Advanced search
1,714
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Genetic toxicology of folpet and captan

, , &
Pages 546-574
Received 16 Oct 2009
Accepted 26 Mar 2010
Published online: 23 Jun 2010

Folpet and captan are fungicides whose genotoxicity depends on their chemical reaction with thiols. Multiple mutagenicity tests have been conducted on these compounds due to their positive activity in vitro and their association with gastrointestinal tumors in mice. A review of the collective data shows that these compounds have in vitro mutagenic activity but are not genotoxic in vivo. This dichotomy is primarily due to the rapid degradation of folpet and captan in the presence of thiol-rich matrices typically found in vivo. Genotoxicity has not been found in the duodenum, the mouse tumor target tissue. It is concluded that folpet like captan presents an unlikely risk of genotoxic effects in humans.

Contents

Abstract    546

1. Introduction    547

2. Chemistry, degradation, and reactivity    547

3. In vitro assay systems    547

 3.1. Microbial gene mutation assays    547

 3.2. Mammalian in vitro gene mutation assays    548

 3.3. Mammalian in vitro chromosomal assays    549

 3.4. In vitro ancillary tests    550

4. In vitro mutagenicity of folpet and captan degradates    550

 4.1. Thiophosgene    550

 4.2. Ring structures and metabolites    551

5. In vivo assay systems    551

 5.1. Gene mutation somatic cell assays    551

 5.2. Chromosomal somatic cell assays    552

 5.3. Ancillary somatic cell in vivo assays    552

 5.4. In vivo germ cell gene mutation    552

 5.5. In vivo germ cell chromosomal mutation    553

6. Special in vivo studies in duodenum    553

 6.1. Duodenal chromosomal aberration    553

 6.2. Duodenal DNA damage    554

7. In vitro and in vivo molecular studies    555

 7.1. Metabolism and distribution    555

 7.2. Interactions with thiols    555

 7.3. DNA binding studies    556

 7.4. DNA-specific proteins    557

8. Summary of the genotoxicity of folpet and captan    571

Acknowledgment    571

Declaration of interest    571

References    571

1. Introduction

Folpet and captan are agricultural fungicides that have been in use for over 60 years. They have been evaluated extensively for genotoxicity using both in vitro and in vivo assays. Early literature contains a number of reports on captan and folpet (Bridges, 1975). Since then, additional studies have been performed in response to the availability of improved genetic tests (Zeiger, 2004). Many of the more recent studies were conducted by registrants and submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, Agency). These studies are available in the public record and have been evaluated in this review. Abridged study data from unpublished reports have been provided online at the Informa Web site (www.informahealthcare.com/txc). Full study reports of the unpublished material that have MRID numbers are available from US EPA via Freedom of Information requests.

EPA initially cited the in vitro mutagenic activity to support a classification of genotoxic carcinogenicity of captan and folpet (US EPA, 1999a, 1999b). In 2004, the Agency reversed this stance for captan and noted that captan has a nongenotoxic carcinogenic mode of action (US EPA, 2004). A reevaluation of folpet’s carcinogenic mode of action is currently under review at the Agency. Folpet and captan share a common mode of action and display similar genotoxicity profiles (Bernard and Gordon, 2000).

Both folpet and captan are degraded to the reactive substance thiophosgene, along with relatively stable ring structures (Gordon, 2010). This reaction is irreversible. It occurs as a result of hydrolysis as well as a rapid chemical reaction in the presence of exposed thiol groups (Lukens, 1966; Siegel, 1971). The half-life of folpet and captan in human blood is 4.9 seconds and 0.97 seconds, respectively (Gordon et al., 2001). Thiophosgene reactivity in blood is also rapid, with a half-life of 0.6 seconds (Arndt and Dohn, 2004).

This review accompanies a companion paper that evaluates the carcinogenic mode of action of folpet on the mouse gastrointestinal tract (Cohen et al., 2010). Taken together, the collective data show that folpet, like captan, induces duodenal tumors in mice through a nongenotoxic, proliferation-based mechanism.

2. Chemistry, degradation, and reactivity

The toxicity and mutagenicity of folpet and captan are determined in large part by their chemical reactivity. The chemical structures of folpet and captan, and their degradation products, are shown in Figure 1. Relevant physical/chemical parameters are shown in Table 1. Reactivity with thiols is the signature chemical reaction of both parent molecules. This reaction is chemically driven and nonenzymatic. The active moiety of each parent chemical is the trichloromethylthio functional group, SCCl3 (Lukens, 1966). Folpet degrades to phthalimide (PI) and thiophosgene (SCCl2); captan degrades to 1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) and thiophosgene. PI and THPI are relatively stable. Phthalimide may be metabolized to phthalamic acid and phthalic acid (Figure 2) (Gordon, 2010). THPI is similarly metabolized with some additional reactions due to the presence of the single double bond in the ring (Gordon, 2010).

Table 1. Identity, chemical, and physical properties of folpet, captan, and thiophosgene.

Figure 1. Simplified chemical reaction of folpet and captan with thiols.

Figure 2. Secondary metabolism of phthalimide.

Both folpet and captan are hydrolyzed at rates that increase with increasing pH (Table 1). Thiophosgene is volatile and will hydrolyze in water to produce hydrochloric acid, carbonyl sulfide, and hydrogen sulfide (Siegel, 1971). Thiophosgene also reacts rapidly with other functional groups (amines, amides, imides, alcohols) (Tilles, 1966; Sharma, 1978, 1986).

As a result of the chemical properties of folpet and captan, the intact animal is exposed systemically only to the ring structures, when dosed by conventional oral routes of exposure; parent fungicides are essentially absent when these compounds are administered orally.

3. In vitro assay systems

3.1. Microbial gene mutation assays

Folpet and captan generally produce positive results in microbial gene mutation assays, which include assays in Salmonella, Esherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and also yeast mitotic recombination assays (see Bridges, 1975, for a review of the early studies). In one of the first studies utilizing a standard Ames plate incorporation method (Ames et al., 1975), folpet and captan were positive in strains TA1535 and TA100, responsive to base pair mutation, whereas strains TA1537 and TA1538, sensitive to frameshift mutation, were either negative or equivocal (Simmon et al., 1977). This specificity for base pair mutation was consistent with the observations in the earlier work (Ficsor and Nii, 1972) and was borne out in subsequent investigations (Hour et al., 1998; Ohta et al., 2002). Although captan and folpet generally show greater activity in base pair–sensitive strains, they are positive in the frameshift strains as well (Clarke, 1971; De Flora et al., 1984; Moriya et al., 1983; Nakajima, 1998; Ruiz and Marzin, 1997), particularly when tested in the more sensitive assays and strains. The DNA damage induced by captan is subject to excision repair as demonstrated by negative responses in the exrA strains and positive responses in strains containing mutations in the uvrA gene (Bridges et al., 1972, 1973). Captan and folpet were later shown to be mutagenic in strain TA104, lacking excision repair, but negative or less mutagenic in strain TA102, which has an intact excision repair system (Barrueco and de la Pena, 1988). Many other bacterial studies have also demonstrated positive results (Carere et al., 1978; Nagy et al., 1975; Shiau et al., 1981; Shirasu et al., 1976). Nonbacterial microbial systems, Saccharomyces and Aspergillus, using bacterial methodology similar to the Ames test, produced positive mutagenicity results for captan and folpet (Bignami et al., 1977; Simmon et al., 1977).

Rat and human blood and to a lesser extent plasma were shown to inactivate captan in the early S. typhimurium tester strain TA1950 (Ficsor et al., 1977). The involvement of thiols was reported in a short communication showing mutagenic activity could be significantly reduced or eliminated when folpet and captan were preincubated with rat liver S9, rat blood, or cysteine (Moriya et al., 1978). Dose-response studies (Carver et al., 1985) evaluating the addition of cysteine or glutathione to captan or folpet further linked increased thiol-rich additives to decreased mutagenic activity. The reduction of the mutagenic activity of folpet by the addition of thiol-rich S9 was confirmed using a preincubation assay (Nakajima, 1998). The mitigation of mutagenicity is also affected by the length of preincubation (May, 1993). Thus, mutagenic activity was greatest in absence of S9 followed by the addition of S9 without preincubation and decreasing as periods of preincubation increased.

Consistent with inactivation of captan and folpet by blood and liver homogenates, host-mediated tests in which Salmonella tester strains are injected in rodents were negative (Ficsor et al., 1977; Kennedy et al., 1975).

Folpet and captan are mutagenic in most microbial test systems; however, both are rapidly degraded when allowed to react with thiols added to the test system with resultant decreases in mutagenic activity.

3.2. Mammalian in vitro gene mutation assays

The mammalian in vitro gene mutation assay systems generated results consistent with the microbial gene mutation assays, although they were generally less responsive. Mutagenic activity was also abated in the presence of thiol-rich components. There are several different mammalian mutation assay systems commonly used. They fall into two general categories, those performed in cell suspension like the mouse lymphoma assay and those treated in monolayers like Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) or hamster V79 cell assays. All employ reverse mutation for detection of gene mutation, similar to the S. typhimurium test systems. The mouse lymphoma system has the capability of detecting chromosomal damage in addition to gene mutations when small colonies are scored.

Folpet was tested in the mouse lymphoma assay (soft agar) as part of a large program to evaluate 20 pesticides for mutagenic activity (Jotz et al., 1980 as cited by Clock, 1997). Folpet was found to increase mutation frequency when dosed from 0.3 to 0.51 μg/ml without S9, but was 10 times less active in the presence of S9 (US EPA, 1997). Captan was evaluated in the mouse lymphoma assay (soft agar) at doses from 0.01 to 0.1 µg/ml (Oberly et al., 1984). There was a dose-related increase in mutation frequency (mutants per 105 surviving cells) from 0.06 to 0.1 µg/ml. Toxicity was evident at 0.1 µg/ml resulting in 39% survival (expressed as relative total growth [RTG]). The mutation frequency at 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1 µg/ml was 57, 63, and 72 mutants per 106 surviving cells, respectively. However, the control mutation frequency of 21 mutants per 106 surviving cells was relatively low compared to the currently acceptable range for negative-control frequencies of 35–140 mutants per 106 surviving cells (Moore et al., 2006). The unusually low background mutation frequency confounds the assessment.

