Advanced search
276
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INNER EAR

Heavy metal staining, a comparative assessment of gadolinium chloride and osmium tetroxide for inner ear labyrinthine contrast enhancement using X-ray microtomography

, , &
Pages 22-27
Received 29 May 2012
Accepted 12 Jul 2012
Published online: 19 Sep 2012
 

Abstract

Conclusion: The use of both gadolinium chloride (GdCl3) and osmium tetroxide (OsO4) allowed for the visualization of the membranous labyrinth and other intralabyrinthine structures, at different intensities, as compared with the control sample. This initial comparison shows the advantages of GdCl3 in radiological assessments and OsO4 in more detailed anatomical studies and pathways of labyrinthine pathogenesis using X-ray microtomography (microCT). Objective: To assess an improved OsO4 staining protocol and compare the staining affinities against GdCl3. Methods: Guinea pig temporal bones were stained with either GdCl3 (2% w/v) for 7 days or OsO4 (2% w/v) for 3 days, and scanned in a microCT system. The post-scanned datasets were then assessed in a 3D rendering program. Results: The enhanced soft tissue contrast as presented in the temporal bones stained with either GdCl3 or OsO4 allowed for the membranous labyrinth to be visualized throughout the whole specimen. GdCl3-stained specimens presented more defined contours of the bone profile in the radiographs, while OsO4-stained specimens provided more anatomical detail of individual intralabyrinthine structures, hence allowing spatial relationships to be visualized with ease in a 3D rendering context and 2D axial slice images.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the facilities and the scientific and technical assistance of the Australian Microscopy & Microanalysis Research Facility at the Australian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Sydney; the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation, Melbourne and the HEARING CRC, Melbourne, Australia.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 167.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.