Skip to Main Content
 
Translator disclaimer

ABSTRACT

Simulation-based Bayesian inference methods are useful when the statistical model of interest does not possess a computationally tractable likelihood function. One such likelihood-free method is approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), which approximates the likelihood of a carefully chosen summary statistic via model simulation and nonparametric density estimation. ABC is known to suffer a curse of dimensionality with respect to the size of the summary statistic. When the model summary statistic is roughly normally distributed in regions of the parameter space of interest, Bayesian synthetic likelihood (BSL), which uses a normal likelihood approximation for a summary statistic, is a useful method that can be more computationally efficient than ABC. However, BSL requires estimation of the covariance matrix of the summary statistic for each proposed parameter, which requires a large number of simulations to estimate precisely using the sample covariance matrix when the summary statistic is high dimensional. In this article, we propose to use the graphical lasso to provide a sparse estimate of the precision matrix. This approach can estimate the covariance matrix accurately with significantly fewer model simulations. We discuss the nontrivial issue of tuning parameter choice in the context of BSL and demonstrate on several complex applications that our method, which we call BSLasso, provides significant improvements in computational efficiency whilst maintaining the ability to produce similar posterior distributions to BSL. The BSL and BSLasso methods applied to the examples of this article are implemented in the BSL package in R, which is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network. Supplemental materials for this article are available online.

Acknowledgments

Computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the HPC and Research Support Group, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Supplementary Materials

Appendices

Appendices referenced in the article (.pdf file).

Additional information

Funding

CCD was supported by an Australian Research Council’s Discovery Early Career Researcher Award funding scheme (DE160100741). ZA was supported by a scholarship under CCDs grant DE160100741 and a top-up scholarship from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistics Frontiers (ACEMS). LFS was supported by an Australian Research Training Program Stipend and a top-up scholarship from ACEMS. DJN was supported by a Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 grant (R-155-000-189- 114).

Login options

Purchase * Save for later
Online

Article Purchase 24 hours to view or download: USD 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase 30 days to view or download: USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable