Solar supplied two-output DC–DC converters in the application of low power

ABSTRACT In this paper, solar fed single-input two-output Converter is discussed in the application of low power. The single-diode model is chosen for the solar panel modelling. The performance of this model is better in case of varying solar irradiation. It is operated with Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm to achieve better efficiency. This paper also discusses the comparative study of two important MPPT algorithms such as Advanced Perturb and Observation (APO) and Incremental Conductance (IC) methods. The characteristics curves between power and voltage as well as between current and voltage are obtained from simulation work and these curves are compared with the actual characteristics curve. The solar-fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converters are analysed as a two output converter. Moreover, the converter has a DC bipolar output voltage with the ground connected power switch. The ground connected switch reduces the sparks on the switch. The system is simulated and modelled using MATLAB software and its performance is tested using real-time simulator using OP-5142.


Introduction
Nowadays, solar energy is commonly used for energy conversion [1]. However, the solar energy power generation has low effectiveness in energy conversion and high cost as compared to other natural energy resources [2]. The solar energy is commonly used for battery charging applications. In this article, a solution to the current power crisis is overcome by using solar energy as a means of implementing some state of art techniques [3]. The use of efficient charge control of the battery helped to obtain the highest power point. Another renewable energy source, like wind, can also be used for battery charging application. In [4] design and implementation of a small wind turbine for battery charging application are discussed. Like solar energy conversion, the method for extracting maximum power from the wind turbine is also explained in [5]. In this paper, a high efficiency buck converter and a control algorithm based on a microcontroller are used for achieving the highest power from the turbine. The modelling of a PV module for laboratory purpose is a very challenging area. The three important parameters while designing a solar panel are change in solar irradiation, voltage and current. In [6,7] they analysed the solar panel by a single diode model with parasitic resistances by using mathematical relations. Design of a solar powered battery charger is discussed in [8,9]. In order to get maximum efficiency, they followed an optimal control method. For obtaining the highest power, different power tracking methods are employed such as P & O, IC, Constant voltage method, etc. Among those methods the Perturb and Observe method is the best cost-effective method [10]. While designing a solar panel for battery charging, the protection of the battery must be considered. The charging current to the battery is decided depending on the SOC [11].
The voltage obtained from the panel can be converting into another voltage levels by using the DC-DC converters [12]. The operating principles and conversion formulae are given in [13]. The modelling, different classifications and analysis of DC-DC converter switched modes are discussed in [14]. In this paper for analysis, different types of converter cells are explained. The paper [15] explains the network complexity and conversion efficiency of the converters. Nowadays two inductor converter topologies getting more popular than that of normal converters [16][17][18][19].
Apart from the conventional non-isolated converters, a new topology of single input many outputs DC-DC converters is explained in [20]. Nowadays the power supply voltages are reduced in the digital systems. For the application which requires high voltage or regulated voltages from a low voltage, a single input regulated multiple output converters are used in [21]. The different topology and control strategy of this type of converters based on diode-clamped converters are given in [22,23]. This type of converters can use in both low and high power applications. To verify this converter topology, the steady-state analysis is also done in this work. The same idea is used for buck boost converter and is explained in [24] for different load and input voltage changes. The advancement in the field of switching technology is the modified time-sharing switching technique which is given in [25]. This single input multiple output converters can be fed by natural energy resources [26] and can be used for the hybrid electric vehicle as well as dc micro-grid applications [27][28][29].
In this paper, solar fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converters are discussed. Both these converters will provide DC bipolar outputs. The input and output currents of the Zeta-Buck Boost converter is discontinuous and continuous for SEPIC-Cuk combination converter. For obtaining the highest power from the solar panel, the MPPT control technique is implemented for the switching operation. These converters are analysed by using Advanced P & O (APO), IC MPPT techniques with solar. From performance analysis, converter with better efficiency is suggested. The switch control terminals are connected to ground to reduce the spark on the switch. These types of singleinput two-output converters are capable of producing DC bipolar outputs of a magnitude of +24 and −24 V. This +24 V is used in different types of lightings, battery for electric vehicles etc. and −24 V is used as a supply for amplifiers.

