Advanced search
1,879
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Efflux pump inhibitors as a promising adjunct therapy against drug resistant tuberculosis: a new strategy to revisit mycobacterial targets and repurpose old drugs

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 741-757
Received 24 Feb 2020
Accepted 22 Apr 2020
Published online: 20 May 2020

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In 2018, an estimated 377,000 people developed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), urging for new effective treatments. In the last years, it has been accepted that efflux pumps play an important role in the evolution of drug resistance. Strategies are required to mitigate the consequences of the activity of efflux pumps.

Areas covered: Based upon the literature available in PubMed, up to February 2020, on the diversity of efflux pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their association with drug resistance, studies that identified efflux inhibitors and their effect on restoring the activity of antimicrobials subjected to efflux are reviewed. These support a new strategy for the development of anti-TB drugs, including efflux inhibitors, using in silico drug repurposing.

Expert opinion: The current literature highlights the contribution of efflux pumps in drug resistance in M. tuberculosis and that efflux inhibitors may help to ensure the effectiveness of anti-TB drugs. However, despite the usefulness of efflux inhibitors in in vitro studies, in most cases their application in vivo is restricted due to toxicity. In a time when new drugs are needed to fight MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant TB, cost-effective strategies to identify safer efflux inhibitors should be implemented in drug discovery programs.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious Public Health problem worldwide, causing millions of deaths per year and it is estimated that one-third of the world population is latently infected [1]. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched the ‘End TB’ strategy, which aims to reduce TB deaths by 95% and to cut new cases by 90% between 2015 and 2035 [2]. Although there has been a decrease in global TB incidence rates and mortality, the present rate of such decline is insufficient to meet the 2035 goals mainly due to several challenges such as the rise of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) [2]. Treatment of M/XDR-TB is extremely difficult since it requires more expensive drugs with a higher toxicity profile, during a longer period (up to 24 months), resulting in patient noncompliance and poorer outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to identify new drugs and new combined therapies that are better tolerated with the possibility to treat both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB alike, faster and efficiently.

Over the years, it has become widely accepted that the overall resistance of mycobacteria to any antimicrobial agent is due to a synergy between intrinsic and genetic resistance [3,4]. Since no horizontal transfer of resistance genes has been reported in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, genetic drug resistance is mainly acquired by spontaneous mutations in chromosomal genes that cause modification or overproduction of the drug target, provide the ability to inactivate drugs, or decrease the activation of the drug into its active form [5,6]. In M. tuberculosis, intrinsic resistance is a result of the interplay between the impermeable cell wall, which limits drug uptake, and the activity of membrane proteins, also known as efflux pumps, that transport a variety of substrates from the interior to the exterior of the cell [3,4,7,8]. Several studies have proposed that efflux activity emerges before the acquisition of mutations in drug target-coding genes. Overexpression of efflux pumps in M. tuberculosis previously exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of isoniazid and ethambutol resulted in a low-level resistance phenotype, which allowed the bacteria to survive in the presence of the antibiotic until the acquisition of mutations in drug target genes that confer high-level resistance [9–12]. This has also been hypothesized for the emergence of resistance to bedaquiline, a recent anti-TB drug recommended for use in the treatment of M/XDR-TB. It was demonstrated that mutations in rv0678, a regulator of the MmpS5-MmpL5 efflux pump, might be the first step in low-level resistance, followed by high-level resistance due to atpE mutations [13].

This may reflect what occurs during a long-term therapy, as in the case of TB, where an inappropriate therapy may result from incorrect prescription, poor compliance by the patient and inadequate drug supply and quality. An unsuitable treatment can cause a sustained pressure of subinhibitory concentrations of an anti-TB drug that may cause increased efflux activity and survival of a low/moderate-level resistant population from which results the selection and expansion of mutation based drug-resistant M. tuberculosis variants – the evolution of resistance arrow-of-time in mycobacteria [3,4].

Therefore, it is crucial to understand the mechanism(s) that cause efflux-mediated resistance in order to find appropriate ways to prevent it. The use of an efflux inhibitor as adjuvant to therapy would help lower the frequency of mutant selection and, thus, prevent the development of resistance. In addition, given the urgency for new therapeutic regimens for the control of M/XDR-TB, new drug discovery strategies are needed in order to find new drugs or repurpose existing drugs, including efflux inhibitors, in a cost-effective way. After a literature search in PubMed, covering the studies published on efflux in M. tuberculosis up to February 2020, this review will give a general overview of what is currently known about the contribution of efflux pumps in drug resistance in M. tuberculosis and how efflux inhibitors may help to ensure the effectiveness of anti-TB drugs and prevent the emergence of M/XDR-TB. Finally, we will present our experience and recent findings in using a new drug discovery strategy to identify new anti-TB drugs that may be used as efflux inhibitors.

2. Efflux pumps and drug resistance in M. tuberculosis

Efflux pump systems are membrane proteins that are widespread in many organisms, including Gram-positive and -negative bacteria and eukaryotes. These transporters are categorized in different families according to their structural characteristics and energy requirements: ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily; the major facilitator superfamily (MFS); the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family; the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family; the proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE) superfamily; and the resistance nodulation division (RND) superfamily. The ABC superfamily are classified as primary transporters since they use the hydrolysis of ATP as energy source, whereas the other families of efflux pumps are defined as secondary transporters, because they use the proton (or sodium in the case of MATE family) gradient [14–16]. The efflux pumps that have been associated with drug resistance in M. tuberculosis are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. List of efflux pumps associated with drug resistance in M. tuberculosis.

