Clinical outcomes and functional recovery after temporomandibular joint replacement: a six-month follow-up study

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. Clinical outcomes and functional recovery after temporomandibular joint replacement: a six-month follow-up study Emilie Sapin de Brosses, A.-S Bonnet, N. Zwetyenga


Introduction
Temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) is recognized to solve pain and functional limitations when other less invasive strategies failed. TMJR consists in condyle osteotomy (leading to the section of the lateral pterygoid muscle) followed by the fixation of the fossa and the mandibular components. The surgery leads to immediate pain relief and a progressive increase of the mouth opening, assessed by the gap between the upper and lower incisal teeth. Other parameters were rarely considered such as the trajectories of mandibular landmarks (Wojczy nska et al. 2019). Our study combines the assessment of the quality of life (QoL) outcomes with quantitative functional measurementselectromyography (EMG) of the masticatory muscles and 3 D mandibular motions in order to evaluate the mid-term effects of TMJR.

Methods
A national ethical committee validated the protocol and all the subjects gave their consent to participate.

Subjects
Five females (P1 to P5, 63 ± 7.6 years old), who suffered from advanced TMJ osteoarthritis, underwent unilateral TMJR. They participated in four measurements: one before and three after the surgery at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of follow-up. 29 asymptomatic volonteers were also considered as a reference group (18 males & 11 females, 37 ± 12 years old). Inclusion criteria were a type 1 dental occlusion, and the absence of previous TMJ disorders, clicking joint, cephalalgia and tinnitus.

EMG of the masticatory muscles
The muscular activities of the masseters (M), anterior temporalis (T) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles were recorded during the rest and the maximal volontary contraction (MVC) obtained by clenching on dental cottons or by rotating the head, following the protocol described by Sapin-de Brosses et al. (2019). The values were compared to 10 females having the patients' morphotype among the reference group.

Mandibular kinematic measurement
The mandibular 3 D positions were recorded using the CMS-20-JMA device (Zebris GmbH, Germany) composed by a mobile transmitter unit glued on the mandibular teeth, and a receiving unit placed on the head. Cranial and mandibular landmarks were palpated while keeping the mouth closed. The 3 D coordinates of the mandibular points were then provided at each time during thirty opening-closing movements. The six mandibular degrees of freedom (DOF) were computed with an accuracy of 0.26 mm for the translations and 0.5 for the rotations (Koeppel et al. 2015).

Clinical outcomes
No surgical complications occurred. The pain, rated at the maximum for 4 over the 5 patients before TMJR, was reduced to a controlled pain for all the patients one month after the surgery. The pain relief is sustainable: 4 patients had no more pain 3 months post-surgery and after on. The quality of life, rated as "poor" to "moderate" before the surgery, increased for all the patients from three months after the TMJR.

Functional recovery: muscular activities
Before the surgery, the patients had difficulty to relax due to the extreme pain, revealed by the high muscular activities for all the muscles during the rest (4 to 8 mV vs a maximum of 4 mV for the reference group).
After the surgery, the activities during the rest progressively decreased and stabilized within the asymptomatic range. The MVC values were significantly smaller than for the asymptomatic women before the surgery for the suffering side, and close or within the asymptomatic range for the contralateral side ( Figure 1). After the surgery, the MVC activities globally increased for all the muscles and both sides. Six months after the surgery, the MVC values were in the asymptomatic range for the SCM muscles. They were smaller than the asymptomatic values for the T and M muscles for the prosthetic side, with the exception of patient P4. The difficulty to obtain patients' maximal contraction by biting on the cottons should be noticed, due to a lack of intraoral feeling or the fear of suffering. Interestingly, patient P4 who recovered asymptomatic contractions for both sides, was the unique patient performing daily sessions of physiotherapy.

Kinematic analysis
Before the surgery, the vertical displacement of the inter-incisal point was on average limited to the half of the asymptomatic opening (18.9 ± 9.6 mm vs 39.5 ± 5.7 mm respectively). This magnitude significantly increased three months after the surgery and later on. Six months after the TMJR, mouth opening reached between 80% and 800% of the preoperative value depending on the patient, but remained lower than the asymptomatic one (average of 25.9 ± 3.5 mm).
The analysis of the six mandibular DOF provides insights into the mandibular behaviour with the prosthesis. Before the surgery, all the DOF were smaller than the asymptomatic values (Table 1), which is consistent with the limitation of the mouth opening.
One month after TMJR, mandibular translations were nearly zero. The rotation around the intercondylar axis (IC) was divided by a factor of two and represented the third of the asymptomatic IC value. On the contrary, the frontal tilt and the axial rotation increased and were higher than the asymptomatic range. The translations increased with time but remained lower than the asymptomatic values six months after TMJR. As expected, the anterior-posterior (AP) and inferior-posterior (IS) translations were limited, due to the design of the prosthesis that ensures vertical contact between the prosthetic elements and avoids anterior luxation. The lack of translation was compensated by the mandibular tilt and axial rotation towards the prosthetic side to allow the anterior displacement of the contralateral natural condylar pole. The IC rotation increased with time and reached on average 21 six months after TMJR but was smaller than the asymptomatic rotation.