A state against boys’ love? Reviewing the trajectory of censorship over danmei

ABSTRACT Practices of online censorship around boys’ love (danmei) in mainland China have exhibited continuous change, with varying media targets and nominal justifications. This article explores dynamic transformations in the strategies employed by authorities, media platforms, and danmei creators throughout different time periods. Based on the authors’ archival research, the censorship of danmei can be classified into three distinct stages: the years 2004 to 2015, 2016 to 2020, and 2021 to the present. These periods are distinguished by the primary danmei media form that authorities most often target for censorship. We argue that China’s digital censorship apparatus has given rise to an unrelenting and intensifying suppression of danmei content, which is further bolstered by the sustained promotion of a media discourse that fosters a culture of disdain for danmei, and hence, has limited spaces for the expansion of danmei fandom and its practitioners’ creativity. Moreover, we suggest that there is a continuous and combative interplay between danmei culture and censorship, wherein creative practices become highly responsive to government regulations and vice versa.


Introduction
Boys' Love (BL) is a genre that portrays male-male romantic and/or erotic relationships.Its origins can be traced back to Japanese comics in the 1970s, and it has gained significant popularity in the Chinese media landscape during the past two decades.In the Chinese context, this genre is commonly referred to as danmei, a term that directly translates to 'addicted to beauty,' borrowed from the Japanese word 'tanbi.'While BL and danmei can often be used interchangeably, danmei is the preferred term within the Chinese media sphere.The danmei genre made its debut in China towards the end of the 1990s, primarily influenced by Japanese BL manga and fiction, with its introduction facilitated through transit ports in Taiwan and Hong Kong.In contemporary times, danmei in China has evolved to establish its distinct identity, seamlessly integrating with a diverse array of local and global media and celebrity cultures.It has developed into a transnational, all-encompassing, and predominantly female-driven meta-fan culture (Hu, Jin, and Liao 2023).
Danmei culture encompasses a wide spectrum of media formats, including fiction, manga, anime, games, audio drama, web series, music, and cosplay.Nevertheless, due to its dual association with homosexuality and sexually explicit content, danmei stories often find themselves in the crosshairs of state censorship and the regulations imposed by media platforms, particularly those works featuring explicit male-male sex scenes (Chao  2016; Yang and Xu 2016).In China, some critics have accused the danmei genre of excessively featuring male effeminacy, leading to its suppression under the party-state's han-xu (reticent) politics (Hu et al. 2023).This governance strategy primarily involves rendering danmei culture invisible, including removal of the danmei-adapted dramas on video platforms, online blocking of certain danmei fiction, and removal of discussion posts on dammei works on social media.If these measures prove ineffective, more stringent actions are taken, including banning cultural forms that challenge the prevailing hegemonic masculinity.This politics is enacted, in turn, to perpetuate the existing heteropatriarchal socio-familial system (Hu et al. 2023).
This article focuses on the dynamic interplay between censorship around danmei culture and danmei participants' responses to censorship in mainland China.We investigate how authoritative censorship, media platforms' self-censorship, and danmei creators' responses have shaped the trajectory of danmei censorship over different time periods.Drawing from the authors' investigative archival research, the variations in the censorship over danmei can be classified into three stages (2004-2015; 2016-2020; 2021-present), each targeting a specific danmei media form.Mainland China's digital censorship consistently targets the danmei genre, transitioning its focus from online literature to web dramas.This shift throughout the three periods has resulted in an unyielding and escalating suppression of danmei content.The establishment of an enduring media discourse that fosters contempt for danmei further reinforces this suppression, which not only limits the spaces for the expansion of danmei fandom but also leads to selfcensorship from danmei practitioners themselves.We suggest that danmei culture and the state censorship are mutually responsive, giving rise to new forms of visibility -and invisibility -for danmei communities.Therefore, the marginalization does not only apply to danmei creation and production but also extends to a wider range of narratives depicting homo-intimacy.This research aims to build on existing scholarship on digital censorship in China (e.g.Li 2023; Wacker 2003) highlighting its impact on the cultural landscape and gender-related digital policies in mainland China.

