128
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recreational Leasing of Alaska Commercial Halibut Quota: The Early Years of the GAF Program in Alaska

, , &
 

Abstract

The Pacific Halibut Catch Sharing Plan formalized the process for allocating halibut between the Alaska commercial and recreational charter sectors. It included a new program intended to allow for “flexibility” through inter-sectoral trading, permitting charter operators to lease commercial halibut pounds to relax client harvest restrictions. Here we evaluate the first two years of lease market activity and participation. Participation from some commercial quota holders in the lease market suggests that the program provided beneficial flexibility; in fact, the number of transfers to the charter sector was greater than transfers within the commercial sector for some quota types. We also identified a high proportion of self-leasers. However, transfers to the charter sector were on average smaller than within-sector commercial transfers, and total poundage leased by the charter sector was low compared with commercial transfers. Usage of leased quota by the recreational charter sector enables the harvest of larger fish or additional fish, and provides flexibility in catch composition on halibut closure days. Finally, the value-per-pound may be higher in the charter sector, as commercial-to-charter transfer prices approached the commercial ex-vessel price.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean Lee of the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and the Alaska Fisheries Information Network (AKFIN) for help acquiring and understanding the data, Sarah Marrinan of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, and Julie Scheurer of the Alaska Regional Office of the National Marine Fisheries Service for useful discussions about the GAF program and data, and Elaine Swiedler and Justine Huetteman for research assistance. We thank Steve Kasperski, Rosemary Kosaka, and Ron Felthoven for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This publication was prepared by Kailin Kroetz, Daniel K. Lew, James N. Sanchirico, and Pierce Donovan under NOAA Grant # NA11NMF4370212. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of Resources for the Future, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Commerce, or the University of California, Davis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, and Resources for the Future.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.