Waste sulfur from biogas desulphurization: a supplement of Brassica napus L. nutrition

Abstract The content of sulfur in soils has been declining. Possible option to supply sulfur into the soil can be utilization of waste sulfur from biogas production. Two pot experiments with identical treatments were established to examine the effect of waste sulfur from biogas plant applied solely and in mixture with other nutrients on the growth and yield of oilseed rape. The included treatments were control, waste elemental sulfur (S), S + boron (B), S + B + humic substances (HS), S + B + HS + ammonium sulfate (AS), S + B + HS + ammonium nitrate (AN). The results from the first experiment showed significant increase in N-tester values and aboveground biomass after the treatments with S enhanced with both mineral fertilizers compared to any other treatments. The content of N and S in plants was also higher after these treatments. This was confirmed by second experiment. The seed yield was highest after the same treatments. The result from both experiments proved, that reutilization of waste S can be an interesting option. The application of sole waste S is a viable possibility. However, the mixture of sulfur with AS and AN is a more optimal alternative. Such combination could lead to better N use efficiency due to the co-application of N and S and also presents an interesting compromise to an overall lower consumption of mineral fertilizers (especially N) while adding more sulfur to the soil, especially in mixture with AS. This treatment resulted in the highest seed yield and production of oil in comparison with any other treatment.


Introduction
In the last decades, crops have often suffered from a lack of sulfur in the soil, as it has been reported by many authors (Feinberg et al. 2021;Kulh� anek et al. 2016;Scherer 2009).The deficiency of S is a result of low consumption of conventional sulfur containing fertilizers and organic fertilizers, intensification of crop production yields mostly via low-S or S-free fertilizers like Urea, leaching sulfates out of the soil and especially decrease of air pollution.Since 1990, SO 2 emissions in EU have been reduced by almost 80% (Degryse et al. 2016) and the sulfur deposition should further decrease until 2050 (Engardt et al. 2017).The atmospheric deposition of S in Czech Republic is about 5 kg ha −1 per year (CHMI 2019).Zb� ıral, Smatanov� a, and N� emec (2018) have described a highly statistically significant decrease of S in our soil from 33 mg kg −1 in year 1981 to average 8 mg kg −1 in year 2017 caused by the reduction of sulfur emissions.
Similar decline in the atmospheric deposition of S from 100 kg ha −1 to 5-20 kg ha −1 per year in United Kingdom is described by Campbell and Smith (1997).Therefore, it is crucial to fertilize by sulfur in addition to the other essential nutrients, especially because of the increased cultivation of high yielding crops (and cultivars) with high sulfur requirements (Zenda et al. 2021).
Sulfur has a key role in the synthesis of cysteine, methionine, and some vitamins (Schoenau and Sukhdev 2008).Sulfur is also necessary for the vegetative growth (Narayan et al. 2022).Plants take up sulfur from the soil solution, mainly as sulfate ion SO 4 2− .Sulfur is commonly applied in the form of mineral fertilizers, and the co-application with nitrogen is often recommended as these nutrients have been proved to have good synergy (Dubousset, Etienne, and Avice 2010;Fismes et al. 2000).Salvagiotti and Miralles (2008) described the increase of biomass and grain yield after S fertilization and the positive interaction between N and S, which resulted in a greater nitrogen use efficiency.Sulfur deficiency also lowers the utilization of N and results in a deterioration in crop quality (Carciochi et al. 2017).As sulfur is an essential constituent of enzymes involved in N metabolism, its deficiency could decrease N assimilation and effectiveness of N 2 fixation (Grzebisz, Niewiadomska, and Przygocka-Cyna 2022).The accumulation of nitrates in S-deficient plants (Salvagiotti et al. 2009) have been also described, similar as accumulation of trace elements (Na and Salt 2011) and heavy metals stress response or increased susceptibility do diseases (Dubuis et al. 2005).In addition, Haneklaus, Bloem, and Schnug (2007) reported that each kg of S deficit causes up to 15 kg of nitrogen to be lost in the environment.Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) is one of the major crops worldwide (Shahzadi et al. 2015) with the high demand for sulfur fertilization (Sienkiewicz-Cholewa and Kieloch 2015).Sulfur, together with boron, are essential for a synthesis of glucosinolates and sulfur amino acids (Zhao et al. 1993).Approximately 16 kg of sulfur per ha is required to produce 1 t of rape seeds according to the Var� enyiov� a, Ducsay, and Ryant (2017).Because of this high demand for S, oilseed rape is particularly sensitive to sulfur deficiency compared to the other crops such as cereals or legumes (Zhao et al. 1997).For the oilseed rape, S has an important role in production of oil and total oil content (Egesel, G€ ul, and Kahrıman 2009;Jankowski 2008).Besides common sulfur containing fertilizers, some wastes from industrial production can be used as a source of this plant nutrient.A possible source of such waste sulfur is a biogas production.By application of this waste, it is possible to return at least part of the sulfur consumed by biomass utilized in the biogas plant back into the agroecosystem.
Biogas production is a currently promoted source of renewable energy, which can produce sulfur as a waste product.The European Green Deal sets to lower the greenhouse emission by at least 55% by the year 2030 and the biogas and biomethane should play a key role in Europe transition to the cleaner energy utilization according to the European Biogas Association (Arnau et al. 2020).Biogas contains hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), which is removed in the biogas purification process while producing waste sulfur.The reutilization (Dong et al. 2022) of waste sulfur obtained from the biogas pre-treating process seems to be promising from the point of view of plant nutrition (Fontaine, Eriksen, and Sørensen 2021) and especially from the economic aspect of biogas production.It also provides a possible decrease in the use of common mineral fertilizers (which often requires an input of nonrenewable resources), decrease in the amount of waste deposited in the landfills and decrease in sulfur deficiency in the environment (Lisowska et al. 2022).Another possible positive effect of waste sulfur is the elemental form of sulfur, which acts much slower in the soil and have to be oxidize before it becomes available to the plants (Fontaine, Eriksen, and Sørensen 2021).Therefore, it can provide the plant-available sulfate more gradually, especially in combination with mineral fertilizers.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of fertilization with waste elemental sulfur from biogas production solely and in combination with additional sources of nutrients.The waste sulfur from biogas plant is still an unconventional source of sulfur in common agriculture, therefore, our goal was to evaluate its positive or negative effects on oilseed rape growth and yield in comparison with the untreated plants.The main hypothesis was, that application of waste sulfur obtained from biogas plant after desulphurization process is going to have a positive effect on plant yield and growth in comparison with untreated plants.Second hypothesis was, that the application of other nutrients in the combination with waste S is going to enhance the possible effect of solely applied waste sulfur.The plant-growth experiment (2019) was established in smaller pots to examine the effect of waste sulfur treatments during the early vegetation stages of oilseed rape, the plant-yield experiment (2019-2020) with the identical treatments was established in Mitscherlich pots to verify the effect of waste sulfur treatments on the yield and quality of oilseed rape.Such reutilization of waste sulfur back in agriculture is suitable from the economic aspect of biogas purification and waste management.The application of this sulfur could help to reduce the consumption of mineral fertilizers and, at the same time, address the deficient sulfur content in the soil and plants.

