Engineering of the crystalline state towards a defective state of CeCoO3 perovskite for the OER process in alkaline medium

Perovskite oxides act as an efficient electrocatalyst, but their limited active surface area has made it challenging to enhance their electrocatalytic activity. Thus, researchers found that changing the crystalline surface to an amorphous surface having oxygen vacancy can create an enriched active zone. In this research, we adopt a top-down approach for the amorphization of the crystalline CeCoO3 nanostructure that creates crystal defects, producing materials with a higher specific surface area, potential electrocatalysis for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and greater stability. The calculated overpotential (η) and Tafel slope for defective CoCO3 (D-CCO3) is 265 and 35.95 mV dec−1 very low as compared to the crystalline CoCO3 (C-CCO3, 384 and 76.11 mV dec−1). The electrochemical analysis also suggests that the defective CoCO3 (D-CCO) exhibited the 33.96 mF and ECSA of 849 cm2. The current research enables a valuable approach for improving and changing the material properties and electrochemical efficiency of nanoscale perovskite oxide electrocatalysts attributed to crystal defects and nitrogen doping. However, further modifications to the D-CCO structure in the near future may be employed to address other environmental challenges.


Introduction
Our diminishing fossil fuel supply and the consequent environmental impact need the development of sustainable technology and renewable resources of energy [1][2][3][4].Renewable resources of energy, like wind power, can be used in conjunction with electrically powered electrocatalysis to create environmentally friendly fuels and easily accessible chemicals [5][6][7][8][9].An example of a clean, renewable energy source is the electrocatalytic water-splitting process, which produces hydrogen through the half-reactions involving oxygen evolution as well as hydrogen evolution [10][11][12][13].Since oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has a high activation barrier, multiple electrons along with proton transfers and slack reaction kinetics, it is one of these processes and the limiting factor in the efficiency of related energy devices [14][15][16][17].Scientists have put a lot of time and effort over the past decade, looking for more efficient and long-lasting OER electrocatalysts [18][19][20][21][22][23].Examples include transition-metal complexes, nanomaterials based on IrO 2 or RuO 2 , atomically dispersed metals and others [24][25][26].
To get active, stable and cost-effective results in OER, researchers are looking into perovskite oxides with the general formula ABO 3 , in which A along with B sites have been filled with lanthanide metals (or alkalineearth metals) alongside transition metals, as possible replacements regarding nanocatalysts made of precious metals [27][28][29][30].Perovskite catalysts have several advantageous properties, but an essential one is those materials at the A or B sites have a high propensity to be heavily leached away in an electrochemical process [31][32][33][34].In addition, an amorphous layer on the catalyst's surface is possible to be formed, surface reconstruction and chemical development in the case of BaIrO 3 [35], LaCo 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 3 [36], LaNiO 3 thin film [35], and La 0.8 Sr 0.2 MnO 3 [37] double perovskites, among others [38].The electrochemical water oxidation performance of perovskites is enhanced via a passive amorphous rebuilding process, but the convolution of the whole reconstruction mechanism is hindered by an unidentified reaction process along with inadequate stability concerning OER [39][40][41].However, crystalline materials have a well-defined periodic arrangement of atoms, which creates a rigid structure.This regular arrangement of atoms can enhance the electrical conductivity of the substance by helping the movement of electrons through the crystal lattice.Additionally, the well-defined structure of crystalline materials can provide sites for electrochemical reactions to occur, such as the adsorption or desorption of ions, which can affect the material's capacitance and electrochemical reactivity.On the other hand, defective products lack the long-range arrangement of crystalline substances and have a disordered atomic arrangement.The lack of regularity in the atomic structure can lead to lower electrical conductivity in amorphous materials compared to their crystalline counterparts.However, the disordered structure of amorphous materials can also provide an enriched active zone for the electrochemical process to occur, which can enhance their electrochemical reactivity [42].One way to address these challenges is to keep a close eye on the