The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy Journal

Volume 28, Issue 1, 2013

Translator disclaimer
Capturing Inherent Variability in Solar PV Energy through Realistic Estimates: A Case Study for the State of Minnesota

Capturing Inherent Variability in Solar PV Energy through Realistic Estimates: A Case Study for the State of Minnesota

DOI:
10.1080/21563306.2013.10596279
Mouli Vaidyanathana

pages 7-55

Article Views: 94
Article usage statistics combine cumulative total PDF downloads and full-text HTML views from publication date (but no earlier than 25 Jun 2011, launch date of this website) to 26 Dec 2014. Article views are only counted from this site. Although these data are updated every 24 hours, there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.

ABSTRACT

Solar photovoltaic (PV) deployment in the United States and the world is gaining accelerated momentum. It is very important for the solar PV industry standards to be realistic in its energy production estimates. The model of choice for most solar PV installers, enthusiasts and owners is the use of National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) PV Watts' simulation program. Through systematic analysis of multiple installations in the State of Minnesota, real data are analyzed and compared to the PV Watt's simulated results. It has been determined through this analysis that PV Watts is aggressive, unattainable and misleads the public in its energy estimates for the State of Minnesota.

It has also been discussed that to obtain more realistic solar PV energy estimates, one must use of range of production rather than just one value. Giving one value for solar PV energy estimates has the tendency to mislead because a low value estimate would make solar PV unattractive and a high value estimate will not be consistently attainable. Using an average PV energy production is also deceptive, since by definition, half of the values are below and half are above the average. So, it's imperative to understand the statistical nature of available solar energy at any given time, which varies by the hour of the day and the season in the year. Thus, through systematic analysis, a range of solar PV energy production estimate for the State of Minnesota is being presented which is different and more accurate than NREL's PV Watts.

Other significant results summarized are the correlation between energy production and precipitation, effects of tilt angles on energy production, summer and winter energy production, equipment related energy production and string and microinverter effects on energy production.

Key Words

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 14 Dec 2012

Author affiliations

  • a Mouli Engineering Inc.

Journal news

  • Formerly Cogeneration & Distributed Generation Journal

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group