Advanced search
Publication Cover

Cochlear Implants International

An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 18, 2017 - Issue 4
451
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Impact of music on the quality of life of cochlear implant users: a focus group study

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 207-215
Published online: 22 Mar 2017

Objective: To study the aspects of the quality of life (QoL) on which music has an impact in adult cochlear implant (CI) users.

Methods: Thirty adult CI users aged between 18 and 81 years old with a wide range of patient characteristics and musical backgrounds participated in the study. Six focus group discussions about music in everyday life were conducted and data were analysed using template analysis based on the QoL model of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life BREF questionnaire.

Results and discussion: A theoretical framework of the impact of music on the QoL was developed. Music was reported to contribute to many aspects of physical, psychological, and social well-being in adult CI users. These positive effects of music on QoL were similar to what has been reported in the literature for normal-hearing adults. However, difficulties in music perception and enjoyment were found to have a negative impact on CI users’ QoL, especially by causing unpleasant feelings and limited participation in music-related or routine daily activities.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that an improvement in music experiences of CI users may lead to improvements in QoL and therefore support the need for music rehabilitation. However, the relative importance of music overall and of specific aspects of music for each individual should be measured for an accurate assessment of the impact of music on the QoL of CI users.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the CI users who participated in the focus groups for their time, feedback, and enthusiasm. We would also like to thank Dr Helen Cullington from the USAIS for her help with the recruitment of participants and Dr Kim Bull from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Southampton for revising the article.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors None.

Funding This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under a Doctoral Training Grant awarded to the University of Southampton, EP/K503150/1.

Conflicts of interest None.

Ethics approval The study was approved by the UK National Research Ethics Committee (14/ EM/ 0140), the University of Southampton Ethics Committee, and the University of Southampton Research Governance Office (8264).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 241.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.