The natural role of efflux pumps is to intervene in several physiologic processes. For example, Rv1410c (P55) is involved in the maintenance of normal growth characteristics and in the oxidative stress response and Rv1258c is important for normal growth kinetics and cell morphology and it appears to play a relevant role in the stationary phase of growth [17–19]. Other transporters like the mycobacterial membrane proteins large (MmpL) are involved in the transport of lipids and promote cell wall biosynthesis [20,21]. In particular, MmpL3 is involved in the export of mycolates, one of the key components of the cell wall and MmpL7 exports phthiocerol dimycocerosate, a lipid component of the outer membrane [22–26]. In addition to their natural role in the cell, most efflux pumps have the ability to transport a diversity of unrelated compounds. For example, Mmr plays a role in the resistance to tetraphenylphosphonium, ethidium bromide, erythromycin, acriflavine, safranin O, pyronin Y and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and Rv1217c-Rv1218c has been associated with the efflux of several compounds and resistance to biarylpiperazines, bisanilinopyrimidines, novobiocins, pyrazolones, pyridines and pyrroles [27–29].

However, in the last years, efflux pumps have become more relevant due to their association with resistance to antimicrobials, namely first-line anti-TB drugs. For example, Rv1410c, Rv2936 and Rv0783 may be responsible for low-level resistance to rifampicin and Rv1258c has been reported to confer rifampicin tolerance during macrophage infection [18,19,30–32]. Recently, it was demonstrated that point mutations in Rv1258c in clinical isolates can confer clinically relevant drug resistance to pyrazinamide, streptomycin and isoniazid [33]. Exposure of M. tuberculosis to isoniazid caused overexpression of mmpL7 and mmr, the latter also in the presence of ethambutol [22,34–36]. The doxorubicin-resistance operon, drrABC, has also been implicated in resistance to ethambutol [37]. In 2017, Zhang and collaborators identified four putative efflux proteins in M. tuberculosis: Rv0191, Rv3756c, Rv3008, and Rv1667c. They demonstrated that overexpression of the genes coding for these proteins caused resistance to pyrazinamide that was reduced by efflux inhibitors [38].

Efflux pumps have been associated with resistance to all classes of antibiotics, including drugs used in the treatment of drug-resistant TB. The ABC transporter coded by the Rv2686c-Rv2687c-Rv2688c operon is responsible for fluoroquinolone efflux, while DrrABC is involved in resistance to several antibiotics, including tetracycline, erythromycin, norfloxacin, streptomycin and chloramphenicol [37,39]. Recently, it was demonstrated that MDR-TB isolates showed increased overexpression of drrA and drrB [40]. Rv0194 has been associated with resistance to β-lactams, streptomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol and vancomycin, while Rv1258c mediates low-level resistance to tetracycline and aminoglycosides [19,30,41,42]. Other transporters implicated in drug resistance are Rv2477 (ofloxacin and streptomycin) and Rv1473 (macrolides) [41,43]. The Rv2994 is a MFS efflux pump that is associated with resistance to streptomycin and fluoroquinolones [34]. The Rv2333c has been shown to confer low-level resistance to tetracycline and spectinomycin, whereas Rv1410c has been associated with resistance to clofazimine [18,44]. Recently, MmpL5 was demonstrated to be involved in the resistance to bedaquiline, clofazimine and other antibiotics [45–49].

Overall, the described studies have highlighted the contribution of efflux pumps to the development of drug resistance and reinforced the urgency to develop strategies that prevent efflux-mediated resistance.

3. Efflux inhibitors as a strategy to prevent efflux-mediated resistance in M. tuberculosis

In the last years, there has been an increased interest in the search and development of compounds that act as efflux inhibitors. The use of these compounds in combination with currently used anti-TB drugs has the potential to increase the intracellular concentration of these drugs, thus improving or restoring the activity of standard antimycobacterials in resistant strains and reduce the duration of the treatment. Moreover, efflux inhibitors could help overcome M. tuberculosis intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and prevent the emergence of mutations conferring drug resistance.

Although some efflux inhibitors have been identified in the last years (Table 2), most of them have only been studied in vitro and ex vivo, few moved to in vivo animal studies, with even fewer reports of their use for the clinical management of M/XDR-TB patients under compassionate therapy regimens [50,51]. The reason for the rare use of these compounds is mainly due to concerns with toxicity, since these agents can target both prokaryote and eukaryote transporters. In fact, the clinical development of several efflux inhibitors had to be put on hold due to toxicity problems [52]. In order to be used for therapeutic purposes, an efflux inhibitor should present limited toxicity to the host’s cells at the dosage required to achieve an effect against the infectious agent. A way to overcome this problem would be to use selective inhibitors that specifically target efflux pumps that are not present in human cells. A drug discovery strategy that could help overcome this limitation is drug repurposing [53]. In many cases, the pharmacokinetics and toxicity data are already available for a repurposed drug, allowing it to follow directly to pre-clinical testing and clinical trials, thus reducing time, costs and risks. In fact, some compounds known to be efflux inhibitors are repurposed drugs that were already approved for the treatment of other diseases. These compounds and others that demonstrated inhibitory activity against M. tuberculosis efflux pumps are described in the following sections.

Table 2. List of most frequently used efflux inhibitors in M. tuberculosis.

