Advanced search
782
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review: GnRH Antagonist and IVF in PCO Patients

Effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in the treatment of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta analysis

, , &
Pages 187-191
Received 14 Aug 2012
Accepted 14 Sep 2012
Published online: 30 Nov 2012

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist on in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: Nine types of databases were searched by computer, and nine types of relevant journals were searched manually. Randomized, controlled trials of the effects of the GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist on IVF-ET treatment in the patients with PCOS were included. A meta-analysis was conducted following a quality evaluation. Results: Seven published studies (755 patients) were included. A meta-analysis was conducted following a quality evaluation. There were no significant differences in the amount of gonadotropin (Gn) (MD = −2.05; 95% CI: −4.14–0.05], E2 levels on the day of hCG administration (MD = −156.13; 95% CI: −389.91–77.64), the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = −0.38; 95% CI: −2.32–1.56), the clinical pregnancy rate (Peto OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.80–1.45), and the abortion rate (Peto OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.54–1.53) between the GnRH antagonist group and the GnRH agonist group. The OHSS rate of the GnRH antagonist group was lower than that of the GnRH agonist group, and the difference was statistically significant (Peto OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25–0.52). Conclusions: Compared with the GnRH agonist protocol, the GnRH antagonist protocol could significantly reduce the risk of OHSS. The clinical pregnancy rates for these two protocols were similar.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Library of Hubei Medicine College for providing the internet and manual search; to the Cochrane Collaboration for The Revman 5.0 Software; to Elsevier’s WebShop for her English translation.

Declaration of Interest: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 143.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.