The online platform for Taylor & Francis Group content

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Advanced and citation search

The International Journal of Human Rights

Volume 19, Issue 2, 2015

Special Issue:   Legal and Ethical Implications of Drone Warfare

Translator disclaimer
Getting drones wrong
Original Articles

Getting drones wrong

DOI:
10.1080/13642987.2014.991212
Stephanie Carvina*

pages 127-141

Abstract

Over the last several years there has been an explosion of scholarly interest in drones, their impact on armed conflict, and the ethics of using such unmanned weaponry. While this attention and inquiry is to be welcomed, an examination of this scholarship reveals that much of it frequently gets drones wrong – focusing too much on the questionable ‘newness’ of the technology, misunderstanding or misapplying the legal principles which govern such conventional weaponry (especially proportionality) and searching for definitive answers from problematic data. This article highlights the trouble with the contemporary debate over drones and sets out a research agenda in a world of murky campaigns and imperfect information.

Keywords

Related articles

View all related articles
 

Details

  • Published online: 24 Feb 2015

Author affiliations

  • a Centre for International Policy Studies, University of Ottawa, Canada

Article metrics

Librarians

Taylor & Francis Group