160
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Historical models and economic syllogisms

Paper presented to the 3rd International Conference Economic Philosophy, Aix-en-Provence, June 15–16, 2016.

View all notes

Pages 68-82
Received 10 Sep 2016
Accepted 13 Aug 2017
Published online: 01 Sep 2017

Abstract

This paper proposes a classification of economic models into three types: historical, axiomatic and conditional. Historical or empirical models utilize the historical-deductive method, and are generalizations from the economic regularities and tendencies that we find in the real world. Axiomatic models utilize the hypothetical-deductive method; they are syllogisms whose major premise is an axiom – a self-evident truth; they are appropriate for methodological sciences such as mathematics and econometrics. Conditional economic models are likewise syllogisms, but they are suitable for economics because they make for clearer and more precise economic reasoning. The criterion of truth of the substantive sciences is the conformity with reality, of the methodological science, its internal consistency. When a school of economic thought adopts mainly axiomatic models, as is the case with neoclassical economics, it implicitly falls into contradiction because their best representatives believe in the conformity with reality criterion.

Acknowledgement

I want to thanks José Márcio Rego and two anonymous reviewers for their comments.

 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.