Materials and methods
The two pot experiments were established in the greenhouse (2019) and vegetation hall (2019-2020) of the Biotechnological house at Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (49•12 0 36.94"N and 16•36 0 49.95" E).

Plant-growth experiment
The pilot experiment was established in smaller plastic pots (ø ¼ 10 cm, height 12 cm) with 2.8 kg of soil per pot with the idea to observe the effect of waste sulfur and its possible combinations with boron, humic substances, and mineral fertilizers on oilseed rape during the early vegetation stages.The soil was imported in large quantities from the locality � Zab� cice (49•1 0 9.009" N and 16•35 0 29.64"E) before the start of the first experiment.Then, it was air dried and homogenized by hand using an expanded mesh panel throwing screen sieve (2 cm diameter sieve) at our university.Then, it was analyzed and used in the experiment.The agrochemical properties of used soil determined according to the certified methodology (Zb� ıral, Mal� y, and V� a� na 2011) are given in Table 1.The oilseed rape (intensive hybrid variety DK Excellium; Dekalb) was sown on July 29, 2019.The application of fertilizers was performed in the form of a solution (240 ml per pot) applied to the soil surface after the sowing.The treatments included in the experiments were: 1. unfertilized control (Control), 2. waste elemental sulfur (S), 3. S þ boron (B), 4. S þ B þ humic substances (HS), The examined treatments and fertilizers doses are described in Table 2.The fertilizers rates used in the pot experiments were converted from the field fertilizers rates: 75 and 100 kg ha −1 S, 1 kg ha −1 B, 1.05 kg ha −1 of HS, 25 kg ha −1 S in AS and 22 kg ha −1 of AN.The suspension of waste elemental sulfur (12% S 0 ) was obtained by the desulfurization of biogas using the ThiopaqV R scrubber (Paques, Balk, The Netherlands), which works by washing the raw biogas with a slightly alkaline solution (pH 8-9) and the subsequent biological oxidation of sulfides to elemental sulfur.The elemental sulfur particle size in the suspension was less than 60 lm (96.9% of the particles).The waste sulfur was mixed with other nutrients according to  Skarpa et al. (2023).The aboveground biomass (AGB) of the rape plants were subsequently manually harvested, dried, and weighed that day.The results of dry matter (DM) of AGB were expressed as a 1 plant per pot (weight from pot/5), as the first, plant-growth experiment was mainly focused on the growth.

