Advanced search
211
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Vertical vergence in nonhuman primates depends on horizontal gaze position

, OD & , PhD
Pages 172-181
Published online: 21 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study was to compare vertical fusion capability at different orbital eye positions in normal nonhuman primates and attempt to use this information to isolate the extraocular muscles (EOMs) that mediate vertical vergence. Scleral search coils were used to record movements of both eyes as two normal nonhuman primates (M1, M2) performed a vertical vergence task at different horizontal eye positions. In a control experiment, M1 was also tested at different angles of horizontal vergence. To elicit vertical vergence, a 50° x 50° stimulus comprising a central fixation cross and random dots elsewhere was presented separately to each eye under dichoptic viewing conditions. Vertical disparity was introduced by slowly displacing the stimulus for one eye vertically. Vertical fusion amplitude (maximum disparity that the monkey was able to fuse) and vertical vergence (maximum difference in vertical position of the two eyes) were measured. Vertical fusion capability differed at different orbital eye positions. Monkey M1 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the right eye (RE) was abducted than left eye (LE) while M2 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the RE was adducted and LE abducted. M1 also showed greater vertical fusion capability for near gaze. M1 data suggested that the vertical recti mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the oblique muscles in the LE while M2 data suggested that the oblique muscles mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the vertical recti in the LE. The variable results within the same animal and across animals suggest that EOM involvement during vertical fusional vergence is idiosyncratic and likely a weighted combination of multiple cyclovertical muscles.

Disclosure Statement

Authors declare no other competing financial interests.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH under Grant -R01 EY026568 and UHCO Core Grant P30 EY07551.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 51.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 311.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.