A mouse lymphoma assay was performed with captan both with and without S9 using the soft agar method (Edgar et al., 1985). No mutagenic activity was observed in the presence of S9. There was a dose-related increase in mutation frequency for two trials in the absence of S9. In the first trial at 0.2 and 0.3 µg/ml, there were 119 and 235 mutants per 106 surviving cells, respectively, compared to 57 mutants per 106 surviving cells in the control cultures. Survival for these doses was 32% and 6% relative total growth (RTG), respectively. In the second trial, only the 0.2 µg/ml dose yielded a mutation frequency (237 mutants per 106 surviving cells) above background levels, but there was only 5% RTG at this concentration. Current criteria set a 10% RTG limit on cytotoxicity for mutation analysis (Moore et al., 2006); thus, the cultures showing 6% RTG (trial 1) and 5% RTG (trial 2) would have been excluded from analysis if they were assessed today. The early mouse lymphoma studies are difficult to interpret. Assay methods and conditions were in flux at the time of their performance, as were the data evaluation criteria.

The in vitro mammalian mutation assays utilizing the CHO or Chinese hamster V79 gene mutation assays are more informative. Folpet and captan were evaluated in a CHO/hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT) assay that was pioneered in the conducting laboratory (O’Neill et al., 1981). A positive response was observed in three independent trials in the absence of S9 at a dose concentration of 0.25 µg/ml and above. In that study, tissue culture flasks were sealed to prevent volatilization and incubation of the cells with the chemical (5 hours) was done in the absence of fetal calf serum. These conditions optimized the potential for detection of mutations by capping of the flasks, which did not allow dissipation of thiophosgene, and with the lack of calf serum in the flasks, which minimized the reaction of folpet and thiophosgene with serum thiols. No trials were done in the presence of S9. Folpet was negative in Chinese hamster V79 cells (HGPRT locus) with and without S9 at two expression times (Bootman et al., 1986). Concentrations ranged from 0.25 to 2 µg/ml without S9 and 3.125 to 50 µg/ml with S9.

Overall, folpet and captan displayed a positive but weak mutagenic response in the in vitro mammalian gene mutation assays. In these test systems the mutagenicity response was much less than the relatively potent responses observed in the microbial test systems without the presence of S9.

3.3. Mammalian in vitro chromosomal assays

As opposed to mutation assays that detect specific gene defects, the chromosomal assays evaluate the structure of the whole chromosome. As the cell goes into mitosis, it is possible to observe the individual metaphase chromosomes. The chromosomes are stained, identified, and microscopically evaluated for structural changes such as breaks, deletions, and other more complex forms of structural damage such as quadiradials. A wide variety of cell culture systems can be used including primary human lymphocytes.

Three studies of folpet and two studies of captan have evaluated the induction of chromosomal damage in mammalian tissue culture. As in the gene mutation assays, negative, equivocal, as well as positive results were obtained using these in vitro assays. In a study evaluating chromosomal aberrations, CHO cells were exposed to various concentrations of folpet for either 10 or 20 hours in the absence and presence of S9 (Loveday, 1989). Dose ranges from 0.08 to 2.5 µg/ml in trials without S9 and from 0.8 to 75 µg/ml with S9 were used. Positive results were obtained in the CHO cells following both 10 and 20 hours of exposure in the absence of S9 but at one concentration only, 0.75 µg/ml, the highest scorable dose based on excessive cytotoxicity. Aberrant chromosomes were primarily chromatid breaks with some triradials and quadradials (18% cells with aberrations). Similar results were obtained in trials using S9. The 20-hour assay displayed a clearer dose-response. A positive response was observed at 25 µg/ml in the presence of reduced mitotic activity with higher doses unscorable. Concentrations of folpet necessary to induce a response (27% cells with aberrations) at the highest scorable dose were 10- to 30-fold greater in the presence of S9 than in its absence.

The effects on chromosomal structure following exposure to folpet were investigated in primary human lymphocytes taken from whole blood (Bootman et al., 1987). Tests were conducted with triplicate cultures and in two independent trials, both with and without S9. In the first trial, cells were incubated with folpet for 2 hours with S9 and 24 hours without S9. For the second trial, cultures both with and without S9 were exposed for 2 hours. In the first trial without S9, there was evidence of weak activity (single-chromatid breaks and fragments) at concentrations of 3 µg/ml. When retested in the second trial, no clastogenicity was observed at doses of 3 or 5 µg/ml. No clastogenic activity was observed for folpet in either trial with S9.

Folpet was also evaluated in a chromosomal assay in a human lymphoid cell line and a Burkitt lymphoma cell line at 0.5–4 µg/ml (Sirianni and Huang, 1978). No treatments were performed with the addition of S9. The authors reported chromosome or chromatid gaps and breaks, and severe cell growth inhibition in both cultured human lymphoid cell lines after short periods of exposure. Following longer treatment periods, fewer breaks were noted but despiralized or pulverized chromosomes were increased likely due to increased cytotoxicity.

The potential of captan to induce chromosomal aberrations in diploid human fibroblast cultures was evaluated at doses of 0 through 4 µg/ml (Tezuka et al., 1978). Significant mitotic inhibition was observed but no chromosomal aberrations were induced at cytotoxic dosages of 3 and 4 µg/ml captan. Captan induced chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells in vitro at doses of 45 µM (13.5 µg/ml) and higher (Tezuka et al., 1980). No cytotoxicity was observed even at the highest dose level in the V79 cell culture. These divergent results are likely due to the exposure to significantly higher concentration of captan used in the V79 cultures and the different cytotoxicity sensitivities of the two test systems.

Folpet and captan are weak clastogens in some mammalian in vitro cell cultures, resulting primarily in chromosome and chromatid breaks. Analogous to the results in the bacterial and in vitro mammalian gene mutation assays, the addition of a rat liver homogenate mitigated the clastogenic activity of folpet.

3.4. In vitro ancillary tests

Other assays have been developed to assess the ability of a compound to cause DNA or chromosomal damage. These tend to be sentinel assays that indicate the potential for mutation but do not demonstrate the compound is actually a mutagen. For example, unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) detects DNA damage that is repaired by a long patch excision repair system. The fact that the damage is repaired is itself evidence that, although the cell sustained DNA damage, it has the ability to recover before mutation occurs. Likewise, sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) assays monitor the exchange of sister chromatids within a chromosome. This recombinational event is a natural process that can repair damaged DNA and is increased following damage to DNA.

Unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) was monitored in human fibroblast cultures following treatment with folpet or captan both with and without S9. Captan and folpet were assessed as positive (2-fold background) in the presence of S9 but was negative in the absence of S9 (Simmon et al., 1977). A second trial was subsequently performed by the same investigators and the results of both trials were then reassessed as negative (Jones et al., 1984). UDS was not detected in primary human lymphocyte and rat thymocyte cultures exposed to folpet or captan (Rocchi et al., 1980). Both these studies measured incorporated radiolabeled thymidine in DNA extracts and did not employ the current UDS methodology based on auto radiographic grain counts.

Sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) were not induced in V79 cells following exposure to folpet (Sirianni, 1978). Another in vitro SCE study was performed in Chinese hamster V79 cultures with captan at higher doses (Tezuka et al., 1980). This study was positive, as was the Chinese hamster V79 chromosomal aberration study performed in the same laboratory. Captan was marginally positive (18.7 compared to 15.7 SCE/cell for captan and control, respectively) at one dose in cultured human lymphocytes (Vigfusson and Vyse, 1980). None of these SCE assays included S9. As a sentinel test, SCE induction would be expected if the test material causes chromatid or chromosomal breaks.

It was reported that captan causes chromosomal breaks in Chinese hamster V79 cells as evidenced by alkaline elution of the DNA fragments extracted from these cells; the effect was prevented in the presence of rat S9 (Swenberg et al., 1976). Captan induced DNA strand breaks in in vitro cultured human diploid fibroblast cultures at 99.0 µM (Snyder, 1992). Addition of the excision repair inhibitor 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine and hydroxyurea led to an increased number of strand breaks at lower doses of captan. Strand breaks were only observed in closed systems indicating a role of a volatile product. The alkaline elution data are consistent with the induction of SCE and the visual measure of chromosomal breaks in the same cell culture system (Tezuka et al., 1980).

4. In vitro mutagenicity of folpet and captan degradates

Folpet and captan both degrade to thiophosgene, the common reactive degradate. The relatively stable degradates are phthalimide (PI) for folpet and tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI) for captan. The mutagenic activities of these degradates and a metabolite of PI, phthalic acid, have been investigated. In the case of thiophosgene, mutagenicity testing has been assessed by inference based on known chemical properties of both parents (folpet and captan) and thiophosgene.

4.1. Thiophosgene

As early as 1972, the mutagenic activity of captan was thought to be due to a volatile breakdown product. The role of volatile captan products using bacterial mutagenesis systems was evaluated in E. coli (Bridges et al., 1972). In a series of studies, captan was placed on the lid of the Petri dish with the bacteria on agar below. Thus, only a volatile chemical reaction product of captan would be able to reach the bacteria. Mutants observed were distributed randomly on the plates, indicating that a volatile component of captan was mutagenic. Knowing that captan degrades much faster as pH rises, captan-impregnated filter paper was moistened with buffers with increasing pH values and the number of mutants increased with alkalinity. From the lack of mutants following extraction of captan from the filters and by bubbling air through saturated suspensions of captan, it was demonstrated that there was no build-up of breakdown product and the mutagenic product was short-lived. Thus, it was inferred that mutagenicity of captan was a result of a “continuous release of an unstable mutagenic breakdown product from the captan-water interface” (Bridges et al., 1972).

By using specially constructed mutants of E. coli containing mutations in recA, exrA, and uvrA, it was demonstrated again that the mutagenicity of captan was mediated by a volatile mutagen and that it was dependent on reduced DNA repair (uvrA only) capability (Bridges et al., 1973). Similar results were reported for folpet (Bridges, 1975).

In an in vitro mammalian cell study in V79 hamster cells similar to the E. coli studies already described, captan was removed from contact with the cell culture and activated by the addition of carbonate to generate volatile degradation products (Arlett et al., 1975). Both 8-azaguanine (8-AG) and ouabain (Oua) were used as selective agents. Positive results were obtained, indicating the mutagenic component was a volatile product of carbonate-reacted captan. In addition, captan cytotoxicity and mutagenicity disappeared if cells and captan were added to media containing 10% fetal calf serum, allowing the interaction of captan or captan products with serum thiols. In a meeting abstract (data not presented), captan, folpet, and thiophosgene were reported to be mutagenic in S. typhimurium (Rideg, 1982).

