Skip to Main Content
475
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
Altmetric

Articles

ABORTION IN AUSTRALIAN ELECTIONS

A Vote Loser for Women?

Pages 389-404
Published online: 15 Nov 2012
 
Translator disclaimer

This article focuses on the question of the salience of the issue of abortion in Australian elections; that is, whether it is an issue on which electors cast their vote, and whether it plays a role in changes in voting patterns. The issue of public attitudes to such primary women's rights and feminist issues as abortion has been important in Australia for many years, but there is no body of research literature here on the electoral salience of those attitudes to abortion. In contrast, a body of US literature indicates that attitudes to abortion there are of significance in predicting voters' choices at state and federal levels and that this significance has increased over time. My argument is that there are no significant patterns of voting or even of party identification that are dependent on parliamentary candidates' views on abortion in Australia, and that this has been the case for at least 30 years. My argument is made through exploring opinion polls and academic surveys; examining three anecdotal claims of electoral retribution; and looking in detail at the case of the defeat of Barry Simon in the 1980 federal election. My finding as to the non-salience of the issue of abortion among Australian voters has significance in terms of accurately identifying obstacles to feminist proposals for reform of abortion laws in Australia. One of the aims of the article is to dispel the myth that politicians who are pro-choice or who vote for abortion reform are likely to face electoral retribution on that score. That is, the feminist project of abortion reform is not a vote loser.

Additional information

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank Kate Gleeson and the anonymous referees for helpful comments on the article.

Notes

1. In 2010, Tegan Leach and Sergei Brennan were found not guilty at the Cairns District Court of charges under the Queensland Criminal Code related to procuring a miscarriage by the use of RU486 and misoprostol (R v Sergie Brennan and Tegan Simone Leach 2010 R v Sergie Brennan and Tegan Simone Leach . 2010 . District Court of Queensland, 14 October, Judge Everson . [Google Scholar]). The case was striking given the rarity of prosecutions for abortion in Australia, and particularly so given that Leach was charged with procuring an abortion on herself. De Costa (2010 De Costa, Caroline. 2010. Never, ever, again … Why Australian abortion law needs reform, Salisbury, QLD: Boolarong Press.  [Google Scholar]) provides an impressionistic account of the trial.

2. Woods’s ignominious resignation as Senator in 1997 and his subsequent conviction for defrauding the Commonwealth suggest that his endorsement by RTLA was not a prudent action in terms of defending ‘family values’ (see e.g. Nicholson 1999 Nicholson , Brendan . 1999 . Judge's mercy keeps Woods out of jail . The Age , June 18 . [Google Scholar], 2; Seccombe 1997 Seccombe , Mike . 1997 . A party problem . Sydney Morning Herald , February 8 . [Google Scholar], 33).

3. Confirmed by personal communication with Aspley Electorate Secretary, 2010.

4. Medibank benefits were made payable for termination of pregnancy in 1974. In 1977, the Health Minister conducted a review of the payments, following discontent among some parliamentarians on the question (see CPD 21 March 1979 Commonwealth of Australia Parliamentary Debates (CPD) . 21 March 1979 . House of Representatives Hansard . Canberra : The Parliament of Australia . [Google Scholar], 963, Stephen Lusher).

5. A similar perspective is also presented by McVey (1983 McVey, Judy. 1983. The Right to Life offensive since 1969. Hecate, 9: 12.  [Google Scholar]).

6. Also see Edwards (1979 Edwards, Max. 1979. “Minor parties and independents”. In Anatomy of an election, Edited by: Hay, Peter, Ward, Ian and Warhurst, John. Melbourne: Hill of Content.  [Google Scholar], 83–4) on the 1979 Victorian election.

7. The DLP gained its first senator for 36 years in the 2010 federal election but, again, not because of any increase in its primary vote but given preference flows at the tail-end of the count.