![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
![Publish Open Access Finland]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110396/JournalAd-OA-Agreements.gif"})
![Publish your Policy Brief rapidly today and inspire change for tomorrow.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110967/JournalAd-CFP-SociologyF1000.jpg"})
![Offer for the Toxicology Open Access!]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110939/OA-Toxicology-F1000.jpg"})
Abstract
The energies of face-centred cubic (fcc) and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) monodisperse foams, associated with their total surface area, are equal in the wet and dry limits, in the usual model. We prove that for all intermediate values of liquid fraction, hcp has lower energy. Energy considerations are thus not sufficient to explain the observed preference for crystallization into fcc over hcp in experiments using monodisperse bubbles.