Single input two output DC-DC converter
A converter which utilizes one input power stage and two isolated output stages are called single-input twooutputs DC-DC converters. Small size and high efficiency are the basic requirements for the converter. The elevated switching frequency is essential when designing a converter to achieve high effectiveness. The soft switching over hard switching is preferred for reducing the switching losses. But it is very difficult to analyse the converters having a combination with three full bridge converters even though it has reduced switching losses. Therefore a new design of single-input manyoutput dc-to-dc converters is evolved. So that cost and achievement of high efficiency are also increased. In this article, two different single-input two-output dc-to-dc combination converters are discussed such as Zeta-Buck-Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converters. Both the converters are producing a dc bipolar output.

Solar-fed Zeta-Buck-Boost combination converter [12]
A combination converter Zeta-Buck-Boost is intended by combining a distinct Zeta and a Buck-Boost converter with a common switch. The Buck-Boost converter produces a negative polarity output voltage whereas Zeta produces a positive polarity output voltage. Combining the converters will produce a DC bipolar output. The circuit diagram of a Zeta-Buck Boost combination converter is displayed in Figure 1(a). The circuit operation can be explained in three modes. The behaviour of the converter in each mode is displayed in Figure 1(b-d).
Mode 1: In this mode, the operation is explained for on condition of the switch. Which is displayed in Figure 1(b). During turn-on time, the supply will pass current through the inductor L 1 and it will start charging up to a voltage equal to the supply voltage, V S . The voltage across inductor L 2 will also be equal to V S . During this mode of operation, both D 1 and D 2 diodes are biased in reverse. The operation in mode 2, the switch is made off, and the inductor L 1 will release the stored energy with a polarity opposite to the mode 1 operation which is displayed in Figure 1(c). Inductor L 1 will release the energy by passing the current through the capacitors C O1 & C 1 and diodes D 1 and D 2 . The current flows through the inductor L 2 through the diode D 1 during turn-off. At this time the voltage at point "a" becomes zero. If the voltage drops across the diode D 1 is neglected, then the voltage at "a" will be V O1 and the coupling capacitor C 1 will start charging with a polarity displayed in Figure 1(c). It implies that the voltage at point "b" will be -V O1 . Therefore voltage across L 2 will also be -V O1 . In this mode, the capacitor C O2 will charge with a lower plate as positive. When inductor, L 1 removes all its energy, all devices are turned off and it will enter into mode 3 of operation. So in mode 3 operation, the current does not flow through the L 1 inductor. Due to this, the diodes, D 1 and D 2 will be reverse biased. It is displayed in Figure 1(d). In Buck-Boost converter because of the reverse biased diodes, the capacitor current will flow through the load from the ground terminal. Therefore the output produced by the buck-boost converter always will have a negative polarity. In Zeta converter the current flow through the load to the ground. Therefore the output produced by the Zeta converter always will have a positive polarity and Buck-Boost converter always will have a negative polarity. Therefore the combination of the Zeta and Buck-Boost will produce a bipolar DC output.