From 2004 to 2015: stigmatizing danmei as obscenity
The danmei genre emerged in mainland China during the 1990s, primarily finding its footing in the realm of fiction published online.In its early days, the bans on danmei were particularly concerned with explicit sexual depictions and labelled online literature with homosexual-related content as obscene.In 2004, the Committee of Internet Society of China and Internet News Information Service introduced the 'Website Selfdiscipline Regulations of Forbidding to Disseminate Obscene, Pornographic, and Other Negative Information.'This regulation included a clause that initially aimed to prohibit the portrayal of homosexual intercourse and other forms of perceived sexual perversion. 1 Notably, this regulation marked the first instance of a state-level official document specifically claiming homosexuality as obscenity and classifying the representation of male-male sex scenes as sexual perversion.Given that danmei works frequently involve explicit depictions of male homoeroticism, this genre has come to be regarded as obscenity as well.
Since 2011, Chinese authorities have consistently imposed long-standing regulations on online literature platforms, including those hosting danmei content.This led to the shutdown of numerous danmei and queer-related forums and websites.An illustrative case of legal action against danmei online literature unfolded in Zhengzhou, Henan Province in 2011.It involved the closure of a danmei fiction website and the arrest of its male founder and several contracted writers, mostly young women.The founder was subsequently sentenced to one and a half years of imprisonment and fined RMB100,000 (USD13,903).The fate of the writers involved in this case remains uncertain. 2Media reports on this case primarily emphasized danmei's 'abnormal' homosexual and pornographic content and its perceived negative influence on young people. 3n 2014, danmei communities faced significant repercussions due to the national antiporn campaign that aimed to eliminate the pornographic content in online novels.Under the higher level of pressure, the online literature platforms had to practice self-censorship, especially for the danmei genre that involves male-male erotic depictions. 4For instance, Baidu, the Chinese Internet giant, blocked several danmei-related Tieba (literally post bar, online interests-based forums hosted by Baidu), including Danmei Bar and Funü Bar. 5 Jinjiang Literature City (hereafter Jinjiang) took a different approach by renaming its danmei channel as 'chun'ai' (literally 'pure love') to distance itself from danmei and present a more 'sanitized' version of male homoeroticism. 6Furthermore, Jinjiang implemented stricter content guidelines, exceeding government expectations by banning any depiction of body parts 'below the neck.' Intimate scenes with sexually explicit content, except for mouth-kissing and handholding, were strictly prohibited by Jinjiang's self-censorship (Yang and Xu 2016).
In response to Jinjiang's increased censorship, the platform's contracted novelists had to significantly self-censor and adapt their creative styles to avoid explicit sexual depictions.Instead, they employed various techniques to convey subtle sexual undertones in their writings, such as metaphors, coded language, and satire.Some writers even resorted to using hyperlinks to direct readers to external websites that allowed more detailed sexual content (Wang 2019).However, in 2021, Jinjiang officially prohibited external links to sexual content, making them unpublishable. 7Simultaneously, since the 2010s, many readers and more experienced writers turned to Changpei as an alternative, due to Jinjiang's excessive self-censorship. 8However, this relative freedom on Changpei was short-lived.Once Changpei grew into a fully-fledged commercial website for publishing and consuming danmei stories, the party-state censorship system also began to recognize Changpei and to exert its regulatatory power.At the same time, to sustain its operation, Changpei also began to self-censor its platform by removing content and directly urging its writers not to publish sexually explicit scenes.
Overall, censorship during the 2004-2015 period primarily targeted online novels, both heterosexual and homosexual, under the guise of 'anti-porn' measures.While the authorities started to propel the top-down censorship, the online literature platforms played a key role in practicing self-censorship under state pressure, and paid special attention to the danmei genre.However, danmei culture managed to survive after this national Internet 'anti-porn' campaign, with danmei creators on mainstream online fiction websites avoiding explicit sexual depictions to continue their work.
