Advanced search
Publication Cover

The Journal of Genetic Psychology

Research and Theory on Human Development
Volume 178, 2017 - Issue 3
2,317
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Halloween Costume Choices: Reflections of Gender Development in Early Childhood

Pages 165-178
Received 02 Aug 2016
Accepted 25 Jan 2017
Published online: 12 Apr 2017

ABSTRACT

The author examined whether preschoolers’ Halloween costume choices reflect their gender development. The sample consisted of 110 (53 boys, 57 girls) infant through preschool-aged participants, and 1 parent of each child. Both observational methodologies and parent-report surveys were used to assess the gender-typed nature of children's Halloween costumes, information about the Halloween costume choice process, and about the children's gender development. Boys’ costumes were more masculine and girls’ costumes were more feminine. Younger children's costumes were consistently less gender typed than the older children's costumes were. Children whose parents chose their Halloween costumes for them had Halloween costumes that were less gender typed than did children who were involved in the Halloween costume decision-making process. Moreover, children's gender-typed play and desire to wear gender-stereotyped clothes were related to the gender stereotyped nature of their Halloween costume. Unexpectedly, gender typicality, a dimension of gender identity, was not related to children's Halloween costume choices. Overall, the findings support that children's Halloween costume choice is an indicator of children's gender development processes.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank all of the research assistants at the Gender Development Laboratory at Monmouth University. Morgan Lalevee and Jessica Clauberg assisted in preparing the manuscript, and Krista St. Louis, Jenna DeLozier, Nicole Altillio, and Nicole Atrashewski helped with data preparation. The author is grateful to the preschool staff members, the parents, and of course the children who participated in the study. The author thanks Dr. Erica Weisgram for her thoughtful edits.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
EUR 40.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
EUR 100.00 Add to cart

Purchase access via tokens

  • Choose from packages of 10, 20, and 30 tokens
  • Can use on articles across multiple libraries & subject collections
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded & printed
From EUR 400.00
per package
Learn more
* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.