Skip to Main Content
659
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
Altmetric
 
Translator disclaimer

Television news coverage following a presidential debate often presents the debate as a contest between winners and losers by employing a horse race paradigm. The use of this paradigm can help viewers form their assessments of the candidates’ performances, but its overuse can limit serious campaign discourse on the issues. This study examines the effect of postdebate analysis by two cable news networks on the perceived outcome of a 2004 presidential debate and the perceptions of the candidates, finding perceptions of the outcome differing between viewers of the two networks. This finding contributes to our understanding of viewer interaction with postdebate television coverage by focusing on the importance of the sources of information.

Notes

Frances R. Matera and Michael B. Salwen, “Unwieldy Questions? Circuitous Answers? Journalists as Panelists in Presidential Election Debates,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 40 no. 3 (1996): 309–318.

Roderick P. Hart and Sharon E. Jarvis, “Political Debate. Forms, Styles, and Media,” American Behavioral Scientist 40, no. 8 (1997): 1096.

John T. Morello, “‘Who Won?’: A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Debates,” Argumentation & Advocacy 27, no. 3 (1991): 114–126; Yariv Tsfati, “The Impact of Exposure to Debate News Coverage and Its Interaction with Exposure to the Actual Debate,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8, no. 3 (2003): 70–86; David Weaver and Dan Drew, “Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78, no. 4 (2001): 787–798; William R. Elliott and Jayanthi Sothirajah, “Post-Debate Analysis and Media Reliance: Influences on Candidate Image and Voting Probabilities,” Journalism Quarterly 70, no. 2 (1993): 321–335.

Russell K. Mayer, “What to Expect from Electoral Expectations,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6, no. 3 (2001): 71–89.

Mayer, “What to Expect.”

Morello, “‘Who Won?’”

William L. Benoit, Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser, “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates,” Communication Monographs 70, no. 4 (2003): 335–350.

Mark Glassman, “Most Wanted: Drilling Down Presidential Debates; with Questions Come Ratings,” The New York Times, October 18, 2004; James Bennet and Jim Rutenberg, “A Televised Event That Delivered High Drama and Garnered High Ratings,” The New York Times, October 15 2004.

Weaver and Drew, “Voter Learning.”

Kathleen Hall Jamieson and David S. Birdsell, Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).

Morello, “‘Who Won?’”, 114; Tsfati, “The Impact of Exposure,”; Weaver and Drew, “Voter Learning and Interest”.

Morello, “‘Who Won?’”

William L. Benoit and Heather Currie, “Inaccuracies in Media Coverage of the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Debates,” Argumentation & Advocacy 38, no. 1 (2001): 28–40.

Judith S. Trent and Robert V. Friedenberg, Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed., Praeger Series in Political Communication (New York: Praeger, 1991).

William L. Benoit, Glenn J. Hansen, and Kevin A. Stein, “Newspaper Coverage of Presidential Primary Debates,” Argumentation & Advocacy 40, no. 4 (2004): 246–258.

Benoit and Currie, “Inaccuracies in Media Coverage.”

Tsfati, “The Impact of Exposure.”

Kathleen E. Kendall, “Presidential Debates through Media Eyes,” American Behavioral Scientist 40, no. 8 (1997): 1193–1207.

Carol K. Winkler and Catherine F. Black, “Assessing the 1992 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates: The Public Rationale,” Argumentation & Advocacy 30, no. 2 (1993): 77–88.

Charles Gordon, “The Next Step: Kill Political Debates,” Macleans (1992).

Jamieson and Birdsell, Presidential Debates.

Robert Lichter, “A Plague on Both Parties: Substance and Fairness in TV Election News,” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6, no. 3 (2001): 8–30.

The Debate Effect: How the Press Covered the Pivotal Period of the 2004 Presidential Campaign, (Washington, DC: Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2004); William L. Benoit, Kevin A. Stein, and Glenn J. Hansen, “New York Times Coverage of Presidential Campaigns,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82, no. 2 (2005): 356–376.

In the Public Interest? A Content Study of Early Coverage of the 2000 Campaign, (Washington, DC: Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2000), http://www.journalism.org/node/394 (accessed October 4, 2009).

Morello, “‘Who Won?’”

“Campaign 2004 - The Primaries. Center for Media and Public Affairs,” Media Monitor XVIII, no. 1 (2004), http://www.cmpa.com/files/media_monitor/04marapr.pdf (accessed October 4, 2009).

James M. Bernstein et al., “Television News and Presidential Debate Verdicts a Comparative Study of Network Newscasts, 1976–1988,” (paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, November 1989).

Trent and Friedenberg, Political Campaign Communication.

Benoit, Hansen, and Verser, “A Meta-Analysis.”

Gary Langer, “Poll: Viewers Divided on Debate Winner,” http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2004/story?id=150662 (accessed August 24, 2008).

William R. Elliott and Jayanthi Sothirajah, “Post-Debate Analysis and Media Reliance: Influences on Candidate Image and Voting Probabilities,” Journalism Quarterly 70, no. 2 (1993): 321–335.

Adam J. Schiffer, “Assessing Partisan Bias in Political News: The Case(S) of Local Senate Election Coverage,” Political Communication 23, no. 1 (2006): 23–39.

James N. Druckman, “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters,” Political Communication 22, no. 4 (2005): 463–481.

The State of the News Media 2005 (Washington, DC: Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2005).

Schiffer, “Assessing Partisan Bias.”

Druckman, “Media Matter.”

Carsten Reinemann and Jürgen Wilke, “It's the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949–2005,” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2007): 92–111.

Morello, “’Who Won?’.”

The State of the News Media 2005.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Jennifer Brubaker

Jennifer Brubaker, Department of Communication Studies, University of North Carolina

Gary Hanson

Gary Hanson, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Kent State University.