Solar-fed SEPIC-Cuk combination converter [12]
Both the SEPIC and Cuk converters have the ability of both bucking and boosting of the voltage. This is governed by the duty ratio control. The main advantages of the Cuk converter are that it can provide good characteristics (in terms of filtering on the input and output sides) of both the Buck and Boost converters. Similar to the basic Buck-Boost converter, Cuk converter also produces a negative terminal voltage whereas a SEPIC converter produces a positive polarity output. The energy transfer in the circuit from input to output happens through a coupling capacitor. Here both C 1 and C 2 are coupling capacitors. The value of coupling capacitors is assumed to be large enough to approximate its voltage to be constant DC in steady-state operation. The circuit diagram of a SEPIC-Cuk combination converter is displayed in Figure 2(a). Both the inductors L 1 and L 2 ensure the currents are non-pulsating in the case of Cuk converter whereas; the output currents are pulsating in the case of SEPIC converter. When the switch is made on the diodes D 1 and D 2 get reverse biased by the large voltage across the coupling capacitors displayed in Figure 2(b). If the voltage across the diode D 2 is neglected, then during turn-on time, the voltage across the coupling capacitor C 2 will become V S + V O2 . Then the current through the inductor L 1 will increase upto a value equal to the supply voltage, V S . At the same time, the condenser, C1 because of its energy stored from the previous cycle also feeds the current to the load and also increases the L 2 inductor current.
During turn off, the current of the L 1 and L 2 inductors forces the D1 diode to become conduction. Similarly, the current flowing through the inductor L 1 will also force the diode D 2 to become forward biased. Here both the inductor currents will flow through the diode D 1 in the case of Cuk converter. During this, the current through L 1 starts charging the coupling capacitors. And the current through the inductors L 2 and L 3 will flow through the output capacitor and load and is displayed in Figure 2(c). In Cuk converter during the turn on and turn off conditions, the current that flows through the load from the ground. Therefore it produces an output with negative polarity. In the case of SEPIC converter, during turn on and turn off conditions, the current is flowing through the load to the ground, therefore, it will produce a positive output voltage across the load.

Design of solar fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk Converters
Solar cells are used to convert solar energy into electricity. It is made up of semiconductor materials and which is not required high temperature for the energy conversion. These waves move towards the earth when the sun shines and touches the surface of the solar cells. The various solar cells are connected to form a solar panel. It takes several solar panels to produce sufficient electricity to power a household or high-power application.

PV cell modelling [1]
A single diode model is used in this document to analyse a solar cell's features under distinct environmental and electrical circumstances. It is displayed in Figure 3.
An ideal PV cell contains a sunlight-generated source of current and is called an I ph . Solar irradiance amount has an effect on I ph 's value. A P-N diode is a parallel connection to the current source and the final current at the terminal of the circuit displayed as "I". It is the distinction between the photon current and the current flowing through the diode. V is the terminal voltage of the circuit.
The diode current (I D ) is given as, where T = Temperature in K; q = Charge of an electron in coulombs (1.602e-19); k = Boltzmann constant (1.38e-23 J/K); I o = Dark current or Reverse saturation current of the diode at T; V D = Diode voltage in V; n = Ideality factor of the diode (normally between 1 and 2). The combined resistances of contacts, PN layers and metal grid are termed as series resistance, R S . Leakage current of the PN junction models the shunt resistance, R sh .
The three demands for solar energy generation are (1) that it should have material capable of absorbing sunlight energy and producing electrons (2) capable of enabling electron movement through the internal circuit and producing the current and (3) that is sufficiently big to generate power. When the incident the energy of sunlight is higher than the energy gap of the material and it will be prepared to release an electron into the conductive band from the valence band. The equations analysing a solar panel is given by, where b = Temperature coefficient; V oc_ref = Refer ence voltage in the open circuit condition of the solar Photon current where G, G r = Measured and reference solar irradiation in W/m 2 ; I sc = Short circuit current in A.
Reverse saturation current (I rs ) = where T, T r = Measured and reference temperature in K; R s = Series resistance in ohms; R sh = Shunt resistance in ohms; N s , N p = Number of series and parallel solar cells linked; V = Output voltage in V; n = Ideality factor of the diode (normally between 1 and 2). In this paper, a peak power output capacity of 10 W is analysed. Therefore a PV module capable of producing 10 W with 36 series connected cells is selected. Its open circuit voltage and short circuit currents are 21.6 V and 0.68 A respectively. Theoretically, the highest power will be obtained at 85% of V oc and I sc . i.e.
Highest Power (P max ) Therefore, the number of series connected Similarly the number of parallel connected The designed parameters of the solar panel are mentioned in Appendix 1.

