Skip to Main Content
623
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
Altmetric
Pages 119-131
Received 01 Jul 2016
Accepted author version posted online: 14 Jun 2017
Published online: 25 Jan 2018
 
Translator disclaimer

ABSTRACT

An interesting extension of the widely applied Hawkes self-exiting point process, the renewal Hawkes (RHawkes) process, was recently proposed by Wheatley, Filimonov, and Sornette, which has the potential to significantly widen the application domains of the self-exciting point processes. However, they claimed that computation of the likelihood of the RHawkes process requires exponential time and therefore is practically impossible. They proposed two expectation–maximization (EM) type algorithms to compute the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the model parameters. Because of the fundamental role of likelihood in statistical inference, a practically feasible method for likelihood evaluation is highly desirable. In this article, we provide an algorithm that evaluates the likelihood of the RHawkes process in quadratic time, a drastic improvement from the exponential time claimed by Wheatley, Filimonov, and Sornette. We demonstrate the superior performance of the resulting MLEs of the model relative to the EM estimators through simulations. We also present a computationally efficient procedure to calculate the Rosenblatt residuals of the process for goodness-of-fit assessment, and a simple yet efficient procedure for future event prediction. The proposed methodologies were applied on real data from seismology and finance. An R package implementing the proposed methodologies is included in the supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

The foreign exchange data used in this work were supplied by the Securities Industry Research Centre of Asia-Pacific (SIRCA) from Thomson Reuters Tick History on behalf of Thomson Reuters. This research includes computations using the Linux computational cluster Katana supported by the Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney. Chen was partially supported by a UNSW SFRGP grant. Stindl was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. The authors thank the editor, the associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that have led to improved presentation as well as the discovery of an error in an earlier draft.

Login options

Purchase * Save for later
Online

Article Purchase 24 hours to view or download: USD 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase 30 days to view or download: USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable