Skip to Main Content
78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
Altmetric

Special Feature: Original Article

Site-level model–data synthesis of terrestrial carbon fluxes in the CarboEastAsia eddy-covariance observation network: toward future modeling efforts

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 13-20
Received 24 Feb 2012
Accepted 21 Jun 2012
Published online: 11 Aug 2012
 
Translator disclaimer

Abstract

Based on the model–data comparison at the eddy-covariance observation sites from CarboEastAsia datasets, we report the current status of the terrestrial carbon cycle modeling in monsoon Asia. In order to assess the modeling performance and discuss future requirements for both modeling and observation efforts in Asia, we ran eight terrestrial biosphere models at 24 sites from 1901 to 2010. By analyzing the modeled carbon fluxes against the CarboEastAsia datasets, the strengths and weaknesses of terrestrial biosphere modeling over Asia were evaluated. In terms of pattern and magnitude, the carbon fluxes (i.e., gross primary productivity, ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem exchange) at the temperate and boreal forest sites were simulated best, whereas the simulation results from the tropical forest, cropland, and disturbed sites were poor. The multi-model ensemble mean values showed lower root mean square errors and higher correlations, suggesting that composition of multiple terrestrial biosphere models would be preferable for terrestrial carbon budget assessments in Asia. These results indicate that the current model-based estimation of terrestrial carbon budget has large uncertainties, and future research should further refine the models to permit re-evaluation of the terrestrial carbon budget.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as one of A3 Foresight Program ‘CarboEastAsia’ studies supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). The KoFlux was also supported by Research Agency of Climate Science (CATER 2012–3030) of Korea Meteorological Administration. We thank ChinaFLUX and the sites of Changbai Mountain, Qianyanzhou, Xishungbanna, Tibet, and Yucheng for providing flux and meteorological data. This research was also supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (RF-1007) of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

Article Purchase

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 132.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related articles

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.