Design of solar fed Zeta-Buck Boost combination converter [12]
For finding out the maximum switching current, it is necessary to derive an expression for duty ratio. The Zeta converter is a derived Buck-Boost converter topology. Therefore the expression for the duty ratio of normal buck-boost converter holds true for the zeta converter also. So, the same duty ratio expression is valid for the combination converter also. The expression for the duty ratio (D) of Zeta-Buck-Boost combination converter working in the continuous current conduction Mode can be represented as a function of the output voltage (V O ) and the input voltage (V S ), and it is given by, The main factor should be considered at the designing of zeta converter is the ripple current ( I L ) through the inductors L 1 and L 2 .
The peak-to-peak value of desired ripple current where K = ripple current constant (0.2-0.4) The expression for the minimum value of inductors L 1 and L 2 is, L 1(min) = L 2(min) = 1 2 The peak current flowing through the inductors L 1 and L 2 can be defined as a function of duty ratio and the ripple current through it, and I L 2 (pk) = I O1 + I L 2 (10) The minimum value of the output capacitance or the filtering capacitance (C O1 ) is, V C O1 = Output ripple voltage (typically 1% of V C O1 ).
The output capacitor C O2 of the buck-boost converter is required to supply the energy to the load during the time when energy is increasing in the inductor because of the discontinuous nature of the output current. The minimum value of the output capacitor C O2 can be calculated as, where ESR C O2 is the Equivalent Series Resistance of the output capacitor C O2 .
The designed parameters of the converter according to the equations explained above are mentioned in Appendix 1.

Design of solar fed SEPIC-Cuk combination converter [12]
The SEPIC and Cuk converters are also derived Buck-Boost converter topologies. Therefore the expression for the duty ratio of normal Buck-Boost converter holds true for these converters. The duty ratio will help to find out the maximum switching current in a circuit. Therefore the expression for the duty ratio (D) of SEPIC-Cuk combination converter is given as, where V fwd = forward voltage drop of the Schottky diode.
If the diode voltage drop is neglected, then the Equation (13) can be re-written as, By rearranging the above expression the duty ratio can be represented in terms of the input current (I S ) and output current (I O ) as, The maximum and minimum duty ratio occurs at a minimum and maximum input voltage. From the Equation (15) it is observed that the duty ratio also can be represented in terms of the input current (I S ) and output current (I O ).
The ripple current ( I L ) through the inductor as a function of efficiency (η) can be calculated as, For a desired ripple value of the current, the minimum inductor value of SEPIC converter can be found as, The expression for peak current flowing through these inductors is, The expression for finding the values of the Coupling capacitor C 2 and filter capacitor C 02 is, where V C 2 = Ripple voltage in coupling capacitor C 2 (1% of V S ) where V C O2 = Output ripple voltage (typically 1% of V C O2 ). For the Cuk converter, the minimum value of L 2 is calculated as, where I L 2 is the ripple current through the inductor L 2 and it is typically taken as 10-20% of I S . The maximum current flowing through L 2 is, The output capacitor (C O2 ) can be design identical to that of a normal buck converter and it is given as, where V O1 is the allowed peak to peak ripple in the output voltage of Cuk Converter (V O1 ) The coupling capacitor C 1 of Cuk converter design is based on limiting the peak-to-peak voltage ripple, V C 1 and it can be defined as, The design parameters of the converters obtained according to the equations explained above are mentioned in Appendix 1.

Control schemes for solar fed converters
In order to get the highest efficiency from the solar panel, it is required to drive the solar panel at its highest power point. The highest power points of any solar panel will change according to the change in the solar irradiation. Therefore, the control scheme which is used to get maximum efficiency from the solar panel is MPPT techniques. The pulses produced by the MPPT, will compare with the switching frequency of the converter and produces corresponding duty ratio to control the switch. The usually used MPPT techniques are P & O, IC, APO etc. among these methods the IC and APO method is discussed in this paper.

Advanced Perturb and Observe (APO) method [1]
Advanced Perturb and Observation method is an enhanced version of the P & O method. The algorithm starts by measuring the present value of voltage and current and it will calculate the current power. After the power calculation, it will perturb in the direction according to the next tracking of the power point. The flow chart of this algorithm is displayed in Figure 4(a).
In this method, the number of stages of P & O is increased by (x-1), (x-2) and (x-3). This can increase the tracking velocity of the MPPT controller. The efficiency of the P&O algorithm is therefore enhanced.

