Advanced search
379
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Comparison of Awareness, Attitudes, and Usage of Water Quality Conservation Practices Between Amish and Non-Amish Farmers

, &
Pages 1476-1490
Received 19 Jan 2017
Accepted 06 Jun 2017
Published online: 16 Oct 2017
 

ABSTRACT

This study provides a unique examination of Amish farmers’ awareness of water quality issues and their attitudes toward and use of agricultural conservation practices compared with small non-Amish farmers in Northeastern Indiana. There is minimal research about the conservation beliefs and behaviors of this growing and highly diverse ethnoreligious minority, who have faith-based technological restrictions and are often hesitant to work with community outsiders, especially the government. We find that, compared with non-Amish farmers, Amish farmers have limited awareness of the linkages between common agricultural practices and broader water quality problems and lower levels of adoption of conservation practices, with the exception of cover crops. This information is essential for conservation practitioners who need to work with a diverse range of agricultural producers to increase the uptake of conservation practices that address critical water quality concerns.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the farmers themselves for spending time talking with us or taking our survey, the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative funds for providing funding, local NRCS conservation agents for research assistance, Belyna Bentlage for interview assistance, Mike Dunn for assistance with survey delivery, Jackie M. Getson for map design, and the undergraduate research assistants in Natural Resources Social Science lab at Purdue University for their help with a variety of research tasks.

Notes

“Significant differences” indicate a statistically significant difference at the p < .05 level.

Excluding large English farmers led to only minimal changes in the results. The only comparison that changed significance was in differences in nutrient management plans between Amish and non-Amish farmers (it becomes nonsignificant).

These percentages only include those for whom the practices are relevant. For instance, awareness/usage of cover crops only includes those who plant row crops.

Other BMPs including two-stage ditches, NRCS conservation plans, and controlled drainage were asked about in the surveys and interviews. They are excluded from our analysis and discussion because they are less likely to be used by Amish farmers because of the small size of their farms and reduced likelihood to use them given their reluctance to take government financial assistance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
GBP 41.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
GBP 136.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From GBP 350.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.