atomiclevel chemical dissolution and surface reconstructive change that occur during electrocatalytic activities.Double perovskite nanopowders had distinctive characteristics that enabled during OER, the surface of a material can rearrange itself dynamically, therefore generating a self-assembled metal hydroxide active layer.The interfacial transition of SrIrO 3 was explored by Suntivich et al.They discovered that crystalline SrIrO 3 's surface became coated in amorphous SryIrO x composed of Ir 4+ O 6 octahedra and Sr 2+-Ir 3+ residue after an electrochemical OER operation.Amorphization concerning SrIrO 3 resulted from lattice oxygen activation, stepcoupled Sr 2+ and O 2− diffusion at (oxide-electrolyte) interface.Zhiwang Li et al. developed the crystalline CeCoO 3 via a hydrothermal approach and changed it into the defective CeCoO 3 via the reduction of urea.The scientist explored that the defective material exhibited lower overpotential as well as a small Tafel slope in comparison to crystalline CeCoO 3 [43].
A second possibility is that an amorphous perovskite catalyst is made early on in the preparation process, which prevents the occurrence of any unnecessary random rearrangement during electrocatalytic water oxidation that will be responsible for the creation of crystal defects [44][45][46].Therefore, crystal defects significantly contributed to the enhancement of OER electrocatalytic reactions [47][48][49].Additionally, remarkable is the fact that amorphous nanocatalysts, in contrast to their nanocrystalline counterparts, generally, display unique features that can be linked back to their disorganized atomic structure as well as unsaturated coordination environments [50,51].The process that involves these strategies for amorphization concerning nanoscale perovskite catalysts has not been widely explored due to the absence of flexible ways for the fabrication of amorphous perovskite nanostructures as well as re-crystallization at higher temperatures.As a result, it is clear that a straightforward technique for manufacturing amorphous nanoscale perovskite catalysts is urgently required [52][53][54].
Doping is considered as a potent strategy to increase the electrochemical feature of the perovskite substances.
There are various types of organic precursor employed as sources of nitrogen precursor.Among the different precursors of nitrogen, urea is considered economical, wide availability, controlled nitrogen release, high nitrogen content and efficient source for doping of nitrogen [55].The doping of nitrogen provided several advantages such as the creation of new active sites on the interfaces of the electrocatalyst, modify the electronic structure and it can also enhance the selectivity of the materials [56].
Nanoscale crystalline CeCoO 3 (COO) perovskite is amorphized evolving, changes into highly disordered condition with improved electrocatalytic OER efficiency.Highly crystalline COO (C-CCO) nanopowders were first produced via a wet chemical approach with higher-temperature calcination for successfully changing the structure of CCO 3 perovskite.C-CCO nanopowders and urea were mixed and heated at 400°C for 3 h before proceeding to cool at room temperature, yielding reduced cerium cobaltite powders.Defective CeCoO 3 (D-CCO) in other contexts show diffraction peaks that have almost completely disappeared and show a transition through the crystalline phase towards a defective state that occurred during the reduction of urea.The electrochemical outcome shows that the D-CCO contains a smaller overpotential of around 300 mV at 10 mA cm −2 along with a Tafel slope around 57.2 mV dec −1 than C-CCO.

Synthesis of CeCoO 3 (CCO)
Cobalt nitrate, citric acid and cerium nitrate were dissolved in DI H 2 O at molar ratios of 1:4:1 in a beaker, gradually by the incorporation of NH 3 with an increase of pH to 7.This solution was stirred for 2 h in order to produce a fluffy precursor.This precursor was used for calcination in an electric furnace at 750°C for 2 h, the temperature being changed at a rate of 5°C per minute to produce pure cerium cobaltite powder.The reaction suspension was then allowed to cool at ambient temperature for obtaining (pristine-CeCoO 3 ).After that a consistent combination of urea (as reducing agent and nitrogen precursor) and CeCoO 3 -pristine nanopowders (mass ratios of 1:5) was created before being put in a tube furnace.Mixed nanopowders were heated to 500°C at 5°C per minute and this temperature was maintained for 2 h in an N 2 environment alongside a flow rate of 40 mL per minute for producing defective cerium Scheme 1. synthesis of the defective CeCoO 3 using urea method.
cobaltite powders (D-CeCoO 3 ).The schematic illustration for the synthesis of defective D-CCO using the urea reduction method is display in Scheme 1.

