1,933
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 287-305
Published online: 05 Dec 2017
 

ABSTRACT

This article identifies and quantifies the 10 most important benchmarks for climate action to be taken by 2020–2025 to keep the window open for a 1.5°C-consistent GHG emission pathway. We conducted a comprehensive review of existing emissions scenarios, scanned all sectors and the respective necessary transitions, and distilled the most important short-term benchmarks for action in line with the long-term perspective of the required global low-carbon transition. Owing to the limited carbon budget, combined with the inertia of existing systems, global energy economic models find only limited pathways to stay on track for a 1.5°C world consistent with the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement.

The identified benchmarks include:

  • Sustain the current growth rate of renewables and other zero and low-carbon power generation until 2025 to reach 100% share by 2050;

  • No new coal power plants, reduce emissions from existing coal fleet by 30% by 2025;

  • Last fossil fuel passenger car sold by 2035–2050;

  • Develop and agree on a 1.5°C-consistent vision for aviation and shipping;

  • All new buildings fossil-free and near-zero energy by 2020;

  • Increase building renovation rates from less than 1% in 2015 to 5% by 2020;

  • All new installations in emissions-intensive sectors low-carbon after 2020, maximize material efficiency;

  • Reduce emissions from forestry and other land use to 95% below 2010 levels by 2030, stop net deforestation by 2025;

  • Keep agriculture emissions at or below current levels, establish and disseminate regional best practice, ramp up research;

  • Accelerate research and planning for negative emission technology deployment.

Key policy insights

  • These benchmarks can be used when designing policy options that are 1.5°C, Paris Agreement consistent.

  • They require technology diffusion and sector transformations at a large scale and high speed, in many cases immediate introduction of zero-carbon technologies, not marginal efficiency improvements.

  • For most benchmarks we show that there are signs that the identified needed transitions are possible: in some specific cases it is already happening.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Cindy Baxter for her editorial work and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by ClimateWorks Foundation [grant number 16–0937] and the German Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation, Buildings and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) via the International Climate Initiative [grant number 16_I_291_Global_A_CAT].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 55.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 285.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From USD 450.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.