Incremental Conductance (IC) method [1]
There are lot of drawbacks for the P and O algorithm. The IC MPPT technique will overcomes these drawbacks and tracks the power efficiently. In this scheme, the highest power from the panel is extracted by comparing the incremental conductance to the present conductance values. i.e.

I pv V pv
= dI pv dV pv (25) where I pv V pv = Instantaneous conductance; The IC MPPT technique will be stable at its highest power point and it will change only when the insolation changes are occurred. Here at every time, it will calculate the ratio of power to voltage. Whenever the value of this ratio becomes equal to zero, it indicates that the highest power point is reached. After that, it will be stable at that point till next change in the solar irradiation. According to the rule of derivatives, the power relation can be written as,  Since dP pv dV pv = 0 at MPP, therefore by rearranging the equation, The highest power point is obtained when this incremental conductance becomes equal to the negative of the instantaneous conductance.
The flow chart of this algorithm is displayed in Figure 4(b). If dP pv dV pv > 0, it means that the PV voltage is less than the MPP. In this case, the duty cycle should be increased. If dP pv dV pv = 0 then the PV voltage is equal to the MPP and if dP pv dV pv < 0 it means that the PV voltage is greater than the MPP so duty cycle should be decreased.
Both the APO and IC MPPT algorithms will find the actual highest power from the solar panel. Comparatively IC method gives more accuracy than the APO method. That is, when the atmospheric conditions fixed or varying with slow rate, the APO control will oscillates at the highest power point but the IC MPPT gives the suitable quantity at varying nature of atmosphere.

Simulation work
MATLAB software is used to simulate the suggested converter. A discrete mode of operation with a 10 μs sampling time is kept. The converter's switching frequency is set to 5 kHz. The solar module is designed for normal test circumstances like 1000 W/m 2 and 25°C. It is also tested for varying irradiation. The static performance of the converter is analysed. The converters are operated under Advanced P & O MPPT and IC MPPT control schemes and the results are also compared. From these MPPT techniques, it is observed that the IC method is more efficient than that of Advanced P & O method. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison between Advanced P & O and IC MPPT Techniques. The waveforms displayed in the figure is Duty ratio, D. from the design, it is found that the highest and lowest values of the duty ratio are 0.6 and 0.55, respectively. And the duty ratio corresponds to the highest power is 0.57. From the figure given below, it is clear that the APO algorithm helps to reach the highest power point faster than the IC algorithm. The APO algorithm takes nearly 0.1s to reach the highest power point whereas the IC algorithm takes 0.3 s. In APO method the duty ratio varying in the range of actual duty ratio value and it is not able to attain stability at actual duty ratio. Therefore by implementing the APO MPPT technique, it will always oscillate nearer to the highest power point. Therefore the efficiency will be lesser than the IC method. In the IC method, it takes more time to reach the actual duty ratio comparing to APO. But after reaching the actual duty ratio it holds for the entire operation. Therefore the efficiency will become higher than that of APO. But implementation of IC MPPT is costlier than APO MPPT. Because in IC MPPT two sensors are required, one for voltage and another for current, whereas in APO only voltage is sensing.  (I PV ), output voltage, current and power of first converter (V O1 , I O1 and P O1 ), output voltage, current and power of second converter (V O2 , I O2 and P O2 ). From the performance, it is observed that the photovoltaic system has non-linearly varying voltage. The  input current (I PV ) of the Zeta-Buck Boost converter is discontinuous and of SEPIC-Cuk converter is continuous which is displayed in Figure 6(a,b). The gate pulse for the switch is generated by the APO MPPT technique. The APO algorithm is executed by measuring the V PV from the solar panel. In Zeta-Buck Boost converter, Zeta has an inductor series to the output preventing the sudden change of the output current that would otherwise increase the ripple terminal voltage. The duty ratio is oscillating at the highest power point.