3.1. Phenothiazines

The phenothiazines are antipsychotic drugs that have long been known to have in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activity. Chlorpromazine, the first antipsychotic drug developed, was found to have anti-TB activity in vitro. However, the interest in chlorpromazine as a possible anti-TB agent decreased due to the side-effects observed in patients [54]. Other phenothiazines were found to have anti-TB activity, but thioridazine (TZ) was the most promising, presenting a dual effect on M. tuberculosis: i) inhibition of the activity of efflux pumps; and ii) enhancement of macrophage killing activity through the inhibition of potassium and calcium channels, causing pH decrease in the phagolysosome, activation of the hydrolases and consequent killing of the mycobacteria [4,54–57]. This fact is particularly important since pulmonary TB is considered mainly an intracellular infection of the alveolar macrophage. Despite these promising results, there are only two reports of clinical management of patients with TZ to date: in Argentina, XDR-TB patients were successfully treated with the combination of TZ and other antibiotics and, in India, where this drug has been used for compassionate purposes in the treatment of XDR-TB patients failing other treatment regimens [50,51]. The reason is mainly due to concerns with toxicity. Although very small concentrations of TZ are required to kill the bacilli inside the macrophages, there is still the concern of adverse side-effects in the central nervous system and cardiotoxicity, which may occur over a prolonged administration period such as the one required for TB treatment. Efforts have been made to reduce toxicity, such as the synthesis of TZ analogs or the encapsulation of the drug in nanoparticles, but further pre-clinical studies and clinical trials are needed [58,59]. It has been suggested that TZ indirectly inhibits efflux pumps or ion channels by blocking their energy supply, ATP or proton motive force (PMF), required for substrate transport. This is a result of the inhibition of the type-II NADH menaquinone oxidoreductase (NDH-2), a key protein of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway [60]. The importance of this pathway as a novel target pathway for drug discovery was recently supported by the development of bedaquiline, which targets the mycobacterial ATP synthase, another oxidative phosphorylation component [61]. Unfortunately, bedaquiline, which revealed to be highly potent against M/XDR-TB strains in vivo and an excellent drug against all forms of rifampicin resistant TB, also suffers from the same adverse side-effects in the central nervous system and cardiotoxicity reported for phenothiazines [62]. Therefore, given the demonstrated potential of TZ and the scarcity of new drug targets for TB, it is of extreme importance to further explore the drug’s mode of action in order to identify potential targets for the development of new and less toxic analogues.

3.2. Phenylalkylamines

Phenylalkylamines are calcium channel blockers and are often used to treat various disorders, such as angina, hypertension and cardiac arrhythmia. The classical example of this group is verapamil (VP), which is also a substrate and inhibitor of the mammalian drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein and of uptake transporters such as the organic cation transporter protein [63–65]. Over the years, several studies have demonstrated that VP can strongly inhibit efflux of ethidium bromide in mycobacteria [66,67]. In addition, VP was found to partially restore the in vitro activity of rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and fluoroquinolones in drug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates [9,11,35,36,68–71]. Moreover, this compound also prevented the acquisition of drug tolerance inside macrophages and accelerated the sterilization of infected lungs in mice treated with a first-line drug regimen [32,72]. In addition, co-administration of VP with subinhibitory doses of bedaquiline had the same bactericidal effect in mice as the bedaquiline dose used in humans and also protected against the development of resistant mutants in vivo [72]. Other studies demonstrated that VP decreased the MIC of bedaquiline and clofazimine in M. tuberculosis both in drug-susceptible and drug-resistant clinical isolates [73,74]. Moreover, VP also reduced macrophage-induced drug tolerance to bedaquiline and moxifloxacin [75]. However, another study showed that VP reduced the MIC of bedaquiline and clofazimine in vitro but failed to increase the bactericidal effect of bedaquiline in vivo [47]. Nevertheless, other studies described that VP increased the sterilizing activity of a regimen composed of bedaquiline, clofazimine, and pyrazinamide in vivo, but had no significant effect on bedaquiline pharmacokinetics [76,77]. Preclinical studies also indicate that VP potentiates the activity of bedaquiline against M. tuberculosis, reducing the bedaquiline dose required for cure, which could be a promising strategy for improving MDR-TB treatment [78–81]. In addition, VP may be cardioprotective, reducing the risk of QT prolongation and the dose related toxicity [78]. However, the effect of VP in vivo is probably due to a higher bioavailability of the co-administered drugs through an effect on the mammalian drug transporters, rather than by the inhibition of mycobacterial efflux pumps [76,82–84]. Recently, it has been shown that VP does not affect intracellular drug uptake in M. tuberculosis through direct inhibition of efflux pumps, but it indirectly alters efflux pump function by interfering with membrane energetics [85]. Nevertheless, VP concentrations required to achieve bactericidal activity against M. tuberculosis are very high and likely to be toxic to human cells. Therefore, further studies are needed to design more effective and selective VP analogs.

3.3. Protonophores

These compounds, also known as proton translocators or uncouplers, dissipate the PMF and electrochemical gradient, preventing further synthesis of ATP and, consequently, the normal function of cell processes that depend on this energy gradient such as efflux pumps [4,56,86]. Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP), 2,4-dinitrofenol (DNP) and valinomycin are examples of such compounds that have been widely used to study the role of efflux pumps in mycobacteria. For example, CCCP decreased the MIC of tetracycline in a M. smegmatis strain expressing Rv1258c and decreased the activity of this efflux pump in a M. bovis BCG overexpressing strain [19,30]. Moreover, CCCP was one of the efflux inhibitors that abolished the decreased susceptibility to several compounds, such as ethidium bromide, acriflavine and safranin O in M. tuberculosis strains overexpressing jefA and mmr (Rv3065) (Rv2459) [28,87]. CCCP and valinomycin reduced novobiocin and rifampicin resistance mediated by P55 [18]. It was also demonstrated in several studies that CCCP and DNP reduce efflux pump activity associated with fluoroquinolone resistance [39,68,87]. However, due to their mechanism of action, these compounds are highly cytotoxic and, thus, further studies are needed to determine the concentrations that are simultaneously the safest and most effective.

3.4. Plant-derived compounds

In the last years, several efflux inhibitors of plant origin have been described. Reserpine, piperine, farnesol, luteolin and biochanin A are among the most used in M. tuberculosis. The alkaloid reserpine was used for many years as an antihypertensive, but its toxicity limited its clinical use [56,86]. Nevertheless, this compound has been widely used in the in vitro evaluation of the activity of antimicrobial agents, namely in mycobacteria. For example, reserpine reduced ciprofloxacin resistance mediated by Rv2686 and decreased the MIC of isoniazid in M. smegmatis expressing mmpL7 [22,39]. In addition, reserpine increased susceptibility to isoniazid in M. bovis BCG and in M. tuberculosis susceptible and resistant strains [88,89]. This compound has also been shown to inhibit the pyrazinoic acid efflux pump, thus, increasing susceptibility to pyrazinamide in M. tuberculosis [90].

