121
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Gender differences in fairness evaluations of own earnings in 28 European countries

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 09 Jun 2021
Accepted 25 May 2022
Published online: 01 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Women tend to evaluate their own pay more favorably than men. Contented women are speculated to not seek higher wages, thus the ‘paradox of the contented female worker’ may contribute to persistent gender pay differences. We extend the literature on gender differences in pay evaluations by investigating fairness evaluations of own earnings and underlying conceptions of fair earnings, providing a closer link to potential subsequent wage demands than previous literature. Using European Social Survey (2018/2019) data, we find no evidence that women evaluate their own earnings more favorably than men. In 15 out of the 28 analyzed countries, women actually report more intense levels of perceived unfairness. Studying fair markups on unfair earnings, i.e. the relative distance between the earnings received and earnings considered fair, we find that women report the same, if not lower, fair markups compared to men in most countries; thus indicating limited potential for perceived unfairness as a driving force to reduce the gender pay gap in Europe.

Acknowledgements

We are greatful for comments on earlier versions of this paper from members of the project ‘Perceptions of Inequalities and Justice in Europe’ (PIJE) as well as from Peter Valet, Alexandra Fedorets, and Mattis Beckmannshagen. Additionally, earlier versions of this work were presented at the SASE 2021 Virtual Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics as well as at the 2021 Virtual Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association; we acknowledge helpful feedback from participants of both conferences as well as from anonymous reviewers and the editor of European Societies. Jule Adriaans received financial and intellectual support for this paper from the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) at DIW Berlin.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All analyses rely on data from the ESS Round 9 (ESS Round 9 2018). The full data is available here: https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018. Full replication code of the analyses is available here https://osf.io/vynk4.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Leibniz Association (K248/2019) as part of the project ‘Perceptions of Inequalities and Justice in Europe’ (PIJE).

Notes on contributors

Jule Adriaans

Jule Adriaans is a researcher at the Chair of Social Inequality and Social Structure Analysis and a doctoral candidate at the Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology (BGHS) at Bielefeld University. Her research focuses on the perception and evaluation of inequalities and justice with a special focus on a comparative European perspective.

Matteo Targa

Matteo Targa is a researcher at the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) and a doctoral candidate at the Graduate Center at DIW Berlin. His research focuses on labor economics with a special focus on job-related determinants of economic inequality.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 40.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 199.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.