Advanced search
364
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Do current OELs for silica protect from obstructive lung impairment? A critical review of epidemiological data

, &
Pages 655-682
Received 24 Nov 2016
Accepted 31 Mar 2017
Published online: 17 May 2017

Abstract

Inhalation of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) can lead to serious health effects such as silicosis and lung cancer. There also seems to be a general consensus to consider that RCS exposure is associated with obstructive lung impairment or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of mortality, morbidity, and disability worldwide. It is, however, not clear whether occupational exposure levels (OELs), generally set to prevent silicosis, also protect workers from developing an obstructive impairment. This review aims at clarifying the potential relationship between RCS exposure and obstructive lung impairment as defined by spirometry. Eleven studies that reported both silica exposure levels and spirometry results were identified. We systematically extracted data pertaining to (a) the population studied, (b) level of exposure to RCS and other pollutants, (c) spirometry procedure and interpretation, and (d) methodology used to investigate the relationship between RCS exposure and spirometry. These studies add supporting evidence in favor of a qualitative association between occupational activities exposing to RCS and obstructive lung dysfunction. However, no well-founded quantitative estimate can be drawn from these investigations; the available relevant literature does not allow defining a RCS exposure threshold associated with an increased risk of obstructive lung dysfunction, as defined by spirometry, in workers without silicosis. Further research is needed, but, as highlighted in this review, conducting epidemiological studies with both valid exposure and outcome measurements is a real challenge.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the insightful comments and suggestions of the external reviewers selected by the Editor and anonymous to the authors. These comments were particularly helpful in improving the manuscript.

Declaration of interest

The authors’ affiliation during the course of this work is as shown on the cover page. Dr. Desvallées is currently employed by an occupational health care service in France. The work reported in the paper was conducted during the normal course of employment at the University (UCL) without any external sponsorship. The authors have not appeared in any legal or regulatory proceedings related to the contents of this review during the last 5 years. Further, the authors have not been engaged to testify in the future as experts in litigation related to the compounds discussed in this paper. DL was an expert at the SCOEL (Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits) from 2006 until 2015 (did not participate in the discussion on Silica document published in 2003). D. L. and P. H. are members of the Scientific Committee of the Belgian Funds for Occupational Diseases, but the subject of interest was not discussed during these last 10 years. P. H. is, since 2014, an expert at the ANSES (Agence Nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environment et du travail) Scientific Committee setting the Occupational Exposure Limits. Silica has not been discussed during that period. The ANSES launched in February 216 a call for experts to participate in a task group on Silica aiming at updating the knowledge on silica exposure, its hazards and risks. None of the authors participates in this task group. The review is exclusively the professional work product of the authors.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 514.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.