Physical measurements
Characterization of the synthesized crystalline and defective CeCoO 3 was analysed by using various techniques that include X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8), Fourier transformed infrared (JASCO 6800), scanning electron microscopy configured with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX, NanoNova SEM 200 FEG) and Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET, V3.01 ASAP 2020) for investigation of crystal structure, surface functionality, morphology and textural property of the both pristine and defective CeCoO 3 .

Electrochemical measurements
The 1.0 M KOH solution was employed for all electrochemical analyses at room temperature.Based on the electrochemical workstation (CHI760e), a threeelectrode system was used, with an Ag/AgCl electrode along with a platinum plate selected as a standard electrode as well as an axillary electrode, respectively.The following was employed to convert the potential into RHE.
where E oAg/AgCl = 0.1976 V, pH = 14. (1) The samples were activated via cyclic voltammetry (CV) that ranges from 0 to 2 V (V vs. silver/silver chloride) at a scan rate of 5 mV s −1 .The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves were produced in the range of 0.1-0.8V vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 5 mV s −1 .
Electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) was investigated by utilizing CV curves in the 0-0.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl range at a scan rate of 10-50 mV s −1 using a sweeping speed of 10-50 mV s −1 .Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) curves were measured in the frequency range of 0.1-100 kHz at a voltage of 0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl.Chronopotentiometry analysis was acquired at 10 mA cm −2 for 24 hours.For a comparative analysis, RuO 2 was used as a benchmark in all the electrochemical tests under the same experimental condition.However, the working electrode was synthesized with 5 mg of the fabricated electrocatalyst dispersed in the DI-H 2 O and then sonicated for 10 min to create a homogeneous ink.This electrocatalytic ink is then deposited in the Ni foam (NF) by the drop casting strategy.

Material analysis
X-ray diffraction (XRD) peak of both pristine and defective CeCoO 3 electrocatalyst is depicted in Figure 1(a).These diffraction curves at 2θ = 28.32°,32.40°, 47.29°, 55.86°and 59.10°are attributed to CeO 2 (111), (200), (220), (311), (222) and those diffraction peaks at 30.85°, 37.17°, 44.76°and 64.94°are corresponding to Co 3 O 4 (220), (311), ( 222) and (400).However, the existence of both phases in the XRD diffractogram confirms the successful synthesis of the CeCoO 3 materials in a single phase and their results are well matched with the reported work [57].The pristine CeCoO 3 XRD diffraction pattern shows the crystalline phases of the electrocatalyst and on the other hand, defective CeCoO 3 shows diffraction peaks that have virtually completely disappeared, suggesting that a nearly complete change from the crystalline phase towards an amorphous state responsible for defective sites providing enriched active site during the reduction of urea [58].Therefore, these data of XRD show the role of urea in supporting the annealing process that proves advantageous for the creation of defective catalysts.
The FT-IR spectrum was used for the investigation of the chemical structure as well as functional groups of materials as illustrated in Figure 1(b).The stretching vibrations of Co-O and CeO are linked to three distinct bands in the CeCoO 3 perovskite's spectrum that appeared below 1000 cm −1 .The large intensity transmittance peak observed at 1650.06 cm −1 is due to the OH − group adsorbed at the surface of the electrocatalyst [59].However, a large adsorption band appeared at 3300-3600 cm −1 corresponding to the absorption of the OH group and the absence of additional peaks suggests the pureness of the material.While the fabricated material shows the same reflectance pattern but the C-CCO exhibited a little bit narrow band in origin and the broadness in the peak indicating the defective nature of the D-CCO nanostructure.However, the broadness of the peaks was responsible for the lack of long-range orderness and amorphous surface [60].
Figure 2(a-c) displays the SEM micrograph of the C-CCO and D-CCO at a magnification of 500 nm.The surface area analysis results imply that both samples possess a mesoporous structure since they exhibit an IV Type of isotherm along with a hysteresis curve of H4 in P/P o ranging from 0.0 to 1.0.The specific interface area (89 m 2 g −1 ) of the D-CCO nanomaterial is higher than that of C-CCO nanoparticles (55 m 2 g −1 ) due to their large number of active zones as displayed in Figure 2(d).The porous structure allows electrolyte ions to more efficiently diffuse to the electrolyte ion [61].Figure 2(e) displays the pore size distribution for both the D-CCO and C-CCO with a value of 18 and 22 nm and the pore volume of D-CCO and C-CCO are 0.06 and 0.03 cm 3 g −1 accordingly.The mesoporous structure of D-CCO and C-CCO has a vast surface area that plays a viable part in increasing electrochemical performance by facilitating shorter diffusion pathways, increased surface area for electrochemical reactions and increased speed of electrolyte transport [62].
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was utilized to investigate the chemical nature and electronic structure of CeCoO 3 and their impact on the adsorption behaviour of active regions in electrocatalytic processes.Figure 3 material during the urea reduction process.Here, the N-H-O-Co configuration is formed as NH 4+ is liberated during urea pyrolysis displacing Ce 3+ and weakly interacts with the CoO 6 octahedra.CeCoO 3 's amorphous structure is formed as N-H is removed, and any residual NH 4+ is eliminated [66].which has the potential to significantly accelerate the electrochemical OER due to the fact that active oxygen species are an example of electrophilic reagents with high catalytic oxidation activity.