Piperine, an organic alkaloid compound found in Piper nigrum and Piper longum, was reported to inhibit the Rv1258c efflux pump in M. tuberculosis [91]. Recently, it was demonstrated that piperine had a synergistic effect with rifampicin and streptomycin, but low effect in enhancing the killing in several strains of M. tuberculosis with different resistance profiles [92]. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify if piperine may be used as an adjunctive drug in TB treatment. Other natural products such as farnesol, biochanin A and luteolin have been shown to inhibit efflux of ethidium bromide in M. smegmatis [93,94]. Recently, modified biochanin A derivatives inhibited efficiently M. avium efflux pumps in a synergistic activity with macrolides and fluoroquinolones [95].

3.5. Other efflux inhibitors

Other compounds with efflux inhibitor activity are Phe-Arg-β-naphtylamide (PAβN) and timcodar. PaβN is known to be a broad-spectrum efflux inhibitor of several Gram-negative bacteria and was reported to be active against M. tuberculosis [96–98]. However, there have been evidences that PaβN may not be the most adequate tool to study efflux mechanisms since it is also an efflux pump substrate and presents a dual mode of action: efflux inhibition and membrane-permeabilizing activity [97–99].

Timcodar is a mammalian efflux pump inhibitor that showed synergism when used in combination with rifampicin, bedaquiline and clofazimine [100]. When assessing the activity of this compound against intracellular M. tuberculosis in host macrophages, it was demonstrated that timcodar caused approximately a 10-fold increase in the growth inhibition of M. tuberculosis and presented synergy with rifampicin, moxifloxacin and bedaquiline [100]. Moreover, in a mouse model of infection, timcodar potentiated the efficacy of rifampicin and isoniazid. However, no additive effect of timcodar was observed when used in combination with moxifloxacin and linezolid [100,101]. Therefore, further studies are required to evaluate the effect of timcodar in the potentiation of efficacy of anti-TB drugs.

In order to potentiate the activity at lower concentrations and decrease the associated toxicity of efflux inhibitors targeting energy in M. tuberculosis, lipophilic compounds that present concomitant anti-TB and efflux inhibitory activity were designed. This is the case of the very promising 2-aminothiazole UPAR-174, a glycolytic pathway enolase inhibitor that also acts as efflux inhibitor, active against replicating, nonreplicating and intracellular M. tuberculosis, dissipating membrane potential and causing ATP depletion [102–104].

4. An in silico repurposing strategy to identify potential efflux inhibitors in M. tuberculosis

Overall, the majority of the known mycobacterial efflux inhibitors are derived from existing drugs developed for other therapeutic usages that revealed high efflux inhibitory activity in vitro. These compounds are good examples of a rational approach that accelerates drug discovery and makes it cost effective – drug repositioning or repurposing [53]. It has been observed that the most effective ones are those that have a direct effect on the mycobacterial energy metabolism [86,103,105]. Energy metabolism and limiting ATP production, as well as the PMF balance, are the most efficient ways to inhibit mycobacterial efflux and are critical for antibiotic susceptibility of M. tuberculosis [105].

As previously mentioned, the oxidative phosphorylation pathway has emerged as a novel target pathway for TB drug discovery, due to the development of bedaquiline, which targets the mycobacterial ATP synthase [61]. The inhibition of the different components of this pathway prevents respiratory electron transport, abolishes the PMF and stops production of ATP, thus inactivating several physiological processes including the activity of efflux pumps and ion channels active transport [106]. An example of this is TZ, the antipsychotic drug that indirectly inhibits efflux pumps or ion channels as a result of the inhibition of NDH-2 that intervenes in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway [57,60]. Considering the above premises, compounds that block the oxidative phosphorylation pathway may have a similar activity or even surpass the potential of TZ. Therefore, it is of great importance to explore oxidative phosphorylation as a target for the development of new drugs against TB. In the following subsections, we describe and review the basis of a new strategy for the identification of drugs with potential inhibitory activity against efflux pumps in M. tuberculosis – a target-based approach directed to proteins involved in energy metabolism and membrane transport in M. tuberculosis, based upon in silico drug repurposing.