4.2. Ring structures and metabolites

THPI, the primary degradate of captan, was not mutagenic in bacterial test systems (Barrueco and de la Pena, 1988; Carver, 1986; EC, 2000a). THPI did not induce micronuclei or apoptotic bodies in mouse duodenal crypt cells following gavage dosing from 250 to 1500 mg/kg (Chidiac and Goldberg, 1987).

PI, the primary degradate of folpet, was not mutagenic in the Ames assay nor in yeast (EC, 2000b; Herbold, 1981; Rideg, 1982). PI was negative in the mouse lymphoma TK+/− gene mutation assay (US EPA, 1984). In a cytogenetic assay performed using human peripheral blood lymphocytes (Pilinskaya, 1986), no chromosomal aberrations were observed. A structurally related product, phthalamide, was also negative in the mouse lymphoma assay performed in the absence of S9 (McGregor et al., 1988). In addition, EPA has judged that phthalimide is not mutagenic or clastogenic and is inactive in tissue culture assays for inhibition of cell growth, differentiation or proliferation (Schnaubelt, 1995).

Phthalic acid, the secondary degradate of PI, was evaluated as negative in the Ames assay (Rideg, 1982; Sayato et al., 1987). It showed no mutagenic effects in the Chinese hamster ovary chromosomal aberration assay nor in the in vivo mouse micronucleus assay (Lee and Lee, 2007).

5. In vivo assay systems

5.1. Gene mutation somatic cell assays

There are very few in vivo tests for gene mutation. One test, the mouse somatic cell assay, measures gene mutation in heterozygous alleles for coat color in mouse embryos exposed in utero (Russell et al., 1981). This assay can detect genetic effects of several kinds, including intragenic mutations, minute deficiencies, chromosomal deletions, and chromosomal crossovers. The somatic cell assay is sometimes referred to as the mouse spot test or the mouse specific locus test and is distinct from the heritable gene mutation assay (Russell et al., 1979) that detects germ cell mutation. Both use the same T-strain of mice with the same heterozygous coat color allele.

Folpet was tested in the mouse somatic cell mutation assay (Moore, 1985) (Table 2). After being co-housed with T-strain male mice, C57Bl/6 pregnant female mice were fed diets containing 0, 100, 1500 or 5000 ppm folpet (equivalent to 11–647 mg/kg) during gestation days (GDs) 8.5 to 12.5. On GD 10.5, pregnant dams received an intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) as a positive control. There was maternal and consequent fetal and neonatal toxicity at 5000 ppm. On days 12 and 28 of lactation, there was no significant increase in the number of pups with recessive coat spots (RCS) or differentiation spots (DS) in any group fed diets containing folpet, as contrasted to a significant increase in the number of pups with RCS delivered from the ENU-treated dams. On day 28 of lactation, there was an increase in pups with white mid-ventral spots (WMVS) in the 5000 ppm group. WMVS are due to melanocyte toxicity and vary with the age of the parental female, time of year, and diet and do not indicate mutation potential (Russell et al., 1981).

Table 2. Number of pups with coat color spots in folpet mouse somatic cell mutation assay.

Captan was evaluated in the same assay at dietary concentrations of 100, 1000, or 5000 ppm (equivalent to 11–419 mg/kg/day) along with positive and negative controls (Nguyen and McGowan, 1980, as reported in Wilkinson et al., 2004). Pregnant dams were fed captan for 5 days beginning on day 8 and ending on day 12 of gestation. Pups were evaluated for “spots” on day 12 and at weaning. The results show that captan did not induce somatic mutations in mice at the three concentrations tested. In a similar study, it was reported in an abstract (Imanishi et al., 1987) that captan induced a frequency of recessive color spots of 2.2% after an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 15 mg/kg, approximating the low dose in the Nguyen study. The background level of recessive color spots in the Nguyen study was 2.9% (Wilkinson et al., 2004), above the reported 2.2% generating the positive result (Imanishi et al., 1987). Based on the two studies, neither folpet nor captan induced in vivo somatic cell mutation (Nguyen and McGowan, 1980, as reported in Wilkinson et al., 2004; Moore, 1985).

5.2. Chromosomal somatic cell assays

Just as chromosomal aberrations can be evaluated in vitro, they can be assessed after in vivo exposure. Although chromosomal aberration can be evaluated in any tissue, the most common tissues used are the bone marrow and peripheral blood. Scoring for chromosomal aberrations is laborious and requires a trained cytogeneticist; however, the micronucleus assay is much simpler to score, and has become an effective substitute for the chromosomal aberration assay (Zeiger, 2004). Both chromosomal aberration and micronucleus assays are widely used to evaluate structural chromosomal damage. Micronuclei arise from chromosomal fragments or whole chromosomes that are not incorporated into daughter nuclei at mitosis and can be scored by differential staining and counting alone. Micronuclei are generally scored in mature erythrocytes of bone marrow or peripheral blood. As the erythrocyte matures, the nucleus is extruded leaving only micronuclei, if present. Both captan and folpet have been evaluated using both direct chromosomal aberration identification and micronuclei formation.

Folpet has been assessed for the ability to induce chromosomal aberrations in both rat and mouse bone marrow in numerous studies with negative results. Folpet showed no clastogenic activity when administered (i.p.) to Swiss albino mice at doses from 125 to 500 mg/kg; there was no increase in chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells at 3, 6, or 24 hours after treatment (Sirianni, 1978). This abstract reported conclusions only with no supportive data available for review. Folpet was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley rat bone marrow following gavage of doses ranging from 150 to 2000 mg/kg (Esber, 1983). Some random aberrations were seen in rats treated with folpet but were not treatment related. Folpet was shown to have no clastogenic activity in male or female rats at post-treatment times of 6, 24, or 48 hours, confirming the earlier results in mice (Sirianni, 1978).

Folpet was also evaluated for its potential to induce chromosomal damage using the bone marrow micronucleus test in CD-1 mice (Jacoby, 1985a). Male and female mice were administered 10, 50 or 250 mg/kg folpet by gavage. All groups were sacrificed at 24 hours with additional control groups, and the 250 mg/kg groups also evaluated at 48 and 72 hours. No toxicity was observed in the animals or in the bone marrow. Treatment with folpet did not result in any significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) or normochromatic erythrocytes (NCEs) at any harvest time (1000 PCEs scored/animal).

Tezuka and co-workers showed captan did not induce chromosomal aberrations in Wistar rat bone marrow whether administered once at oral doses of 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg or on 5 consecutive days at 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg (Tezuka et al., 1978). When Swiss albino mice were i.p. dosed with a 50% captan formulation at 250 mg/kg, chromosomal aberrations were not found (Fry and Ficsor, 1978). In contrast to these studies, it was reported that captan induced chromosomal aberrations in spermatogonia and chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in the bone marrow of an unspecified strain of mice (Feng and Lin, 1987). This study is of questionable quality and has been excluded from the analysis.1

In another chromosomal aberration study, captan was administered to Sprague-Dawley rats by gavage at 0 (0.5% gum tragacanth), 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg per day for 5 consecutive days (Bootman and Whalley, 1979). There was no evidence of chromosomal damage in rat bone marrow at any of the doses tested. Likewise captan did not induce micronuclei in the bone marrow of five male or female CD-1 mice (Jacoby, 1985b). No toxicity or bone marrow cytotoxicity was observed in any treatment with the exception of the positive control group. Captan did not induce micronuclei in either sex at any harvest interval.

In more specialized studies to evaluate nuclear aberrations (micronuclei and apoptotic bodies) in duodenal crypt cells of C57Bl/6J mice exposed in the diet or in CD-1 mice exposed by gavage, it was shown that captan did not induce nuclear aberrations at the tumor target site (Chidiac and Goldberg, 1987). In a similar study, folpet did not induce nuclear aberrations in duodenal crypt cells of CD-1 mice (Gudi and Krsmanovic, 2001). This important study and others conducted in the duodenum will be discussed in detail (Section 6) in relationship to the proposed mode of tumorigenic action. Thus, neither folpet nor captan has been shown to induce chromosomal damage in vivo in studies of acceptable quality.

5.3. Ancillary somatic cell in vivo assays

It has been demonstrated that captan does not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in vivo (Kennelly, 1990). In this study, male Alpk:ApfSD rats were administered captan by gavage at 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg body weight and UDS was evaluated at 4 and 12 hours post-treatment in cultures of excised liver cells. DNA damage was also evaluated in duodenal crypt cells of CD-1 mice exposed to high doses of folpet using the Comet assay. No DNA damage was observed (Clay, 2004). This study is discussed in Section 6.

5.4. In vivo germ cell gene mutation

Although not a mammalian test system, the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal test is considered a measure of germ cell gene mutation in vivo. Mutations in the X-chromosome of D. melanogaster that are phenotypically expressed in males result in lethality. The test detects the occurrence of forward mutations, point mutations, and small deletions in the germ line of the insect.

Sex-linked recessive lethal (SLRL) studies have been performed with captan and folpet with no effect (Kramers and Knaap, 1973; Mollet, 1973; Vogel and Chandler, 1974). However, it was reported that captan and folpet exhibited weak activity at 2000 ppm (Valencia, 1981). In the captan study, when multiples or clusters were appropriately removed from the statistical assessment, both the chromosomal and dominant lethal endpoints were not statistically significantly different compared to controls. With the exception of the weak folpet activity (Valencia, 1981), all studies for SLRL were negative. In a different Drosophila test evaluating wing spots (somatic), captan did not result in an increase in twin spots, which are indicative of mitotic recombination; however, there was weak overall mutagenic activity (Rahden-Staron, 2002). Drosophila somatic cell assays with captan were also negative in a recombination assay (Mollet and Wurgler, 1974).

It should be noted that Drosophila does not possess the glutathione reductase system present in mammalian organisms (Kanzok et al., 2001). Because glutathione reductase systems are involved in the inactivation of folpet and thiophosgene in vivo and are in such abundance in mammalian organisms, Drosophila assays are of limited relevance to mutagenic potential of captan or folpet in higher animals and in humans.

