![Sample our Food Science & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5936/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Food-Science-Technology.jpg"})
![Get clean thinking for climate action.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/111045/JournalAdClimateAction.jpg"})
![SDG Online Goal 2: Zero hunger. Request a free trial today]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110698/JournalAd-Resources-SDGO-2-2021.png"})
![Call for Papers.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/111040/UACNcfp2.jpg"})
Abstract
Abstract
1. In the years 1985 to 1989 decisions (approvals and condemnations) made by poultry meat inspectors were examined by the individual reinspection of 26,815 broiler carcases.
2. The extent of agreement between inspection and revision ranged between 83.2 and 86.2%.
3. Agreement between inspectors and revisors was higher for the category of approved birds than for the condemned category.
4. Differences in the criteria used to assess the birds were observed.
5. The conclusion was drawn that findings in meat inspection require further discussion to reach an agreed standard.