From 2016 to 2020: the rise of web dramas and the crackdown on 'illegal' publications The second stage, spanning from 2016 to 2020, witnessed a remarkable surge in the commercialization of danmei, particularly its adaptation into web dramas and entry into mainstream media.This surge attracted a considerable influx of new fans.In this phase, the focus of censorship over danmei shifted from online novels to danmei-adapted web dramas.
The year 2016 marked a significant milestone for Chinese danmei fandom through the first well-known danmei-adapted drama, Addiction, which was widely popularized through streaming websites. 9However, this show was abruptly blocked by the State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT) on 26 February 2016, even though the series remained unfinished.Simultaneously, as evident from subsequent media coverage, the two leading actors, Jingyu Huang and Weizhou Xu, were prohibited from appearing together in any show or public occasion.This turn of events exemplifies the challenges faced by the danmei community in gaining mainstream acceptance and the subsequent government intervention in response to its growing visibility.
The ban on Addiction had profound implications, not only for the morale of danmei fans but also for the entertainment industry.While the show had provided hope and incentives to the industry, its ban signified the rejection of danmei culture's entry into the mainstream.The catalyst for this divide can be traced back to the release of the 'General Rules of TV Drama Production' by the China Television Production Committee and the China Television Drama Production Association.These rules came into effect on 2 March 2016, and outlined the content that was not allowed in television dramas.Within the section on pornography and obscenity, one item prohibited the depiction of abnormal sexual relations and behaviours, including including incest, homosexuality, sexual perversion, rape, abuse, and violence. 10The enforcement of these rules, which remain unchanged at the time of this publication, effectively meant that storylines from danmei novels and explicit portrayals of male-male romance could not pass the censors.This presented a significant challenge for adapting these novels into streaming media.In response to this restriction, Chinese danmei-adapted web dramas adopted a strategy of 'bromance-as-masquerade.' This strategy allowed them to depict male-male romance under the guise of homosocial bromance, enabling them to pass censorship and engage with mainstream media (Hu and Wang 2021).Examples of such web dramas include Guardian (2018), S.C.I.Mystery (2018), The Untamed (2019) and Word of Honor (2021). 11In these dramas, the intimate relationships between male characters are portrayed as 'friends' rather than 'boyfriends,' allowing danmei fans to actively engage their imaginations and enjoy male homoeroticism while watching these adapted BL stories (Ge 2022).
During Stage Two, the censorship over danmei in online fiction shifted from top-down authoritative censorship to increased self-censorship by platforms.This phase also saw a more severe legal crackdown by the National Office Against Pornography and Illegal Publications, which in some cases pursued criminal sentences against writers.This new approach led to the sentencing of two young amateur danmei writers, Tianyi and Shenhai Xiansheng, in the Anhui and Hubei provinces, respectively. 12Tianyi was sentenced to ten and a half years in prison for the production and sale of obscene materials for profit, with a fine of RMB150,000 (approximately USD23,500), as per official reports.While her arrest, along with publishers, editors, and printers, occurred in 2017, the case was only made public in November 2018 when Tianyi was sentenced (Tian 2020).In the second case, Shenhai was arrested in 2017 and received a four-year prison sentence along with a substantial penalty for illegal business operations (RMB1,180,000, approximately USD 18,530,000 according to official reports) in 2019. 13This phase of censorship involved a widespread reporting system, where informants within fan communities reported writers for 'pornography' to the authorities, resulting in arrests or bans on their works.The campaign from the National Office Against Pornography and Illegal Publications made peer-to-peer reporting a common practice within online fan communities, with some portraying themselves as 'fandom police,' using censorship as a weapon to report 'illegal' comments from rivals, escalating fan conflicts (Wang and Ge 2023).During this period, there was an increase in Netizens using government censorship mechanisms to persecute individuals with opposing viewpoints, and this practice was widely documented until at least 2019 (Zheng 2019).