5.5. In vivo germ cell chromosomal mutation

Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the ability of folpet and captan to induce dominant lethality in mice and rats. The term dominant lethal is used to describe a genetic change in a gamete that kills the conceptus early in development. Male animals are treated and mated with untreated females over a period of several weeks to estimate a chemical’s effect on different stages of spermatogenesis. The uterine contents are evaluated for early and late deaths and living fetuses. The induction of dominant lethality is determined by the increase in pre- and post-implantation loss of zygotes in each group compared to control groups. This assay detects major chromosomal defects resulting in fetus/pup lethality.

Neither captan nor folpet induced dominant lethal effects in ICR/SIM mice following a 7-week exposure at dietary levels of 1250, 2500, or 5000 mg/kg (Simmon et al., 1977). Negative results were also obtained when using analytical grade captan in C3H mice (Tezuka et al., 1978). Captan was negative for dominant lethality in Swiss mice; however, individual data were not presented (Epstein et al., 1972).

In contrast to these studies, somewhat mixed results were obtained in a series of two studies performed on captan (Collins, 1972b) and folpet (Collins, 1972a). Osborne-Mendel rats (captan and folpet) and CA-J mice (captan) were administered test compound to 15 male animals per dose group for 5 days by both gavage (50–200 mg/kg/day) and intraperitoneal (2.5–10 mg/kg/day) routes. Males were mated with different groups of untreated females for 10–12 weeks. Antifertility effects were minimal following captan or folpet treatment in the rat or captan treatment in the mouse by either route of administration. Likewise the numbers of mean total implants were not significantly affected in any treatment group for either chemical. In rats after gavage or i.p. dosing, neither captan nor folpet showed statistically significant increases in the percentage of litters with one or more early deaths, but increases appeared for litters with two or more early deaths during the early weeks of the study. Similar results were found in the mouse following captan treatment.

In an attempt to replicate the Collins study with folpet (Collins, 1972a), folpet (gavage doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg/kg) was evaluated for similar endpoints but with 20 Osborne-Mendel rats per group compared with the 15 animals used in the Collins studies (Bradfield, 1980). The total number of implants, corpora lutea, live implants, early deaths, and late deaths were comparable to controls. There was no increase in any folpet-treatment group of litters with two or more early deaths. The positive control, triethylenemelamine, displayed antifertility effects in addition to increases in the number of litters with two or more early deaths. Thus, Bradfield (1980) was not able to confirm the results of Collins (Collins, 1972a).

The Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues initially noted that data on the dominant lethal effects of captan were equivocal (WHO/FAO, 1983). A later review noted that the dominant lethal studies were predominantly negative (WHO/FAO, 1990). The International Agency for Cancer Research notes reported positive dominant lethal results were not confirmed by other studies (IARC, 1983). Overall, the weight of evidence (WOE) shows folpet and captan do not induce dominant lethal effects.

6. Special in vivo studies in duodenum

Numerous chronic bioassays have been performed for folpet and captan, with treatment related duodenal adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and forestomach squamous cell tumors appearing in mice but not in rats or dogs (Cohen et al., 2010). Proliferative changes were primarily seen in the crypt compartment of the duodenum of CD-1 mice following dietary treatment with folpet at 5000 ppm (Milburn, 1997) or captan at 6000 ppm (Pavkov and Thomasson, 1985). Thus, with continued dietary administration over sufficient time, feeding resulted in duodenal tumors. The high reactivity of folpet (and captan) produces cytotoxicity in the mouse duodenum and forestomach to a lesser extent, leading to regenerative proliferation and ultimately the development of tumors without dependence on a component of mutagenicity or DNA damage in the duodenum of mice. Several studies were undertaken to examine if either folpet or captan are capable of inducing genetic damage in this specific target tissue in mice.

6.1. Duodenal chromosomal aberration

Compounds that are clastogenic will produce nuclear aberrations when cells undergo mitosis due to chromosomal damage. This damage will show up as micronuclei and apoptotic bodies. Neither captan nor folpet induced clastogenic changes in the mouse duodenum following oral exposures (Chidiac and Goldberg, 1987; Gudi and Krsmanovic, 2001).

Nuclear aberrations in mouse duodenal crypts were measured following dietary administration of captan to mice in a series of studies (Chidiac and Goldberg, 1987). Captan was fed in the diet at 0, 8000, and 16,000 ppm for 7 days to five or six male C57B1/6J mice per group. Nuclear aberrations were scored as aberrant nuclei (apoptotic bodies and micronuclei) in mouse duodenal crypts. There was no difference in nuclear aberrations between treated and control animals. Likewise, doses of 0, 20, 200, or 2000/1000 mg/kg captan administered by gavage to 10 male CD-1 mice for 5 days did not induce nuclear aberrations. In addition, a variety of different purities and formulations of captan were evaluated and also found negative for nuclear aberrations at doses of 200 and 2,000 mg/kg. Depletion of glutathione by pretreatment with l-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine (BSO) did not induce nuclear aberrations in captan-treated mice (Chidiac and Goldberg, 1987).

In a similar study, folpet did not induce micronuclei or apoptotic cells in the duodenal crypts in CD-1 mice (Gudi and Krsmanovic, 2001). Mice were administered vehicle control (1% gun tragacanth, 0.05% Tween 40 in water), 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg folpet for 5 days or the positive control, dimethylhydrazine. The numbers of apoptotic cells and micronuclei in folpet-treated groups were not statistically significant when compared to control animals, even in the presence of diffuse hyperplasia in the mucosal epithelium in the high-dose group. The incidence of nuclear aberrations in the duodenum crypts is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Folpet nuclear aberration in mouse duodenum.

6.2. Duodenal DNA damage

The comet assay, also known as single-cell gel electrophoresis, is a microgel electrophoresis technique that detects DNA damage in individual cells. The damage is represented by an increase of DNA fragments that have migrated out of the cell nucleus in the form of a characteristic streak similar to the tail of a comet. The DNA fragments are generated by DNA double-strand breaks and single-strand breaks. The length and fragment content of the tail is directly proportional to the amount of DNA damage.

Folpet-induced effects on mouse duodenum were evaluated using the comet assay (Clay, 2004). CD-1 female mice (eight per group) were dosed by gavage with the vehicle, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg folpet, or the positive control, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) by single gavage administration. Duodenal villi were removed by scraping 2 and 6 hours post-treatment. Fifty crypt cells per slide and 150 crypt cells (where possible) per animal were evaluated for comet formation. Measurements made for each cell included head length, tail length, percent head intensity, and percent tail intensity or tail moment. The primary measure of DNA damage is tail moment (Hartmann et al., 2003; Wiklung and Agurell, 2003). Folpet did not cause statistical or biologically significant increases in head length, tail length, percent head intensity, percent tail intensity, or tail moment compared to controls. There was no DNA damage induced in the duodenum when folpet was administered at high oral doses to the mouse. Data are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Folpet in vivo mouse duodenum comet assay.

A series of DNA binding studies were performed in the digestive tract following captan exposure (Pritchard and Lappin, 1991; Provan and Eyton-Jones, 1996; Provan et al., 1995). There was no evidence of captan-DNA binding in the target tissues. A detailed discussion of these studies is found in Section 7.3, DNA binding studies.

7. In vitro and in vivo molecular studies

As a result of the positive findings in the early microbial test systems, both folpet and captan have been the subject of much research related to understanding the basis of the in vitro genotoxicity. The metabolism and toxicokinetics of both compounds have been studied. Information will be presented in this section that discusses the metabolic fate of captan and folpet and the resultant changes in glutathione (GSH) levels in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This is followed by a discussion of studies on DNA binding, histone binding, and DNA polymerase interactions, which can have significant impacts on genotoxicity.

7.1. Metabolism and distribution

The metabolic fate of folpet and captan has been reviewed (Edwards et al., 1991; Gordon, 2010; HSDB, 2001; Trochimowicz et al., 2001). When ingested, folpet and captan are relatively stable in the acidic environment of the stomach; however, they are more readily hydrolyzed in the alkaline environment of the duodenum to phthalimide (PI) or tetrahydrophthalimide (THPI), respectively, and to thiophosgene.

The distribution of captan and its degradates was determined in different segments of the gastrointestinal tract of mice. CD-1 male mice (30 per exposure level) were administered [1,2-14C]cyclohexene-labeled captan in their diets at concentrations of 0, 400, or 3000 ppm for varying lengths of time (Provan and Eyton-Jones, 1996). Radioactivity was measured in the contents and the epithelial tissue of the different segments of the gastrointestinal tract; segments studied were the stomach, duodenum, 10-cm segments of the rest of the small intestine, cecum, and the cecum to anus segment. A low, steady-state concentration of radiolabel was observed along the entire small intestine in both the 400 ppm and 3000 ppm groups. The radiolabel was associated with the duodenal contents rather than the epithelial tissues and did not accumulate with time. Parent captan was detectable only in the stomach of 3/6 mice receiving the 3000 ppm diets; in mice receiving 400 ppm, only captan degradates were found. Consistent with the rapid degradation of captan observed in the stomach, only THPI and its metabolites were found in duodenum, blood, and urine.

7.2. Interactions with thiols

As was briefly discussed in Sections 2 through 6, glutathione and other thiol-containing molecules play an essential role in the inactivation of folpet and captan (Davidek and Siefert, 1975; Gordon et al., 2001). The role of thiols was noted when folpet and captan were tested for genotoxicity in Salmonella and E. coli repair-deficient strains (Moriya et al., 1978). It was also demonstrated, using the S. typhimurium tester strains, that captan was degraded in rat or human blood during a 45-minute incubation (Ficsor et al., 1977). Rat plasma inactivated captan but not as readily as whole blood. This observation correlated with higher amounts of glutathione in whole blood compared to plasma (Michelet et al., 1995). Captan treatment in V79 cells resulted in a 23% decrease in non-protein sulfhydryl groups, mainly reduced glutathione (GSH) (Rahden-Staron et al., 1994). It can be concluded from these studies that in the presence of thiol-containing systems, captan is degraded and subsequent mutagenic activity in vitro is diminished or eliminated.