Plant-yield experiment
The subsequent, plant-yield experiment was established in Mitscherlich pots (ø ¼ 20 cm, height 17.5 cm, STOMA GmbH, Siegburg, Germany) filled with 6.5 kg of air-dried and sieved soil.Soil from the same spot and locality as in the previous experiment was used, as it was prepared before the start of the first experiment in large quantity (Table 1).The examined treatments were also the same (Table 2).The experiment was established on the December 4, 2019, and the fertilization in form of solution was performed immediately after the sowing, identically to the first experiment.Each treatment had six repetitions.Main goal of this plant-yield experiment was to evaluate the effect of waste sulfur on the yield and quality of oilseed rape.The germination and

Pot experiment Treatment
Waste S (mg pot −1 S) emergence of oilseed rape took place in temperature-controlled greenhouse (day/night: 12 h/12 h, min.light intensity 550 lmol m −2 s −1 /0 lmol m −2 s −1 ; temperature 22 � C/15 � C; relative humidity 55-60%/90-95%) at Mendel University in Brno (Brno, Czech Republic) to reduce the risk of freeze damage and ensuring the optimal progress of growth.Ten days after the emergence, the oilseed rape was thinned down to a final count of 5 plants per pot.The experimental pots were moved to the open vegetation hall with semi-natural climate conditions (under a rain shelter) and randomly (in terms of treatments and repetitions) placed on the aluminum table in the spring of 2020.A minimum spacing of 15 cm between pots was ensured.The average daily temperatures and the daily relative humidity in the vegetation hall are shown in Figure 1.A controlled watering regime identical for all treatments (pots) was used in this experiment.Plants were watered to 70% of the maximum water holding capacity throughout the growing season.The watering regimes were maintained on gravimetric basis (Nachabe 1998).The pots were hand-watered with demineralized water on the soil surface.The two pots from each treatment were used for plants analysis during the vegetation (April 14, 2020; BBCH 55-57), the rest (4 pots) were manually fixed with a string to prevent lodging and they were harvested in full maturity of oilseed rape on the July 14, 2020.The biomass obtained in BBCH 55-57 and after the harvest (straw) were analyzed from two repetitions, the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 are expressed as an average of these two analyses.

Chlorophyll content in plant leaves (N-tester values)
The chlorophyll content of oilseed rape leaves was measured using a Yara N-tester chlorophyll meter (Yara International ASA, Oslo, Norway).The chlorophyll content was expressed as 'Ntester value.'Measurement was performed at a wavelength range of 650-940 nm.Using red and NIR values, the N-tester calculates a numeric, dimensionless value that is proportional to the amount of total chlorophyll present in the leaf.Five plants were assessed in each treatment and the value of the chlorophyll content of each plant was the mean of 60 measurement.

Plant analysis
The plants were manually harvested by cutting above the soil surface from each pot.The AGB of oilseed rape plants was oven-dried at 60 � C for the first two hours.The temperature was then reduced to 45 � C where the samples were kept for 72 h.The dry weight of AGB was determined using a laboratory-scale precision balanced Kern PCB (KERN & Sohn GmbH, Balingen, Germany).Then, the dried AGB was homogenized by the grinder Grindomix GM200 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany).The HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 digestion of biomass was achieved using a microwave digestion systemin ETHOS 1 (Milestone Srl, Sorisole, Italy).Subsequently, the nitrogen content in AGB of rape was determined by Kjeldahl method (Kjeltec 2300 device, Foss Analytical, Hillerød, Denmark) and other nutrients (S, P, K, Mg, Ca, and B) by Optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES (Spectro, Kleve, Germany).Same analyses were used for determination the nutrient content in the rapeseed straw.The N/S uptake was calculated as (weight of AGB � content of N/S)/100 and then expressed as mg.

