Advanced search
250
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Policy

Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005: Case Study of a Second-Generation Rural Medical Education Program

, , , &
Pages 51-61
Received 20 Nov 2007
Accepted 11 Dec 2007
Published online: 11 Oct 2008

ABSTRACT

A pipeline model has been suggested to increase the rural physician supply. This study is an institutional case report used to describe the context, development, and in-house evaluation of the University of Alabama Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005. This program was developed at a University of Alabama School of Medicine branch campus to target rural students at multiple levels, elementary schools through residency, and includes a minority focus. Requirements to enter the medical program include living 8 years in rural Alabama, meeting admission requirements, and affinity for rural lifestyles. Twenty-six percent of 316 high school participants, all 40 students in the minority-focused college program, and 3% of 90 medical program students were African American. The program includes (1) puppet shows in elementary schools depicting different health professions, (2) Rural Health Scholars Program for 11th-grade students, (3) Minority Rural Health Pipeline Program for college students, (4) Rural Medical Scholars Program, a 5-year track of study in rural community health and medicine, and (5) assured admission to family medicine residency. Outcomes studied in this case report included medical school performance, graduation rate, selection of family medicine specialty, and rural practice location. Medical scholars were anticipated to experience academic difficulty, select family medicine specialty, and locate in rural practice more often than peers. Compared to peers, medical scholars showed lower scores on preclinical courses and USMLE steps 1 and 2, reflective of their lower MCAT and GPA scores, but had (1) similar graduation rates (95% vs peers 84%), (2) higher family medicine selection rate (47% vs Huntsville 27% vs Tuscaloosa 12% vs Birmingham 4% [OR compared to Birmingham 22.7, 95% CI 10.5–49.4]), and (3) higher rural practice rate (67% vs peers 14% vs national group 9%) in the first RMSP classes. Based on these important outcomes being better than or equal to the traditional student cohorts, the institution concluded that the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline demonstrates successful use of the rural pipeline model.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ms Linda Jackson and Dr Mitchell Shelton for assistance with graphics. Program funding was secured from the Alabama Family Practice Rural Health Board (AFPRHB), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Academic Award (5K07ES310-5), Health Resources and Services Administration Area Health Education Center Program, National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Southern Rural Access Program, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Academy of Family Physicians, and Office of the President of the University of Alabama. The DeBakey Foundation and the Alabama Farmers Federation endowed Rural Medical Scholars scholarships/loans. The late Representative Jeff Dolbare sponsored the Rural Scholars Programs in the state budget.

 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.