If folpet or captan remains intact long enough to enter the systemic circulation, each will be quickly degraded by thiols in the blood. Studies have shown that thiophosgene also reacts rapidly with other functional groups such as amines, amides, imides, and alcohols (Sharma, 1978, 1986; Tilles, 1966) and EPA has concluded that thiophosgene is so labile that residues after oral ingestion of captan are not quantifiable (US EPA, 1999b).

Concentrations of GSH in the cytoplasm of most animal tissues range from 0.1 to 10 mM (Aukerman et al., 1984; Pastore et al., 2001) and thus are in sufficient quantity to deactivate folpet, captan, and thiophosgene. Furthermore, the cytoplasm of most animal cells contains high levels of GSH S-transferases, which regenerate GSH, resulting in more available GSH for the reactions with reactive chemicals (Levy et al., 1993).

From a toxicological standpoint, the rapid nonenzymatic reactions of folpet, captan, and thiophosgene with tissue and blood thiols result in the effective elimination of these compounds.

GSH levels have been evaluated following captan and folpet treatment in rats. Single oral bolus doses of captan result in an early decrease in GSH in the duodenum (measured in minutes) followed by a rebound increase in GSH levels (Katz et al., 1982). In mice, continued administration of captan in the feed resulted in a higher sustained GSH level (Miaullis et al., 1980).

More elaborate studies of the role of GSH have been conducted with folpet (Chasseaud, 1991). Because folpet shares a common mechanism of toxicity with captan with regard to duodenal tumor induction in mice (along with in vitro mutagenicity), these data help to further understand the likely effects of captan on GSH levels. Folpet was administered as a bolus dose at 7.6, 72, and 668 mg/kg to CD-1 male mice, and GSH levels were measured in the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and liver ranging from 0.5 to 24 hours post-treatment (Chasseaud, 1991). Depletion of GSH was observed 0.5 hours post-treatment in the mid- and high-dosage groups in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum (Table 5). The depletion was the greatest in the duodenum and jejunum. It was still depleted in the duodenum 1 hour post-exposure. After 2 hours, the levels of GSH had rebounded to within control levels in all tissues and at all doses with the exception of the liver. Six hours after exposure, the GSH levels statistically significantly increased in the duodenum, beginning at the low dose and increased in a dose-responsive manner. In the mid- and high-dose groups, GSH levels in the jejunum and ileum were significantly increased. By 24 hours, at the mid-dose, GSH levels in all tissues were declining but still above control values. In the high-dose groups, the level of GSH in the gastrointestinal tract was higher at 24 hours than at 6 hours. No effects, either increases or decreases in GSH, were seen in the stomach at any dose or time period. These data strongly suggest that folpet-GSH interaction occurs in the small intestine following oral administration. It also implies that as the folpet, captan, or thiophosgene move through the intestinal tract, there is time for these products to be deactivated by GSH and other thiols, unless capacity is overwhelmed by very large oral doses.

Table 5. Folpet effect on GSH levelsa in various organs of the mouse.

The liver continued to show decreased levels of GSH at the high dose at 24 hours post-treatment, whereas all the other tissues were showing rebounding effects at 24 hours. This does not likely represent binding of the GSH in the liver as much as the liver being the major source of circulating GSH (Meister, 1988).

7.3. DNA binding studies

Studies with captan have been conducted with the 14C and 35S labels on the trichloromethylthio side chain. Both label locations are not ideal: subsequent to degradation, the 14C enters the one-carbon pool as 14CO2 and the 35S undergoes sulfur exchange. This has the potential to result in the appearance of overall binding when it could be the incorporation of these free available radiolabels into macromolecules.

Captan was reported to bind to nucleotides to produce a 7-(trichloromethylsulphenyl) guanine adduct when added to both purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, which were dissolved in saline (Anderson and Rosenkranz, 1974). When analyzed by paper chromatography, only the migration of deoxyguanosine was affected. The reaction product, identified by spectral properties, was presumed to be the 7-(trichloromethylsulphenyl)-guanine adduct. To confirm their in vitro results, 35S-captan was administered to a single mouse. The DNA reaction product was reported to be the same presumptive 7-guanine adduct (administered dose, specific activity, and tissue source of DNA were not provided) (Anderson and Rosenkranz, 1974).

Captan was reported to form DNA adducts in vitro when treated in cell-free systems (Snyder, 1992). When 3 mg of 14C-captan (methyl labeled) was reacted with 4 or 4.6 mg herring sperm DNA for 1 hour at 37°C in 7.5 ml of buffer, DNA adducts were detected at an unusually high level of binding. Excess radiolabeled captan was not fully removed prior to the analysis of DNA binding, confounding the interpretation of results. Standards were not available for confirmation of DNA adducts.

Studies in Osborne-Mendel rats and CD-1 mice fed 300 and 1600 mg/kg 14C-captan (trichloromethylthio labeled) investigated the ability of captan to interact with DNA (Selsky, 1981). Insufficient radioactivity was present for analysis. An additional dose of 156 mg/kg containing a higher specific activity of radiolabeled captan was administered to mice. Although there was an association of radiolabel with DNA of mice, dialysis experiments showed the majority of the detected radioactivity was noncovalently bound.

A series of DNA binding studies were performed in the digestive tract following captan exposure (Pritchard and Lappin, 1991; Provan and Eyton-Jones, 1996; Provan et al., 1995). Captan was evaluated for the ability to bind to DNA in the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, liver, and bone marrow of CD-1 mice exposed to either 35S- or 14C- (methyl position) labeled captan (Pritchard and Lappin, 1991). Presumed DNA binding was observed in the bone marrow, liver, stomach, jejunum, and duodenum. No attempt was made to digest the DNA to confirm the presence of captan-DNA adducts. Subsequent purification of the DNA by cesium chloride gradient separation showed the radioactivity was not covalently bound to the DNA but was associated with a material co-purified with the DNA. These results were similar to those previously reported (Selsky, 1981).

To better understand the nature of this “bound” co-eluting material, the elution patterns of DNA from CD-1 mice fed either 35S-captan and 35S-N-acetylcysteine or two thiazolidine derivatives were compared (Provan et al., 1995). To elucidate the nature of the association of radiolabel with DNA, cesium chloride elution patterns from the liver and duodenum were analyzed. Although the bound material from captan or thiol containing products co-eluted in different positions on the cesium chloride gradient, none was found to co-elute with DNA. It was concluded the DNA binding observed in the GI tract after exposure to captan was due to the incorporation of free sulfur into protein or sulfur-containing macromolecules that was contaminating the DNA preparations. Thus, there was no evidence of captan-DNA binding. In a follow-up study on the disposition of (14C-cyclohexene-labeled) captan through the digestive tract, radiolabel was found to be associated with the contents of the GI tract and not the tissue (Provan and Eyton-Jones, 1996).

DNA-adduct formation has been noted in vitro (Anderson and Rosenkranz, 1974), giving a presumptive 7-(trichloromethylsulphenyl)-guanine adduct, but DNA-adduct formation in vivo following 14C- or 35S-captan administration has not been convincingly demonstrated (Pritchard and Lappin, 1991; Provan and Eyton-Jones, 1996; Provan et al., 1995).

7.4. DNA-specific proteins

Under specific in vivo administration conditions (i.p. injection), folpet and captan can bind to histones and interfere with DNA unwinding and renaturation (Couch and Siegel, 1977; Couch et al., 1977; Grilli et al., 1995).

Folpet is capable of inducing DNA damage in rats when dosed by i.p. at 1/3 to 1/6 the LD50 (Grilli et al., 1995). Folpet induced single-strand breaks, demonstrated by DNA unwinding as measured by fluorescence comparing rates of renaturation of DNA after physical denaturation. Twenty years earlier, it was demonstrated that the resultant binding of folpet and captan to the lysine-rich histones in vivo (rat liver, i.p. dosed) and in vitro (calf thymus DNA) changed the configuration of the histones, which altered the ability of the nuclear histones to stabilize DNA structure (Couch and Siegel, 1977; Couch et al., 1977). Interestingly, the binding to histones was greater at pH 9 and could be washed out by the addition of dithiothreitol (Couch and Siegel, 1977). Binding to histones also altered the extraction characteristics of the nuclear protein fractions. The DNA strand break results (Grilli et al., 1995), when interpreted in light of reported binding of folpet to histones that directly affects the ability of the DNA to renature are consistent with the results of Couch et al. (1977). Secondly, animals were dosed by i.p. injection, which increases bioavailability of folpet and limits the neutralizing actions of cellular thiols. Because i.p. injection bypasses the normal routes of exposure, it does not simulate anticipated human exposure.

DNA polymerases, similar to histones, are integrally linked to DNA integrity. In vitro biochemical investigations have demonstrated that captan inhibits DNA polymerase by competing for the same site as the DNA while not interfering with the fidelity of the DNA polymerase I copy of the DNA template (Dillwith and Lewis, 1982). Using captan as an inhibitor of viral reverse transcriptase, the differential effects of captan on DNA polymerase and RNase H activity could be determined (Freeman-Wittig et al., 1986). RNase H activity was 10-fold more sensitive to captan than either DNA-dependent or RNA-dependent DNA polymerase. Based on the observation that dithiothreitol prevented captan inhibition, it was concluded that the trichloromethylthio moiety of captan was involved in the inhibitory action (Freeman-Wittig et al., 1986). Captan was subsequently found to be active at but not limited to the nucleoside triphosphate binding site and DNA binding site of the RNA polymerase (Luo and Lewis, 1992).

A number of in vitro studies have been conducted with the goal of elucidating key elements associated with folpet and captan’s mutagenicity. The reactivity of folpet, captan, and thiophosgene is such that within an in vitro environment reactions will occur with available thiols. The in vitro environment is distinct from the intact animal. Although these mechanistic studies speak to possible modes of mutagenic action, they are not performed in systems comparable to the in vivo setting where captan and folpet mutagenicity is absent.

8. Summary of the genotoxicity of folpet and captan

In the first concerted effort to assess mutagenicity by a weight-of-evidence (WOE) approach, the International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (ICPEMC) assigned a system of quantitative scoring to help elucidate if a chemical was active (Brusick et al., 1992; Lohman et al., 1992; Mendelsohn et al., 1992; Moore et al., 1992). A more direct WOE was undertaken by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) (Kirkland et al., 2007) and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) (Thybaud et al., 2007b).

