651
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Racial conservatism, self-monitoring, and perceptions of police violence

&
Pages 254-275
Received 12 Sep 2019
Accepted 10 Jun 2020
Published online: 29 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

A sharp racial divide in attitudes towards the police has been a mainstay throughout US history. The divide has come to the fore in recent years due to a number of high-profile police shooting incidents, such as the 2014 death of Michael Brown. This paper examines how whites and African-Americans differ in their perception of such incidents, as well as how the race of the officer and victim involved influence these perceptions. Across multiple data sources, whites are much more likely than African Americans to express favorable attitudes towards the police and see police shootings as justified. These pro-police attitudes are strongest for whites with the strongest levels of racial resentment. Racial identity attachment, however, does not have a consistent effect on whites’ attitudes. Further, in an experiment where the race of the officer and victim are manipulated, whites are less likely to state that a police shooting is justified if it explicitly involves a white officer and black victim. Evidence suggests self-monitoring may make some whites reluctant to state an explicitly “racialized” shooting can be justified.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the discussants, panelists, and audiences at the 2019 American Political Science Association and Midwest Political Science Association annual meetings, as well as the anonymous reviewers at this journal, for their thoughtful feedback and critique. We would also like to thank Robert Oldendick and Yanna Krupnikov for helpful advice in the early stages of this research. Further, we are grateful for the financial support provided by the American Political Science Association's Centennial Center Research Grant program.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by an American Political Science Association Centennial Center Research Grant [grant number 1981412].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 47.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 257.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From USD 450.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.