Electrochemical analysis
Its electrocatalytic property regarding C-CCO and D-CCO electrode material was analysed with the threeelectrode system under an alkaline solution.Figure 4(a) illustrates that D-CCO shows the highest current density along with the prominent faradic behaviour than C-CCO under the same 0-2 V (V vs. RHE).The C-COO shows greater alkaline OER initial potential (onset) at 1.68 V and a steady spike in current density as the applied potential increases, as displayed in Figure 4(b).Whereas D-COO shows a small onset potential (1.44 V) and acts as efficient electrocatalytic activity for the OER process and only needs ultralow overpotentials around 265 and 384 mV for the attaining current densities of 10 cm −2 , accordingly as displayed in Figure 4(c).D-COO has an amorphous shape, nitrogen doping and a modified electronic structure, which likely account for the observed increase in OER activity.The Tafel slope of the defective D-CCO (35.95 mV dec −1 ) is less than crystalline C-CCO-pristine (76.11 mV dec −1 ) indicating the enhanced reaction kinetics concerning OER in the amorphous material as represented in Figure 4(d).The OER analysis revealed that D-CCO exhibited the highest OER electrocatalytic efficiency than the other C-CCO and Ni foam, it might be due to several factors.(i) Defective materials typically have a large density of active zone on their surface, which enhances the electrocatalytic behaviour of the material towards the OER process.(ii) Defective materials can have a larger surface area than their crystalline counterparts, which can offer more surface area for catalytic reactions to occur and increase the efficiency of the OER process.(iii) The amorphous structure can lead to a more irregular surface morphology, which enhances the interfacial roughness and provide more active regions for the OER process [67].(iv) Nitrogen doping also increase the OER activity.Overall, defective materials can offer significant advantages over crystalline materials for the OER process, making them an attractive choice for several applications in energy storage and conversion (Table 1).Table 1 presented the present article with reported previous work.
Additionally, double-layer capacitance (C dl ) experiments were performed for evaluating the ECSA of  fabricated electrocatalysts as represented in Figure 5(a,b).By utilizing the CV procedures, we find that the Cdl of R-COO is 33.96 mF, which is much greater than that of C-CCO (19.86 mF), a higher C dl value indicating a more active surface and greater amounts of stored electrolyte ions as depicted in Figure 5(c,d).Remarkably, D-CCO (8496 cm 2 ) had an ECSA that was higher than the C-CCO (4500 cm 2 ) and was calculated using the following equation [74]: Herein, C dl represents the double layer capacitance as well as C sp represents the specific capacitance regarding conductive substrate (NF, 0.04 mF cm −2 ).The larger surface area of the fabricated electrode material is then responsible for diverse morphology, small crystallite size, nitrogen doping and remarkable electronic structure.
For further evaluating charge transfer rates concerning electrocatalysts, EIS measurements performed at applied potential 0.55 V in frequency ranging from 100 Hz to 100 kHz as shown in Figure 6(a).The declined semi-circle indicates charge transfer resistance (R ct ) among electrode material as well as electrolyte ion.when OER is activated, its charge transfer rate increases and the R ct value decreases and vice versa.The obtained Nyquist plot shows that the R ct of D-CCO (0.38 ) is smaller than that of C-CCO (1.2 ).This result suggests that the amorphization of the perovskite nanostructure of R-COO makes fast electron transport among electrodes and electrolyte feasiblity in C-COO [75].Additionally, there are some other factors that also contribute to reducing the value of R ct .(i) The lack of long-range order in defective materials results in the presence of defects and disorder in the material.These defects can act as catalytic zones and promote the OER reaction, resulting in lower charge transfer resistance [76], (ii) defective materials often have a porous structure that permits effective mass transportation of reactants and products to and from the reaction sites [77].This can increase the reaction rate and decline the charge transfer resistance.(iii) Defective materials typically have a high surface area, which provides an enriched active area for the OER  process to occur and (iv) nitrogen doping also increases the OER activity of D-CCO [78]. Figure 6(b) depicts that the R-COO shows a straight line over the current density of 96 mA cm −2 at an applied potential of 0.75 V for 50 h.The chronoamperometry result indicates that the material exhibited stable behaviour than that of the C-COO and RuO 2 as a benchmark due to existence of a large number of active sites responsible for the high charge transfer rate.
Therefore, D-CCO demonstrates better OER properties than C-CCO and recently reported perovskite OER catalysts including low Tafel slope and overpotential, quick charge transfer, along with remarkable long-term flexibility.One benefit is that the amorphization of CCO perovskite nanostructures and nitrogen doping creates the structure defect that results in high active-site densities as well as large exposed surface areas that are required for the resultant CCO electrocatalytic activities for water oxidation.