Seed yield and quality
The rape seeds in the plant-yield experiment were purified from coarse impurities by repetitive sifting.Rapeseed yield was weighed from five plants within each pot, and the value was adjusted to 8% of moisture.Rapeseed yield was than expressed as gram per pot (g pot −1 ).The oil content was determined gravimetrically after the extraction of the samples with diethyl ether using the Soxhlet method based on the NMR extraction of seeds in a continuous flow extractor Minispec mq series TD-NMR (Bruker Corporation, Ettlinger, Germany).

Statistic analysis
The effect of the waste sulfur treatments on the observed parameters (N-tester value, average DM weight of AGB of 1 plant, oilseed rape yield, straw yield, oil content and oil production) of oilseed rape was statistically analyzed using the STATISTICA 14 software (TIBCO Software, San Jose, CA, USA) by the method of analysis of variance with the treatment such as fixed effect and the pot used as the random effect to take into account the grouping of individuals in the same pot.The differences between the means were determined according to the Fisher's LSD test, at the 95% level of significance (p � 0.05).The normality and homogeneity of variances were verified, respectively, by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene values at p � 0.05.The influence of the monitored factors was analyzed via analysis of variance (level of significance p � 0.05).The statistical evaluation methods used were identical for both experiments.

Plant-growth experiment
The first parameter observed in the pilot experiment with small pots was the chlorophyll content in oilseed rape leaves expressed as N-tester values.The results obtained from the measurements are given in Figure 2. The effect of fertilization with waste sulfur proved to be statistically significant, the highest content of chlorophyll was observed after both treatments supplemented with mineral fertilizers, as the content of chlorophyll in plants is directly dependent on the amount of nitrogen in the tissues (Gianquinto et al. 2004;Mu et al. 2017).Ammonium nitrate same as ammonium sulfate both provided a quickly available nitrogen to the plants, which resulted in almost 42% and 44% increase in observed values in comparison with control treatment.Evaluation of the nutritional status after the joint fertilization with N and S by using the N-tester device was performed by Lacroux et al. (2008), and � Skarpa et al. ( 2021), and their results also showed a significant increase in measured N-tester values after the joint treatment with N and S compared to the control.The application of sole waste sulfur from biogas plant also provided an increase in N-tester value in comparison with control treatment without fertilization, possibly because of the well-known synergy between sulfur fertilization and nitrogen efficiency.
The average weigh of DM of AGB of oilseed rape plant after the harvest are in correlation with N-tester values as it is evident from the similar trend in the results presented in Figures 2, 3.The results presented in Figures 1, 2 were used to calculate correlation, which represents a strong dependency (r ¼ 0.98, p < 0.001).Both treatments of waste sulfur supplemented with mineral fertilizers provided the highest production of plant biomass, which can be again explained by the nitrogen addition to the fertilizer mixture.This result is in agreement with our previous work ( � Skarpa et al. 2021), where the waste sulfur was applied in mixtures with mineral nitrogen fertilizer (urea ammonium nitrate) with a positive effect on AGB production.The increase in AGB weight due to the sulfur fertilization was also described by Perveen et al. (2018), as they observed a significant increase in root and shoot biomass and root and shoot length of maize due to the application of different sulfur compounds.An increased barley yield after the fertilization with S 0 was described also by Grzebisz and Przygocka-Cyna (2007) in their long-term experiment.A positive effect of the S application on canola pods formation and subsequent seed yield was also demonstrated by Khalid et al. (2016).In our experiment, the fertilization with sole waste sulfur without any supplements (S) also proved to be statistically significant, with the 35.5% increase in comparison with control treatment.Although the importance of boron for the oilseed rape is well documented, neither the Ntester values or weight of AGB were increased after the treatments with the combination of S and B without mineral fertilizers (S þ B, and S þ B þ HS) in comparison with fertilization with sole sulfur, possibly because of the early vegetation stages of measured and harvested plants (BBCH 19).It is also important to remind, that the examined fertilizers were applied to the soil (not on leaves), therefore, the applied boron had possibly less time for uptake and assimilation to the plants in this pilot experiment, although Malhi et al. (2003) are describing incorporation of B into the soil as the most effective application.Other literatures on the contrary, have considered foliar application to be more suitable (Ma et al. 2015;Mortvedt 1994).
The average contents of nitrogen and sulfur determined in the AGB of the rape harvested at the end of the experiment are described in Table 3.The content of nitrogen was significantly highest in the plants treated with waste sulfur in mixture with mineral fertilizers, which can be easily explained by the addition of mineral nitrogen in comparison with other treatments.The content of sulfur after these treatments in plants was also one of the highest, which can be attributed to the great nitrogen-sulfur synergy (Jamal, Moon, and Abdin 2014) and to the additional source of sulfur in AS fertilizer.It could be also influenced by increased mobilization of organic sulfur and oxidation rate of sulfur as a result of mineral fertilizers addition.Various researchers have reported a lack of S to be a limiting factor for the efficient utilization of added nitrogen.Thus, for maximal use of added N, fertilization by sulfur to the soil becomes essential.More importantly, these mixed treatments resulted in highest N:S ratios, which can be presented as an interesting indicator of nutritional status according to Sutradhar, Kaiser, and Fern� andez (2017).The principle behind this assessment is the fact that plants need a proportional amount of N and S for optimal amino acid synthesis.Therefore, nitrogen-to-sulfur ratios above a N:S ratio threshold indicate S deficiency (Haneklaus, Bloem, and Schnug 2007).A possible disadvantage of this indicator is the decreasing value of the N:S ratio during the vegetation (Reussi, Echeverr� ıa, and Sainz Rozas 2012).For oil seed rape, the ideal N:S ratio have been described as 7:1 (Janzen and Bettany 1984).The ratios observed from our experiment are lower, mostly because the plant analysis was performed early in the vegetation.The contents of sulfur observed in plants in our experiment were higher in comparison with common field conditions.On the contrary, the contents of nitrogen were lower compared to the common field conditions with high amounts of applied nitrogen.The main goal of our experiment was to evaluate the effect of waste sulfur, therefore, another uniform fertilization with nitrogen was omitted.The uptake of N and S by 1 plant were expressed from the average weight and average contents of nutrients (Table 3).It is evident from these results, that both treatments enhanced with mineral fertilizers have resulted in highest uptake of both N and S, the results are slightly in favor of AS instead of AN as it also provides available sulfur.The value of S uptake also helps to explain a lower content of sulfur in plants after the fertilization with solely waste S compared to the control treatment.The weight of average AGB of 1 plant was significantly higher on S treatment in comparison with control, which can possibly result in a lower content of S in plant tissues.However, the uptake of sulfur on both treatments were identical, in addition, the uptake of nitrogen was higher after the sulfur fertilization.The experiment performed by Tabak, Lisowska, and Filipek-Mazur (2020) proved, that the application of waste sulfur increases the content of available form of S in the soil, which can lead to a higher uptake by plants, which is supported by our results (Tables 1-3).This effect is more visible with longer time period and the dose of applied S.However, the high amount of waste sulfur can also have a negative effect on soil pH (Lisowska et al. 2022).

