The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest

Volume 11, Issue 3-4, 2012

Special Issue:   Occupy!

Translator disclaimer
How Local Networks Shape a Global Movement: Comparing Occupy in Amsterdam and Los Angeles

How Local Networks Shape a Global Movement: Comparing Occupy in Amsterdam and Los Angeles

DOI:
10.1080/14742837.2012.704181
Justus Uitermarka* & Walter Nichollsb

pages 295-301

Article Views: 1270
Article usage statistics combine cumulative total PDF downloads and full-text HTML views from publication date (but no earlier than 25 Jun 2011, launch date of this website) to 30 Apr 2015. Article views are only counted from this site. Although these data are updated every 24 hours, there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.

Abstract

The Occupy encampments erupting around the world in Fall and Winter of 2011 developed into local platforms where activists from different milieus came together and forged relations and shared understandings. While Occupy protests broke out around the world in a synchronized fashion and used similar symbols and narratives, the protests were sustained by quite different local networks in different cities. We argue that the abilities of local Occupy movements to cope with challenges and magnify their resonance in the public sphere largely depended on how they were connected to local activist networks. We provide a political geography of Occupy and show how local networks in Amsterdam and Los Angeles shaped the global movement. Occupy activists were able to connect to some of the more prominent elements of Los Angeles' local activist networks and effectively formulated claims, but Occupy activists in Amsterdam were isolated and lost public support. The aims of the essay are twofold: first, to explain these divergent outcomes and second, to assess the effects of these outcomes in shaping the sustainability of Occupy struggles in these cities over the medium term.

Keywords

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 17 Jul 2012

Author affiliations

  • a Department of Sociology , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , 3000DR , The Netherlands
  • b Department of Sociology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands

Author biographies

Dr Justus Uitermark is an assistant professor of sociology at the Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Gradus Hendriks professor of community development at the same university. His research interests are located at the intersection of political sociology and urban studies. He has researched minority politics, drug policy, gentrification and social movements.

Dr Walter Nicholls is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Amsterdam and completed his PhD in Urban Planning from UCLA. His main area of research has been the role of cities in social movements. More recently, he has been studying how undocumented immigrants forge a voice in hostile political environments.

Journal news

Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days

Audio Clip

Listen to the audio

John Krinsky on ‘Social Networks and Social Movements’ special issue

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group