Conclusion
In conclusion, we suggest that a straightforward urea reduction procedure can successfully convert a nanometer-sized CCO catalyst into an amorphous form and nitrogen doping also create defective sites.This inexpensive, readily available, and simple-to-build defective nanoscale CCO catalyst with disordered structure exhibits a lower overpotential of 265 mV at 10 mA cm −2 , a low Tafel slope of 35.95 mV dec −1 , along with significant anodic currents in alkaline solutions.The D-CCO nanocatalyst also demonstrates outstanding stability for catalysis, with virtually full activity retention after 50 h.However, several characterization techniques, such as XRD confirm the synthesis of urea aid towards defective CCO and their diffused and agglomerated morphology was also observed via SEM.The BET analysis also showed a larger surface area of D-CCO (89 m 2 g −1 ) than the C-CCO (55 m 2 g −1 ).In addition to confirming a highly muddled nanoscale structure and an optimized electronic arrangement with many defects, this material analysis also provided a fine explanation for the electrochemical behaviours that resulted in OER's accelerated activity and extraordinary durability.A possible active, highly stable and reasonably priced electrocatalyst may be produced by combining perovskite nanoparticles with the amorphous state.Our finding opens a new avenue for sutural engineering to enhance the electrochemical property of the electrocatalyst towards water splitting and it can be employed for solutions of other environmental issues.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) Diffraction pattern and (b) FTIR spectra of C-CCO and D-CCO.

Figure 2 (
a) displays sharp with a defined boundary of irregular nanoparticles, indicating the crystalline morphology of C-CCO nanoparticles.Besides this, Figure 2(b) depicted the agglomerated, random, diffused and with no prominent nanoparticles showing the D-CCO morphology of the nanostructures.To

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. (a, b) ECSA and (c, d) Cdl plot profile of C-CCO and D-CCO.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.(a) Nyquist plot profile and (b) chronoamperometry analysis of all fabricated material.

Table 1 .
Comparative analysis of reported research and fabricated materials.