Plant-yield experiment
The aboveground biomass of oilseed rape was analyzed twice for the nutrient contents during the plant-yield experiment established in Mitscherlich pots.First results were obtained after the plants collection during the vegetation (the beginning of bud formation, BBCH 55-57) on April 14, 2020, second analysis was performed after the oilseed rape harvest three months later (July 14, 2020).The content of nutrients in the first term is described in Table 4.It is evident, that the addition of boron to the fertilizer mixture rapidly increased the content of B in the plants, as they were more mature (compared to the first experiment) and therefore had more time to uptake the nutrient from the soil.Almost every treatment has also provided an increased content of sulfur in comparison with unfertilized control.An increase in mobility and availability of sulfur after the application of waste sulfur is described by several authors (Lisowska et al. 2022;Tabak, Lisowska, and Filipek-Mazur 2020).The highest increase by 53% of S in plants in our experiment was observed after the fertilization with mixture of S þ B þ HS þ AS.The dose of waste sulfur on this treatment enhanced with mineral fertilizers was lower (in comparison with the treatment without mineral fertilizers), but the addition of readily available ammonium sulfate provided the additional amount of S. On the contrary, the second treatment supplemented with mineral fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) provided a lower supply of S to the plants, as the content of sulfur in plants was by 30% lower in comparison with control.This result can be explained again by lower dosage of applied waste sulfur, which was enhanced only by mineral fertilizer without sulfur (ammonium nitrate) in this treatment.Interestingly, the content of nitrogen in plants were also lower after this treatment with ammonium nitrate in comparison with the treatment supplemented with ammonium sulfate, which again points out to more optimal nitrogen efficiency when the sulfur content is abundant (Carciochi et al. 2019).An increase in N concentration in leaves after the sulfur fertilization was also observed by Rossini et al. (2018).The content of other nutrients was primarily based on their content in the soil since these nutrients were not supplied via examined treatments.However, the content of phosphorus in the plants was slightly higher after both treatments supplemented with mineral fertilizers.This result supports the idea, that the nitrogen, especially in ammonium form, is frequently increasing the P absorption.Nitrogen also supports the root growth, which is also essential for the uptake of low mobile phosphorus in the soil.As the provision of nitrogen to the agriculture is relatively infinite thanks to the Haber-Bosch synthesis, the phosphorus is predicted to be a limited source worldwide.Thus, a positive interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus is a welcome result.In addition, there has also been reported a positive interaction between sulfur and phosphorus (Yadav 2011).The Table 5 is describing the content of nutrients in the straw of rape after the harvest of oilseed rape and seed separation.The content of sulfur in the plant biomass was higher in every treatment fertilized with sulfur (compared to the control), which is an optimal prerequisite for high yield and oil content in the seeds.However, this result is in contrary with Var� enyiov� a, Ducsay, and Ryant (2017), where the crop fertilized with sulfur showed lower content of sulfur in tissues.Treatments based on the application of waste sulfur (elemental sulfur) provided slightly higher content of sulfur in comparison with treatment supplemented with mineral fertilizers.This can be explained by a slower availability of elemental sulfur, which provided more optimal amount of available sulfate in later vegetation stages.Unfertilized plants (Control) showed the lowest AGB production (Figure 3), straw (Figure 4), and seed production (Figure 5).It is likely that the nitrogen content was not diluted in their tissues (due to low carbohydrate productions) and therefore the N content was relatively highest (Table 5).Similar trends were observed for other nutrients (P, Mg, and Ca).The boron content in straw of rape under treatments with B fertilization were significantly higher than Control and S (no-B application).