Performance of solar-fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converter under Advanced Perturb and Observe MPPT technique
In Zeta-Buck Boost converter, they generate DC bipolar voltages of 25.23 and −25.85 V. The total output power obtained from the converter will be the sum of the output power of Zeta (P O1 ) and Buck-Boost (P O2 ) converters. It is obtained as 8.043 W and efficiency of the Zeta-Buck Boost converter is obtained as 79.97%.
Similarly, in SEPIC-Cuk converter, they generate DC bipolar voltages of 24.36 and −23.45 V. The total output power obtained is 7.61 W and the efficiency becomes 76.06%.

Performance analysis of solar-fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converter under Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT technique
The performance analysis of Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converters controlled by the Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT technique is given in Figure 7(a,b). The waveforms displayed in Figures are Duty ratio (D), supply or voltage obtained from the PV panel (V PV ), panel current (I PV ), output voltage, current and power of first converter (V O1 , I O1 and P O1 ), output voltage, current and power of second converter (V O2 , I O2 and P O2 ). From the performance, it is observed that the photovoltaic system has nonlinearly varying voltage. The input current (I PV ) of the Zeta-Buck Boost converter is discontinuous and of SEPIC-Cuk converter is continuous which is displayed in Figure 7(a,b). The gate pulse for the switch is generated by the IC MPPT technique. The IC algorithm is executed by measuring the V PV and I PV from the solar panel. By comparing the IC and APO control techniques, it is observed that IC gives a stable duty ratio which is able to extract highest power from the panel. Moreover, the APO oscillating at the peak power point throughout the operation. It can be observed from the D waveform in Figures 6 and 7. Therefore, the IC MPPT gives more accurate values than APO MPPT and efficiency is also improved.
In Zeta-Buck Boost converter, they generate DC bipolar voltages of 25.21 and −25.05 V. The total output power obtained from the converter will be the sum of the output power of Zeta (P O1 ) and Buck-Boost (P O2 ) converters which is obtained as 8.596 W. And the efficiency of the Zeta-Buck Boost converter is obtained as 85.47%. Similarly in SEPIC-Cuk converter; they generate DC bipolar voltages of 25.52 and −24.74 V. The total output power obtained is 8.4205 W and the efficiency becomes 83.29%. The improvement in the efficiencies while implementing IC over APO MPPT method is, 5.5% in the case of Zeta-Buck Boost and 7.2% in the case of SEPIC-Cuk converters. The comparative analysis of both the converters under both the MPPT techniques is shown in Table 1.
On the basis of the results shown in Table 1, converters with Incremental Conductance MPPT give more efficiency and fewer losses. So that for test results, both the Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converter with IC MPPT technique is analysed.

Dynamic performance of Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converter under varying solar irradiation
From the above analysis, it is observed that converters with Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT algorithm has higher efficiency than that of Advanced Perturb and Observation (APO) MPPT algorithm. Therefore the varying solar irradiation is applied only for Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converters with IC MPPT and it is displayed in Figure 8(a,b). While varying the solar irradiation from 1000 to 2000 W/m 2 , the output voltage from the PV panel is increased. This increased the converter output also. It means that, while increasing the radiation, the panel will be able to operate at its maximum designed power level. So the power taken by the converter input side will be increase and effectively the converted power at output side will also increase as shown in Figure 8(a,b). For this, the simulation model is run at 1000 W/m 2 irradiation till 0.65 s. Again, level of Irradiation is increased to 2000 from 0.65 till 0.7 s at end of simulation performance. From this dynamic performance, it is observed that system is working satisfactory even this large variation.