A tiered WOE approach has been used to evaluate the available database of folpet and captan genotoxicity studies. In this WOE, more weight is placed on the results from the higher tier in vivo studies. Although the lower tier studies are intentionally designed to optimize sensitivity, the higher tier studies are more relevant to determine the potential for somatic and heritable mutations in humans (Kirkland et al., 2007; Thybaud et al., 2007a, 2007b). Table 6 summarizes the folpet and captan results of the genotoxicity studies by category. Tables 7 reports the results of the individual genotoxicity studies in vitro; Table 8 reports the results of the in vivo genotoxicity studies; and Table 9 reports the results of genotoxicity studies of folpet and captan metabolites. Both folpet and captan induce gene mutation in microbial systems, and the mutation frequency is greatly diminished or eliminated by the addition of thiol containing components. In vitro mammalian test systems for both gene mutation and chromosomal damage show mixed results overall in the absence of S9 and little or no activity when S9 is present.

Table 6. Summary of folpet and captan genotoxicity.

Table 7. Folpet and captan in vitro genotoxicity studies.

Table 8. Folpet and captan in vivo genotoxicity studies.

Table 9. Folpet and captan metabolite genotoxicity studies.

The collective in vivo tests indicate the absence of genotoxicity. In particular, both folpet and captan do not induce clastogenic changes in the carcinogenic target tissue, the mouse duodenum. DNA damage in this tissue, as noted in the Comet assay, is also absent after folpet administration. The WOE conclusion is that these fungicides are not in vivo genotoxicants. Neither folpet nor captan produce mutagenic or clastogenic effects following oral ingestion in vivo. If allowed access to DNA, as in in vitro test systems, folpet and captan and/or thiophosgene have the ability to induce mutagenic effects in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. The presence of thiol-containing small molecules and macromolecules in the whole animal neutralize folpet and captan before they can induce DNA damage.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Cheryl Putnam with the preparation of the manuscript.

Declaration of interest

Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc., a registrant of folpet and captan, employs Dr. Singh. Drs. Cohen, Gordon, and Arce have served as consultants for Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc. The contents of this review reflect solely the view of the authors.

Notes

1 The reported LD50 (2850 mg/kg) from a local source was unusually low and mathematical errors were present that made data interpretation difficult.