The weight of aboveground biomass (straw) of oilseed rape after the harvest and seed separation is described in Figure 4.The highest, statistically significant, yield of straw was observed after both treatments supplemented with mineral fertilizers, which is in correlation with previous plant-growth experiment, and it can be similarly explained by the combination of waste sulfur in a slower elemental form with the quickly available nitrogen (ammonium nitrate) and even sulfur (ammonium sulfate) in mineral fertilizers.Similar availability of different form of sulfur are described by Riley, Zhao, and Mcgrath (2000), a slower effect of fertilization with S 0 is also published by Malhi, Solberg, and Nyborg (2005).The control treatment without fertilization provided straw yield by 30.7% lower in comparison with the treatment S þ B þ HS þ AS and by 26.1% lower in comparison with treatment S þ B þ HS þ AN.Treatments based on the application of waste sulfur without mineral N-fertilizers also provided higher yield in comparison with control, the highest increased was observed after the mixture of waste S with boron (by 15.5%).The role of boron is often associated with a participation in the formation, structure and stability and cell walls.The optimal supply of B also ensures the strength and elasticity of plants tissues via lignification.Another important function of boron is the involvement in synthesis of proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and hormones, especially IAA.The addition of humic substances did not provide an increase in comparison with application of sole S or S þ B. On the contrary, the straw yield was slightly lower.An interesting result was published by � Ser� a and Nov� ak (2022).Their research points out, that the effect of humic substances is strongly dependent on their origin 0.87 a ± 0.05 0.09 ab ± 0.01 1.91 ab ± 0.12 0.09 a ± 0.01 0.41 ab ± 0.09 0.37 a ± 0.02 33.96 0.91 a ± 0.06 0.08 b ± 0.01 2.02 a ± 0.09 0.10 a ± 0.01 0.41 ab ± 0.09 0.39 a ± 0.02 37.90 ab ± 1.4 Different letters indicate significant differences p < 0.05 (Fisher's LSD test); the ± values mean standard deviation; 1. unfertilized control (Control), 2. waste elemental sulfur (S), 3. (AN).(Nardi et al. 2002), structural, physical, and chemical properties, and on the taxonomy of examined plant species.In their experiment, the effect of humic substance on the germination and initial growth of oilseed rape was also not significant, the positive effect was observed with different plant species, Papaver somniferum L. The studies of HS on seed germination capacity with any positive effect was also published by T€ urkmen et al. (2004).Important factors of applied HS are also a pH (Chen, Clapp, and Magen 2004) and content of potassium.However, even the adjusting of tested HS on the same level of pH and concentration of K may not resulted in positive effect of HS, as published by � Ser� a and Nov� ak (2011).They are also promoting the origin of HS as the most important factor, even compared to the application dose.According to their study, another important factors to fully examine the interactions of HS with plants are natural plant species and large ecological plasticity, as the high seed vitality and germination or low dormancy of model crops may obscure the effect of HS application.The different concentrations of humic acid were tested in the experiment performed by Dulaimy and Fahdawi (2020).It is evident from their results, that some concentrations also had a negative effect on the examined parameters.On the contrary, the positive effect of HS is described by several authors (Al-Eezzi and Al-Alawy 2022; Zhang et al. 2021).
The obtained yield of oilseed rape is given in Figure 5.The highest, statistically significant, yield was again achieved after both treatments supplemented with mineral fertilizers.The mixture of waste sulfur with ammonium sulfate provided an increase by 31.5% in comparison with control, the addition of ammonium nitrate has resulted in increase by 27.8%.The seed yield was significantly correlated with straw production (r ¼ 0.97, p < 0.001).The mixture of waste sulfur and mineral fertilizers have provided the highest AGB also in the first, plant-growth experiment in smaller pots.The results of several studies (Ahmad et al. 2011;Jackson 2000) have also described the highest seed yield at treatments with sulfur and nitrogen combination.It has been reported that the grain yield can be significantly boosted by the combined application of N and S, which is related to the close link between the uptake of SO 4 2-and NO 3 -.N and S have exhibited strong interdependence on effecting significant yield and quality improvements in several crop species, including maize (Xie et al. 2003), oilseed rape (McGrath and Zhao 1996), oilseed crops (Fazili et al. 2010), soybean (Jamal and Abdin 2005), wheat (Salvagiotti and Miralles 2008), sunflower (Hocking, Randall, and Pinkerton 1987), or sesame (Raza et al. 2018).The treatments based on fertilization with sole waste sulfur and waste S in mixture with boron provided a similar yield (Malhi, Gan, and Raney 2007;Pu_ zy� nska et al. 2018).The seed yield provided by the treatments with S þ B þ HS was again lower in comparison with the treatments without humic acids, although not significantly.This is partially in the contrary with the results published by Al-Bourky et al. (2021).In this work with Oryza sativa L., the addition of HS resulted in higher yields, weight of grains, number of grains, number of panicles, leaf area and even plant height.Neither parameter was, however, statistically significantly higher compared to the control treatment.The effect of humic acid and the nitrogen fertilization was also tested by Delfine et al. (2005).Their results are in agreement with ours, as the treatment with the application of humic acid provided a statistically significantly lower yield of Triticum durum compared to the soil fertilization by nitrogen in two experimental years.It is evident from Figure 4, that the addition of mineral fertilizers to the mix have similar, significant effect.