Test results
The solar fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converters for small power application are implemented. The Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT algorithm is programmed using OP-5142 based real-time simulator. OP-5142 allows the integration of the FPGA technologies in the simulator for implementation of HDL functions and high speed and high-density digital inputs/ outputs in real-time models. It allows the connectivity of 4 digital and/ or analog output modules. It provides high precision switching with a maximum capacity of 100 MHz. The maximum output voltage of Table 1. Performance of solar fed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converters at 1000 W/m 2 solar irradiation.   In y-axis: CH1-500 mV/div, CH2-10 V/div, CH3-1A/div; In xaxis:500 μs/div, (b) In y-axis: CH1-10 V/div, CH2-500 mA/div, CH3-5 V/div; In x-axis:5 ms/div, (c) In y-axis: CH1-10 V/div, CH2-500 mA/div, CH3-5 V/div; In x-axis:5 ms/div.
is displayed in CH3 of Figure 9(a). The hardware is tested for constant solar irradiation of 1000 W/m 2 and a temperature of 25°C. The outputs obtained from Zeta-Buck Boost converter is separately displayed in Figure 9(b,c). Figure  9(b) gives the output of Zeta converter and Figure 9(c) shows the outputs of the Buck-Boost converter. V O1 , I O1 and P O1 represent the voltage, current and power obtained from the Zeta converter and V O2 , I O2 and P O2 represents the voltage, current and power obtained from the Buck-Boost converter. In both the waveforms, the CH1, CH2 and CH3 denotes the output voltage Table 2. Performance of solar Fedzeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk converters at 1000 W/m 2 solar irradiation. (V O1 and V O2 ), output current (I O1 and I O2 ) and output power (P O1 and P O2 ). The V O1 and V O2 of the Zeta and Buck-Boost converters are DC bipolar of value 25 V. The total power delivered from the converter is 8.5965 W. The total losses in this converter are less compared to the APO implemented Zeta-Buck Boost converter. Therefore efficiency is improved by 5%.

Performance of solar-fed SEPIC-Cuk converter with IC MPPT
The performance analysis of implemented SEPIC-Cuk converter is displayed in Figure 10. Figure 10(a) shows Duty ratio (D), the Input voltage (V in ) and input current (I in ). The duty ratio equivalent to the highest power is obtained at 0.57. The solar panel is able to deliver the highest power throughout the operation and the available maximum voltage is 17 V. The input current waveform of the SEPIC-Cuk converter is continuous in nature and it is displayed in Figure 10(a) in CH3. The hardware is tested for constant solar irradiation of 1000 W/m 2 and a temperature of 25°C. The outputs obtained from SEPIC-Cuk converter are separately displayed in Figure 10(b,c). Figure 10(b) gives the output of the SEPIC converter and Figure  10(c) shows the outputs of the Cuk converter. V O1 , I O1 and P O1 represent the voltage, current and power obtained from the SEPIC converter and V O2 , I O2 and P O2 represents the voltage, current and power obtained from the Cuk converter. In both the waveforms CH1, CH2 and CH3 denotes the output voltage (V O1 and V O2 ), output current (I O1 and I O2 ) and output power (P O1 and P O2 ). The V O1 and V O2 of the SEPIC and Cuk converters are DC bipolar of values of 25 and −24.7 V. And the total power delivered from the converter is 8.42 W. The total losses in this converter are less compared to the APO implemented SEPIC-Cuk converter. Therefore efficiency is improved 7% more. The results obtained from the hardware implementation of both Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converter is shown in Table 2.

Conclusion
The single-input and two-output converter implemented with Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT has more efficiency than that implemented with Advanced Perturb and Observation (APO) method. The IC MPPT algorithm always gives a stable duty ratio corresponds to the highest power whereas APO algorithm is varying in nature. Moreover, the time taken for reaching the highest power point is more in IC compared to the APO method. An improvement in efficiency of 5% and 7% is achieved in the proposed Zeta-Buck Boost and SEPIC-Cuk combination converter while implementing with IC MPPT. The solar panel produces exact characteristics curves given in the datasheet. One of the disadvantages found out while designing the converters is that the setup will become bulkier due to more number of the components. To lower the spark on the switch, the switch terminals are connected to ground during the implementation. These converters are useful in the field of battery charging, 24 V power supplies, telecommunications, microelectronics, electric vehicles and other small power level applications.

Disclosure statement
Authors do have any conflict of interest.