4.1. Generation of an in silico library of approved drugs with potential activity against M. tuberculosis

The rational workflow of the strategy is summarized in Figure 1 and is inspired in the methodology previously described by Bispo et al. and Neves et al. and can be easily adapted to other metabolic pathways and other microorganisms [107,108]. A list of M. tuberculosis proteins involved in energy metabolism and membrane transport was compiled using the TDR Targets Database and Mycobrowser [109,110]. In the case of TDR Targets Database the strategy was as follows: i) Enter TDR targets database, http://www.tdrtargets.org/, select targets [111,112]; ii) Select M. tuberculosis; iii) Targets: Select ‘energy metabolism’, ‘oxidative phosphorylation’ and ‘membrane transport’ under the parameter ‘KEGG high-level pathway’. The search results obtained with TDR targets were crosschecked and complemented with a search in Mycobrowser: i) Enter Mycobrowser website https://mycobrowser.epfl.ch/ [112]; select Advanced Search; Enter protein function and free text search: ‘energy’, ‘oxidative phosphorylation’, ‘membrane’, ‘transporter’. This search revealed 668 genes that encode proteins involved in energy metabolism and membrane transport (Table S1). The corresponding protein sequences were used to interrogate two publicly available web-based databases that provide detailed information on drugs and their targets: DrugBank and STITCH 5.0 [113,114]. The search strategy used by DrugBank relies on the principle of homology, where each query (query = protein of M. tuberculosis) results in a comparison by similarity with all drug targets known to the databases. Only proteins with a statistical similarity value of E-value ≤ 10−20 were considered potential targets [108]. STITCH defines a group of interactions of variable statistical confidence between drugs and targets. In this case, only targets with a score ≥ 0.8 were considered for further studies [108]. From the targets selected from both databases only the ones predicted to interact with approved drugs were selected. The sequence similarity screening in these databases predicted 69 targets associated with 246 approved drugs. Examples of the protein targets and their respective functions are presented in Table 3 (the complete data can be found in Table S2). DrugBank and STITCH 5.0 exclusively predicted 216 (87.8%) and 12 (4.9%) of the approved drugs, respectively, whilst 18 (7.3%) drugs were predicted by both databases. The functional regions of the approved drug targets and M. tuberculosis targets were compared using The ConSurf Server, a bioinformatics tool for estimating the evolutionary conservation of amino acid positions in a protein based on the phylogenetic relationships between homologous sequences [115]. This procedure was used to estimate the conservation of active sites between the proteins and the preservation of affinity for the predicted M. tuberculosis drugs. The parameters for the analysis were selected as previously described [108]. The results obtained were classified as functional residues with high (≥ 80%) or moderate conservation (60-79%). When the conservation between functional residues is less than 59%, the putative targets were excluded from further analyzes. This strategy resulted in a list of 19 potential druggable M. tuberculosis targets (2.8% of the interrogated targets) that could interact with 24 approved drugs. Table 3 presents these targets and their potential drugs (detailed data provided by Table S2). These drugs are approved for a variety of indications, such as treatment of epilepsy, chronic immune thrombocytopenia, arrhythmia and cancer (Figure 2). The PubMed database was used to verify if the identified drugs had already been tested against M. tuberculosis [116]. Drugs were classified as ‘tested’ when any in vitro and/or in vivo tests were already performed in M. tuberculosis and ‘not tested’ when no publication could be found. According to this search, the following drugs were never tested against M. tuberculosis: acetyldigitoxin, bretylium, deslanoside, dexlansoprazole, enasidenib, esomeprazole, ethacrynic acid, fomepizole, halothane, isoflurane, ivosidenib, levoleucovorin, rabeprazole and tipiracil.

Figure 1. Flowchart summarizing the in silico drug repurposing strategy and corresponding results

Figure 2. Distribution of the predicted drugs according to their original indication

Table 3. Potential anti-TB drugs and their predicted targets identified in this study

4.2. Drugs already tested against M. tuberculosis

From the 24 drugs identified using this strategy, 10 were already tested for activity against M. tuberculosis. As proof-of-concept, this strategy successfully identified bedaquiline, recommended by WHO as part of combination therapy in adults with pulmonary MDR-TB [117]. Since bedaquiline targets the mycobacterial ATP synthase, an enzyme that intervenes in the oxidative phosphorylation and essential for the generation of energy in M. tuberculosis, this provides an adequate validation of the strategy.

Doxorubicin was also one of the drugs identified by this method. This drug is an antineoplastic in the anthracycline class, used to produce regression in solid tumors and disseminated neoplastic conditions and as a component of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. However, doxorubicin can cause toxicity in multiple organs, including cardiotoxicity, which has to do with its mechanism of action [118,119]. Doxorubicin binds to nucleic acids, presumably by specific intercalation of the planar anthracycline nucleus with the DNA double helix. It may also inhibit polymerase activity, affecting regulation of gene expression, and producing free radical damage to DNA [120]. In mycobacteria, previous studies have found evidences that doxorubicin is a potent inhibitor of the DNA primase (DnaG), with an MIC of 5 μM in M. tuberculosis [121]. Our analysis revealed the NADH dehydrogenase I chain B (Rv3146) and chain D (Rv3148) as potential targets of doxorubicin in M. tuberculosis. However, it has been previously demonstrated that doxorubicin is a substrate of efflux pumps, particularly the DrrAB transporter, which undermines its potential as anti-TB drug [37]. Therefore, further studies are necessary in order to clarify the mode of action of doxorubicin in M. tuberculosis and to develop safer derivatives that are not subject to efflux.

Fostamatinib is indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, chronic thrombocytopenia and autoimmune diseases and acts as an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase. Fostamatinib is a pro-drug, requiring hydrolysis by the intestine’s alkaline phosphatase that generates R406, which is the active metabolite [122]. Neither fostamatinib nor R406 were found to be carcinogenic or mutagenic. Serious adverse effects include hypertension, neutropenia, diarrhea, and hepatotoxicity in the recommended human dose [123–125]. In 2018, Kanehiro et al. described R406 as an inhibitor of the mycobacterial serine/threonine-protein kinase PknG. The same study demonstrated that R406 showed bactericidal activity against M. bovis BCG in infected human macrophages without cytotoxicity [126]. Fostamatinib was revealed by our in silico method to have several potential targets in M. tuberculosis: transmembrane serine/threonine-protein kinase B (Rv0014c); transmembrane serine/threonine-protein kinase A PknA (Rv0015c); probable transmembrane serine/threonine-protein kinase E PknE (Rv1743) and anchored-membrane serine/threonine-protein kinase PknF (Rv1746). Interestingly, Rv0014c and Rv0015c are essential genes.

Thiabendazole is a fungicide and parasiticide mostly used for the treatment of strongyloidiasis, cutaneous larva migrans, visceral larva migrans, and trichinosis. Thiabendazole is a known inhibitor of tubulin polymerization. It selectively binds to nematode ß-tubulin, inhibiting polymerization, thus preventing the formation of microtubules and preventing cell division [127,128]. Thiabendazole has also been shown to inhibit the helminth-specific enzyme, fumarate reductase [129]. Previous studies examined the effect of thiabendazole in M. tuberculosis and demonstrated that this drug prevented FtsZ polymerization, causing septum formation inhibition and, thus, abolishing cell division [130,131]. Our strategy identified a probable succinate dehydrogenase (Rv0248c) and a probable fumarate reductase (Rv1552) as potential targets of thiabendazole in M. tuberculosis. These enzymes are involved in interconversion of fumarate and succinate in aerobic respiration. Experimental studies are now needed in order to determine if these proteins are indeed targets of thiabendazole.