The most important factor of oilseed rape quality is the oil content in seeds (Brennan, Mason, and Walton 2000).The average oil content in the seed of oilseed rape is described in the Figure 6.There are several studies (Ahmad et al. 2011;Rehman et al. 2013) describing the positive effect of sulfur fertilization on the oil content.On the contrary, Ma et al. (2015) reported, that the oil content is not dependent on the dose of sulfur, unlike the crop yield.Withers and O'Donnell (1994) are described a decreased oil content in treatments fertilized by sulfur.It is evident from our results, that the established trend from previous examined parameters (highest values after both treatments with mineral fertilizers) is different.From the minerally enhanced treatments, only the treatment supplemented with ammonium sulfate have provided more oil content in comparison with control treatment.The second treatment based on the addition of mineral fertilizer supplemented with ammonium nitrate did provide lower content of oil in comparison with control treatment by 10.0%.This result can be possibly explained by the 'dilution effect' (Jarrell and Beverly 1981).The younger the plants, the higher the nutrient concentrations of nutrients.The more the plants grow, the lower the concentration of nutrients.This is evident from Tables 4, 5, especially for the nitrogen content in plants tissues.The plants fertilized with mixture of waste sulfur and ammonium sulfate did provide high yield of straw and seeds, probably due to the addition of nitrogen contained in mineral fertilizer.However, the nitrogen efficiency of solely N from mineral fertilizers is relatively small (around 33-40% according to Barł� og, Grzebisz, and Łukowiak (2022), so the nitrogen was probably depleted and utilized for the mentioned parameters.The full potential of nitrogen fertilization cannot be achieved with suboptimal amount of sulfur, as it was presented by several authors (Dubousset, Etienne, and Avice 2010;Fismes et al. 2000;Haneklaus, Bloem, and Schnug 2007).On the contrary, the mixture of waste sulfur and ammonium sulfate have provided slightly less nitrogen to the plants, but more amount of quickly available sulfur, which resulted in higher nitrogen utilization in plants and higher oil content in seeds probably due to the mentioned N-S synergy and addition of quickly available NS mineral fertilizer.Treatments without mineral fertilizers based only on waste sulfur have also provided statistically (except for S þ B þ HS) higher content of oil in comparison with control treatment, probably because of mentioned dilution effect.The observed yield of straw and seed was lower after these treatments; therefore, more nutrient was available for creating a sufficient amount of oil.The addition of solely HS did not result in higher quality product, which is similar to the finding by Delfine et al. (2005).In this two years experiment, the bulk density, weight of thousand grains and protein content of Triticum durum were not significantly different compared  to the control treatment.Not entirely unambiguous are also the findings published by Danyaei et al. (2017).In their work, the combined application of sulfur-containing humic acid in different rates resulted in the highest fresh and dry weight of olives after the fertilization, however, the highest fruit length, chlorophyll a content and content of total chlorophyll were highest after the control treatment.
The average seed yield of rape and the average oil content were used for the expression of oil production (g pot −1 ).It is evident from the results (Figure 7), that the treatment with mineral fertilizer containing sulfur (AS) have provided the highest production of oil from each pot.The treatment with sole waste sulfur application is another treatment with high oil production.The seed yield was lower after this fertilization compared to the minerally enhanced treatments (Figure 4), however, the oil content (Figure 5) in seed fertilized with elemental sulfur was the highest compared to every other treatment.The second treatment enhanced with mineral fertilizer (AN) have on other side provided one of the highest seed yields, the oil content was however lower.These results are supporting the more balanced application of N and S as a more suitable option for oilseed rape.

