Advanced search
149
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Levels and determinants of perceived health risk from solid wastes among communities living near to dumpsites in Kenya

, &
Pages 409-420
Received 04 Jan 2019
Accepted 14 Mar 2019
Published online: 08 Apr 2019

ABSTRACT

Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have poor solid waste management systems, putting people living near dumpsites at higher risk of disease infections. Good risk perception could enhance individual- and community-level protection and prevention efforts. The objective of this study was to examine the levels and determinants of perceived health risk associated with exposure to solid waste dumpsites in Kenya. The level of risk was measured on a five-point Likert scale. The results showed that about 27% and 42% of the study population in Nairobi and Mombasa, respectively, perceive that they have little or no health risk from the nearby dumpsites. Study site, family size and wealth index were associated with risk perception in the multivariate analysis. A sizable proportion (42%) of the population living near dumpsites has lower risk perception. Health promotion interventions are needed to enhance risk awareness and perception in these communities.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for their financial support through the Urban Africa: Risk Knowledge (ARK). The Urban ARK Programme was funded by ESRC and DFID Humanitarian Innovation and Evidence Programme, grant code: ES/L008777/1. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the donors. Besides, the authors also extend their acknowledgement to the research team and field workers who made the implementation of the Urban ARK project and data collection for this study possible. We also wish to express our gratitude to the study participants for agreeing to participate in the study and providing us with this rich information.

Disclosure of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest

Additional information

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for their financial support through the Urban Africa: Risk Knowledge (ARK). The Urban ARK Programme was funded by ESRC and DFID Humanitarian Innovation and Evidence Programme, grant code: ES/L008777/1.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 47.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 256.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.