The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Defense & Security Analysis

Volume 28, Issue 4, 2012

Translator disclaimer
Unpacking the various meanings of redundancy: from refining the concept to military planning
Articles

Unpacking the various meanings of redundancy: from refining the concept to military planning

DOI:
10.1080/14751798.2012.730721
Leo J. Blankena & Jason J. Leporeb*

pages 326-342

Abstract

The authors engage in the debate over waste in military force structure planning by rigorously deconstructing the concept of “redundancy.” First, a typology of redundancy is constructed that provides a common framework for identifying variety among redundant structures. These are labeled “true redundancy,” “expanded capacity,” “portfolio diversification,” and “mission overlap.” Further, a number of mechanisms are identified that produce these types of structures, and show the conditions under which planners may utilize redundant structure in the search for optimization. In sum, the article provides refined concepts for analysts and planners to identify when redundancy is deleterious or beneficial.

Keywords

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 22 Nov 2012

Author affiliations

  • a Department of Defense Analysis , Naval Postgraduate School , Monterey , CA , 93943 , USA
  • b Department of Economics , Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University , San Luis Obispo , CA , 93449 , USA

Article metrics

  • Views: 124
Follow Routledge Strategic Studies on twitter ,

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group