Advanced search
288
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Facilitators and barriers to implementing pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception in California independent pharmacies

, PhD, , BA, , MSW, , MSW, , MSW, , MSW & , MSW show all
Pages 249-259
Received 03 Oct 2018
Accepted 20 Jun 2019
Published online: 02 Jul 2019

ABSTRACT

In 2013, California passed legislation to expand the scope of pharmacist practice, including authorizing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. Pharmacist-prescribed contraception was largely unavailable across the state in 2017. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to offering this service in California independent pharmacies. To do so, we thematically analyzed qualitative data from structured interviews with 36 pharmacists working in independent pharmacies in 2016–17. We found that pharmacists anticipated general benefits from expanding their roles to prescribe contraception, including increasing health care access and decreasing costs. In contrast, described barriers were concrete, including lack of financial incentives and business risks for independent pharmacies. Specific barriers to prescribing hormonal contraception included time required to screen and counsel women about contraception and concerns that pharmacist-prescribed contraception would increase liability and lead to patients seeking health care less frequently. This study suggests that incentives and barriers identified by the respondents are likely to have varied and unequal impacts, with immediate barriers being potentially prohibitive for pharmacists to prescribe contraception. For independent pharmacies, perceived business risks and lack of insurance reimbursement may outweigh professional support for prescribing contraception, limiting the public health impact of legislation that should increase contraceptive access.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Diana Bahena, Rachel Crowley, Alicia Cuevas, Virginia Graham, Rachel Henry, Blanca Ramirez, Patricia Torres and Danielle Veloso for their work as interviewers. Additionally, the authors thank Jennet Arcara, Lauren Caton, Rachel Crowley, Maggie Downey, Julia Hernandez, Krystale Littlejohn, Zakiya Luna, Allison Rodriguez, and LaKisha Simmons for providing feedback on this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 40.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 383.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.