Advanced Search

Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture

Volume 1, Issue 1, 2007

Environmental Communication: Why This Crisis Discipline Should Facilitate Environmental Democracy

Environmental Communication: Why This Crisis Discipline Should Facilitate Environmental Democracy

DOI:
10.1080/17524030701334292
M. Nils Peterson*, Markus J. Peterson & Tarla Rai Peterson

pages 74-86

Available online: 23 May 2007

Abstract

The authors concur with Cox's claim that environmental communication (EC), like conservation biology, is a crisis discipline. Cox's proposed tenets for EC challenge the scientific norm of objectivity that has guided science for centuries, suggesting that today's environmental crisis requires us to travel a different path. The authors take Cox's essay as provocation to radically challenge magical notions of scientific objectivity. They briefly review Platonic contributions to the myth of scientific objectivity and then advocate a nondualistic perspective toward the relationship between humans and nature. They then suggest how this perspective both expands upon and diverges from Cox's vision of political and ethical engagement among EC scholars.

Keywords

 

Details

  • Citation information:
  • Available online: 23 May 2007

Author notes

  • M. Nils Peterson -

    M. Nils Peterson is a doctoral student in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University

  • Markus J. Peterson -

    Markus J. Peterson is associate professor in the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University

  • Tarla Rai Peterson -

    Tarla Rai Peterson is the Boone and Crockett Wildlife and Conservation Policy Chair at Texas A&M University

Journal news

  • 2010 Impact Factor: 0.568
The Natural Disasters Collection from Routledge - click here to access these articles online

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group