These two instances of criminalizing danmei writers not only pressured online platforms to intensify their self-censorship, but also created widespread panic among danmei writers and fans.Many felt compelled to remove or significantly censor their works, especially those with sexual content.Following investigations by the National Office Against Pornography and Illegal Publications, several online literature platforms, including Jinjiang, Fanqie (also known as 'tomato'), and Midu, were reprimanded for the perceived negative impact of pornography on teenagers, and were required to undertake self-rectification measures. 14In a significant move, Jinjiang, one of the most influential platforms, announced a server disconnect for 15 days in July 2019, without specifying the exact reasons for this action. 15During this period and continuing into 2020, numerous fictions, including well-known works like Moxiang Tongxiu's The Grandmaster of Demonic Cultivation, were blocked and have not been re-released. 16These developments were a source of significant concern for the danmei community.In 2020, the influence of censorship extended to Lofter, a Chinese platform for publishing and consuming fanfiction and other forms of fan arts.Lofter removed many danmei-related tags, texts, and images, citing a data adjustment as its official reason, although this move was widely interpreted as a manifestation of the censorship challenges faced by the danmei community.
Before 2016, a growing number of novelists and creators had participated in custom printing through amateur self-publishing, inspired by the success of fanzines/dōjinshi.Many of these publications were authorized by the writers themselves before 2014, but gradually, such self-publication practices waned as control tightened around publications without official ISBNs.As noted by Zheng (2019), Chinese fan communities developed an efficient network for dōjinshi production and sales during that period.Writers typically promoted their printed works through social media, with fans purchasing print versions as souvenirs since they had already read the stories online.However, prosecutions launched under the guise of policing illegal publications had a chilling effect on both danmei writers and fans who did not seek formal publications, as indicated by the cases of Shenhai Xiansheng and Tianyi above (Bai 2021).Contracted danmei writers were forced to downplay the depiction of sexual relationships, and more writers followed the path of early pioneers by seeking publishers in Taiwan and Hong Kong to secure complete versions in hardcopies.While there is no official statement openly declaring opposition to queer content, the stricter crackdown on danmei writers in the name of combatting pornography creation implies that queer-related media will also be targeted as so-called taboo content.Curtailing danmei novelists' self-publishing through potential legal threats has proven to be a significant deterrent for all danmei practitioners, cutting off their incentive to pursue opportunities for publishing completed versions beyond mainland China.It implies the mainland China's discouragement for novelists from publishing uncensored versions outside of China in order to prevent the risk of authors' publishing controversial material aborad.While some individuals may use VPNs to access blocked websites or circumvent censorship measures, they may not necessarily be effective for publishing content that violates Chinese censorship laws.

From 2021 to the present: crackdown on danmei-adapted web dramas and establishing the anti-danmei media discourse
In the third stage of censorship over danmei, which began in 2021, a new regulatory approach emerged, utilizing state media criticism as the initial step, followed by top-down authoritative measures to compel digital platforms to self-censor.This stage saw a significant clampdown on danmei-adapted dramas, especially after state media published a series of critical articles branding them as a form of 'vulgar culture' in line with the 'Internet cleanup campaign' initiated in August 2021.
