Advanced search
223
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Airborne Fungal Spores in a Cross-Sectional Study of Office Buildings

, , , , &
Pages 379-389
Published online: 23 Oct 2007

Airborne fungal spores were measured in 44 office buildings in the summer and winter throughout the continental United States, as part of the Building Assessment, Survey and Evaluation (BASE) program. Six indoor air and two outdoor air samples were collected on a single day from each building. The cross-sectional and repeated measure design afforded evaluation of between-building and within-building variability of fungal spore levels in buildings. Total fungal spore concentrations in indoor air ranged from < 24 to 1000 spores/m 3 , except for one building with natural ventilation where indoor levels were approximately 9000 spores/m 3 . Indoor air concentrations of total spores did not vary significantly between winter and summer or morning and afternoon monitoring periods or among climate zones or locations within a test area. Indoor-outdoor ratios of total spore concentrations typically ranged between 0.01 and 0.1 and were approximately seven times greater in winter than summer because of relatively low outdoor levels in the winter. The indoor-outdoor ratio of total spore concentrations for a building was consistent (reliability coefficient = 0.91) among repeated measures. Distributions of rank correlation coefficients for spore types in pairs of individual indoor-outdoor and indoor-indoor samples were weakly correlated (Spearman correlation = 0.2 on average). When spore type data were aggregated among samples from the same building, the central tendency of the rank correlation coefficients increased to 0.45. Rank correlation coefficients were also proportional to the number of spore types present in the samples that were compared. The BASE study provides normative data on concentrations of fungal spores that can aid in identification of problematic levels of mold in buildings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors wish to thank the all of the building staff who cooperated with and participated in this study.

This manuscript has not been reviewed by the USEPA. Any opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not imply official endorsement by the sponsors.

 

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.