References

  • Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. (1975). Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31:347363. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Anderson MD, Rosenkranz HS. (1974). Greenhouse fungicide—Environmental carcinogen? Henry Ford Hosp Med J 22:3540. [Google Scholar]
  • Arlett CF, Turnbull D, Harcourt SA, Lehmann AR, Colella CM. (1975). A comparison of the 8-azaguanine and ouabain-resistance systems for the selection of induced mutant Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 33:261278. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Arndt T, Dohn D. (2004). Measurement of the half-life of thiophosgene in human blood. Hercules, CA: PTRL West, Inc. Sponsor: Captan Task Force. Report no. 1146W-1. June 3, 2004. MRID 46296101. [Google Scholar]
  • Aukerman SL, Brundrett RB, Hartman PE. (1984). Detoxification of nitrosamides and nitrosocarbamates in blood plasma and tissue homogenates. Environ Mutagen 6:835849. [Google Scholar]
  • Barrueco C, de la Pena E. (1988). Mutagenic evaluation of the pesticides captan, folpet, captafol, dichlofluanid and related compounds with the mutants TA102 and TA104 of Salmonella typhimurium. Mutagenesis 3:467480. [Google Scholar]
  • Bignami M, Aulicino F, Velcich A, Carere A, Morpurgo G. (1977). Mutagenic and recombinogenic action of pesticides in Aspergillus nidulans. Mutat Res 46:395402. [Google Scholar]
  • Bootman J, Whalley H. (1979). Merpan Tech: Investigation of effects on bone marrow chromosomes of the rat after sub-acute oral administration. Essex, England: Life Sciences Research Stock. Report no. 79/MAK008/292. MRID 00062982. [Google Scholar]
  • Bootman J, Hodson-Walker G, Lloyd JM. (1986). Folpan tech: Investigation of mutagenic activity at HGPRT locus in a Chinese hamster V79 cell mutation system. CRO: Eye, Suffolk, England: Life Science Research. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works Limited. Report no. 86/MAK054/188. May 16, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • Bootman J, Dance CA, Hodson-Walker G. (1987). In vitro assessment of the clastogenic activity of Folpan technical in cultured human lymphocytes. Eye, Suffolk, England: Life Science Research. Sponsor: Makhteshim-Agan (America), Inc. Report no. 87/MAK053/031. March 23, 1987. MRID 42122015. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradfield LG. (1980). Dominant lethal study of Phaltan technical (folpet). Richmond, CA: Chevron Environmental Health Center. Report no. SOCAL 1355. January 8, 1980. MRID 00029462. [Google Scholar]
  • Bridges BA. (1975). The mutagenicity of captan and related fungicides. Mutat Res 32:334. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Bridges BA, Mottershead RP, Rothwell MA, Green MHL. (1972). Captan mutagenesis of repair-deficient strains of Escherichia coli. EMS Newslett 6:10. [Google Scholar]
  • Bridges BA, Mottershead RP, Colella CM. (1973). Induction of forward mutations to colicin E2 resistance in repair deficient strains of Escherichia coli: Experiments with ultraviolet light and captan. Mutat Res 21:303313. [Google Scholar]
  • Brusick DJ, Ashby J, de Serres EJ, Lohman PHM, Matsushima T, Matter BE, Mendelsohn ML, Moore DH, Nesnow S, Waters MD. (1992). A method for combining and comparing short-term genotoxicity test data. Mutat Res 266:160. [Google Scholar]
  • Carere A, Ortali VA, Cardamone G, Torracca AM, Raschetti R. (1978). Microbiological mutagenicity studies of pesticides in vitro. Mutat Res 57:277286. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Carver JH. (1986). Microbial/mammalian microsome mutagenicity plate incorporation assay with tetrahydrophthalimide. Richmond, CA: Chevron Environmental Health Center. Report no. CEHC 2618. October 2 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • Carver JH, Machado ML, Richter WR. (1985). Microbial/mammalian microsome mutagenicity plate incorporation assay: Comparison of Captan Technical (SX-1086), Chevron Folpet Technical (SX-1388), and Chevron Captafol Technical (SX-945). Richmond, CA: Environmental Health & Toxicology. Report no. SOCAL 2041; R-9246. October 15, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • CDPR (1992). Summary of toxicology data—Captan. Sacramento, CA: Medical Toxicology Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. T910722. SB 950-206, Chemical Code 104. July 6 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • Chasseaud LF. (1991). Comparative metabolic fate and biochemical effects of folpet in male rats and mice. Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, England: Huntingdon Research Centre Ltd.. Sponsor: New York: Makhteshim-Agan (America) Inc. Report no. NRC/MBS 32/90110 (Volume I: rats); NRC/MBS 33/90110 (Volume II: mice). March 5, 1991. MRID 42122016. [Google Scholar]
  • Chidiac P, Goldberg MT. (1987). Lack of induction of nuclear aberrations by captan in mouse duodenum. Environ Mutagen 9:297306. MRID 43405103. [Crossref], [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • Clarke CH. (1971). The mutagenic specificities of pentachloronitrobenzene and captan two environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 11:247248. [Google Scholar]
  • Clay PP. (2004). Evaluation of the in vivo comet assay in the mouse duodenum. Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK: Central Toxicology Laboratory. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works, Ltd. Report no. SM1245. September 22, 2004. MRID 47605801. [Google Scholar]
  • Clock M. (1997). HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document for Folpet; Case No. 0101; Chemical No. 081601. Memorandum to Lois Rossi, Chief, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508W), thru Elizabeth A. Doyle, Chief, Chemistry and Exposure Branch 1, Health Effects Division (7509C). July 2, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen SM, Gordon EB, Singh P, Arce GT, Nyska A. (2010). Carcinogenic mode of action of folpet in mice and evaluation of its relevance to humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 40: this issue. [Google Scholar]
  • Collins TF. (1972a). Dominant lethal assay. II. Folpet and difolatan. Food Cosmet Toxicol 10:363371. [Google Scholar]
  • Collins TF. (1972b). Dominant lethal assay. I. Captan. Food Cosmet Toxicol 10:353361. [Google Scholar]
  • Couch RC, Siegel MR. (1977). Interaction of captan and folpet with mammalian DNA and histones. Pestic Biochem Physiol 7:531546. [Google Scholar]
  • Couch RC, Siegel MR, Dorough HW. (1977). Fate of captan and folpet in rats and their effects on isolated liver nuclei. Pestic Biochem Physiol 7:547558. [Google Scholar]
  • Davidek J, Siefert J. (1975). The interaction of Folpet with glutathione-dependent demethylation enzyme stystem of rat liver. Pestic Biochem Physiol 5:552556. [Google Scholar]
  • De Flora S, Zannacchi P, Camoirano A, Bennicelli C, Badolati G. S. (1984). Genotoxic activity and potency of 135 compounds in the Ames reversion test and in a bacterial DNA-repair test. Mutat Res 133:161198. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Dillwith JW, Lewis RA. (1982). Inhibition of DNA polymerase by captan. Biochim Biophys Acta 696:245252. [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2000a). Dataset on 1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide. International Uniform Chemical Information Database, European Commission. CD-Rom edition. February 19, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • EC (2000b). Dataset on phthalimide. International Uniforn Chemical Information Database, European Commission. Report no. IUCLID, Version 4. February 19, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • Edgar DH, Bosworth HJ, Ransome SJ, Banks S, Hankinson K. (1985). An assessment of the mutagenic potential of Merpan technical using an in vitro mammalian cell test system. CRO: Huntington, Cambridgeshire, England: Huntingdon Research Centre. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd. Report no. MSB/9A. December 16, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards R, Ferry DG, Temple WA. (1991). Fungicides and related compounds. In: Hayes WJ Jr, Laws ER Jr, eds. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 14091470. [Google Scholar]
  • Epstein SS, Arnold E, Andrea J, Bass W, Bishop Y. (1972). Detection of chemical mutagens by the dominant lethal assay in the mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 23:288325. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Esber HJ. (1983). In-vivo cytogenetics study in rats with Chevron Folpet Technical. EG&G Mason Research Institute. Sponsor: Chevron Chemical Company. Report no. 2-225. November 9, 1983. MRID 160445. [Google Scholar]
  • Feng JY, Lin BY. (1987). Cytogenetic effects of an agricultural antibiotic captan on mouse bone marrow and testicular cells. Environ Res 43:359363. [Google Scholar]
  • Ficsor G, Nii GM. (1972). Survey of pesticides for mutagenicity by the bacterial-plate assay method. Newslett Environ Mutagen Soc (6):68. [Google Scholar]
  • Ficsor G, Bordas S, Wade SM, Muthiani E, Wertz GF, Zimmer DM. (1977). Mammalian host- and fluid-mediated mutagenicity assays of captan and streptozotocin in Salmonella typhimurium. Mutat Res 48:116. [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman-Wittig MJ, Vinocour M, Lewis RA. (1986). Differential effects of captan on DNA polymerase and ribonuclease H activities of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. Biochemistry 25:30503055. [Google Scholar]
  • Fry SM, Ficsor G. (1978). Cytogenetic test of captan in mouse bone marrow. Mutat Res 58:111114. [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon EB. (2010). Captan and folpet. In: Krieger R, ed. Hayes Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Elsevier, New York, p. 19151949. [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon EB, Mobley SC, Ehrlich T, Williams M. (2001). Measurement of the reaction between the fungicides captan or folpet and blood thiols. Toxicol Methods 11:209223. [Google Scholar]
  • Grilli S, Moauro A, Mazzullo M. (1995). In vivo fluorimetric assay of DNA unwinding as evidence of the damage induced by folpet in rat liver DNA. J Environ Sci Health A 30:119127. [Google Scholar]
  • Gudi R, Krsmanovic L. (2001). Nuclear aberration test in the mouse duodenum (folpet) and photomicrographs. Rockville, MD: BioReliance Corporation. Report no. AA31SK.123005.BTL. March 15, 2001. MRID 45745105. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, Brendler-Schwaab S, Burlinson B, Clay P, Collins A, Smith A, Speit G, Thybaud V, Tice RR. (2003). Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. Mutagenesis 18:4551. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Herbold BA. (1981). Studies to evaluate artificial sweeteners especially Remsen-Fahlberg saccharin, and their possible impurities for potential mutagenicity by the Salmonella/mammalian liver microsome test. Mutat Res 90:365372. [Google Scholar]
  • Hour T, Chen L, Lin J. (1998). Comparative investigation on the mutagenicities of organophosphate, phthalidomide, pyrethoid and carbamate insecticides by the Ames and lactam tests. Mutagenesis 13:157166. [Google Scholar]
  • HSDB (2001). Hazardous Substances Databank. Comprehensive peer-reviewed toxicology data for about 5000 chemicals generated and maintained by the National Occupational Safety and Health Administration (NIOSH). Available at: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB. Access date: October 1, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • IARC. (1983). Summaries and evaluations—Captan. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 30:295. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/IARC.vol30/captan.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Imanishi H, Sasaki YF, Watanabe M, Moriya M, Shrasu Y, Tutikawa K. (1987). Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticides in the mouse spot test [abstract]. Mutat Res 182:361. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacoby O. (1985a). Folpan—Mouse micronucleus test. Ness Ziona, Israel: Life Science Research Israel, Ltd. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works, Ltd. Report no. MAK/071/FOL. April 7, 1985. MRID 150558. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacoby O. (1985b). Merpan—Mouse micronucelus test. Ness Ziona, Israel: Life Science Research Israel, Ltd. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works. Report no. MAK/072/MER. May 26, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones DCL, Simmon VF, Mortelmans KE, Mitchell AD, Evans EL, Jotz MM, Riccio ES, Robinson DE, Kirkhart BA. (1984). Project summary: In vitro and in vivo mutagenicity studies of environmental chemicals. Research Triangle Park, NC: US EPA, Health Effects Research Laboratory. Report no. EPA-600/S1-84-003. March 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • Jotz M, Rundle D, Mitchell A. (1980). An evaluation of mutagenic potential of Folpet employing the L5178Y TK+/− mouse lymphoma assay. Stanford Research Institute. Report no. LSU-7558. MRID 162394. [Google Scholar]
  • Kanzok SM, Fechner A, Bauer H, Ulschmid JK, Muller HM, Botella-Munoz J, Schneuwly S, Schirmer R, Becker K. (2001). Substitution of the thioredoxin system for glutathione reductase in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 291:643646. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Katz AC, Sauerhoff MW, Zwicker GM, Freudenthal RI. (1982). The effect of captan on duodenal sulfhydryl levels in rats. Farmington, CT: Stauffer Chemical Company, Environmental Health Center. Report no. T-10832. September 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy GL, Arnold DW, Keplinger ML. (1975). Mutagenicity studies with captan, captafol, folpet and thalidomide. Food Cosmet Toxicol 18:5564. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennelly JC. (1990). Captan assessment for the induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes in vivo. Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK: ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory. Report no. CTL/P/2995. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirkland D, Pfuhler S, Tweats D, Aardema M, Corvi R, Darroudi F, Elhajouji A, Glatt H, Hastwell P, Hayashi M, Kasper P, Kirchner S, Lynch A, Marzin D, Maurici D, Meunier J, Müller L, Nohynek G, Parry J, Parry E, Thybaud V, Tice R, van Benthem J, Vanparys P, White P. (2007). How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. Mutat Res 628:3155. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Kramers PGN, Knaap AGAC. (1973). Mutagenicity tests with captan and folpet in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 21:149154. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee KH, Lee BM. (2007). Study of mutagenicities of phthalic acid and terephthalic acid using in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70:13291335. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Levy EJ, Anderson ME, Meister A. (1993). Transport of glutathione diethyl ester into human cells. Biochemistry 90:91719175. [Google Scholar]
  • Lohman PHM, Mendelsohn ML, Moore DHI, Waters MD, Brusick DJ, Ashby J, Lohman WJA. (1992). A method for comparing and combining short-term genotoxicity test data: The basic system. Mutat Res 266:725. [Google Scholar]
  • Loveday K. (1989). In vitro chromosomal aberration assay on Folpet technical. Cambridge, MA: A. D. Little Company. Report no. 61565-00. March 31, 1989. MRID 42122014. [Google Scholar]
