonic or stratigraphic discontinuities and are particularly well-preserved in the carbonate deposits pertaining to the AP and the Lagonegro Basin units (Bucci et al., 2012;Novellino et al., 2015).LANFs strike N-S or NW-SE, display a listric geometry, with dip angles ranging from 3°to 30°.

High angle faults
These tectonic structures were active between the Lower Pleistocene to the Quaternary, thereby decisively contributing to the opening of the Agri Valley.They consist of normal and strike-slip faults with dip angles ranging from 40°to 90° (Catalano et al., 1993;Hippolyte et al., 1994;Monaco et al., 1998).
N110°-120°and N140°-160°oriented normal and strike-slip (both transpressional and transtensional) faults which mainly shaped the high Agri Valley.Kinematic indicators, mainly represented by slickensides and calcite steps, usually show a sequence of events with strike slip faults reactivated as normal faults.Strike slip faults are attributable to the East Agri Fault System (EAFS; Cello et al., 2000;Maschio et al., 2005), which is best exposed along the southwestern slope of the Monte di Viggiano ridge.The involvement of the Brecce di Galaino and the occurrence of growth structures allows to constrain the faults activity to the Lower-Middle Pleistocene (Giano et al., 2000).Nearly E-W striking normal faults, compartimentalized by N140°trending faults, have also locally been recognized.Clear examples are exposed at Pizzo Corno (Main Map) (Figure 8a-c).
N-S to N40°striking faults form a set of fist-order structures responsible for the dissection of most of folds and thrusts, allowing for the exposure of different structural levels of the thrust and fold belt in the four homogeneous sectors recognized in the study area.They generally consist of normal faults; however, a subsequent dextral strike slip activity has been documented in the Cognone area (Mazzoli et al., 2004).N30°normal faults delimiting the SE-side of the Monte S. Enoc -Caldarosa ridge form a series of splays with the Lagonegro units at the footwall and the FAB and FGO formations at the hangingwall.In the Montemurro area, deep-rooted normal faults, related to this set, affect the FAB (Prosser et al., 2021).

Discussion and conclusions
In this paper, we present the geological map of the north-eastern flank of the Agri Valley which encompasses an area of about 350 Km 2 .The map is based on detailed stratigraphic subdivisions which took into consideration not only the single formations but also, when possible, lower rank units such as members or beds.This has allowed us to successfully define the tectonic structures with a greater amount of detail, that would otherwise not possible using a simple formational subdivision approach.It also allowed to newly recognize and map for the first time previously overlooked stratigraphic units.Based on the new data we divided the whole area into four sectors, bounded by first-order NE-trending faults (Figure 4).The main criteria considered for defining the four sectors are the exposure of specific tectonic units and the homogeneous orientation and geometry of the tectonic structures.Using this approach some general considerations are possible: (i) Moving from NW to SE, the different sectors show the involvement of tectonically higher units.This means that the NE-trending faults, although characterized by complex and possibly polyphase kinematics, produce a general uplift of the north-western sectors with respect to the south-eastern portions of the area.previously described.Younger E-W and NW-SE oriented normal and strike-slip (transtensional) faults mostly controlled the opening of the Agri Valley tectonic depression, cutting the older structures as evident for the Torrente Casale Fault Zone.Anomalous fault cross-cutting relationships, differing from the previously proposed tectonic scheme, are attributed to the reactivation of the NE-SW trending faults as transfer faults, connected the activity of the NW-SE trending normal faults.