Conclusions
The result from both experiments had proved, that the reutilization of waste sulfur obtained from the biogas plants can be a viable option in agriculture.The reutilization of such waste as a fertilizer represents at least partial return of some nutrients depleted from the soil by the crops utilized in biogas plants, which is important from the point of view of nutrient balance.It is evident from presented results, that the application of sole waste sulfur is certainly a possibility, which confirmed initial hypothesis.However, the combination of waste S with additional nutrients is a more optimal alternative, which confirmed the second hypothesis.The mixture of waste sulfur and mineral nitrogen fertilizers (ammonium nitrate or ammonium sulfate) proved to have the greatest influence on the examined parameters of oilseed rape, such as weight of aboveground biomass, N/S content in the plant tissues and seed and straw yield.The mixture of waste sulfur with mineral fertilizers also represents an interesting compromise, that could lead to a lower consumption of common mineral fertilizers (especially N or NS) usually applied in agriculture.The mixture of waste sulfur in elemental form with ammonium sulfate also represent a prerequisite for optimal supply of S during the vegetation of crops.This treatment resulted in the highest overall seed and straw yield.Although the oil content in seeds was slightly lower probably due to the dilution effect, the production of oil was the highest due to the highest seed yield.In conclusion, the examined combination of waste sulfur with AS, resulted in the most quantitative and qualitative product.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.The average daily temperature ( � C) and relative humidity (%) in the vegetation hall during the experiment.

Table 1 .
Agrochemical properties of soil used in both experiments.

Table 2 .
Experimental treatments of waste sulfur in combination with another nutrients.

Table 3 .
The average content of N and S in the plants and their uptake by AGB of 1 plant with the N:S ratio.

Table 4 .
Average content of nutrients in plants at the start of bud formation (April 14, 2020).

Table 5 .
Average post-harvest content of nutrients in straw of rape.