Valproic acid, or valproate, is a fatty acid derivative and anticonvulsant used in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorders [132]. This drug has been also investigated for neuroprotective, anti-manic, and anti-migraine effects. Currently, it is a compound of interest in oncology drug research for its anti-proliferative effects and is the subject of many clinical trials. The mechanism of action of valproate is relatively unknown, but it is suggested that the drug’s action is a result of several pathways: i) inhibition of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase and increasing GABAergic neurotransmission; impact on fatty acid metabolism, which alters membrane fluidity; and noncompetitive inhibition of brain microsomal long-chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetase, which decreases available arichidonyl-CoA, a substrate in the production of inflammatory prostaglandins [133–135]. Valproate has been previously tested in M. tuberculosis. In 2015, Schieber et al. demonstrated that this drug stimulates the autophagosome formation in vitro and, in 2018, Rao and collaborators showed that it improves the action of isoniazid and rifampicin in the macrophage [136,137]. However, the specific target in M. tuberculosis has not been identified to date. Our study predicted a possible acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE19 (Rv2500c) as a potential M. tuberculosis target.

Ouabain is a cardiac glycoside similar to digitoxin that is used to treat congestive heart failure, supraventricular arrhythmias and to control ventricular rate in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation [138,139]. This compound inhibits the Na+/K+-ATPase membrane transporter, causing an increase in intracellular sodium and calcium concentrations, which may promote activation of contractile proteins such as actin and myosin [140]. Ouabain has been demonstrated to potentiate the intracellular killing of M. tuberculosis by macrophages [141,142]. Recently, Kaur and collaborators performed a virtual screening to search for novel drugs against secretory lipid-catabolizing enzymes in M. tuberculosis. Ouabain was identified as a suitable drug for the enzyme LipU [143]. We have predicted a probable metal cation transporter P-type ATPase A (Rv1997) as a possible target for ouabain. These evidences suggest that this compound affects several cell processes and, thus, more studies are needed to clarify its mode of action.

Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent used for the management of type II diabetes and is prescribed to at least 120 million people worldwide [144,145]. It is suggested that metformin inhibits the mitochondrial complex I, preventing the production of mitochondrial ATP leading to increased cytoplasmic ADP:ATP and AMP:ATP ratios. These changes activate the AMP-activated protein kinase, an enzyme that plays an important role in the regulation of glucose metabolism [146,147]. Our analysis identified Rv0235c, annotated as a probable conserved transmembrane protein involved in cell wall and cell processes, as a potential target for metformin in M. tuberculosis. However, this drug has been the subject of several studies evaluating the use of metformin in TB treatment. It was demonstrated that the use of metformin in diabetes mellitus patients reduced the risk of subsequent active TB and that it has potentially beneficial effects in innate host responses to M. tuberculosis [148,149]. A study using the mouse model of TB infection found that mice treated with metformin and isoniazid showed a considerable reduction in the bacillary load in the lungs and reduced areas of lung tissue damage compared with isoniazid monotherapy [150,151]. A clinical trial is being conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin-containing anti-TB treatment in comparison to the standard 6-month regimen in patients with newly diagnosed sputum smear-positive drug-sensitive pulmonary TB [152].

Our in silico strategy also identified several compounds used to treat gastric acid-related disorders. They are known to be inhibitors of the parietal gastric cell H+/K+-ATPase pump, hence their use in gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and other diseases characterized by the oversecretion of gastric acid. Our analysis predicted a probable metal cation transporter P-type ATPase A CtpF (Rv1997) as a potential target in M. tuberculosis. In the case of omeprazole and pantoprazole, a previous study has revealed that these drugs have no effect in M. tuberculosis [153]. On the other hand, the same study showed that lansoprazole has intracellular activity against M. tuberculosis. Target identification studies revealed that lansoprazole kills M. tuberculosis by targeting its cytochrome bc1 complex leading to disruption of the mycobacterial respiratory chain and ATP depletion [153].

The described body of work already performed, provide useful data about the identified drugs that may be used as a starting point for future studies by the scientific and pharmaceutical community. In this case, information concerning toxicity and pharmacokinetics properties will have to be considered before selecting the most promising compounds.

4.3. Drugs not yet tested against M. tuberculosis

We predicted 14 drugs that, to our knowledge, have not yet been experimentally tested against M. tuberculosis. Levoleucovorin is indicated for use as rescue therapy following high-dose methotrexate in the treatment of osteosarcoma or for diminishing the toxicity associated with inadvertent overdosage of folic acid antagonists. Levoleucovorin has an additional indication for use in combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer [154,155]. The predicted M. tuberculosis target is the serine hydroxymethyltransferase GlyA2 (Rv0070c).

Our study identified two drugs that are used for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, ivosidenib and enasidenib. These agents are inhibitors of isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2, mitochondria-localized enzymes involved in diverse cellular processes [156–158]. The potential M. tuberculosis target identified in this study for both drugs is a probable isocitrate dehydrogenase (Rv3339c).

Tipiracil is a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that is used in combination with trifluridine for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [159]. The predicted target in M. tuberculosis is the thymidine phosphorylase DeoA (Rv3314c).

Dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole are inhibitors of the human H+/K+-ATPase, that to our knowledge have not been tested in M. tuberculosis. The predicted target identified by our method is a probable metal cation transporter P-type ATPase A CtpF (Rv1997). Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of these compounds in M. tuberculosis. However, the adverse effect of these drugs needs to be further clarified due to recent evidence that prescription of acid-suppressive agents seems to be associated with TB infection/activation [160,161].

