160
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparing farmer‐based and satellite‐derived deforestation estimates in the Amazon basin using a hybrid classifier

, , &
Pages 1299-1315
Received 31 May 2005
Accepted 23 Aug 2005
Published online: 15 Mar 2007
 

The Amazon basin remains a major hotspot of tropical deforestation, presenting a clear need for timely, accurate and consistent data on forest cover change. We assessed the utility of a hybrid classification technique, iterative guided spectral class rejection (IGSCR), for accurately mapping Amazonian deforestation using annual imagery from the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) from 1992 to 2002. The mean overall accuracy of the 11 annual classifications was 95% with a standard deviation of 1.4%, and z‐score analysis revealed that all classifications were significant at the 0.05 level. The IGSCR thus seems inherently suitable for monitoring forest cover in the Amazon. The resulting classifications were sufficiently accurate to assess preliminarily the magnitude and causes of discrepancies between farmer‐reported and satellite‐based estimates of deforestation at the household level using a sample of 220 farms in Rôndonia mapped in the field in 1992 and 2002. The field‐ and satellite‐derived estimates were significantly different only at the 0.10 level for the 220 farms studied, with the satellite‐derived deforestation estimates 8.9% higher than estimates derived from in situ survey methods. Some of this difference was due to a tendency of farmers to overestimate the amount of forest within their property in our survey. Given the objectivity and reduced expense of satellite‐based deforestation monitoring, we recommend that it be an integral part of household‐level analysis of the causes, patterns and processes of deforestation.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the US National Science Foundation (BCS‐0136965), NASA (NAG5‐10548 and NNS‐04AB26G), and the US McIntire‐Stennis Research Program (VA‐136589). We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers whose comments were helpful in improving this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.