3,049
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reflexivity, complexity, and the nature of social science

Pages 330-342
Received 24 Sep 2013
Accepted 17 Oct 2013
Published online: 13 Jan 2014
 

In 1987, George Soros introduced his concepts of reflexivity and fallibility and has further developed and applied these concepts over subsequent decades. This paper attempts to build on Soros's framework, provide his concepts with a more precise definition, and put them in the context of recent thinking on complex adaptive systems. The paper proposes that systems can be classified along a ‘spectrum of complexity’ and that under specific conditions not only social systems but also natural and artificial systems can be considered ‘complex reflexive.’ The epistemological challenges associated with scientifically understanding a phenomenon stem not from whether its domain is social, natural, or artificial, but where it falls along this spectrum. Reflexive systems present particular challenges; however, evolutionary model-dependent realism provides a bridge between Soros and Popper and a potential path forward for economics.

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the support of the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) and thanks the participants of the workshops on reflexivity at Central European University, Budapest, November 2011 and October 2013 for their comments and suggestions. The author also benefited enormously from George Soros's insights and his Popperian ‘critical attitude.’ All errors are the author's.

 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.