This strategy also identified several antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive drugs that potentially target a probable metal cation transporter P-type ATPase A CtpF (Rv1997) in M. tuberculosis. Deslanoside is a cardiac glycoside used to treat congestive heart failure, supraventricular arrhythmias and to control ventricular rate in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation. This compound inhibits the Na+/K+-ATPase pump, resulting in an increase in intracellular sodium and calcium concentrations that may promote activation of contractile proteins, such as actin and myosin [162]. Acetyldigitoxin is a cardioactive derivative of lanatoside A or of digitoxin used for fast digitalization in congestive heart failure. The proposed mode of action is similar to deslanoside: inhibition of the Na+/K+ pump that leads to increased amounts of calcium [163]. Ethacrynic acid is used in the treatment of high blood pressure and edema caused by diseases like congestive heart failure, liver failure, and kidney failure. It inhibits the symport of sodium, potassium, and chloride primarily in the ascending limb of Henle. This pharmacological action results in excretion of these ions, increased urinary output, and reduction in extracellular fluid [164]. Finally, the last drug in this group is bretylium, used in emergency medicine, cardiology, and other specialties for the acute management of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The main mode of action for bretylium is thought to be inhibition of voltage-gated potassium channels and the Na+/K+-ATPase [165].

Fomepizole is used as an antidote in confirmed or suspected methanol or ethylene glycol poisoning. It is a competitive inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase, the enzyme that catalyzes the initial steps in the metabolism of ethylene glycol and methanol to their toxic metabolites [166]. The predicted target in M. tuberculosis is the zinc-type alcohol dehydrogenase AdhD (Rv3086).

Halothane and isoflurane are general inhalation anesthetics used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia [167]. Halothane causes general anesthesia due to its actions on multiple ion channels, which ultimately lowers nerve conduction, breathing and cardiac contractility. Its immobilizing effects have been attributed to its binding to potassium channels in cholinergic neurons [168]. Isoflurane’s anesthetic effect is thought to be the result of: i) the reduction in junctional conductance by decreasing gap junction channel opening times and increasing gap junction channel closing times; ii) the activation of calcium dependent ATPase in the sarcoplasmic reticulum by increasing the fluidity of the lipid membrane; iii) the binding to the D subunit of ATP synthase and NADH dehydrogenase; iv) the binding to the GABA receptor, the large conductance calcium-activated potassium channel, the glutamate receptor and the glycine receptor [169]. The potential M. tuberculosis target identified in this study is a probable NADH dehydrogenase I (chain H) (Rv3152). We did not find any published study of these agents as antimycobacterials and little is known about the antibacterial mechanisms of anesthetics, with previous studies reporting contradictory results [170–172]. The technical difficulties associated with the study of these agents may be responsible for the variety of results obtained.

Experimental evidence is needed to clarify if any of these identified drugs presents antimycobacterial activity and if their mechanism of action involves the suggested targets. In addition, it is also imperative to determine if their absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) properties could affect their activity in vivo. If their activity is revealed to be promising, these compounds could be important leads in TB drug discovery.

4.4. Experimental strategies for validation of activity of identified drugs

To confirm the efficacy of these drugs, in vitro and in vivo studies will have to be performed. This can be applied even to the drugs that have already been tested against M. tuberculosis, since these compounds may be interesting lead molecules and become the starting point for the design of new improved molecules. The identified drugs will need to be sequentially evaluated using different methodologies in order to be classified as potential antimycobacterials or as potential efflux inhibitors [35,36,55,173]. However, this classification may be confusing as the same compound can be a good efflux inhibitor and restore the activity of established antibiotics, while presenting antimicrobial activity by itself at concentrations near its MIC. Determination of MICs in vitro in extracellular (bacteria in liquid culture) and intracellular conditions (infected macrophages) will give information concerning the activity of these compounds against M. tuberculosis and their ability to enhance the killing of intracellular mycobacteria. In addition, the evaluation of synergistic interactions between these drugs and currently used anti-TB drugs (e.g. checkerboard method) will allow the identification of potential adjuvants. In this case, further studies would have to be performed in order to clarify if a given compound acts as adjuvant by inhibition of efflux or by other mechanism(s). Efflux activity can be studied using a fluorescent marker dye, such as ethidium bromide, as an efflux pump substrate in several bacteria [35,36,66,67]. In addition to the assays described above, the predicted target on M. tuberculosis must be confirmed, for example, through the selection of resistant mutants in the presence of the compound or by the construction of knockdown and overexpression mutants and the following comparison of the MIC of these strains with the wild-type strain. However, even if a given drug proves itself to be promising after these studies, the issue of toxicity must be addressed. Therefore, evaluation of drug cytotoxicity in specific cell-lines (e.g., human macrophages and others) must be carried out in parallel with the determination of antimycobacterial activity. Only the compounds that can be used at safe concentrations should be selected. Other studies could also involve the determination of in vitro and ex vivo drug activity against drug-susceptible and M/XDR-TB M. tuberculosis strains. Furthermore, efficient penetration through the lipidic mycobacterial cell wall of new anti-TB drugs must be guaranteed and lipophilicity is a very important feature to consider in designing new or repurposing old drugs as effective agents against M. tuberculosis [103]. Finally, the compounds that prove to be the most interesting, with the desired antimycobacterial and synergistic properties, as well as demonstrable inhibitory activity at low nontoxic concentrations, will be selected for further research, namely in the mouse model and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in preparation for potential clinical trials [36,58,173].