Editorials from the Xinhua News Agency in March 2021 contended that danmei stories excessively fuelled irrational fanaticism and consumption among adolescents, and therefore needed to be regulated. 17An article published by the Guangming Daily in August that same year emphasized the perceived vulgarity in male-male flirting, the distorted aesthetics of male femininity, and the promotion of authorities' preferred hypermasculinity, while depreciating opposing viewpoints that were deemed detrimental to young people's values. 18In September, the Central Propaganda Department (CPD) issued the 'Article of Comprehensive Management of the Cultural and Entertainment Sector,' which pointed out concerns related to 'traffic and commercial dominance,' 'distorted aesthetics,' 'fandom community chaos,' and danmei adaptations as new issues contaminating the social environment and as particularly harmful to teenagers. 19CPD and the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) officials also convened a meeting with major game production companies and new media platforms, including Tencent and NetEase, to emphasize the need for heightened political awareness. 20On September 16, the State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT) held a conference in Beijing to officially declare their stance on boycotting danmei adaptations and addressing the perceived issues within fandom communities. 21Since then, danmei-adapted dramas have faced a stark decline, in contrast to the few years of prosperity buoyed by Addiction in 2016.The previously utilized bromance-as-masquerade strategy is no longer accepted by the state, resulting in many completed danmei-adapted dramas remaining unreleased, such as Immorality and You by My Side. 22he state media's anti-danmei discourse has effectively equated danmei adaptation with male effeminacy, creating a foundation for intensive denunciation of the genre and stirring heated opposition against danmei in online spaces.Non-normative expressions of masculinity within danmei content are seen as substantial threats by the hypermasculine party-state, whose authoritative power and promotion of hegemonic masculinities were significantly reinforced during their strict pandemic control measures from early 2020 to late 2022 (Hu et al. 2023).In this environment, numerous popular media platforms encompassing online literature, manga, and audio dramas, where danmei content was prevalent, were compelled to implement stringent self-censorship measures.Specifically, platforms like Jinjiang, Fanqie, Bilibili Manga (a manga and anime platform), and Miss Evan (an audio drama platform) removed their danmei channels.While danmei works were not deleted, users could only access them by directly searching for specific titles.Jinjiang went further by blocking some well-known danmei fiction without specifying reasons, especially those for which copyrights had been sold for web drama adaptation. 23Additionally, in October 2021, Jinjiang announced the implementation of a grading system based on genre, style, and readers' age, without disclosing specific criteria. 24Authors of the blocked novels provided no explanation but indicated that they were revising their works.Consequently, many fans speculated that these authors may have been pressured by drama production companies to remove their original male-male romance novels.Through the removal of the original source material, the web drama adaptations could be presented as 'original' works without any connection to danmei themes.This strategy appears to have emerged in order to navigate the boundaries of state censorship, and it enables completed web series to be released without any risky links to the original danmei authors.

Concluding remarks
This article highlights a significant shift in the primary target of danmei censorship over the last two decades, and illuminates the dynamics between state censorship, selfcensorship from digital platforms, and responses from danmei producers in mainland China.Before 2016, the focus of state regulation was primarily on danmei fiction serialized online, but it shifted to hardcopies of self-published works between 2016 and 2020.Since 2021, state regulators have heightened efforts to remove all forms of danmei-adapted web dramas, such that web dramas now seek to remove associations with the danmei texts from which they have been adapted.The censorship system has changed from a simple top-down practice initiated by authorities over the past two decades to a more complex system involving collaboration between state authorities, official media, commercial media and digital platforms, and netizens who 'report' on their peers through digital platform tools linked to government censors.This comprehensive crackdown goes beyond targeting danmei and queer-related content in the broader new media space: it has also subtended a growing media discourse that promotes the hatred of danmei.This finding resonates with Li's (2023) argument that China's Internet censorship system defies simple characterization as a top-down instrument of punitive control.Rather, Chinese authorities have tactically developed approaches that foster self-regulation practices among both citizens and Internet service providers (ISPs).Correspondingly, many Chinese Internet users also employ direct and indirect methods to challenge the government's censorship system, highlighting the potential for censorship to provoke creative forms of resistance -albeit, within notable constraints.
This review article predominantly employs secondary data derived from pertinent official documents, statements, announcements, and media reports on danmei censorship, rather than primary data from digital platforms.Consequently, we do not have more spaces to link our discussion with the data acquired from our direct interactions with danmei participants, which may prevent us from offering more detailed analysis of danmei practitioners' relationships to digital censorship.To address these constraints, we call for a comprehensive evaluation of diverse perspectives within the danmei culture and broader Chinese queer media domains in future research to explore further the dynamics among producers, consumers, media platforms, commercial capitals and the Chinese party-state.