Advanced search
197
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prevalence and correlates of cognitive asymmetry in a large sample of Alzheimer’s disease patients

, &
Pages 516-526
Received 21 Sep 2015
Accepted 30 Nov 2015
Published online: 12 Jan 2016

ABSTRACT

Previous research has suggested that a significant minority of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) exhibit asymmetric cognitive profiles (greater verbal than visuospatial impairment or vice versa) and that these patient subgroups may differ in demographic and other characteristics. Prior studies have been relatively small, and this investigation sought to examine correlates of asymmetry in a large patient sample (N = 438). Patients were classified into the following cognitive profile groups: low verbal, symmetric, and low visuospatial. Consistent with past research, 28.3% of participants were classified as having asymmetric cognitive profiles, with more participants in the low visuospatial subgroup. Low visuospatial participants were younger than members of the other subgroups, and low verbal participants performed worse on a measure estimating premorbid verbal intelligence. Findings regarding apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 genotype were equivocal, although results provided some evidence for an effect of the ɛ4 allele on cognitive asymmetry. These results suggest systematic differences between neuropsychological asymmetry profiles that support the possibility of distinct subgroups of the disease.

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on the Master’s thesis of the first author at the University of Houston. Portions of the paper were also presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2015, in Denver, CO. The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding sources to disclose. Special thanks to the individuals involved in the database and to Julia Hannay of the University of Houston and Mario Dulay of The Methodist Hospital for their comments on the original thesis manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 40.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 433.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.