Software
Outcrops have been georeferenced in the field by means of an open-source mobile phone app (Geopaparazzi by Hydrologis; www.geopaparazzi.org).Lithological data, bedding attitude and structural measurements have been obtained in each outcrop.This information has been imported in the QGIS 3.22 LTR open-source software (www.qgis.org),that has been used to construct the geological map, to manage attitude and structural data and to produce the initial layout at 1:30.000 scale.The final layout of the geological map, including the legend, the geological cross-sections and the index map, has been obtained with Adobe Illustrator.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(A) Tectonic sketch map of the Southern Apennines and the Agri Valley; (B) Area of the Agri Valley covered by the geological map (red line).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Tectono-stratigraphic scheme of the units showed in the geological map.Inset on the upper right side of the figure shows finer stratigraphic details of the successions included in the red boxes.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Examples of the mapped stratigraphic units.(A) Liguride Unit: regularly bedded sandstones and clays of the Albidona Formation (FAB) cropping out at Monte dell'Agresto.The fragmented whitish rocks pertain to a cm-thick marly horizon; (B) Sicilide Unit: thinly laminated marls pertaining to the Varicolored Clay (AVA) cropping out north of the Monte di Viggiano; (C) Apennine Platform Unit: rudist (caprinids) fragments-rich limestones recognized at Monte di Viggiano pertaining to the Radiolitids Limestones (RDT); (D) L2 Unit: cm-thick, well-bedded red sandstones pertaining to the Monte Facito Sandstones member (AMF) of the Monte Facito Formation, north of the Cognone locality; (E) L1 Unit: dmthick grey calcilutite layer showing a 1.5 cm thick bioturbated whitish interval at the base.Sorgente Acero member (USA), south of Monte San Nicola ridge; (F) L1 Unit: cmthick, well bedded cherts pertaining to the upper member of the Scisti Silicei Formation (SCS1) in the Monte Farneta locality; (G) Synorogenic Unit: conglomerates of the Gorgoglione Formation (FGO) east of Montemurro village; (H) Quaternary basin infill: scree deposits pertaining to the Brecce di Galaino Unit (GALB) near Marsicovetere.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Structural sketch map of the northeastern side of the Agri Valley showing the outcropping tectonic units and the main structures recognized in the area.Three main structures, represented by the Agri, Marsicovetere, and Torrente Casale fault zones respectively, allowed recognizing four distinct structural sectors.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Tectonic structures exposed in the Sector 1. (A) Detail of the Torrente Melaggio tectonic window (refer to the Main Map for the legend); (B) Lower hemisphere equal area stereographic projections of poles to bedding planes at Torrente Melaggio.The third eigenvalue shows the orientation of the fold axis; (C) Outcrop photograph of the Monti della Maddalena thrust surface; (D) Detail and (E) Interpretation of the thrust shear zone showing S-C tectonites which provide a top-toward-NE sense of shear.(F) Detailed sketch map of the Cognone area (refer to the Main Map for the legend); (G) Lower hemisphere equal area stereographic projections of poles to bedding planes at Cognone Anticline.The third eigenvalue shows the orientation of the fold axis.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Tectonic structures exposed in the Sector 2. Portions of the geological map (refer to the Main Map for the legend) illustrating (A) the Monte Lama -Calvelluzzo -Monte San Nicola (numbered rectangles are referred to stereoplots in Figure 6E) and (B) the Volturino structures (numbered rectangles are referred to stereoplots in Figure 6G); (C) Panorama view of the Monte Lama Anticline from the SW and (D) relative interpretation; (E) Lower hemisphere equal area stereographic projections of poles to bedding planes showing the progressive rotation of the fold axes trends along the Monte Lama -Calvelluzzo -Monte San Nicola structure.The third eigenvalues show the orientation of the fold axes; (F) Panorama view of the Volturino anticline-syncline structure from the SW; (G) Lower hemisphere equal area stereographic projections of poles to bedding planes at Monte Volturino.The third eigenvalues show the orientation of the fold axes.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Tectonic structures exposed in Sector 3. (A) Portion of the geological map illustrating the Monte Caldarosa -Monte S. Enoc -Torrente Alli anticlines (numbered rectangles are referred to stereoplots in Figure 7D) (refer to the Main Map for the legend); (B) Panorama view of the Monte Caldarosa Anticline from the S; (C) Interpretation.(D) Lower hemisphere equal area stereographic projections of poles to bedding planes in Sector 3; the third eigenvalues show the orientation of the fold axes; (E) Portion of the geological map illustrating the Rupe Rossa Thrust area (refer to the Main Map for the legend).(F) Panorama view of the Rupe Rossa Thrust from the SW; (G) Outcrop interpretation; (H) Close up view of the Rupe Rossa Thrust showing slickensides and folds at the hangingwall and footwall respectively.
(ii) Passing from Sector 1 to Sector 4, orientations of fold axial traces and thrusts vary from NW-SE, the typical Apennine trend, to N-S and NE-SW.In some cases, trend variations can be observed in map view along a single structure providing an arc-shaped geometry (see the Monte S. Enoc-Monte-Caldarosa anticline or the Serra di Calvello and Monte San Nicola anticline system on the Main Map).This indicates non-cylindrical development of folds in different sectors of the study area.(iii) The different tectonic units show different structural styles.In particular, the deepest unit, represented by the L1 Unit, are characterized by folds showing a box geometry.Conversely, the L2 Unit show folds characterized by an asymmetric geometry, consistent with their interpretation as fault-propagation folds.The Apennine Platform is affected only by gentle folds showing local amplification in the frontal ramp area (at the Monte di Viggiano see the Main Map).The uppermost Liguride and Sicilide units, show strong internal structural complexities with tight or overturned folds, inherited by older tectonic phases.(iv) Combining the new stratigraphic and structural data a more detailed reconstruction of the tectonic evolution of the study area is possible.According to the previous models (Patacca & Scandone, 2007 and references therein), emplacement of most of the Southern Apennine nappes in the Agri Valley occurred during the Lower-Middle Miocene time.The time constrain for the contractional tectonics is consistent with the involvement, at the base of the main thrusts, of the Lower Miocene ATS and UMI formations.The contractional phases were followed by different faulting events showing clear cross-cutting relationships.N-S or NW-SE trending LANFs represent an older tectonic event, followed by NE-SW oriented normal/strike-slip faults.These latter faults are responsible for the segmentation of the study area in the four sectors

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. E-W oriented normal fault exposed at Pizzo Corno.(A) Portion of the geological map illustrating the Pizzo Corno area (refer to the Main Map for the legend).The considered faults are included in the red rectangle; (B) Fault plane view from the S; (C) Detail of the fault plane showing dip-slip oriented slickensides.