5. Conclusion

It is now widely accepted and demonstrated that mycobacterial efflux pumps contribute to drug resistance by allowing the bacteria to survive in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics until the emergence of mutations, as reviewed in this work. Several evidences support the use of efflux inhibitors as a strategy to overcome efflux of anti-TB drugs in mycobacteria, shortening the treatment regimens and preventing the emergence of resistance, as aimed by the WHO End TB Strategy [2,174]. In addition, several of these efflux inhibitors also act as enhancers of the macrophage activity, which makes them especially useful in the case of TB, since the bacteria reside inside the pulmonary macrophage [4]. However, despite their promising results in vitro, none of them have been used in clinical practice for TB management, with the exception of TZ used in compassionate therapy for particular XDR-TB cases [50,51]. Their application in vivo is restricted mostly due to toxicity concerns, since most of these compounds are able to target both prokaryote and eukaryote transporters. In a time when new drugs are needed to fight M/XDR-TB, cost-effective strategies to identify safer efflux inhibitors should be implemented in drug discovery programs. This review has highlighted a new strategy for the development of anti-TB drugs, including efflux inhibitors, using in silico drug repurposing (Figure 3). This approach has been successfully used for the identification of new hits for malaria, schistosomiasis, human african trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis [107,108,175]. Concerning the identified potential anti-TB drugs, if promising activities are revealed, they could constitute important starting points for lead identification and optimization and, ultimately, for the development of new antimycobacterials, including efflux inhibitors.

Figure 3. Graphical summary of the proposed strategy for the development of anti-TB drugs, using in silico drug repurposing. TB, tuberculosis

In conclusion, it is scientifically evident that efflux inhibitors should be exploited for synergistic use with current therapeutic regimens to improve the efficacy of TB treatment. If efflux inhibitors can be used as adjuvants of currently used anti-TB drugs, they could not only restore the activity of such drugs, but also modulate the killing activity of the infected macrophage. However, there is still the need for clinical trials that indisputably demonstrate the importance of efflux inhibitors as adjuvant compounds for the current recommended therapies for TB and M/XDR-TB. Several efforts have been made to address specific issues such as toxicity, lipophilicity and selectivity of these compounds. The synthesis of analogues of known efflux inhibitors (e.g. VP and TZ analogues), the study of certain natural derived products (e.g. berberine, piperine and other berberflavonoids) and promising drug repurposing strategies are important directions for the future development of the ideal efflux inhibitor [92,103,104,176].

6. Expert opinion

TB is one of the top ten causes of death and the leading cause from a single infectious agent (above HIV/AIDS). M. tuberculosis has the ability to acquire resistance to all anti-TB drugs known, leaving very limited therapeutic options. In order to prevent the selection of resistant variants of M. tuberculosis, TB treatment consists of a combination of three or more drugs, given simultaneously for a long period of time to promote their synergistic activity and increase the probability of a successful outcome. M. tuberculosis is equipped with other drug resistance mechanisms that act in synergy with drug resistance mutations, namely efflux pump systems that allow the bacteria to survive in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics until the selection of resistant mutants. This fact is particularly relevant in the case of TB, due to its long-term therapeutic regimens that frequently cause poor patient adherence facilitating acquisition of resistance. The inhibition of efflux pumps through the action of efflux inhibitors could be a way to restore the activity of antibiotics subject to efflux by decreasing the mutation frequency and, thus, prevent the evolution toward resistance. Therefore, efflux pumps are attractive drug targets and efflux inhibitors could be used in combination with current anti-TB drugs, in new therapeutic regimens, to help increase treatment efficacy. The major limitation to this approach has to do with toxicity, since most of these compounds have an effect on both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In particular, their side effects could be an issue in combined therapy, emphasizing the need for more advanced studies concerning the dose of efflux inhibitor used in combination with existing first-line anti-TB drugs and the subsequent side effects. It is crucial to tailor the pharmacokinetics of the efflux inhibitor to the pharmacokinetics of the antibiotic in order to optimize synergy. This applies even to drugs that are already approved for clinical use for other diseases (e.g. TZ and VP and analogues), which have shown promising in vitro and in vivo activity against TB. Although the use of efflux inhibitors as adjuvant therapeutic agents still faces many challenges, the evidences show that they provide many advantages. Future studies should continue to focus on the design and development of new efflux inhibitors and new anti-TB drugs to be used in combination of multiple drugs in new therapeutic regimens. In this case, drug repurposing provides several advantages, namely reducing costs, risk and time associated with drug discovery. This approach combined with in silico computer-aided drug design strategies can greatly improve the drug discovery paradigm and help identify promising drug leads for TB. Also, new drugs and drug development pipelines should always take into account the effluxability of the drug as an important variable in its pharmacodynamics and possible mechanism of resistance, as recently happened with bedaquiline, and design strategies to minimize these undesirable events that reduce tremendously its efficacy and lifetime [13,47].

Ending the TB epidemic by 2030 is one of the health targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs). Therefore, it is expected that many efforts will continue to be made in the next five years in order to achieve this goal. This includes the design of novel antimycobacterial agents and the development of accelerated drug discovery strategies. Efflux inhibitors provide the attractive possibility of restoring the activity of already available antibiotics, saving time, effort and financial investment that is usually required for drug development. There is still a long way to go before efflux inhibitors can be routinely used in clinical practice. Future studies will continue to address the issues of selectivity and safe usage of these compounds. Hopefully, advancements in in silico and computer-aided drug design strategies will help to achieve the rapid discovery of novel, effective and safe efflux inhibitors drugs and ultimately decrease the global burden of TB and contribute to achieve the 2030 UN-SDGs.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (246 KB)

Article highlights

  • Tuberculosis (TB) control faces many challenges, including the increase of drug-resistant forms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that require new effective therapeutic regimens.

  • Efflux pumps play a significant role in the development of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis during treatment; efflux inhibitors could prevent this outcome.

  • Scientific evidence supports the use of efflux inhibitors as therapeutic adjuvants to increase the effectiveness of anti-TB drugs.

  • Drugs that target energy metabolism components may inhibit several bacterial physiological processes, namely the activity of efflux pumps.

  • Drug repurposing can accelerate drug discovery and make it cost effective, by finding new uses for existing approved drugs. This can be achieved by using an in silico approach.

  • New cost-effective strategies to identify safer efflux inhibitors should be implemented in drug discovery programs.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

L Rodrigues has received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 795924.

References

Alternative formats

 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.