![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
![Sociology:
Unlock the potential of your research by publishing fast, openly and without restrictions]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/111118/JournalAdSubmissionSociologyF1000CK.jpg"})
![SDG Online Goal 4: Quality Education. Request a free trial today]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110751/JournalAd-Resources-SDGO-4-2021.png"})
![Researching Political Science? Publish now with F1000Research]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/111164/JournalAd-Announce-SocialSciences-F1000.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective
An attitude change perspective represents a central line of research in the smoking literature. This line of research focuses on influencing individuals’ attitudes toward smoking in order to alleviate the negative outcomes of smoking and to achieve positive smoking behaviours. This line of research, however, does not explain why attitudes toward cigarette smoking are a weak predictor of cigarette smoking, an indication of a smoking paradox. The current study introduces two domain-general factors to explore this smoking paradox.
Design
We used an online survey and collected data from American subjects (n = 328) via a crowdsourcing platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk, in 2018.
Results
We found that the association between attitude toward smoking and the likelihood of smoking is significantly weaker when individuals perceive a low probability of risk and/or believe that this probable risk will only occur in the distant future, after many years. These results suggest that smoking may not be consistent with attitude because individuals perceive low probability of risk and/or they temporally discount the occurrence of this probable risk.
Conclusion
The results suggest that novel strategies that incorporate the concepts of perceived risk probability and temporal discounting of the probable risk are needed for smoking cessation.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.