La Forte et al. (this issue) failed to find an increase in the numbers of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in rats of advancing age. However, their conclusion that our data (Devor and Govrin-Lippmann, 1985) to this effect were methodologically flawed is based on an incorrect application of our counting method. In fact, both their counting method and ours provide similar results when applied to the same tissue sections. We believe that the difference in results is biological. Specifically, DRG neurogenesis in adulthood occurs in animals in which growth continues throughout life (including the male Wistar-derived rats we used), but not in those whose body size stabilizes soon after sexual maturity (including the female Sprague-Dawley rats they used). With this caveat in mind, recent data of Schmalbruch (1987a, b) and others can be understood as corroborating our conclusions. However, an adequate, independent replication of our 1985 study has yet to be carried out.