![Sample our Urban Studies journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110826/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Urban-Studies.jpg"})
Abstract
Sustainable development (SD) has become a catchall phrase for addressing gross economic inequality, environmental degradation, and systemic marginalization and oppression. Like all concepts, we understand the meaning and act according to the conceptual metaphors that illuminate and articulate the term SD. The attention given to the technical aspects of SD far outweighs the attention given to the way the concept has been constructed and organized as theory and practice are built. In this article, we examine the conceptual metaphors that form the foundation for SD theory and practice. We suggest that these conceptual metaphors reveal problematic understandings and assumptions. Through a conceptualization of paradigm, we describe the constituent elements as frame, worldview, and posture. We further suggest that the normative ethics found in the ecological paradigm provide a comparably superior foundation for the theory and practice of SD.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks goes to Elise Peterson for her unending support and major influence in our thinking and process. Also thanks to Luke Black, Gautam Prateek, Tiffanie Ord, Joao Paulo Faria Tasso, Mikulas Pstross, Craig Talmage, Peter Westoby, Ariel Rodriguez, Ron Hustedde, and Cornelia Flora for their assistance with this project. The Partnership for Community Development at Arizona State University provided incubation as well as funding for this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.