  • Lukens RJ. (1966). The fungitoxicity of compounds containing a trichloromethylthio-group. J Agric Food Chem 14:365367. [Google Scholar]
  • Luo G, Lewis RA. (1992). Inhibition of RNA polymerase by captan at both DNA and substrate binding sites. Biochem Pharmacol 44:22512258. [Google Scholar]
  • May K. (1993). Folpet technical: Bacterial mutagenicity studies using strain TA 100 of Salmonella typhimurium. CRO: Eye, Suffolk, England: Cell Biology Laboratory, Pharmaco-LSR. Sponsor: Beer Sheva, Israel: Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd. Report no. 93/MAK174/0886. October 26, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • McGregor DB, Brown A, Cattanach P, Edwards I, McBride D, Riach C, Caspary WJ. (1988). Responses of the L5178Y tk+/tk− mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay: III. 72 coded chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 12:85154. [Google Scholar]
  • Meister A. (1988). Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification. J Biol Chem 263:1720517208. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Mendelsohn ML, Moore DH II, Lohman PHM. (1992). A method for comparing and combining short-term genotoxicity test data: Results and interpretation. Mutat Res 266:4360. [Google Scholar]
  • Miaullis JB, Quale DC, Vispetto AR, DeBaun JR. (1980). Effect of dietary captan of soluble thiol content of liver and duodenal tissues. Mountain View, CA: Mountain View Research Center. Report no. MRC-B-109; MRC-80-04. MRID 00153291. [Google Scholar]
  • Michelet F, Gueguen R, Leroy P, Wellman M, Nicolas A, Siest G. (1995). Blood and plasma glutathione measured in healthy subjects by HPLC: Relation to sex, aging, biological variables, and life habits. Clin Chem 41:15091517. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Milburn GM. (1997). Folpet: Study of hyperplasia in the mouse duodenum. Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK. Report no. CTL/p/5577. R-9688. December 17, 1997. MRID 44866402. [Google Scholar]
  • Mollet P. (1973). [Mutagenicity and toxicity tests with captan in Drosophila (author’s translation)]. Mutat Res 21:137148. [Google Scholar]
  • Mollet P, Wurgler FE. (1974). Detection of somatic recombination and mutation in Drosophila. A method for testing genetic activity of chemical compounds. Mutat Res 25:421424. [Google Scholar]
  • Moore DH II, Mendelsohn ML, Lohman PHM. (1992). A method for comparing and combining short-term genotoxicity test data: The optimal use of dose information. Mutat Res 266:2742. [Google Scholar]
  • Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J, Bolcsfoldi G, Burlinson B, Cifone MA, Clarke J, Delongchamp R, Durward R, Fellows M, Gollapudi B, Hou S, Jenkinson P, Lloyd M, Majeska J, Myhr B, O’Donovan M, Omori T, Riach C, San R, Stankowski LF Jr, Thakur AK, Van Goethem F, Wakuri S, Yoshimura I. (2006). Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Follow-up meeting of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing—Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003—Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation. Environ Mol Mutagen 47:15. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Moore MR. (1985). Evaluation of Chevron Folpet Technical in the mouse somatic cell mutation assay. CRO: Rockville, MD: Litton Bionetics. Sponsor: Richmond, CA: Chevron Environmental Health Center, Inc. Report no. 20994. March 12, 1985. MRID 148625, [Google Scholar]
  • Moriya M, Kato K, Shirasu Y. (1978). Effects of cysteine and a liver metabolic activation system on the activities of mutagenic pesticides. Mutat Res 57:259263. [Google Scholar]
  • Moriya M, Ohta T, Watanabe K, Miyazawa T, Kato K, Shirasu Y. (1983). Further mutagenicity studies on pesticides in bacterial reversion assay systems. Mutat Res 116:185216. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Nagy Z, Mile I, Antoni F. (1975). The mutagenic effect of pesticides on Escherichia coli WP try. Acta Microbil Acad Sci Hung 22:309314. [Google Scholar]
  • Nakajima M. (1998). Reverse mutation assay of Folpet. CRO: Shizuoka, Japan: Biosafety Research Center, Foods, Drugs, Pesticides. Sponsor: Tokyo, Japan: SDS Biotech. Report no. 3795. May 18, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen T, McGowan J. (1980). Mutagenicity evaluation of captan in the somatic cell mutation assay. Rockville, MD: Litton Bionetics, Inc. Sponsor: Richmond, CA: Chevron Chemical Company. Report no. LBI 20951. MRID 00131703 (Year cited as 1981 by Wilkinson, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  • O’Neill JP, Forbes NL, Hsie AW. (1981). Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of the fungicides captan and folpet in cultured mammalian cells (CHO/Hgprt system). Environ Mutagen 3:233237. [Google Scholar]
  • Oberly TJ, Bewsey BJ, Probst GS. (1984). An evaluation of the L5178Y TK+/− mouse lymphoma forward mutation assay using 42 chemicals. Mutat Res 125:291306. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Ohta T, Tokishita S, Tsunoi R, Ohmae S, Yamagata H. (2002). Characterization of Trp(+) reversions in Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA. Mutagenesis 17:313316. [Google Scholar]
  • Pastore A, Piemonte F, Locatelli M, Lo Russo A, Gaeta LM, Tozzi G, Federici G. (2001). Determination of blood total reduced, and oxidized glutathione in pediatric subjects. Clin Chem 47:14671469. [Google Scholar]
  • Pavkov KL, Thomasson RW. (1985). Identification of a pre-neoplastic alteration following dietary administration of captan technical to CD-1 mice. Farmington, CT: Environmental Health Center, Stauffer Chemical Company. Report no. T-11007. MRID 00151472. [Google Scholar]
  • Pilinskaya MA. (1986). Study of the cytogenetic activity of certain metabolites of a number of pesticides representing several classes of chemical compounds. Tsitologiya i Genetika 20:143145. [Google Scholar]
  • Pritchard DJ, Lappin GJ. (1991). Captan: DNA binding study in the mouse. Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK: ICI Central Toxicology Laboratory. Report no. CTL/P/3380. September 19, 1991 (Second Amendment: September 22, 1994). MRID 43405102. [Google Scholar]
  • Provan WM, Eyton-Jones H. (1996). The bioavailability of captan to the duodenum of CD-1 mice following dietary administration. Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK: Zeneca, Inc., Central Toxicology Laboratory. Report no. CTL/R/1260. January 24, 1996. MRID 43982202, [Google Scholar]
  • Provan WM, Eyton-Jones H, Lappin G, Pritchard D, Moore RB, Green T. (1995). The incorporation of radiolabelled sulphur from captan into protein and its impact on a DNA binding study. Chem-Biol Interact 96:173184. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahden-Staron I. (2002). The inhibitory effect of the fungicides captan and captafol on eukaryotic topoisomerases in vitro and lack of recombinagenic activity in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 518:205213. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Rahden-Staron I, Szumilo M, Ziemkiewicz P. (1994). The effects of captan and captafol on different bacterial strains and on c-mitosis in V79 Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Acta Biochim Pol 11:3555. [Google Scholar]
  • Rideg K. (1982). Genetic toxicology of phthalimide-type fungicides. Mutat Res 97:217. [Google Scholar]
  • Rocchi P, Perocco P, Alberghini W, Fini A, Prodi G. (1980). Effect of pesticides on scheduled and unscheduled DNA-synthesis of rat thymocytes and human lymphocytes. Arch Toxicol 45:101108. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz MJ, Marzin D. (1997). Genotoxicity of six pesticides by Salmonella mutagenicity test and SOS chromotest. Mutat Res 390:245255. [Google Scholar]
  • Russell LB, Selby PB, von Halle E, Sheridan W, Valcovic L. (1981). Use of the mouse spot test in chemical mutagenesis: Interpretation of past data and recommendations for future work. Mutat Res 86:355379. [Google Scholar]
  • Russell WL, Kelly EM, Hunsicker PR, Bangham JW, Maddux SC, Phipps EL. (1979). Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:58185819. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Saxena S, Ashok BT, Musarrat J. (1997). Mutagenic and genotoxic activities of four pesticides: Captan, foltaf, phosphamidon and furadan. Biochem Mol Biol Int 41:11251136. [Google Scholar]
  • Sayato Y, Nakamuro K, Ueno H. (1987). Mutagenicity of products formed by ozonation of naphthoresorcinol in aqueous solutions. Mutat Res 189:217222. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Schnaubelt LJ. (1995). Reregistration of phosmet; literature review of the metabolite, phthalimide. Washington, DC: Reregistration Branch, Section II, Special Review and Reregistration Division, US Environmental Protection Agency. May 24, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • Selsky CA. (1981). The association of captan with mouse and rat deoxyribonucleic acid. Farmington, CT: Stauffer. Report no. T-10435. MRID 93759, 132477. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma S. (1978). Thiophosgene in organic synthesis. In: Schill G, Sosnovsky G, Ziegler HJ, eds. International Journal of Methods in Synthetic Organic Chemistry. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 803–820. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma S. (1986). The Chemistry of Thiophosgene. London Series: Sulfur Reports. Senning A, series ed. Harwood Academic Publishers, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Shiau SY, Huff RA, Falkner IC. (1981). Pesticide mutagenicity in Bacillus subtilis and Salmonella typhimurium detectors. J Agric Food Chem 29:268271. [Google Scholar]
  • Shirasu Y, Moriya M, Kato K, Furuhashi A, Kada T. (1976). Mutagenicity screening of pesticides in the microbial system. Mutat Res 40:1930. [Crossref], [PubMed][Google Scholar]
  • Siegel MR. (1971). Reaction of the fungicide folpet (N-trichloromethylthio phthalimide) with a thiol protein. Pestic Biochem Physiol 1:225233. [Google Scholar]
  • Simmon VF, Mitchell AD, Jorgenson TA. (1977). Evaluation of selected pesticides as chemical mutagens: In vitro and in vivo studies. Research Triangle Park, NC: Health Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. EPA-600/1-77-028. MRID 132582. [Google Scholar]
  • Sirianni SR. (1978). Further Studies on cytogenetic effects of folpet. Mutat Res 53:264265. Abstract 195 presented at the 2nd International Conference on Environmental Mutagens; July 11–15; Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  • Sirianni SR, Huang CC. (1978). Effect of the fungicide folpet on growth and chromosomes of human lymphoid cell lines. Can J Genet Cytol 20:193197. [Google Scholar]
  • Snyder RD. (1992). Effects of captan on DNA and DNA metabolic processes in human diploid fibroblasts. Environ Mol Mutagen 20:127133. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Swenberg A, Petzold GL, Harbach PR. (1976). In vitro DNA damage/alkaline elution assay for predicting carcinogenic potential. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 72:732738. [Google Scholar]
  • Tezuka H, Teramoto S, Kaneda M, Henmi R, Murakami N, Shirasu Y. (1978). Cytogenetic and dominant lethal studies on captan. Mutat Res 57:201207. [Google Scholar]
  • Tezuka H, Ando N, Suzuki M, Terahata M, Moriya M, Shirasu Y. (1980). Sister chromatid exchange and chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster cells treated with pesticides positive in microbial reversion assays. Mutat Res 78:177191. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Thybaud V, Aardema M, Casciano D, Dellarco V, Embry MR, Gollapudi BB, Hayashi M, Holsapple MP, Jacobson-Kram D, Kasper P, MacGregor JT, Rees R. (2007a). Relevance and follow-up of positive results in in vitro genetic toxicity assays: An ILSI-HESI initiative. Mutat Res 633:6779. [Crossref][Google Scholar]
  • Thybaud V, Aardema M, Clements J, Dearfield K, Galloway S, Hayashi M, Jacobson-Kram D, Kirkland D, MacGregor J.T, Marzin D, Ohyama W, Schuler M, Suzuki H, Zeiger E. (2007b). Strategy for genotoxicity testing: Hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. Mutat Res 627:4158. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
  • Tilles H. (1966). Thiophosgene. In: Kharasch N, Meyers CY, eds. The Chemistry of Organic Sulfur Compounds. New York: Pergamon Press, 311336. [Google Scholar]
  • Trochimowicz HJ, Kennedy GL, Krivanek ND. (2001). Aliphatic and aromatic nitrogen compounds. In: Bingham E, Cohressen B, Powell C eds. Patty’s Toxicology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 11631170. [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA (1984). Mutagenicity evaluation of Bio-76-248 CP 4668 (Phthalimide) in the mouse lymphoma assay. Rockville, MD: Litton Bionetics. Sponsor: Monsanto. Report no., Doc no. FYI-OTS-1084-0346; TSCATS/035099 and TSCATS/035100. [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA (1997). HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document for Folpet; Case No. 0101; Chemical No. 081601. [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA (1999a). Folpet: Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED). Washington, DC: Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7508C). Report no. EPA 738-R-99-011. November 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA (1999b). Captan: Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED). Washington, DC: Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7508C). Report no. EPA 738-R-99-015. November 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • US EPA. (2004). Captan: Cancer Reclassification; Amendment of Reregistration Eligibility Decision; Notice of Availability. Federal Register 69:6835768360. [Google Scholar]
  • Valencia R. (1981). Mutagenesis screening of pesticides using Drosophila. CRO: Madison WI: WARF Institute, Inc.. Sponsor: US Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. 600/1-81-017. Contract Number: 68-01-2474. February 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • Vigfusson NV, Vyse ER. (1980). The effect of the pesticides, Dexon, Captan and Roundup, on sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat Res 79:5357. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogel E, Chandler JLR. (1974). Mutagenicity testing of cyclamate and some pesticides in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 30:621623. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO/FAO (1983). Pesticide Residues in Food—Evaluations—Captan, 1982. Data and recommendations of the joint meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues; 23 November–2 December 1982; Rome. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/v82pr07.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO/FAO (1990). Pesticide Residues in Food—Evaluations—Captan. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/v90pr03.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiklung SJ, Agurell E. (2003). Aspects of design and statistical analysis in the Comet assay. Mutagenesis 18:167175. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson CF, Arce G, Gordon EB. (2004). Analysis of the appropriate cancer classification of captan under EPA’s current guidelines. Captan Task Force: San Francisco: Arvesta Corporation and New York: Makhteshim Agan of North America. Report no. CTF 0304. April 9, 2004. MRID 46247701. [Google Scholar]
  • Zeiger E. (2004). History and rationale of genetic toxicity testing: An impersonal, and sometimes personal, view. Environ Mol Mutagen 44:363371. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®][Google Scholar]
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.