2,889
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Defining Cataloging Ethics: Practitioner Perspectives

ORCID Icon &
Pages 533-546
Received 25 Feb 2020
Accepted 11 Jul 2020
Published online: 23 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Catalogers often need to make ethical decisions about their daily work. What is the starting point for defining cataloging ethics and how do practitioners define the concept? In this paper, the authors explore definitions of ethics and cataloging ethics in the literature, and subsequently analyze responses to a question asking respondents to define cataloging ethics. Set against the existing backdrop of the American Library Association “Code of Ethics,” the authors propose that shared values create a framework for discussing cataloging ethics, rather than a single articulated definition.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Karen Snow

Karen Snow is an Associate Professor in the School of Information Studies at Dominican University in River Forest, IL. She teaches face-to-face and online in the areas of cataloging, classification, and metadata. She completed her Ph.D. in Information Science at the University of North Texas in 2011 and while doing so worked as a cataloger in the Rare Book Room, University Archives, and the Technical Services departments. Her main areas of research interest are cataloging quality, ethics, and education.

Beth Shoemaker

Beth Shoemaker is the Rare Book Cataloger at the Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archive & Rare Book Library at Emory University. Her research interests center on professional ethics and how ethical decision-making informs cataloging work, sustainable hiring practices and healthy workplace environments. She is a graduate of the University of Illinois Graduate School of Information Sciences.

Notes

1 “Professional Ethics,” American Library Association, last modified January 22, 2008, http://www.ala.org/tools/ethics.

2 “CILIP’s Ethical Framework,” CILIP: The Library and Information Association, accessed July 10, 2020, https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/ethics.

3 Wallace Koehler, “Professional Values and Ethics as Defined by ‘The LIS Discipline’,” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 44, no. 2 (2003): 99, doi:10.2307/40323926

4 Ibid.

5 Michael Gorman, Our Enduring Values Revisited: Librarianship in an Ever-Changing World (Chicago: ALA Editions, 2015), 1.

6 Ibid.

7 “Professional Ethics,” paragraph 6.

8 Kohler, “Professional Values,” 99.

9 Martin L. Garnar, “Information Ethics,” in Information Services Today: An Introduction, ed. Sandra Hirsh, 2nd ed. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018), 367.

10 Melodie J. Fox and Austin Reece, “Which Ethics? Whose Morality?: An Analysis of Ethical Standards for Information Organization,” Knowledge Organization 39, no. 5 (2012): 377–83, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2012-5-377, 378.

11 John T. F. Burgess, “Principles and Concepts in Information Ethics,” in Foundations of Information Ethics, ed. Emily Knox and John T. F. Burgess (Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman, 2019), 1.

12 John T. F. Burgess, “History of Ethics in the Information Professions,” in Foundations of Information Ethics, ed. Emily Knox and John T. F. Burgess (Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman, 2019), 26.

13 Clare Beghtol, “Professional Values and Ethics in Knowledge Organization and Cataloging,” Journal of Information Ethics 17, no. 1 (2008): 12–19, doi:10.3172/jie.17.1.12.

14 “Professional Ethics,” paragraph 6.

15 “Ethical Framework: Commitment to Professional Ethics by CILIP Members,” CILIP: The Library and Information Association, accessed July 11, 2020, https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cilip.org.uk/resource/resmgr/cilip/policy/new_ethical_framework/cilip_s_ethical_framework.pdf.

16 Fox and Reece, “Which Ethics”; Riccardo Ridi, “Ethical Values for Knowledge Organization,” Knowledge Organization 40, no. 3 (2013): 187–96, doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2013-3-187.

17 Sheila Bair, “Toward a Code of Ethics for Cataloging,” Technical Services Quarterly 23, no. 1 (2005): 13–26, https://doi.org/10.1300/j124v23n01_02; Elizabeth Shoemaker, “No One Can Whistle a Symphony: Seeking a Catalogers’ Code of Ethics,” Knowledge Organization 42, no. 5 (2015): 353–64, doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-353.

18 Melissa Adler, Cruising the Library: Perversities in the Organization of Knowledge (New York: Fordham University Press, 2017); Daniel CannCasciato, “Ethical Considerations in Classification Practice: A Case Study Using Creationism and Intelligent Design,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49, no. 5 (2011): 408–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.589221; Emily Drabinski, “Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction,” Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 80, no. 2 (2013): 94–111; Jens‐Erik Mai, “Classification in a Social World: Bias and Trust,” Journal of Documentation 66, no. 5 (July 2010): 627–42, doi:10.1108/00220411011066763.

19 Amber Billey, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto, “What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52, no. 4 (2014): 412–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465; Brian Dobreski and Barbara Kwaśnik, 2017. “Changing Depictions of Persons in Library Practice: Spirits, Pseudonyms, and Human Books,” Knowledge Organization 44, no. 8 (2017): 656–67; Maurine McCourry, “Domain Analytic, and Domain Analytic-Like, Studies of Catalog Needs: Addressing the Ethical Dilemma of Catalog Codes Developed with Inadequate Knowledge of User Needs,” Knowledge Organization 42, no. 5 (2015): 339–45, doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-339; Amelia Bowen Koford, “Engaging an Author in a Critical Reading of Subject Headings,” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 1, no. 1 (2017), doi:10.24242/jclis.v1i1.20; Jane Sandberg, Ethical Questions in Name Authority Control (Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press, 2019).

20 Jihee Beak, “Where is Childrens’ Voice in KO?” Knowledge Organization 42, no. 5 (2015): 284–9; Karen Snow, “An Examination of the Practical and Ethical Issues Surrounding False Memoirs in Cataloging Practice,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 53, no. 8 (2015): 927–47. doi:10.1080/01639374.2015.1056571.

21 Sheila S. Intner, “Ethics in Cataloging,” Technicalities 13, no. 11 (1993): 6.

22 Ibid., 7.

23 Roy T. Cook, A Dictionary of Philosophical Logic (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009), s.v. “Intensional Definition.”

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid.

26 Joseph T. Tennis, “Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis,” Knowledge Organization 39, no. 3/4 (2003): 191–5.

27 Ibid., 192.

28 Ibid., 194.

29 “Professional Ethics,” paragraphs 5 and 6.

30 Ibid, paragraph 5.

31 Gorman, Our Enduring Values, 1.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 43.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 284.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.